This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2353 2461155.7353 13.86 07:32:11.96 +34:04:31.8
185.02193 22.69972 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -2 1 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:32:11.96 +34:04:31.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:32:11.96 +34:04:31.8: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7353,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2353 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2353 2461155.7353 14.02 07:35:27.41 +30:10:36.0
189.25344 22.09075 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -2 -0 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits at 07:35:27.41 +30:10:36.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits at 07:35:27.41 +30:10:36.0: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7353,14.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2353 14.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461155.7353,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260425.2353 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461155.73567611 25.04.2026 05:39:12.416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13942
Objects passed selection criteria: 13892
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10239.2
Average stars matched: 9990.25 (97.5682 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118884 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:41:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
First image: 2461119.66450689 20.03.2026 03:56:43.395 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Last image: 2461155.73567611 25.04.2026 05:39:12.416 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 41 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78185
Objects passed selection criteria: 77987
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62257
Average stars matched: 60280 (96.8245 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2122156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:44:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.73494940
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0569 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rqgdckFHmD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sk8NQO5eNk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bzt1saViln
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Wk6FKThD4h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897192
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897192
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3035 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6193 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3035 deg
Loaded 9467 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7183 out of 7679 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7679 out of 14578 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3044 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6189 to 129.5920 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3044 deg
Loaded 9463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7187 out of 7676 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7676 out of 14611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rqgdckFHmD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1032, passed=14578
Got 14578 stars (including 13536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sk8NQO5eNk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1022, passed=14611
Got 14611 stars (including 13580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bzt1saViln (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=450, passed=5998
Got 5998 stars (including 5541 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5998 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Wk6FKThD4h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=426, passed=6024
Got 6024 stars (including 5589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6024 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20924.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20924_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 20924_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:17:11.17 +24:47:45.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.959 679310547434352384 124.29625376464 +24.79591203332 11.5380 11.1741 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.959#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0569 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:00:08.031 +30:01:52.45
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:00.079 +29:58:55.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:57.838 +29:58:30.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01059 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pK1C7PNv8i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.34h0ZpT7Gg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OgtM3KiImi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eKhToUsiO4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.760793
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.760793
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec +24.4232 to +35.3079 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6085 to 129.6414 deg, Dec 24.4232 to 35.3079 deg
Loaded 9496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6463 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 84052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 84140 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec +24.4256 to +35.3113 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.6089 to 129.6124 deg, Dec 24.4256 to 35.3113 deg
Loaded 9485 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6460 out of 7793 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7793 out of 84140 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pK1C7PNv8i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6475, passed=84011
Got 84011 stars (including 77428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-56-43_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0124.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.34h0ZpT7Gg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=6514, passed=84099
Got 84099 stars (including 77496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84099 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_22-57-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OgtM3KiImi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1454, passed=41765
Got 41765 stars (including 40242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eKhToUsiO4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1446, passed=40986
Got 40986 stars (including 39476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-38-09_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0028.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_004011_TTUQ1b1x1_2462877_DR7A8ylb/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100533.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100619.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100761.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100888.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100892.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101161.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101176.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101181.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101233.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101239.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101419.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101458.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101519.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101564.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101565.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101608.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101760.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.88 +34:16:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100531_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100531_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:41.49 +30:29:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100533_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:13.66 +34:16:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.614 893733942125432320 112.30694232096 +34.27633584674 13.1036 12.6008 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.614#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100535_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:44.62 +34:38:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100619_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100619_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:39.72 +27:22:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.414 872996908010937600 111.16561790752 +27.38217454909 10.2767 9.9588 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.414#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100678_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.08 +31:52:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100723_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100723_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:07.09 +34:13:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100761_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100761_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:29.75 +27:17:27.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.185 683609676554996224 123.62363131393 +27.29101550996 11.8240 11.0609 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.185#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100848_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100848_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.73 +25:46:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100888_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100888_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:15.51 +26:14:19.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.746 681998685860800896 121.56516552450 +26.23879320687 12.4386 12.0584 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.746#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100892_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100892_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:06.41 +28:21:20.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.221 876161714793078528 121.27661570840 +28.35588483682 12.1908 11.2636 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.221#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100908_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100908_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:37.10 +26:45:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100984_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 100984_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:34.95 +26:43:05.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.369 682827575894059648 123.64553114347 +26.71805189963 12.4550 11.8335 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.369#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101028_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101028_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:00.20 +26:26:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101050_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101050_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:14.16 +33:29:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101059_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101059_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.66 +29:49:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101096_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101096_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101138_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101138_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:00.42 +34:23:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101161_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101161_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:42.00 +30:25:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.460 900791123148319616 123.42511893737 +30.41845177908 13.2671 12.8532 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.460#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101165_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.72 +34:00:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101170_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101170_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:55.82 +30:20:13.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.203 708600716860988416 124.23259291718 +30.33702741606 13.0036 12.4107 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.203#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101176_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101176_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:11.95 +31:29:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.934 900912035067590912 125.04964381823 +31.49271757811 13.1564 12.7486 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.934#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101181_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:05.97 +27:04:15.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.928 683720108754752896 121.77465673773 +27.07147119925 13.2734 12.7016 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.928#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101188_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101188_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.92 +31:51:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101233_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101233_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:58.54 +28:34:18.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.863 707389433004115328 126.24378350087 +28.57204258556 13.2297 12.7263 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.863#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101239_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101239_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:10.48 +29:28:10.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.702 707913139840096640 127.29372751913 +29.46939572031 13.0424 12.5566 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101246_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:11:46.33 +25:57:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101257_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101257_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:02.32 +28:27:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101259_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101259_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:53.88 +26:56:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101264_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101264_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:16.88 +28:49:13.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.189 684368373938325888 122.57039334281 +28.82047118690 13.0472 12.5817 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101268_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.97 +26:41:41.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:24.82 +32:21:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101280_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101280_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.54 +27:14:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101302_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.01 +26:00:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101322_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.36 +25:02:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:03.74 +31:35:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101374_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101374_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.35 +26:48:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101386_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:50.27 +31:33:29.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.576 892841684142918400 111.20964119009 +31.55810202666 13.1963 12.5758 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.576#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101407_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101407_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:23.60 +33:12:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101419_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101419_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:38.60 +28:09:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.069 876015724561079680 121.41092628526 +28.16614643214 13.9794 13.4388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.069#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101424_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101424_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:14.01 +31:55:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101434_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101434_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.67 +33:27:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101458_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101458_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:12.12 +27:54:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.701 875441710771776768 118.30029071497 +27.90135627911 13.4613 12.9670 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.701#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101462_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101462_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:49.33 +29:44:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101470_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101470_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:15.96 +33:29:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101477_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101477_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:17.24 +30:49:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101482_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101482_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:42.80 +30:53:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101488_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101488_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:10.12 +34:24:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101504_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:33.32 +30:37:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101512_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:05.95 +33:23:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101519_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101519_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:55.05 +28:01:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.570 876056303412138240 120.97947461133 +28.01626741081 13.6873 13.1239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.570#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101526_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:30.52 +32:29:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101545_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:48.00 +27:46:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101564_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:29.13 +25:13:54.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.618 681810428855561600 120.62147666387 +25.23186713897 13.5202 12.8343 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.618#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101565_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101565_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:55.13 +25:04:50.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.745 681772152107086336 121.22953816024 +25.08077693088 13.5931 12.9239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.745#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101579_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101579_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.82 +27:56:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101608_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101608_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:05.91 +34:53:24.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.836 895133895305288192 114.27447201116 +34.89002669782 13.4748 12.9339 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.836#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101706_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101706_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:07.53 +26:58:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101742_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 101742_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.51 +32:11:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101760_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 101760_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
Preparing report for the candidate 101774_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47167_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029
The candidate 47167_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-39-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0029 did not pass the final checks