	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 04 25.21970	2461155.71970	13.50	11:33:55.70 +12:36:21.6	4704 4043	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 04 25.22019	2461155.72019	13.39	11:33:55.66 +12:36:22.3	4705 4043	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 04 25.21970	2461155.71970	14.23	11:42:18.28 +16:58:43.1	3450 1412	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 04 25.22019	2461155.72019	14.24	11:42:18.27 +16:58:42.1	3450 1412	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 04 25.21970	2461155.71970	14.76	11:17:42.91 +17:15:27.9	7007 1168	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 04 25.22019	2461155.72019	14.77	11:17:43.23 +17:15:28.6	7007 1168	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
	Date (UTC)	JD(UTC)	mag.	R.A. & Dec.(J2000)	X & Y (pix)	Image
Discovery image 1	2026 04 25.21970	2461155.71970	14.93	11:26:17.65 +09:46:28.4	5871 5739	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Discovery image 2	2026 04 25.22019	2461155.72019	14.80	11:26:17.48 +09:46:28.7	5873 5739	/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1409374 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1409374 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits_preview.png'

Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits


renamed 'Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits_preview.png'

Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 532.6367
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.1419
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1834.2918
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 526.1027
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1835.0300
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 526.0078
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.4438
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.3899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T00:16:11.7871512' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T05:16:11.7871512' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61155.2195808683 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T05:16:21.6887487' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61155.2196954628 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     173.331730716081 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999335907583 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =               64.975 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     221.370555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.10329123498601 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20383 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20383 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.3899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.3899993896484 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 -6.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 18.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               892.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                343.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits :)

Spent 0.610791 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     16.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-25T00:16:54.7012773' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-25T05:16:54.7012773' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =      61155.220077558 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-25T05:17:04.6046681' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61155.2201921758 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                 -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     173.331730731058 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9999335768509 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     64.8736111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     221.717222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.10420307352771 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Leo-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '11 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20383 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20383 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     16.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     16.2700004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 -6.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 18.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               892.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                343.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            10.400832 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits :)

Spent 0.621856 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-22.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/d_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits



fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.71969661
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.n4j3IRVLC4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OqWjCcxDKa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EVlkWVb0gA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GVh9deoHTE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909359
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909359
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33

Magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec +8.4844 to +19.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.4966 deg, Dec 8.4844 to 19.3112 deg
Loaded 3827 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2957 out of 3146 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3146 out of 5845 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec +8.5231 to +19.3318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.4972 deg, Dec 8.5231 to 19.3318 deg
Loaded 3815 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2962 out of 3141 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3141 out of 5851 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.2 pix  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 15.3 mag.  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.n4j3IRVLC4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=5845
Got 5845 stars (including 5387 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5845 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OqWjCcxDKa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=5851
Got 5851 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5851 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EVlkWVb0gA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=293, passed=4016
Got 4016 stars (including 3720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GVh9deoHTE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=285, passed=4058
Got 4058 stars (including 3770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4058 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3994 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3995 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 20459_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    10.81    11:25:36.50 +16:28:18.3   5875 1682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:25:36.50 +16:28:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 04578_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    10.39    11:23:40.23 +16:51:05.1   6150 1444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:40.23 +16:51:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0221 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:33:20.692 +14:00:05.86
Second-epoch image center 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0205 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:33:15.458 +14:00:28.95
Second-epoch second image center 11:33:15.850 +14:00:27.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00163 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00163 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VnXY34540Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dgz9sYG0IU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.swDGqw6CL0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j25b8jcNJY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.790746
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.790746
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.51

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.51

Magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30089 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec +8.4661 to +19.3314 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9322 to 181.5060 deg, Dec 8.4661 to 19.3314 deg
Loaded 3838 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2863 out of 3171 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3171 out of 30089 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 30117 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec +8.4752 to +19.3348 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 164.9329 to 181.5106 deg, Dec 8.4752 to 19.3348 deg
Loaded 3840 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2876 out of 3175 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3175 out of 30117 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.1 pix  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
 15.5 mag.  Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VnXY34540Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1260, passed=30074
Got 30074 stars (including 28759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30074 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-09-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dgz9sYG0IU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1200, passed=30101
Got 30101 stars (including 28849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30101 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.swDGqw6CL0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=712, passed=20797
Got 20797 stars (including 20062 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j25b8jcNJY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=681, passed=20617
Got 20617 stars (including 19911 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/wcs_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55517.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55385.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51680_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51680_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.39    11:26:19.97 +10:18:15.2   5858 5416   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:26:19.98 +10:18:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51681_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51681_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.91    11:40:17.17 +11:09:56.7   3775 4928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:40:17.18 +11:09:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51942_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 51942_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    10.83    11:25:36.49 +16:28:18.5   5875 1682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:25:36.49 +16:28:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52549_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52549_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    12.50    11:18:08.96 +17:34:07.1   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52709_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    12.71    11:33:21.29 +14:10:18.8   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 52997_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    12.96    11:43:12.11 +14:29:04.5   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53090_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.12    11:15:56.20 +12:49:01.6   7359 3851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:15:56.19 +12:49:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53251_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.24    11:38:02.00 +12:59:05.4   4097 3823   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:38:02.00 +12:59:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53331_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.27    11:51:46.43 +12:12:37.9   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53367_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.37    11:18:56.37 +10:11:22.0   6965 5460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:18:56.38 +10:11:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53597_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 53597_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53863_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 53863_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.70    11:43:39.40 +10:42:05.1   3275 5215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:43:39.38 +10:42:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54152_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54152_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.03    11:44:59.32 +17:08:47.7   3060 1311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:44:59.38 +17:08:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54190_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54190_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.09    11:15:31.74 +13:47:51.5   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54239_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.82    11:31:23.66 +16:05:33.6   5040 1930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:31:23.67 +16:05:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54301_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54301_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.95    11:26:34.88 +17:53:25.4   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54522_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.20    11:46:59.78 +10:05:41.4   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54535_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54535_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.39    11:37:09.70 +16:47:14.2   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54689_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 54689_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54754_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 54754_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.23    11:18:46.25 +14:52:46.1   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55219_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55219_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.49    11:21:27.82 +15:49:48.2   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55323_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55323_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.67    11:44:33.03 +11:54:08.3   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55385_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 55385_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55411_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55411_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.93    11:40:45.68 +10:58:13.8   3705 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55467_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55467_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.88    11:51:51.94 +12:08:11.4   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55468_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55468_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.53    11:22:16.23 +12:45:39.7   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55469_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55469_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.90    11:40:50.57 +10:23:46.9   3696 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55483_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55483_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.66    11:40:20.54 +13:43:48.5   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55498_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
Preparing report for the candidate 55498_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55517_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 55517_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    14.84    11:33:14.79 +16:15:48.0   4769 1831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:33:14.86 +16:15:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.337 3973343823999897600 173.31259058852 +16.26355189680 15.1525 14.6389 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.337#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04935_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 04935_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    12.87    11:39:34.19 +10:31:38.5   3885 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 26067_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    10.60    11:23:40.21 +16:51:05.3   6150 1444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

**** FOUND  11:23:40.22 +16:51:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08183_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 08183_fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 04 25.22019    2461155.72019    13.86    11:28:49.66 +11:34:24.7   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_001926_TTUQ2b1x1_1758248_a1Dc9wbR/fd_Leo-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-25_00-16-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:33:55.68 +12:36:22.0
11:42:18.27 +16:58:42.6
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2
11:26:17.56 +09:46:28.6
########### Completed Leo-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
11:33:55.68 +12:36:22.0
11:42:18.27 +16:58:42.6
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2
11:26:17.56 +09:46:28.6
###################################################################################
11:33:55.68 +12:36:22.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
11:42:18.27 +16:58:42.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
11:26:17.56 +09:46:28.6  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2  -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
11:17:43.07 +17:15:28.2
11:33:14.86 +16:15:48.6
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.71969661 -observatory V36
01:00:06.13 +03:47:26.6 Mercury (-0.4mag)
03:54:29.59 +20:57:44.1 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:43:58.80 +03:43:15.5 Mars (1.2mag)
07:17:15.33 +22:38:20.2 Jupiter (-2.0mag)
00:33:13.29 +01:13:58.4 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:49:42.42 +19:53:51.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:12:00.63 -00:08:02.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:34:04.46 -22:53:20.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
09:24:05.09 +16:24:39.1 Moon (-10.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Apr 25 00:21 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.71969661:
07:17:22.28 +22:38:06.1 Io (5.8mag)
07:17:07.07 +22:38:36.7 Europa (6.0mag)
07:17:03.52 +22:38:40.6 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:16:43.12 +22:39:31.5 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:20:08.92 +22:22:01.5 Himalia (15.4mag)
07:17:17.68 +22:38:16.4 Thebe (16.3mag)
07:20:30.47 +22:52:09.6 Elara (17.3mag)
07:16:45.66 +23:13:30.9 Pasiphae (17.5mag)
07:25:21.75 +22:37:09.9 Carme (18.6mag)
00:33:20.05 +01:13:44.8 Titan (8.8mag)
00:33:12.00 +01:14:00.9 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:32:43.66 +01:12:43.5 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:33:06.69 +01:13:53.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:34:42.45 +01:21:44.3 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 25 00:22 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461155.71969661:
16:13:44.70 -22:01:20.9 JWST
17:52:56.99 +36:49:00.5 Chandra
18:03:05.14 -37:15:41.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 25 00:21 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461155.71969661 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
05:49:11.72 +30:41:44.2 17.9mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:51.60 -29:21:10.1 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:13:42.16 -69:15:01.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:34:39.33 +31:30:19.9 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:29:06.30 +11:36:44.6 17.7mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:12:22.35 +29:36:58.7 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:40:08.15 +26:16:37.5 16.1mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:05:56.23 +32:01:23.5 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:32:53.95 +00:46:34.6 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:51:04.56 +19:16:52.6 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:37:24.09 -11:23:08.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:04:00.94 -10:28:04.8 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:02:31.69 +63:28:49.1 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:09:49.84 -03:55:59.9 14.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
20:55:04.48 +87:12:05.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:23:16.66 +63:30:12.9 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:32:08.63 +20:59:33.4 11.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:12:54.95 +07:52:50.9 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:48.60 +17:50:51.8 14.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:34:49.81 -21:01:53.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:24:46.89 +43:06:10.4 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:02:00.64 +50:01:59.9 15.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:40:28.17 -27:43:58.1 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
02:03:15.95 +09:54:40.1 7.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:50:14.60 +03:32:13.6 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
04:26:29.94 +01:57:52.0 15.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:24:44.97 +38:45:52.8 14.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
19:00:48.68 -09:12:57.3 11.3mag 10P/Tempel
14:47:47.38 +02:07:42.1 14.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:00:44.24 -01:15:29.5 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:38:07.44 -03:27:12.0 17.1mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
02:03:00.02 +19:02:02.9 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:28:21.52 +34:58:57.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:40:32.58 -10:22:34.1 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:28:33.10 +24:15:18.4 16.0mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:26:09.96 +10:00:48.0 14.2mag 78P/Gehrels
23:30:08.43 -06:40:09.8 14.7mag 88P/Howell
02:37:02.66 +22:59:40.1 15.0mag 93P/Lovas
05:12:47.34 +32:43:51.3 16.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:40:09.35 +34:07:27.2 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:47:37.35 +15:22:22.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
03:05:43.51 +15:33:56.8 17.6mag 131P/Mueller
02:15:32.59 +16:04:39.1 10.5mag 141P/Machholz
02:22:54.56 +08:15:15.8 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz
01:04:36.53 +03:58:52.7 11.8mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:53:32.21 +09:57:19.6 18.0mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:28:17.56 +03:07:59.1 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:35:24.72 +00:43:48.1 17.9mag 210P/Christensen
22:03:58.41 -09:15:57.1 17.8mag 218P/LINEAR
17:17:20.17 -12:48:10.2 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:54:43.08 +35:17:28.7 16.9mag 240P/NEAT
07:43:32.29 -04:14:06.5 17.8mag 242P/Spahr
22:40:00.01 -18:23:18.5 17.6mag 260P/McNaught
02:17:29.46 +22:45:20.3 17.9mag 295P/LINEAR
15:38:35.43 +07:32:44.7 17.4mag 391P/Kowalski
07:38:13.15 +21:22:08.1 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:49:38.77 +44:29:38.2 17.6mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 25 00:21 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30    2026-04-22.16 15.12
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30    2026-04-22.16 15.12
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00  SN2026fwt  2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20  ASASSN-26ce  2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50  AT2026hiy  2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80  ASASSN-26cg  2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20  SN2026fzb  2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30  ASASSN-26cd  2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70  AT2026gzl  2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50  ASASSN-26cf  2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60  SN 2026evz  2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50  ASASSN-26bx  2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10  ASASSN-26bw  2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80  ASASSN-26ca  2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20  SN 2026fvx  2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60  ASASSN-26bz  2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.88 -53:16:33.80  ASASSN-26cc  2026-03-20.04 15.48
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20  SN 2026fmh  2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50  ASASSN-26cb  2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50  ASASSN-26by  2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60  SN2026fjc  2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20  ASASSN-26bv  2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40  ASASSN-26bt  2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10  ASASSN-26bu  2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00  SN 2026eza  2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90  AT2026fsf  2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30  SN 2026enn  2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00  AT 2026ezy  2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30  ASASSN-26bs  2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20  ASASSN-26br  2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40  AT 2023uk  2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10  AT2026fhw  2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10  SN2026drr  2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90  ASASSN-26bo  2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40  SN2026ebt  2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00  SN2026ehe  2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70  SN2026efq  2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00  SN2026evh  2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10  AT2026ffp  2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50  AT2026fij  2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10  SN 2026exe  2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00  SN2026ess  2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80  AT2026ewa  2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20  ASASSN-26bp  2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20  AT2024cmo  2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.89 -15:50:13.40  AT2026fdy  2026-03-10.5 16.39
11:30:09.70 -47:26:45.00  ASASSN-26bn  2026-03-10.3 15.14
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40  (= Gaia  2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70  ASASSN-26bm  2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20  ASASSN-26bl  2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40  SN 2026dkf  2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90  SN 2026ejl  2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80  ASASSN-26bk  2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30  ASASSN-26bi  2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80  AT2026enm  2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60  ASASSN-26bh  2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40  ASASSN-26bg  2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40  ASASSN-26bf  2026-02-26.3 16.28
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 25 00:21 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9  TCP J18085199-2616219  2026-01-31.8519  12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1  TCP J07032576-1241401  2026-03-10.4268  15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8  PNV J00423682+4116058  2026-03-12.5744  17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1  TCP J07264579-2745141  2026-03-17.4417  14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7  TCP J17571956-2808147  2026-03-19.7972  14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7  TCP J08460573+1047397  2026-03-21.1936  14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7  PNV J09553883+6905217  2026-04-01.893  19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 25 00:21 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
03:58:37.523 -47:58:27.05  AT 2026jyc  2026-03-10.04 22.794
04:19:14.199 -48:07:43.84  AT 2026jyb  2026-03-22.02 23.509
04:14:48.000 -48:01:04.00  AT 2026jya  2026-03-07.06 22.906
04:17:07.910 -49:07:16.08  AT 2026jxz  2026-03-13.03 23.78
04:14:22.630 -48:22:12.14  AT 2026jxy  2026-03-07.06 21.712
04:01:07.229 -47:46:52.90  AT 2026jxx  2026-03-07.07 23.052
04:09:53.881 -47:38:41.66  AT 2026jxw  2026-03-16.05 23.624
04:08:49.695 -48:00:04.57  AT 2026jxv  2026-03-13.14 23.598
04:10:45.076 -47:56:49.63  AT 2026jxu  2026-03-10.04 23.502
04:14:31.399 -46:42:43.71  AT 2026jxt  2026-03-10.18 21.706
04:11:12.235 -45:58:40.33  AT 2026jxs  2026-03-25.100 22.751
03:55:48.361 -50:00:22.74  AT 2026jxr  2026-03-13.04 23.431
03:52:20.927 -49:00:26.83  AT 2026jxq  2026-04-03.01 21.127
03:45:32.951 -49:53:47.26  AT 2026jxp  2026-03-16.05 22.986
14:06:31.160 +25:41:16.06  AT 2026jxo  2026-04-17.40 19.74
15:04:50.183 +06:52:09.46  AT 2026jxn  2026-04-15.48 20.43
15:54:08.337 +01:23:10.14  AT 2026jxm  2026-04-15.47 20.9
16:51:56.725 +00:24:09.11  AT 2026jxl  2026-04-15.54 21.12
16:40:46.820 -23:21:05.30  AT 2026jxk  2026-04-17.18 16.1
11:40:08.766 +27:39:36.84  AT 2026jxj  2026-04-17.74 19.72
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 25 00:21 tns_transients_list.txt
NMW transient search results

Processing complete!

Processing log:

Filtering log:

Profiling:
