This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J064153+2757.3,2461155.7155,10.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J064153+2757.3 20260425.2155 10.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2155 2461155.7155 13.18 06:38:44.98 +27:19:48.6
187.01555 9.53209 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.42 Isis 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:38:44.98 +27:19:48.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:38:44.98 +27:19:48.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7155,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2155 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2155 2461155.7155 13.50 06:32:55.48 +34:23:31.7
179.98401 11.43777 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.98 Ianthe 1 0 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:32:55.48 +34:23:31.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:32:55.48 +34:23:31.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7155,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2155 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2155 2461155.7155 13.81 07:32:10.29 +34:04:35.2
185.01900 22.69454 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -2 -1 2 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:32:10.29 +34:04:35.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:32:10.29 +34:04:35.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7155,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2155 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 25.2155 2461155.7155 13.89 07:35:25.96 +30:10:39.6
189.25054 22.08616 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.432 Pythia -1 -0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 07:35:25.96 +30:10:39.6: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 07:35:25.96 +30:10:39.6: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461155.7155,13.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260425.2155 13.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0704478+280712,2461155.7155,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0704478+280712 20260425.2155 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461155.71583696 25.04.2026 05:10:38.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22988
Objects passed selection criteria: 22887
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16401.2
Average stars matched: 15929.5 (97.1237 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:13:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
First image: 2461058.73602979 18.01.2026 05:39:42.974 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Last image: 2461155.71583696 25.04.2026 05:10:38.313 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 154755
Objects passed selection criteria: 154411
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 118181
Average stars matched: 113626 (96.1453 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1913832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 25 00:17:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461155.71518326
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0909 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0883 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00342 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cglNg95U9Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vQ30q4BbUT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aqeWspEx8f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ZXNuXJcJg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.889510
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.889510
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec +24.1626 to +35.3660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2311 to 114.2882 deg, Dec 24.1626 to 35.3660 deg
Loaded 15249 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10842 out of 11962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11962 out of 24243 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec +24.1931 to +35.3694 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2309 to 114.2881 deg, Dec 24.1931 to 35.3694 deg
Loaded 15192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10819 out of 11947 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11947 out of 24037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cglNg95U9Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2293, passed=24243
Got 24243 stars (including 21925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vQ30q4BbUT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2282, passed=24037
Got 24037 stars (including 21723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aqeWspEx8f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=607, passed=8892
Got 8892 stars (including 8275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8ZXNuXJcJg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=626, passed=8836
Got 8836 stars (including 8201 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8836 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31434_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31434_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31463_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31463_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.64 +25:21:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31626_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:51.95 +31:52:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31631_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 31631_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.61 +30:33:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 08118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.68 +27:36:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 19966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.23 +33:22:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 13804_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.05 +30:16:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 08375_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.51 +27:29:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 08801_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:41:53.23 +27:57:20.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0909 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:00:00.353 +29:59:44.05
Second-epoch image center 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0883 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:00:25.313 +30:00:28.99
Second-epoch second image center 07:00:24.498 +30:00:35.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00342 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e0VPKy7ybi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0iAeHXykME
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits &> /tmp/tmp.70kY4WDfFw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YvwRa7UauR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits and wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.744234
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.744234
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167542 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec +24.1448 to +35.3665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.1866 to 114.3050 deg, Dec 24.1448 to 35.3665 deg
Loaded 15341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8753 out of 12230 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12230 out of 167542 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 166985 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec +24.1637 to +35.3763 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 95.2108 to 114.3113 deg, Dec 24.1637 to 35.3763 deg
Loaded 15283 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8658 out of 12221 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12221 out of 166985 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 139 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.e0VPKy7ybi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=53, blended=20873, passed=167489
Got 167489 stars (including 146338 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0iAeHXykME (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20907, passed=166934
Got 166934 stars (including 145740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 166934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits -region wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.70kY4WDfFw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3487, passed=70704
Got 70704 stars (including 67119 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70704 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YvwRa7UauR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=3356, passed=70188
Got 70188 stars (including 66729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70188 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69029 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-09-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0002.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-25_CI_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_001141_TTUQ1b1x1_1587509_875GVK6V/wcs_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192071.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out192099.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193606.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193654.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193736.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193781.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193989.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194122.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194546.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194597.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194734.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194807.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out194833.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195326.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out195396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194951.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56983.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192055_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192055_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:32.18 +28:07:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192071_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:04.25 +33:32:19.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.637 939082955615742720 104.01760745421 +33.53867778243 13.5525 13.0404 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.637#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192076_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:06.79 +32:40:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192078_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:57.13 +29:27:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192084_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192084_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:17.42 +34:18:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192085_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:23.22 +29:51:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192090_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192090_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:17.20 +26:54:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192096_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:30.36 +29:44:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192098_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:33.48 +25:30:28.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192099_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192099_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:17.73 +26:58:55.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.516 3385734607911514880 100.82282224435 +26.98136173823 13.4143 12.7506 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.516#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192101_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192101_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.51 +26:48:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192102_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:04.40 +26:33:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192184_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192184_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:04.66 +25:21:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192195_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192195_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.61 +24:47:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192463_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192463_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:43.89 +34:13:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192577_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192577_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192622_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192622_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.92 +29:19:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192635_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:54.54 +27:49:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192668_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:29.43 +30:24:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192731_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:43.93 +29:29:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192744_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192744_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192870_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192870_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 192970_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193044_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193044_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:07.55 +25:15:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193092_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193108_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193108_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193133_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193133_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:00.48 +29:47:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193148_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:17.70 +27:48:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193157_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193157_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:10.98 +29:45:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193166_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193166_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:16.87 +28:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193224_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193224_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:39.20 +27:38:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193242_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193242_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.52 +32:29:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193243_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193243_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:34.05 +28:18:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193305_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:01.85 +31:53:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193349_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193349_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193418_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193418_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.35 +26:03:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193435_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193435_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:52.83 +33:40:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:05.40 +28:00:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193477_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193477_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:15.61 +27:12:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:06.62 +29:16:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193507_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:25.11 +27:14:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193552_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193552_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:51.04 +32:48:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193601_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:04.58 +27:12:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193606_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193606_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:52.79 +27:05:16.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.519 872730693055231104 111.96919172902 +27.08767941590 13.2902 12.7933 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.519#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193617_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:28.53 +31:28:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193647_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193647_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:52.07 +29:43:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193654_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:00.34 +27:03:34.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.383 3384448802074738816 098.50175949943 +27.06073417305 12.7596 12.0229 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193688_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.65 +25:29:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193714_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193714_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:29.39 +32:50:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193716_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193716_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.12 +26:07:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193736_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193736_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:18.95 +26:58:21.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.097 3385734543485076992 100.82879883771 +26.97276947336 13.6093 13.2835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.097#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193756_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193756_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:05.06 +34:09:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193775_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193775_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:21.23 +30:20:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193781_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193781_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:13.34 +26:25:19.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.713 3381916416340515456 104.80553497815 +26.42283559147 13.0367 12.4934 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.713#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193784_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193784_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:49.26 +32:38:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193840_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.64 +33:53:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193850_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193874_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193874_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.09 +34:14:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.78 +25:33:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193894_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:52.33 +28:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193902_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:47.91 +25:27:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193906_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:22.68 +26:58:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193938_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:12.58 +30:33:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 193989_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:32.51 +29:39:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.947 3435247368852589824 096.88529466470 +29.65816058434 12.8141 11.9687 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.947#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194004_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:53.57 +32:48:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194012_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:46.11 +27:46:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194044_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194044_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:58.65 +34:47:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194059_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194059_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:48.68 +28:29:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194104_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 194104_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194122_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194122_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:21.36 +26:58:26.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.208 3385734543485071488 100.83937088335 +26.97408178682 13.3252 13.0779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.208#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194157_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194157_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:31.31 +29:02:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194211_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194211_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:29.61 +27:25:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194239_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194239_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194260_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:46.84 +31:55:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194270_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:22.72 +31:11:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194335_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:13.57 +28:32:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194344_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194344_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.54 +26:19:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194359_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194359_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:09.95 +33:21:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194404_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:02.74 +29:43:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194416_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194416_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:31.28 +30:38:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194418_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194418_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194437_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.14 +27:02:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194465_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194465_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.21 +26:04:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194492_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:26.79 +33:15:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194495_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194495_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:27.08 +25:34:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194505_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:51.34 +26:54:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194546_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194546_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.41 +26:58:31.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.610 3385734509125343104 100.81319136677 +26.97671215026 13.1864 12.5213 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.610#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194553_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:59.50 +33:13:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194578_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:40.62 +31:22:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194597_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194597_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:30.75 +32:10:14.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194645_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194645_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.11 +34:28:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194696_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194696_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:25.94 +31:14:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194701_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194701_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:10.50 +34:00:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194712_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194712_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:15.42 +33:42:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194715_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194715_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:08.13 +33:08:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194734_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194734_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:21.29 +27:15:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.293 3385345969203681536 102.58836227510 +27.25456456497 13.4217 12.6245 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.293#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194737_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194737_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-39-42_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0226.fits at 06:52:08.66 +30:33:44.5: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-40-27_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0227.fits at 06:52:08.66 +30:33:44.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194752_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194767_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194767_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.01 +32:38:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194778_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194778_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:26.77 +27:59:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194797_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.59 +29:44:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194800_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:46.44 +26:19:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194807_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194807_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.81 +32:46:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.511 937545941439524224 102.68654510616 +32.76778638862 14.0222 13.3033 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.511#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194833_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194833_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:38.09 +31:13:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.123 889596479870088192 106.90872293522 +31.21831185745 13.8791 13.1934 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.123#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194853_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:44.42 +32:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194855_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:41.00 +32:38:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194864_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 194864_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194884_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:20.94 +30:56:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 194937_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
Preparing report for the candidate 194951_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 194966_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195041_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195041_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:40.29 +33:10:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195147_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195147_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:34.69 +32:22:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195156_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.56 +29:56:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195251_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:10.94 +27:17:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195253_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195253_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:56.64 +29:27:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195264_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195264_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195268_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:44.19 +33:01:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195302_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195302_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195326_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195326_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.07 +30:58:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.723 886750565820763648 109.36656322424 +30.97952310626 14.1499 13.4968 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.723#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195339_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195339_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195340_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195340_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:36.38 +31:38:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195353_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195353_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:44.08 +31:28:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195367_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195367_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195392_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195392_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:01.85 +28:46:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 195396_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:17.96 +31:46:16.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.474 889343970154076288 103.82468708156 +31.77112323962 14.6841 14.2102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.474#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 108118_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:42.60 +30:33:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 61074_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.23 +27:57:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 48598_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:20.65 +27:15:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 36451_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:47.92 +26:59:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 96257_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:07.06 +30:16:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 55671_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:40.69 +27:36:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 56485_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:29.51 +27:29:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 146225_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:17.45 +31:35:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003
The candidate 127611_fd_Gem-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-25_00-10-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0003 did not pass the final checks
