######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1384422 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1384422 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1622.1189 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 591.7169 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1621.8407 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 592.0906 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.04268 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T01:26:05.7292916' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T06:26:05.7292916' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61155.2681218632 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T06:26:15.6316013' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61155.2682364699 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 144.003505352868 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9995274993068 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.5344444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.145 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.53665962134193 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20375 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20375 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.9499998092651 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 21.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 892.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits :) Spent 0.508303 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 14.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T01:26:52.1203561' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T06:26:52.1203561' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61155.2686587963 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T06:27:02.0212748' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61155.2687733914 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 144.003505452461 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.999527480724 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 40.4697222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.126944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.53868431556741 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20375 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20375 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 14.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 14.7399997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.0 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 21.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 892.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 16.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 14.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits :) Spent 0.512079 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.76823760 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00558 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fqvg4N8KLv Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k0BfEJWzvF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.szPxwsSEBz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kl6iIfhwNr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.865180 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.865180 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.fqvg4N8KLv (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779 Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8708 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8708 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.k0BfEJWzvF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894 Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.szPxwsSEBz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, passed=6425 Got 6425 stars (including 6007 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6425 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kl6iIfhwNr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6396 Got 6396 stars (including 5993 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6396 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6363 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6363 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6363 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 10:55:39.47 +71:52:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0258 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Image size: 937.4'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 Second-epoch image center 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0261 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:03.100 +69:59:44.68 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:04.530 +70:00:03.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00558 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gKjtbjMD5q Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wpjWGBZqke Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MlRZmC9idg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cROVIWsCP9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.741054 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.741054 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55 Discovery image 3 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 9.68 10:55:39.46 +71:52:08.7 1072 1487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.6) Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2 Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 2.4 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.gKjtbjMD5q (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2624, passed=51522 Got 51522 stars (including 48803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51522 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51013 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51011 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51012 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wpjWGBZqke (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2687, passed=51868 Got 51868 stars (including 49084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51868 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51377 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51376 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51376 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.MlRZmC9idg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1558, passed=33073 Got 33073 stars (including 31483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33073 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32743 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32743 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.cROVIWsCP9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1524, passed=33327 Got 33327 stars (including 31765 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33327 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33049 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33050 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33050 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out39917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64492.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65084.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65579.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65713.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65791.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 64492_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 64492_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 08:47:11.22 +70:11:14.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.889 1118499545049030016 131.79662866641 +70.18777301405 14.8433 14.2120 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.889#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 64750_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 64750_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.72 08:47:11.39 +70:11:14.1 7276 2804 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 64841_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 64841_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 11.96 09:44:03.38 +72:45:13.7 4413 1528 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 64879_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 64879_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 12.36 08:46:00.16 +73:14:26.6 6939 0981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65063_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65063_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 12.51 09:36:20.87 +70:09:54.1 4774 3096 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65084_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65084_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 12.86 10:24:07.20 +67:46:35.7 2065 4304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 08:59:18.70 +67:23:44.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.796 1117004346674076032 134.82954118176 +67.39607321136 13.3291 12.6749 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.796#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65098_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65098_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.21 08:59:18.70 +67:23:44.5 6936 4589 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:18:43.21 +67:14:21.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.156 1069136901800187776 139.68015313722 +67.23965155509 13.0934 12.4091 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.156#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65232_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65232_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.04 09:18:43.26 +67:14:21.5 5821 4818 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:06:33.82 +73:11:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65312_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65312_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.58 09:06:33.84 +73:11:42.8 6056 1168 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:13:06.55 +69:38:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65332_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65332_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.48 09:13:06.53 +69:38:50.8 5995 3339 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:34:45.45 +69:51:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65370_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65370_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.58 09:34:45.44 +69:51:31.9 4858 3280 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65424_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65424_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.69 08:46:43.72 +69:25:05.7 7398 3255 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 08:50:43.83 +73:45:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65459_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65459_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.58 08:50:43.73 +73:45:56.8 6674 0711 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65463_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65463_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.71 09:13:30.82 +73:49:30.0 5714 0824 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65534_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65534_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.75 10:09:02.36 +65:51:56.9 2777 5588 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:06:33.75 +68:25:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65560_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65560_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.87 09:06:33.80 +68:25:52.4 6434 4028 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65565_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65565_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.84 10:30:02.49 +65:58:11.6 1498 5316 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65571_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65571_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.83 10:48:05.68 +71:01:07.6 1272 2092 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65575_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65575_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.67 10:24:10.25 +65:20:00.3 1784 5768 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65579_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65579_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.97 10:42:30.77 +73:05:04.7 1865 0953 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:46:31.69 +65:55:15.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.894 1065029091999361792 146.63330194518 +65.92072148901 13.9970 13.4712 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.894#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65635_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65635_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.97 09:46:31.84 +65:55:14.8 4170 5659 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65699_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65699_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.80 10:37:38.77 +70:28:46.5 1696 2546 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 08:56:30.85 +72:53:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65713_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65713_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.00 08:56:30.93 +72:53:01.0 6524 1286 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:06:40.65 +73:12:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.832 1123699376055272576 136.66951926981 +73.20075718677 14.3471 13.7767 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.832#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65722_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65722_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.30 09:06:40.68 +73:12:00.3 6050 1166 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65735_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65735_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.88 08:53:42.61 +70:36:52.2 6899 2616 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65744_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65744_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.01 09:48:52.52 +72:45:07.0 4197 1522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65788_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65788_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.09 09:00:00.49 +71:38:49.4 6488 2053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65791_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65791_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.05 10:24:58.92 +65:43:37.8 1779 5522 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:09:27.28 +69:12:59.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 1117774451490524416 137.36458751378 +69.21670136139 14.3704 13.7264 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65825_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65825_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.22 09:09:27.38 +69:12:59.0 6218 3576 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65833_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65833_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.87 10:05:10.58 +67:43:55.5 3139 4487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65888_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65888_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.16 09:47:07.90 +65:54:44.1 4133 5663 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:25:38.75 +71:17:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65903_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65903_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.20 09:25:38.63 +71:17:49.3 5285 2395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65971_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65971_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.25 09:55:51.69 +69:39:00.9 3753 3376 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.41 11:03:18.79 +72:54:07.6 0940 0773 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 65976_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 65976_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.16 09:06:30.70 +68:37:18.5 6422 3913 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66007_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66007_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.32 10:38:18.16 +73:17:09.1 2076 0882 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66014_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66014_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.65 09:41:47.38 +66:02:22.0 4464 5593 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66057_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66057_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.55 08:54:04.18 +70:04:21.6 6941 2942 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 08:58:21.22 +66:45:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66067_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66067_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.27 08:58:20.99 +66:45:09.4 7056 4966 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66077_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66077_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.36 09:54:41.53 +66:53:26.8 3705 5047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66082_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66082_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.49 10:27:48.47 +71:33:30.6 2316 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 08:51:47.17 +66:54:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66087_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66087_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.29 08:51:47.12 +66:54:17.7 7426 4807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:42:30.56 +72:15:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66099_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.54 09:42:30.67 +72:15:43.1 4478 1827 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66131_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 66131_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.59 10:36:50.85 +66:46:38.3 1201 4745 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 14.49 09:54:27.66 +66:19:00.1 3696 5396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 10:55:39.48 +71:52:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39917_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 The candidate 39917_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 10.10 10:55:39.46 +71:52:08.7 1072 1487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits **** FOUND 09:57:10.40 +65:51:24.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:57:10.40 +65:51:24.1 08:47:11.22 +70:11:14.1 08:59:18.70 +67:23:44.2 09:18:43.21 +67:14:21.6 09:46:31.69 +65:55:15.0 09:06:40.65 +73:12:00.9 09:09:27.28 +69:12:59.5 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.76823760 -observatory V36 01:00:24.28 +03:49:30.6 Mercury (-0.4mag) 03:54:44.38 +20:58:35.4 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:44:07.11 +03:44:09.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:17:16.91 +22:38:17.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag) 00:33:14.56 +01:14:06.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:49:43.08 +19:53:53.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:12:01.00 -00:08:00.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:34:04.54 -22:53:20.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:26:01.07 +16:05:51.1 Moon (-10.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Apr 25 01:29 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.76823760: 07:17:24.43 +22:38:01.5 Io (5.8mag) 07:17:07.97 +22:38:35.5 Europa (6.0mag) 07:17:04.49 +22:38:39.2 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:16:44.88 +22:39:28.3 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:20:10.36 +22:21:57.4 Himalia (15.4mag) 07:17:20.61 +22:38:09.7 Thebe (16.3mag) 07:20:31.95 +22:52:05.3 Elara (17.3mag) 07:16:47.44 +23:13:26.4 Pasiphae (17.5mag) 07:25:23.26 +22:37:07.1 Carme (18.6mag) 00:33:21.50 +01:13:52.6 Titan (8.8mag) 00:33:13.54 +01:14:08.0 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:32:44.91 +01:12:50.8 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:33:08.10 +01:14:00.4 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:34:43.67 +01:21:51.6 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 25 01:29 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.76823760: 16:13:44.00 -22:03:56.9 JWST 17:56:26.18 +36:16:11.3 Chandra 18:26:53.62 -28:46:12.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 25 01:29 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.76823760 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 05:49:30.30 +30:41:29.1 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina) 18:54:52.22 -29:21:22.0 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:13:44.48 -69:14:53.6 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:34:40.09 +31:30:21.2 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:29:05.74 +11:37:04.3 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:12:22.95 +29:37:06.5 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:40:11.65 +26:16:41.7 16.1mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:57.17 +32:01:22.6 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:32:54.64 +00:46:51.3 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:51:03.58 +19:17:06.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:37:22.96 -11:23:06.3 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:59.98 -10:27:39.1 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 22:02:34.07 +63:29:00.8 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:09:46.45 -03:56:04.7 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 20:54:44.32 +87:12:29.8 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:23:18.68 +63:30:13.0 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:32:14.38 +21:00:17.8 11.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:12:52.80 +07:53:18.7 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:22:49.06 +17:51:41.9 14.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:34:52.56 -21:01:28.6 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:24:49.52 +43:05:30.3 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:01:49.55 +50:03:02.0 15.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:40:33.20 -27:44:28.3 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 02:04:15.42 +09:49:54.1 7.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:50:13.39 +03:32:22.8 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 04:26:44.49 +01:57:43.5 15.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:24:52.70 +38:46:19.7 14.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 19:00:54.30 -09:12:48.1 11.3mag 10P/Tempel 14:47:43.35 +02:07:19.7 14.8mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:00:43.69 -01:15:25.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:38:07.84 -03:27:01.4 17.1mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 02:03:04.60 +19:02:31.8 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:28:27.22 +34:58:17.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:40:36.16 -10:22:14.4 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:28:41.33 +24:16:11.8 16.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:26:16.58 +10:01:21.2 14.2mag 78P/Gehrels 23:30:16.84 -06:39:18.6 14.7mag 88P/Howell 02:37:11.29 +23:00:22.6 15.0mag 93P/Lovas 05:12:53.22 +32:43:58.4 16.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:40:13.27 +34:06:06.6 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:47:41.98 +15:22:40.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 03:05:49.32 +15:34:16.0 17.6mag 131P/Mueller 02:15:48.47 +16:05:26.0 10.5mag 141P/Machholz 02:23:09.88 +08:16:17.6 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 01:04:51.00 +03:59:54.1 11.8mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:53:47.48 +09:58:18.9 18.0mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:28:25.88 +03:09:27.4 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:35:19.74 +00:44:00.4 17.9mag 210P/Christensen 22:04:05.98 -09:15:16.8 17.8mag 218P/LINEAR 17:17:19.92 -12:47:48.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:54:49.57 +35:17:37.6 16.9mag 240P/NEAT 07:43:34.02 -04:13:50.0 17.8mag 242P/Spahr 22:40:07.38 -18:22:27.1 17.6mag 260P/McNaught 02:17:35.76 +22:46:03.3 17.9mag 295P/LINEAR 15:38:33.99 +07:32:54.3 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski 07:38:14.56 +21:22:07.5 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:49:43.22 +44:29:27.7 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 25 01:29 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 2026-04-22.16 15.12 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 2026-04-22.16 15.12 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.04 15.48 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.89 -15:50:13.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.5 16.39 11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.3 15.14 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 25 01:29 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 25 01:29 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 03:58:37.523 -47:58:27.05 AT 2026jyc 2026-03-10.04 22.794 04:19:14.199 -48:07:43.84 AT 2026jyb 2026-03-22.02 23.509 04:14:48.000 -48:01:04.00 AT 2026jya 2026-03-07.06 22.906 04:17:07.910 -49:07:16.08 AT 2026jxz 2026-03-13.03 23.78 04:14:22.630 -48:22:12.14 AT 2026jxy 2026-03-07.06 21.712 04:01:07.229 -47:46:52.90 AT 2026jxx 2026-03-07.07 23.052 04:09:53.881 -47:38:41.66 AT 2026jxw 2026-03-16.05 23.624 04:08:49.695 -48:00:04.57 AT 2026jxv 2026-03-13.14 23.598 04:10:45.076 -47:56:49.63 AT 2026jxu 2026-03-10.04 23.502 04:14:31.399 -46:42:43.71 AT 2026jxt 2026-03-10.18 21.706 04:11:12.235 -45:58:40.33 AT 2026jxs 2026-03-25.100 22.751 03:55:48.361 -50:00:22.74 AT 2026jxr 2026-03-13.04 23.431 03:52:20.927 -49:00:26.83 AT 2026jxq 2026-04-03.01 21.127 03:45:32.951 -49:53:47.26 AT 2026jxp 2026-03-16.05 22.986 14:06:31.160 +25:41:16.06 AT 2026jxo 2026-04-17.40 19.74 15:04:50.183 +06:52:09.46 AT 2026jxn 2026-04-15.48 20.43 15:54:08.337 +01:23:10.14 AT 2026jxm 2026-04-15.47 20.9 16:51:56.725 +00:24:09.11 AT 2026jxl 2026-04-15.54 21.12 16:40:46.820 -23:21:05.30 AT 2026jxk 2026-04-17.18 16.1 11:40:08.766 +27:39:36.84 AT 2026jxj 2026-04-17.74 19.72 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 25 01:29 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 04 25.26877 2461155.76877 13.85 09:57:10.48 +65:51:23.6 3510 5664 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_012740_TTUQ2b1x1_3419378_nNvrcXiu/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_01-26-52_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0227.fits
