######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.china-vo.org GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.china-vo.org) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-04-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1369659 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1369659 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
renamed 'UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits_preview.png'
UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 460.2937 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 533.2207 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1402.0908 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 541.6937 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1399.3793 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 541.8482 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.04608 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T02:27:39.4220964' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T07:27:39.4220964' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61155.3108729399 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T07:27:49.3236990' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61155.3109875349 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998532262302 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999748492373 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 50.9505555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 329.279166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.28678982179346 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20368 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20368 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 20.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 892.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits :) Spent 0.530653 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 16.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T02:28:23.2318071' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T07:28:23.2318071' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61155.3113799882 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T07:28:33.1345132' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61155.3114946065 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 179.998532294567 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999748146156 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 50.8722222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 329.219444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.28821553197622 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20368 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20368 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 16.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 16.4699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 20.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 892.11 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 17.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 27.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits :) Spent 0.563410 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/d_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits
fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.81098868 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 Second-epoch image center 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dDMu85wzyl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rVyPNvbfx4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AngKRVSVYM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.azjg4bx0ox Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5518 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5518 deg Loaded 6658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4151 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4151 out of 8020 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.959399 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.959399 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5518 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7657 to 199.8673 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5518 deg Loaded 6658 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3980 out of 4151 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4151 out of 8020 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7898 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 160.7334 to 199.4568 deg, Dec +55.8733 to +67.2738 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 160.7334 to 199.4568 deg, Dec 55.8733 to 67.2738 deg Loaded 6167 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3997 out of 4157 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4157 out of 7898 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.4 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.4 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dDMu85wzyl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=8020 Got 8020 stars (including 7524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8020 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.rVyPNvbfx4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=467, passed=7898 Got 7898 stars (including 7427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7898 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7823 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7822 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7822 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.AngKRVSVYM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, passed=5587 Got 5587 stars (including 5244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5587 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.azjg4bx0ox (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, passed=5564 Got 5564 stars (including 5235 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5564 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5526 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 730 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.2) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5528 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5528 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Image size: 937.6'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 Second-epoch image center 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:00:03.662 +62:00:28.43 Second-epoch image center 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0316 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:00:19.142 +62:00:01.56 Second-epoch second image center 12:00:18.948 +61:59:52.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00268 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yhO4A1wLrD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Yw4RQSUqDH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R3wbsk0QIx Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eaDQDkAnEJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 37529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5533 deg Loaded 6693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3759 out of 4152 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4152 out of 37529 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.847118 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.847118 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 37529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec +55.1060 to +67.5533 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 161.7326 to 200.0177 deg, Dec 55.1060 to 67.5533 deg Loaded 6693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3759 out of 4152 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4152 out of 37529 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 36817 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 160.6955 to 199.6809 deg, Dec +55.8734 to +67.2780 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 160.6955 to 199.6809 deg, Dec 55.8734 to 67.2780 deg Loaded 6206 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3781 out of 4157 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4157 out of 36817 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits (aperture=5.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.3 pix UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 2.3 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.yhO4A1wLrD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1970, passed=37515 Got 37515 stars (including 35501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37515 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.1 to 67.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37257 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Yw4RQSUqDH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1641, passed=36812 Got 36812 stars (including 35126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36812 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36501 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36500 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.R3wbsk0QIx (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1096, passed=26991 Got 26991 stars (including 25857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26991 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26845 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26846 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26846 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eaDQDkAnEJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1097, passed=26971 Got 26971 stars (including 25836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26971 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26875 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26878 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26878 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-27-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 100s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52789_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 52789_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 11:28:34.69 +60:31:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53885_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 53885_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.71 11:28:34.69 +60:31:56.8 7155 3913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54133_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 54133_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 12.46 11:25:49.73 +65:22:09.9 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54237_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 54237_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 12.65 12:05:52.05 +64:45:14.7 4413 1528 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55259_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 55259_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 12.69 12:12:01.93 +58:28:44.8 3885 5314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 11:58:21.22 +61:26:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55574_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 55574_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.56 11:58:21.26 +61:26:11.4 4934 3532 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55673_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 55673_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.66 12:25:39.22 +57:55:32.0 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55858_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 55858_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.78 11:44:58.71 +65:50:55.0 5714 0824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55892_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 55892_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.75 11:24:02.25 +61:33:06.0 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56000_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56000_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.80 12:09:12.97 +64:45:26.8 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 11:56:12.85 +61:00:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56105_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56105_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.97 11:56:12.87 +61:00:04.4 5096 3791 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56228_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56228_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.92 12:08:48.23 +57:54:58.0 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56281_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56281_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.17 11:34:43.96 +63:42:52.8 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56300_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56300_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.84 12:21:07.08 +62:22:36.9 3330 2923 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 11:35:38.60 +62:38:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56430_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56430_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_01-32-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0282.fits at 12:14:59.68 +64:36:31.4: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-20_00-52-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits at 12:14:59.68 +64:36:31.4: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.04 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56555_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56555_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.15 11:35:38.83 +62:38:16.3 6495 2708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56626_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56626_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.04 11:29:44.35 +62:42:37.5 6899 2616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56711_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56711_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.80 12:22:11.49 +59:46:37.3 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 11:45:01.94 +64:47:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56720_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56720_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.15 11:45:02.11 +64:47:38.2 5755 1463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 11:46:30.14 +61:30:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56844_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 56844_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 13.96 11:46:30.08 +61:30:38.1 5787 3452 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57003_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57003_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.08 12:46:15.29 +65:18:42.1 1865 0953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57018_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57018_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.49 12:14:48.11 +61:40:07.6 3753 3376 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57128_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57128_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.26 12:14:22.26 +58:19:58.7 3696 5396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57322_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57322_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.18 11:38:20.79 +60:40:06.3 6422 3913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57489_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57489_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.74 12:14:44.89 +57:49:50.8 3652 5700 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57500_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57500_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.51 11:29:13.89 +59:02:60.0 7224 4812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits **** FOUND 12:08:13.34 +63:45:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57604_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57604_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.52 12:08:13.19 +63:45:36.5 4250 2127 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57683_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57683_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.50 12:37:05.43 +63:41:57.0 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57699_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57699_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.50 12:04:41.72 +58:02:17.0 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57705_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57705_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.61 11:25:11.73 +65:02:56.1 7007 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57745_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57745_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.26 12:14:27.06 +58:54:27.3 3705 5047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57834_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57834_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.23 12:32:16.69 +60:40:49.6 2433 3873 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57910_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 57910_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.50 12:43:09.83 +65:29:02.3 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58100_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 The candidate 58100_fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.67 12:13:28.12 +62:33:29.3 3870 2843 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 100s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-04-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.81098868 -observatory V36 01:00:40.28 +03:51:19.9 Mercury (-0.4mag) 03:54:57.43 +20:59:20.7 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:44:14.43 +03:44:56.2 Mars (1.2mag) 07:17:18.32 +22:38:14.6 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:33:15.68 +01:14:12.8 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:49:43.66 +19:53:55.3 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:12:01.32 -00:07:58.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:04.61 -22:53:20.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:27:56.03 +15:48:53.6 Moon (-10.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Apr 25 02:34 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.81098868: 07:17:26.16 +22:37:57.8 Io (5.8mag) 07:17:08.83 +22:38:34.3 Europa (6.0mag) 07:17:05.37 +22:38:37.9 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:16:46.45 +22:39:25.5 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:20:11.64 +22:21:53.8 Himalia (15.4mag) 07:17:22.68 +22:38:04.8 Thebe (16.3mag) 07:20:33.27 +22:52:01.4 Elara (17.3mag) 07:16:49.03 +23:13:22.5 Pasiphae (17.5mag) 07:25:24.61 +22:37:04.7 Carme (18.6mag) 00:33:22.77 +01:13:59.4 Titan (8.8mag) 00:33:14.90 +01:14:14.4 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:32:46.01 +01:12:57.2 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:33:09.34 +01:14:06.9 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:34:44.75 +01:21:58.1 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 25 02:34 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.81098868: 16:13:40.90 -22:05:58.2 JWST 17:58:47.48 +35:43:43.7 Chandra 18:48:24.30 -19:03:04.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 25 02:34 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.81098868 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 05:49:46.74 +30:41:15.8 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:52.75 -29:21:32.4 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:13:46.52 -69:14:47.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:34:40.77 +31:30:22.4 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:29:05.25 +11:37:21.6 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:12:23.48 +29:37:13.4 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:40:14.74 +26:16:45.4 16.1mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:58.00 +32:01:21.7 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:32:55.25 +00:47:06.1 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:51:02.72 +19:17:18.5 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:37:21.96 -11:23:04.0 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:59.13 -10:27:16.5 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:02:36.16 +63:29:11.2 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:09:43.44 -03:56:09.0 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 20:54:26.32 +87:12:51.1 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:23:20.47 +63:30:13.0 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:32:19.44 +21:00:56.9 11.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:12:50.91 +07:53:43.2 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:49.45 +17:52:26.0 14.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:34:54.98 -21:01:06.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:24:51.85 +43:04:55.0 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:01:39.80 +50:03:56.3 15.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:40:37.64 -27:44:54.9 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 02:05:07.85 +09:45:41.6 7.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:50:12.33 +03:32:30.9 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 04:26:57.30 +01:57:36.1 15.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:24:59.50 +38:46:43.4 14.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:00:59.22 -09:12:40.0 11.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:47:39.78 +02:06:59.8 14.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:00:43.21 -01:15:21.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:38:08.21 -03:26:52.0 17.1mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:03:08.63 +19:02:57.2 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:28:32.27 +34:57:41.8 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:40:39.31 -10:21:57.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:28:48.59 +24:16:58.9 16.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:26:22.40 +10:01:50.6 14.2mag 78P/Gehrels 23:30:24.24 -06:38:33.5 14.7mag 88P/Howell 02:37:18.89 +23:01:00.0 15.0mag 93P/Lovas 05:12:58.41 +32:44:04.7 16.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:40:16.76 +34:04:55.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:47:46.05 +15:22:56.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:05:54.44 +15:34:33.1 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 02:16:02.46 +16:06:07.2 10.5mag 141P/Machholz 02:23:23.38 +08:17:12.1 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 01:05:03.74 +04:00:48.2 11.8mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:54:00.94 +09:59:11.1 18.0mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:28:33.21 +03:10:45.3 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:35:15.35 +00:44:11.1 17.9mag 210P/Christensen 22:04:12.62 -09:14:41.4 17.8mag 218P/LINEAR 17:17:19.66 -12:47:30.1 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:54:55.31 +35:17:45.5 16.9mag 240P/NEAT 07:43:35.56 -04:13:35.4 17.8mag 242P/Spahr 22:40:13.85 -18:21:41.9 17.6mag 260P/McNaught 02:17:41.32 +22:46:41.3 17.9mag 295P/LINEAR 15:38:32.72 +07:33:02.6 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:38:15.80 +21:22:07.1 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:49:47.15 +44:29:18.4 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 25 02:34 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 2026-04-22.16 15.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 2026-04-22.16 15.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.89 -15:50:13.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.5 16.39 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 25 02:34 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 25 02:34 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 04:16:05.380 -46:30:06.89 AT 2026jyi 2026-03-10.18 22.063 04:11:48.358 -46:13:13.57 AT 2026jyh 2026-04-04.100 22.285 04:03:45.426 -49:14:02.26 AT 2026jyg 2026-03-10.05 23.142 03:48:30.297 -49:29:41.14 AT 2026jyf 2026-03-07.05 21.983 03:41:46.251 -49:27:33.40 AT 2026jye 2026-03-07.07 23.444 03:43:39.957 -48:51:44.36 AT 2026jyd 2026-03-30.01 22.388 03:58:37.523 -47:58:27.05 AT 2026jyc 2026-03-10.04 22.794 04:19:14.199 -48:07:43.84 AT 2026jyb 2026-03-22.02 23.509 04:14:48.000 -48:01:04.00 AT 2026jya 2026-03-07.06 22.906 04:17:07.910 -49:07:16.08 AT 2026jxz 2026-03-13.03 23.78 04:14:22.630 -48:22:12.14 AT 2026jxy 2026-03-07.06 21.712 04:01:07.229 -47:46:52.90 AT 2026jxx 2026-03-07.07 23.052 04:09:53.881 -47:38:41.66 AT 2026jxw 2026-03-16.05 23.624 04:08:49.695 -48:00:04.57 AT 2026jxv 2026-03-13.14 23.598 04:10:45.076 -47:56:49.63 AT 2026jxu 2026-03-10.04 23.502 04:14:31.399 -46:42:43.71 AT 2026jxt 2026-03-10.18 21.706 04:11:12.235 -45:58:40.33 AT 2026jxs 2026-03-25.100 22.751 03:55:48.361 -50:00:22.74 AT 2026jxr 2026-03-13.04 23.431 03:52:20.927 -49:00:26.83 AT 2026jxq 2026-04-03.01 21.127 03:45:32.951 -49:53:47.26 AT 2026jxp 2026-03-16.05 22.986 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 25 02:34 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.31150 2461155.81150 14.72 12:35:31.20 +61:16:19.1 2238 3489 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_022909_TTUQ2b1x1_260237_2iIbyVCf/fd_UMa-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_02-28-23_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
