This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2905 2461153.7905 11.72 17:04:45.70 -09:48:28.9
11.07124 18.41787 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 1 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits at 17:04:45.70 -09:48:28.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 17:04:45.70 -09:48:28.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7905,11.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2905 11.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2905 2461153.7905 13.15 16:50:47.10 -06:53:19.8
11.65793 22.90893 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho -0 0 0 13.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits at 16:50:47.10 -06:53:19.8: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 16:50:47.10 -06:53:19.8: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7905,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2905 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2905 2461153.7905 12.82 17:25:19.90 -10:52:58.7
12.94044 13.56810 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 1 1 12.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits at 17:25:19.90 -10:52:58.7: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 17:25:19.90 -10:52:58.7: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2905* 17 25 19.90 -10 52 58.7 12.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7905,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2905 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2905 2461153.7905 14.03 16:54:17.89 -07:16:36.7
11.82405 21.96730 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 2 1 2 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits at 16:54:17.89 -07:16:36.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 16:54:17.89 -07:16:36.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7905,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2905 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461153.79073796 23.04.2026 06:58:29.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4216
Objects passed selection criteria: 4206
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3647.5
Average stars matched: 3587.75 (98.3619 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 02:01:35 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
First image: 2461099.01326235 27.02.2026 12:18:55.867 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Last image: 2461153.79073796 23.04.2026 06:58:29.760 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 136
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44791
Objects passed selection criteria: 44727
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40311.8
Average stars matched: 38951.2 (96.6251 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 150416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 02:04:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461153.79017242
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zzye2OV6Ue
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z2g01tRtX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vBpFGkzWTS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8VlHe8UMCd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.964209
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.964209
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6291 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0335 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2758 to -4.6406 deg
Loaded 4109 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3268 out of 3414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3414 out of 6291 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0337 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2756 to -4.6400 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0337 to 265.1596 deg, Dec -15.2756 to -4.6400 deg
Loaded 4110 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3279 out of 3411 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3411 out of 6127 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.8 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zzye2OV6Ue (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=458, passed=6287
Got 6287 stars (including 5821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6287 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z2g01tRtX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, passed=6127
Got 6127 stars (including 5735 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6127 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vBpFGkzWTS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=186, passed=3242
Got 3242 stars (including 3054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8VlHe8UMCd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=233, passed=3830
Got 3830 stars (including 3593 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3830 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3772 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20189_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 20189_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.98 -12:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 20194_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.81 -10:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20213_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 20213_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.47 -11:47:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 20223_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.67 -10:50:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 03859_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.10 -09:32:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0166 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:33.337 -10:00:14.71
Second-epoch image center 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0179 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:29.474 -09:59:56.64
Second-epoch second image center 17:08:29.278 -10:00:38.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nqUtnRtqCe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cwjhLprukW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.evreVDiIMB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h1e5dbq4KB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739902
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739902
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 64679 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 248.9951 to 265.1706 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.6303 deg
Loaded 4125 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3192 out of 3626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3626 out of 64679 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 61408 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0120 to 265.1782 deg, Dec -15.2756 to -4.6229 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0120 to 265.1782 deg, Dec -15.2756 to -4.6229 deg
Loaded 4124 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3219 out of 3635 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3635 out of 61408 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
14.9 mag. Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nqUtnRtqCe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3753, passed=64663
Got 64663 stars (including 60806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 64663 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-18-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0317.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cwjhLprukW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3159, passed=61397
Got 61397 stars (including 58163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61397 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-19-53_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.evreVDiIMB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1283, passed=34813
Got 34813 stars (including 33487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34813 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h1e5dbq4KB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1553, passed=40249
Got 40249 stars (including 38649 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40249 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-57-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_015925_TTUQ2b1x1_691251_KCbLYjpz/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78578.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78585.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78593.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78930.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79024.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79113.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79131.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79134.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79177.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79188.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79190.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79192.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79201.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79216.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79255.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79256.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79263.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79271.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79273.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out79306.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78958.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:24.48 -10:35:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.713 4335146925510032896 256.10180293366 -10.58437434499 14.1983 13.4847 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.713#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78585_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:03.06 -08:12:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.923 4339646779925796736 253.01288650216 -08.20813445863 14.3455 13.6401 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.923#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78590_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78590_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:57.10 -06:33:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78591_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78591_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:54.72 -07:09:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78593_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:28.56 -08:17:14.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78597_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78597_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:44.47 -05:55:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78602_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78602_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:28.64 -06:41:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78617_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78617_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:24.90 -10:36:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78623_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78623_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.66 -07:56:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78629_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78629_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:51.01 -12:50:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78664_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 78664_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78668_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78668_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:25.67 -10:50:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78683_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78683_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:46.80 -12:43:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78748_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.20 -14:03:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78755_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.31 -10:10:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78757_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 78757_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78760_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78760_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.08 -11:20:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78775_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78775_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:03.68 -07:33:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78778_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78778_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:41.88 -08:56:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78792_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78792_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:28.14 -13:23:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78794_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 78794_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78803_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78803_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:03.23 -07:07:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78805_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78805_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.16 -08:49:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78824_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78824_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:00.66 -07:07:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78832_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78832_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:33.07 -09:06:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78834_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:12.13 -07:32:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78835_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78835_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.58 -11:48:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78860_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78860_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.49 -08:12:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78869_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78869_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:29.56 -12:43:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78884_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78884_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:31.12 -10:52:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78900_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78900_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:28.92 -09:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78903_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78903_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:13.58 -05:54:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78907_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78907_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:09.36 -09:32:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78925_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78925_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:56.67 -07:46:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78930_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78930_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:05.74 -12:16:24.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.703 4333897055667997952 251.02463052228 -12.27463240094 13.9976 13.2418 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.703#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78949_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:04.76 -08:16:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
Preparing report for the candidate 78958_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78963_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78963_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:14.48 -06:30:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78979_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78979_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:53.93 -13:31:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78980_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:35.65 -08:44:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78981_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:11.79 -14:07:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78995_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 78995_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:30.21 -09:15:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79021_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79021_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:59.39 -09:33:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79022_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79022_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:09.94 -06:42:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79024_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79024_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:39.29 -06:41:59.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.361 4340060058860280704 255.16386881235 -06.70006503393 14.2881 13.4949 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.361#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79025_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79025_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:21.89 -14:10:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79036_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79036_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:02.38 -06:21:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79054_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79054_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:30.22 -06:14:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79055_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79055_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:42.63 -09:35:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79063_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:21.86 -11:38:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79072_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79072_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:29.50 -06:39:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79075_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79075_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:22.96 -05:47:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79082_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79082_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:12.85 -09:00:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79091_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79091_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:32.83 -09:10:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79093_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79093_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:31.99 -07:26:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79094_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79094_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:07.29 -06:57:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79109_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79109_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:09.38 -10:20:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79113_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79113_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:30.73 -11:25:22.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.268 4334207942581576832 253.37864619558 -11.42281346897 14.5045 13.7798 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.268#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79120_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:23.70 -06:32:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79131_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79131_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:51.32 -07:29:58.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.622 4340507457011826560 252.21393065026 -07.49969876000 14.3669 13.6514 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.622#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79134_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79134_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:48.27 -08:36:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.870 4339526967517848448 252.45095459876 -08.61478446707 14.4359 13.7779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.870#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79146_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:15.16 -07:36:21.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.301 4340446331037064320 251.31353048783 -07.60586416847 14.1956 13.4473 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.301#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:43.77 -14:10:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79165_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79165_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:24.87 -09:19:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79171_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79171_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:22.45 -07:18:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:30.29 -08:14:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79177_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79177_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:53.79 -07:50:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.069 4339720653363732096 252.97437165284 -07.83910358341 14.2631 13.5381 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.069#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79186_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79186_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:29.27 -05:59:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79188_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79188_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:50.31 -08:01:45.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.319 4336665110551151360 256.70963782171 -08.02947667988 14.5649 13.6929 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.319#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79190_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:00.35 -07:16:06.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.894 4360945965127457536 256.75123447801 -07.26847247768 14.2751 13.4543 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.894#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79192_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79192_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:39.79 -10:42:42.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.096 4334574938944945920 253.16666631257 -10.71189419119 14.1760 13.2336 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.096#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79201_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79201_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:12.44 -12:03:46.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.001 4333786829628137600 252.55161486524 -12.06320577050 14.1559 13.2414 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79209_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79209_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:01.35 -11:54:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79211_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:09.40 -09:01:05.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.890 4339264970216422528 253.78963603389 -09.01846855388 14.5279 14.1762 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.890#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79216_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:17.91 -09:04:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.615 4336117588118796672 255.32485645281 -09.07324700039 14.2744 13.3292 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.615#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79228_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79228_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:50.64 -11:46:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79231_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:43.76 -07:29:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79241_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79241_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79255_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:03.96 -07:30:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.087 4360773552256498304 257.76638566056 -07.50152980577 14.2981 13.3619 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.087#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79256_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79256_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:18.62 -07:27:40.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.055 4339946156327163776 255.07773518827 -07.46136240157 14.2572 13.3611 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.055#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79263_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79263_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:42.08 -06:12:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.543 4364156027980592128 256.67540209850 -06.20993788218 14.3029 13.3749 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.543#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79268_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79268_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:15.37 -08:24:14.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.401 4336593092539345536 257.06413438506 -08.40396474214 14.2322 13.2221 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79271_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79271_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:54.83 -07:01:57.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79273_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79273_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:14.73 -10:33:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.780 4335155446725250304 255.81158332463 -10.55951236186 14.5145 13.5980 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79288_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79288_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:35.49 -08:41:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79295_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79295_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:48.74 -08:23:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79306_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 79306_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:50.92 -08:21:35.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.864 4336630097977723648 256.46192409722 -08.35981320300 14.2307 13.2845 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.864#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 36413_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:13.96 -10:18:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 34174_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:44.37 -10:40:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 32237_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:30.59 -10:59:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 31248_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:08.07 -11:05:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 22747_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:56.98 -12:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 35099_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:10.81 -10:28:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 34578_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:46.53 -10:37:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 25148_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:31.50 -11:47:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 40753_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:00.54 -09:33:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 40045_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:52.09 -09:32:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139
The candidate 50662_fd_Oph-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-23_01-58-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0139 did not pass the final checks