This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1221 2461158.6221 13.62 07:11:53.59 +12:23:32.6
204.09165 10.09827 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.194 Prokne 2 2 2 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:11:53.59 +12:23:32.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:11:53.59 +12:23:32.6: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6221,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1221 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 28.1221 2461158.6221 13.48 07:10:38.34 +18:13:08.5
198.58981 12.31618 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.34 Circe 0 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:10:38.34 +18:13:08.5: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:10:38.34 +18:13:08.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461158.6221,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260428.1221 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461158.62242425 28.04.2026 02:56:07.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16676
Objects passed selection criteria: 16645
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15631
Average stars matched: 14513.8 (92.8523 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126020 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 23:42:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
First image: 2461082.64008763 11.02.2026 03:21:33.571 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Last image: 2461158.62242425 28.04.2026 02:56:07.455 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 116
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 64 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125728
Objects passed selection criteria: 125431
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 121210
Average stars matched: 113413 (93.5674 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1928804 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Apr 27 23:46:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461158.62184818
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0164 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lh1BqFyQYw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.beaoRPa048
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3EwRgDcxuU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q9ZAKr7QCO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.887029
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.887029
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec +8.4660 to +19.3435 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2658 to 114.8194 deg, Dec 8.4660 to 19.3435 deg
Loaded 18981 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13233 out of 14919 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14919 out of 28861 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 25465 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec +8.5622 to +19.2817 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8448 deg, Dec 8.5622 to 19.2817 deg
Loaded 18666 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13861 out of 14947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14947 out of 25465 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.9 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Lh1BqFyQYw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3379, passed=28861
Got 28861 stars (including 25451 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28178 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.beaoRPa048 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=7, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2216, passed=25458
Got 25458 stars (including 23222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25078 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25079 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3EwRgDcxuU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=993, passed=13629
Got 13629 stars (including 12629 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q9ZAKr7QCO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=928, passed=13650
Got 13650 stars (including 12709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13650 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34448_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 34448_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:39.33 +10:34:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0083 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:41.943 +14:00:23.80
Second-epoch image center 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0164 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:43.734 +14:00:08.89
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:45.831 +14:00:40.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01226 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SXqKaJKx68
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xNqph0kisB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zimsdfdhfx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YNTVLadVpl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.700525
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.700525
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec +8.4571 to +19.3472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.2378 to 114.8303 deg, Dec 8.4571 to 19.3472 deg
Loaded 19031 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10041 out of 15738 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15738 out of 208537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 174030 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec +8.5562 to +19.2862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3423 to 114.8515 deg, Dec 8.5562 to 19.2862 deg
Loaded 18685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11872 out of 16121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16121 out of 174030 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 94 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SXqKaJKx68 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=33805, passed=208495
Got 208495 stars (including 174392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 204249 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xNqph0kisB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=45, blended=23358, passed=173985
Got 173985 stars (including 150470 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 173985 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zimsdfdhfx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=8323, passed=102266
Got 102266 stars (including 93833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 102266 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100458 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100463 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YNTVLadVpl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=8093, passed=99944
Got 99944 stars (including 91744 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-55-17_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0040.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-27_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_220018_TTUQ2b1x1_3726178_Jv8jiBSd/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249122.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249188.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249192.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249310.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249354.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out249470.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out249360.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out249376.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out249377.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out249406.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249359.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out249397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 53s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249062_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249062_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:07:00.72 +13:42:00.8: 14.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:07:00.72 +13:42:00.8: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249082_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:15.46 +11:09:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249088_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249088_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:09.98 +13:22:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249092_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249092_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.36 +09:54:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249099_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:51.38 +17:56:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249100_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.13 +14:39:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249101_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249101_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.80 +15:39:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249117_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249117_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:05.50 +15:11:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-21-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits at 07:20:24.91 +10:13:54.0: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-04_22-30-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0034.fits at 07:20:24.91 +10:13:54.0: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249122_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249122_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:03.09 +15:33:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.499 3354932309350225664 103.26415033026 +15.55499422290 13.9669 13.4285 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.499#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249127_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249127_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:34.02 +16:44:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249134_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:25.22 +18:13:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249138_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249138_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:36.68 +12:20:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249142_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249142_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:38.35 +14:33:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249143_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:43.55 +12:58:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249144_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249144_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:37.36 +10:51:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249146_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249146_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.20 +13:19:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249147_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249147_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:21.87 +15:23:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249148_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249148_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:12.25 +12:44:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249150_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249150_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:51.19 +13:24:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249151_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:11.31 +10:25:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.711 3156387791004428672 108.54705686761 +10.41754689334 13.6884 13.2650 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249159_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249159_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:58.63 +16:31:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249171_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:54.59 +10:03:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249187_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249187_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:53.72 +11:05:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249188_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:40.54 +13:30:40.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.519 3161393867445514752 106.91886901887 +13.51133097635 12.5080 11.7978 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.519#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249190_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249190_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.02 +13:06:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249192_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249192_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.50 +10:10:39.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249197_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:09.91 +16:09:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249201_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:40.77 +16:09:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249225_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249225_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.04 +16:04:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249226_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249226_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.14 +17:59:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249227_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:43.16 +15:59:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249228_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249228_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.27 +15:07:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249233_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249233_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.70 +16:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249234_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:50.06 +12:33:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249238_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:29.13 +12:08:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249252_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:38.57 +16:09:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249253_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249253_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:44.49 +10:01:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249257_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249257_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.50 +10:36:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249264_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.53 +15:18:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249265_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249265_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:50.75 +16:55:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249267_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.60 +10:39:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249268_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:09.40 +14:14:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249273_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:33.27 +17:27:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249277_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249277_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:50.40 +11:33:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249283_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249283_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:31.52 +10:56:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249294_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249294_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:57.07 +14:13:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249295_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249295_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:19.62 +15:47:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249296_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249296_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:54.06 +12:25:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249299_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:45.41 +10:57:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249302_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249302_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:09.37 +17:52:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249304_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249304_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.08 +11:00:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249309_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249309_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:05.46 +12:20:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249310_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:16.25 +13:51:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.071 3166543601951744640 109.31758491579 +13.85433890372 13.5509 13.2597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.071#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249311_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:28.21 +15:40:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249312_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:13.44 +16:09:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249318_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:52.60 +11:49:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249319_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249319_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:14.55 +15:48:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249325_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249325_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:35.84 +14:21:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249327_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249327_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:30.13 +10:54:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249331_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249331_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:40.00 +12:44:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249346_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249346_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:36.26 +10:47:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249347_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:11.32 +16:01:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249352_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249352_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:08.28 +14:46:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249354_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249354_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:29.68 +13:42:44.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.031 3161462445185203840 106.37278929247 +13.71305941644 13.8760 13.3866 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.031#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249358_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249358_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:32.57 +13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249359_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 249359_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249360_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249360_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.92 +16:01:50.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249366_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249366_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.02 +17:46:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249368_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249368_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:36.13 +12:27:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249369_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249369_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:56.26 +13:47:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249371_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249371_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:59.53 +13:05:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249372_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249372_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:16.73 +10:41:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249373_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.08 +12:58:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249374_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249374_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.31 +18:07:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249376_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249376_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:02.08 +15:25:55.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249377_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249377_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:16.67 +13:51:37.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249378_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249378_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:18.27 +17:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249379_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:53.95 +17:40:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249380_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249380_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:40.31 +12:45:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249381_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249381_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:38.94 +15:33:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249383_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249383_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:05.20 +10:14:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249393_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:57.00 +13:42:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
Preparing report for the candidate 249397_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249398_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:03.46 +12:18:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249406_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249406_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:29.59 +10:05:04.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249408_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249408_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:25.95 +13:39:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249412_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249412_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:17.76 +16:33:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249418_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249418_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:18.62 +11:43:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249423_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249423_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:26.88 +14:38:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249445_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249445_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:01.10 +15:10:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249446_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249446_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:22.91 +11:38:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249470_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 249470_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:00.84 +13:46:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.572 3166529686257746560 109.25305863746 +13.77097208765 14.0733 13.6516 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041
The candidate 223754_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-27_21-56-07_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0041 did not pass the final checks