This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1404 2461158.6404 13.33 06:40:02.23 +15:25:51.6
197.89352 4.51201 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.80 Sappho 2 2 3 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 06:40:02.23 +15:25:51.6: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 06:40:02.23 +15:25:51.6: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6404,13.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1404 13.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1404 2461158.6404 13.49 07:10:40.06 +18:13:10.7
198.59216 12.32262 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 1 3 3 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:40.06 +18:13:10.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:40.06 +18:13:10.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6404,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1404 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1404 2461158.6404 13.58 07:11:54.74 +12:23:37.0
204.09260 10.10301 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.194 Prokne 3 3 4 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:54.74 +12:23:37.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:54.74 +12:23:37.0: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6404,13.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1404 13.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461158.6404,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260428.1404 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461158.64077304 28.04.2026 03:22:32.791 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24881
Objects passed selection criteria: 24824
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19112.2
Average stars matched: 18746.8 (98.0876 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 129416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 22:33:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461158.64077304 28.04.2026 03:22:32.791 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 292 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 168106
Objects passed selection criteria: 167684
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 136393
Average stars matched: 133134 (97.6108 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1935280 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 22:42:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461158.64002684
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00850 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KjobR5cr4c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.002BHxn9Oi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b54YqZXOm2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.heOKydtxZN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893937
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893937
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KjobR5cr4c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.002BHxn9Oi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25094 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25095 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b54YqZXOm2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=892, passed=11336
Got 11336 stars (including 10438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11138 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.heOKydtxZN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=922, passed=11277
Got 11277 stars (including 10340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31237.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30936_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 30936_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:18.08 +16:19:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31201_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 31201_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.16 +10:34:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31237_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 31237_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:38.83 +19:14:33.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.577 3364885226041622784 105.41202016086 +19.24211872162 10.9193 10.5979 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.577#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0296 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0376 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:39.209 +14:02:02.84
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:39.259 +14:02:33.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00850 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c12Ec3db1N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JK6aHXzLgo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hln4v15ylZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ElD3KddHkr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.713417
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.713417
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.c12Ec3db1N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=64, blended=33805, passed=208473
Got 208473 stars (including 174370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204246 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JK6aHXzLgo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=102, blended=23358, passed=173928
Got 173928 stars (including 150413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hln4v15ylZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=7386, passed=82464
Got 82464 stars (including 74980 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82464 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ElD3KddHkr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=7493, passed=84441
Got 84441 stars (including 76838 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84441 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-21-28_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0049.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_222327_TTUQ1b1x1_169467_UkLfou45/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out219334.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out219344.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out219405.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out219541.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227625.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227639.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227640.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227643.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227654.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227655.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227656.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227658.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227662.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227673.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227679.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227685.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227687.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out227986.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228000.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228116.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228710.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out228861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229120.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out229625.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out230081.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14964.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out230873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 126s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227621_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227621_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:50.57 +13:25:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227624_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:39.51 +14:00:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:26.78 +15:54:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.395 3357861751923840512 101.11164281862 +15.90084351024 13.7913 13.2765 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.395#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227629_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:58.03 +11:21:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227632_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227632_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.47 +19:06:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227634_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227634_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:57.86 +16:15:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227639_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:29.62 +09:40:29.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.836 3158712948861784704 104.12316321570 +09.67422514943 13.6914 13.1670 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.836#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227640_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227640_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:42.21 +10:51:08.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227643_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:08.77 +13:32:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.962 3163426830084734848 113.53541042466 +13.53464916392 13.3890 12.8083 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.962#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227650_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:58.71 +16:35:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227654_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:26.40 +09:39:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.341 3157927102986141312 104.86015837175 +09.65802281423 12.8855 12.1452 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.341#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227655_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227655_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:55.87 +16:42:22.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.994 3358856191472120832 099.23225757956 +16.70600991037 13.2222 12.4513 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.994#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227656_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227656_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:15.58 +17:44:37.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.396 3362086659711004416 110.56586227995 +17.74480924651 12.9973 12.3550 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.396#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227658_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227658_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:16.20 +15:57:14.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.03)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227662_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.33 +15:49:58.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227669_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:06.52 +17:52:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227670_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:30.98 +16:35:59.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.762 3357961017207104512 100.87858272187 +16.59984645403 13.0054 12.4304 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.762#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227673_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227673_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:34.68 +12:44:25.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.521 3352477198664613376 101.14382287405 +12.74029467348 13.2805 12.8355 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.521#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227675_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:35.25 +13:37:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227677_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227677_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:49.82 +11:45:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227679_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227679_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:32.94 +18:39:43.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227683_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:59.94 +11:44:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227684_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227684_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.76 +11:05:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227685_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227685_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:39.52 +11:33:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.785 3351348721781032576 102.66445375219 +11.55114648517 11.9612 11.0265 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.785#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227687_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227687_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:53.80 +14:09:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.513 3352915289629308544 101.22351037893 +14.16673150094 12.8609 12.6306 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.513#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227688_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227688_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:10.16 +17:25:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227689_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.07 +14:12:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 227986_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 227986_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:38.91 +19:14:32.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.761 3364885226041622784 105.41202016086 +19.24211872162 10.9193 10.5979 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.761#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228000_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228000_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.95 +16:09:34.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.507 3360276760490870016 108.29074588696 +16.15965672502 10.7535 10.0548 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.507#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228098_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:13.72 +16:46:41.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.658 3169003312542085376 114.80700708960 +16.77817749936 11.1217 10.3254 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.658#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228116_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:13.18 +16:32:58.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.835 3168995272363434496 114.80470562902 +16.54975250193 11.4859 11.2028 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.835#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228171_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228171_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:56.23 +13:15:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228445_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228445_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.63 +19:12:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228710_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228710_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:47.13 +19:14:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.911 3364885153024598656 105.44629895656 +19.24300745654 12.2324 11.8293 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.911#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:02.92 +09:18:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.25 +15:07:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228861_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228861_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:11.44 +15:38:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.532 3165802737272811776 114.79733757379 +15.63643820689 12.4463 12.0027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228882_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228882_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:04.41 +09:51:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 228922_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 228922_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:47.33 +10:59:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229014_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229014_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:43.31 +19:14:07.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.240 3365069286862300288 105.18018027376 +19.23508237180 12.3248 11.5142 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.240#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229064_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229064_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:51.76 +09:15:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229080_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229080_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:00.07 +14:14:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229120_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229120_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.43 +17:12:23.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.284 3358964974403248640 098.98128887607 +17.20636207462 12.7406 12.2549 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.284#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229148_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.30 +12:08:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229188_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229188_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:49.16 +18:48:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229286_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.54 +10:36:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229299_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229299_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.44 +17:27:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229434_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229434_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:31.68 +09:00:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229514_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:55.71 +13:57:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229603_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229603_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:29.36 +10:51:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229612_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229612_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.39 +14:13:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229625_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:10.98 +17:51:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.833 3359415121335835520 100.79595600361 +17.84964111188 12.8058 11.8730 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.833#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229631_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229631_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:19.47 +18:18:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229660_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229660_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:47.04 +09:46:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229696_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229696_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.37 +09:17:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.26 +12:25:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229962_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 229962_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:12.16 +10:11:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230081_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 230081_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.29 +16:01:54.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.091 3169428995341986688 111.04744981421 +16.03112511136 13.4433 12.9227 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.091#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230127_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 230127_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:58.86 +09:57:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230180_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 230180_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 230312_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.49 +16:09:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230552_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 230552_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 230798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:48.69 +17:52:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219404_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219404_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:52.75 +09:26:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219818_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219818_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.28 +10:34:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
Preparing report for the candidate 14964_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 169182_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:54.02 +18:14:18.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.853 671400802520607360 114.47514698520 +18.23827077735 12.9170 12.3595 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.853#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219541_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.40 +10:08:44.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.595 3327642190229430528 098.99731324948 +10.14518013512 12.8922 12.3991 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219405_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:34.26 +15:53:34.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.561 3165849084263265408 114.39320360152 +15.89211212289 13.0429 12.4893 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.561#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219344_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:28.93 +18:10:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.133 3371168930697499520 098.87038408186 +18.16986212420 12.9110 12.5333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.133#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 219334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050
The candidate 219334_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-27_22-22-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0050 did not pass the final checks