This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 7.32 07:17:14.98 +22:38:21.7
195.08455 15.53563 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.9 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 100.3" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.3.7" Jupiter (-2.0mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:17:14.98 +22:38:21.7: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:14.98 +22:38:21.7: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,7.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 7.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 7.67 07:16:43.04 +22:39:31.3
195.01553 15.43058 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.9 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 0.6" Callisto (6.6mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.0.6" Callisto (6.6mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:43.04 +22:39:31.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.04 +22:39:31.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,7.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 7.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 7.86 07:16:43.05 +22:39:31.3
195.01555 15.43062 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.9 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 0.7" Callisto (6.6mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.0.7" Callisto (6.6mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:43.05 +22:39:31.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.05 +22:39:31.3: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,7.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 7.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 11.66 07:22:27.08 +24:43:14.2
193.56875 17.44281 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia 0 -0 1 11.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:27.08 +24:43:14.2: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:27.08 +24:43:14.2: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,11.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 11.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 13.27 06:54:25.93 +22:35:58.4
192.90350 10.71732 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.17 Thetis 3 0 3 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 06:54:25.93 +22:35:58.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:25.93 +22:35:58.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 13.49 07:12:40.80 +24:14:21.6
193.13032 15.20736 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.200 Dynamene 2 -1 2 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:12:40.80 +24:14:21.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:40.80 +24:14:21.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2169 2461155.7169 13.86 07:18:12.06 +23:52:53.8
193.98675 16.22556 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 1 -1 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:12.06 +23:52:53.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:12.06 +23:52:53.8: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7169,8.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2169 8.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461155.71725630 25.04.2026 05:12:40.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20867
Objects passed selection criteria: 20792
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15600.8
Average stars matched: 14753.5 (94.5692 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 125700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:15:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461058.73760365 18.01.2026 05:41:58.955 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461155.71725630 25.04.2026 05:12:40.944 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 141 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 136732
Objects passed selection criteria: 136370
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 107711
Average stars matched: 102875 (95.5107 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2098464 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:20:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.71656950
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00816 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WBTVAbdpKD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lFxLnuxnhg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YmMWEL21Fw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.00jm3W0gEg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.883687
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.883687
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3006 to +27.3458 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7556 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3006 to 27.3458 deg
Loaded 14532 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10648 out of 11733 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11733 out of 22550 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec +16.4807 to +27.2946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0351 to 119.5904 deg, Dec 16.4807 to 27.2946 deg
Loaded 13969 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10670 out of 11761 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11761 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WBTVAbdpKD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2218, passed=22550
Got 22550 stars (including 20300 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lFxLnuxnhg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21362 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YmMWEL21Fw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=608, passed=8304
Got 8304 stars (including 7681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.00jm3W0gEg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, passed=8292
Got 8292 stars (including 7691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 33130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 33132_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 14622_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.47 +23:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1192 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:22:55.118 +21:59:39.20
Second-epoch image center 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:25.411 +22:01:00.53
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:25.444 +22:01:29.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00816 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pwXWhh1cNE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C4huWYLnnw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MClcZv8P8Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VUmcLMem9k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739001
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739001
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 153680 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec +16.3007 to +27.3487 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 101.7461 to 119.3352 deg, Dec 16.3007 to 27.3487 deg
Loaded 14554 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8811 out of 12036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12036 out of 153680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec +16.4751 to +27.2973 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.6237 deg, Dec 16.4751 to 27.2973 deg
Loaded 14001 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8799 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pwXWhh1cNE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=17863, passed=153629
Got 153629 stars (including 135492 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C4huWYLnnw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148360 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148361 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 148362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MClcZv8P8Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2857, passed=64360
Got 64360 stars (including 61399 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64360 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63222 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VUmcLMem9k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2780, passed=64065
Got 64065 stars (including 61188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-11-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_001341_TTUQ1b1x1_1617892_klOV6x5K/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181730.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181967.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181997.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out181998.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182007.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182074.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182078.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182116.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182209.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182292.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182302.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182305.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182306.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182317.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182318.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182339.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182351.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182430.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182549.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182558.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182585.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out182625.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out181895.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out181935.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out182029.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out181424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182418.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 151s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181119_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:22:20.46 +22:01:49.0: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:22:20.46 +22:01:49.0: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181123_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:28:06.74 +22:44:23.3: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:06.74 +22:44:23.3: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181126_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:08.45 +26:10:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181130_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:05.95 +21:44:09.9: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:05.95 +21:44:09.9: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.02
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181131_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:26.51 +25:01:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181137_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.69 +21:35:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181139_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181139_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.87 +22:06:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181143_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.87 +26:10:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181146_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:44.75 +21:03:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181151_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.71 +22:16:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 181154_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181424_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 181424_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181510_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.28 +24:07:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181573_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181573_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.20 +22:38:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181574_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.69 +19:12:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181602_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.52 +22:23:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181701_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:27.23 +26:25:33.6: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.23 +26:25:33.6: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181714_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.42 +25:56:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181729_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.91 +19:13:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181730_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181730_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.15 +17:59:36.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.083 3361367093772552448 105.45069285223 +17.99320603676 12.4706 12.0042 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.083#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-41-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:27:42.21 +22:10:16.5: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:42.21 +22:10:16.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181787_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.78 +22:27:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181816_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181816_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.39 +26:03:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181824_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.80 +23:56:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181825_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.15 +25:55:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:51.24 +25:39:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181883_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181883_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.20 +23:37:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:46.29 +26:38:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181895_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.53 +21:18:41.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181935_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:33.01 +24:41:31.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.05 +17:45:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181967_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181967_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:17.78 +26:51:40.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.056 3382175630504057600 104.07359405243 +26.86049420420 12.9955 12.2949 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.056#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181992_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.45 +26:01:17.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.638 871252124793279488 108.77201793102 +26.02202895320 13.2283 12.7102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.638#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181997_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181997_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:08.41 +20:10:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.066 673348793528066048 118.28594120536 +20.18105583310 13.3730 12.9596 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.066#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181998_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 181998_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:55.65 +22:17:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.358 3367354385559914368 107.98169012777 +22.29519717107 12.7054 11.8602 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.358#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182001_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.95 +25:33:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182007_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182007_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:57.17 +26:00:37.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.219 874825056547181952 116.73744817705 +26.00989514308 13.2362 12.7354 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.219#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182009_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.38 +24:32:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182014_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:10.94 +23:57:26.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.032 866849748955170944 113.04544150365 +23.95753348066 13.0365 12.2984 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.032#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.41 +21:47:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:19.72 +21:35:19.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182062_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.95 +20:58:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182074_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182074_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.52 +24:54:15.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.852 868498707159086464 113.95577717978 +24.90431569114 13.3039 12.8144 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182078_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182078_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:53.24 +24:07:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.636 867430222375755904 115.72202688580 +24.13094167628 13.3194 12.8640 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.636#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182084_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182084_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.88 +23:26:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182088_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.89 +18:51:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182098_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182098_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.87 +23:15:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.758 3368456749046604928 106.69072311975 +23.25120853732 13.1957 12.8963 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.758#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.50 +21:31:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:04.25 +18:36:03.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.595 3170420686110006272 112.51745987187 +18.60023526742 13.2664 12.6645 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182122_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182122_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.31 +18:20:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182140_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.57 +18:39:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182164_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:02.94 +18:51:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182170_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:02.64 +26:11:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.50 +24:00:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182209_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182209_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.53 +20:30:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.414 3366573972822210560 106.84323009761 +20.50495870910 13.3375 12.7649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.414#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182212_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.36 +25:34:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182228_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:10.95 +24:39:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182254_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182254_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.63 +26:19:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182292_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.46 +20:05:39.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.418 3363674869898774272 110.12681456640 +20.09435113590 13.3276 12.8630 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.418#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182298_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.75 +19:56:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182302_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182302_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.56 +25:56:36.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.304 871118053095045760 109.70996224066 +25.94349159797 13.6995 13.2227 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.304#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182305_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:21.48 +26:41:45.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.062 872151559664340608 114.58902590264 +26.69561436785 13.5736 13.1051 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.062#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182306_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:11.39 +25:40:41.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.582 868785610974249344 116.29697223473 +25.67802043345 13.2487 12.6234 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.582#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182313_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182313_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.30 +24:08:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182317_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182317_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:49.15 +22:03:01.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.664 3367988906849471488 105.45459611660 +22.05004706377 13.0322 12.5604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.664#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182318_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182318_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.62 +20:26:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.983 3363744242210248320 109.93965485058 +20.44756748257 13.4697 13.0790 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182321_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182321_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.73 +20:31:56.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.898 3363978880565123072 108.66965640492 +20.53263344299 13.5392 13.0804 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.898#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182338_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:34.66 +21:51:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182339_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182339_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:36.80 +19:19:52.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.632 3363374806302677760 107.65227194183 +19.33121108250 13.3349 12.6391 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.632#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182344_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.94 +25:32:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182351_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182351_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:13.16 +22:11:21.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.688 865646917594982912 113.05423707418 +22.18883059921 14.0566 13.6413 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.688#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182352_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182352_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.08 +20:06:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182355_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182355_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.74 +24:54:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 182373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 182418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182430_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.30 +22:57:31.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.790 869346842941428608 110.62610948067 +22.95865621725 13.7173 13.2273 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182447_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:48.97 +26:29:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.18 +24:28:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:36.94 +26:28:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:58.15 +26:41:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.539 871401069962358912 109.24064598444 +26.69820333220 13.7322 13.2649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.539#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:02.53 +25:10:29.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.510 871488176195629696 112.76039834131 +25.17483507316 13.7491 13.2455 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.510#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:18.73 +24:00:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.122 870377424637508992 108.57804551950 +24.00682710146 13.7655 13.2473 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.122#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182625_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:55.81 +20:49:17.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.885 3363864879251446784 109.98235908713 +20.82121175647 13.7431 13.3155 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.885#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182680_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.59 +22:40:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182683_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 182683_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182725_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.69 +24:30:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 182727_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.85 +17:52:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 102023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.48 +23:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91263_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 91263_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 119081_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-12-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
