This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 9.80 11:39:03.67 +01:55:16.8
265.35128 59.40518 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia -1 0 1 10.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 11:39:03.67 +01:55:16.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 11:39:03.67 +01:55:16.8: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 11 39 03.67 +01 55 16.8 9.8 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,9.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 9.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 12.55 11:09:51.99 +01:41:21.8
254.90002 54.79541 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.120 Lachesis -1 0 1 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 11:09:51.99 +01:41:21.8: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 11:09:51.99 +01:41:21.8: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 11 09 51.99 +01 41 21.8 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 13.84 11:01:06.76 -01:18:41.6
255.45020 51.09619 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 1.9 pix This object is listed in comets.txt 4.3" 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.4.3" 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 11:01:06.76 -01:18:41.6: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 11:01:06.76 -01:18:41.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 11 01 06.76 -01 18 41.6 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 13.98 10:39:03.28 +00:02:17.4
247.86636 48.23635 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.420 Bertholda -2 1 2 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 10:39:03.28 +00:02:17.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 10:39:03.28 +00:02:17.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 10 39 03.28 +00 02 17.4 14.0 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 14.31 10:40:49.19 -04:18:40.0
252.82257 45.47288 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.709 Fringilla -2 2 3 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 10:40:49.19 -04:18:40.0: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 10:40:49.19 -04:18:40.0: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 10 40 49.19 -04 18 40.0 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 14.45 11:24:01.72 +01:57:30.8
259.47215 57.26076 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.327 Columbia -0 2 2 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 11:24:01.72 +01:57:30.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 11:24:01.72 +01:57:30.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 11 24 01.72 +01 57 30.8 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2585 2461153.7585 14.49 11:24:17.09 -06:09:03.4
267.37718 50.60541 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1086 Nata -1 1 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits at 11:24:17.09 -06:09:03.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits at 11:24:17.09 -06:09:03.4: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.2585* 11 24 17.09 -06 09 03.4 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7585,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2585 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461153.75878994 23.04.2026 06:12:29.451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6309
Objects passed selection criteria: 6298
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5618
Average stars matched: 5470.5 (97.3745 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 01:14:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461153.75878994 23.04.2026 06:12:29.451 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33568
Objects passed selection criteria: 33501
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31418.5
Average stars matched: 30520.2 (97.141 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 134728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 01:16:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461153.75813912
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0304 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00340 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.20FqNap50s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZYiOQ8wiTn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iw5nVcl16U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GvHcCszq2Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to +3.3133 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to 3.3133 deg
Loaded 3835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3372 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3372 out of 6399 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879752
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879752
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to +3.3133 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to 3.3133 deg
Loaded 3835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3372 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3372 out of 6399 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6519 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2389 to 175.0841 deg, Dec -7.2953 to +3.3128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2389 to 175.0841 deg, Dec -7.2953 to 3.3128 deg
Loaded 3847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3255 out of 3370 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3370 out of 6519 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.20FqNap50s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, passed=6399
Got 6399 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZYiOQ8wiTn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=6519
Got 6519 stars (including 6107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iw5nVcl16U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=358, passed=4798
Got 4798 stars (including 4436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GvHcCszq2Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=4906
Got 4906 stars (including 4546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4906 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20393_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 20393_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:39:03.67 +01:55:16.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0304 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0336 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:33.863 -02:01:42.55
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:34.104 -02:01:54.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00340 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VsJFiMKeDr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kn0SvstKNl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tvo0w7mugH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5ism7N93xk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to +3.3144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to 3.3144 deg
Loaded 3852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 34371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774901
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774901
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to +3.3144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to 3.3144 deg
Loaded 3852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 34371 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 33119 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2387 to 175.0916 deg, Dec -7.3036 to +3.3137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2387 to 175.0916 deg, Dec -7.3036 to 3.3137 deg
Loaded 3850 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3091 out of 3396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3396 out of 33119 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VsJFiMKeDr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1404, passed=34365
Got 34365 stars (including 32904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kn0SvstKNl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1420, passed=33111
Got 33111 stars (including 31640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tvo0w7mugH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1036, passed=29356
Got 29356 stars (including 28261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5ism7N93xk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1058, passed=29797
Got 29797 stars (including 28674 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.8 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29570 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-11-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_011322_TTUQ1b1x1_2328755_vPnun4ea/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51718.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51725.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52627.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52775.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52846.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52881.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52016.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52435.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52628.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51718_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51718_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:04.14 +01:17:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.467 3805347522542270336 165.01738446863 +01.28922647865 14.8571 14.3258 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.467#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51721_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51721_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:30.14 +02:10:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:04.76 +01:12:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51725_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51725_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:08.75 -03:31:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.595 3792267422980803456 174.53631758723 -03.51666283326 13.5121 12.8831 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.595#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:43.04 +02:17:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.89 +02:04:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51728_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51728_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:19.07 -03:15:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:03.67 +01:55:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51780_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51780_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51868_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51868_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51897_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51897_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51903_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51903_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51904_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51904_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:44.96 +01:57:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51910_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51910_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51926_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51926_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51950_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:17.23 +02:07:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51959_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51959_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51990_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 51990_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52016_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52016_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52030_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52030_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:27.83 +02:36:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52032_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52032_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52063_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52063_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52107_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52107_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52145_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52146_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.37 -02:53:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52166_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:24.03 -01:03:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52225_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52225_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:33.44 +00:11:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52309_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:57.95 -05:23:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52331_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52331_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:14:03.15 +02:50:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52357_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52357_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.74 -00:49:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52362_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52362_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:41.28 -03:54:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52366_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52390_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:16.99 +02:47:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52446_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52446_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:36.78 -02:35:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52456_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52456_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52462_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52462_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:36.10 -00:13:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52514_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52514_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:10.33 -00:48:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52516_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52516_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:16.15 -05:38:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52533_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:07.38 +00:24:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52537_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:07.79 -05:55:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52552_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52552_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52576_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52576_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:50.77 +01:39:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52581_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52581_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:47.25 -04:50:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52617_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:41.23 -06:01:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52627_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:48.58 -04:45:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.752 3786636102380358656 170.20289722716 -04.75871917753 14.3163 13.6499 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.752#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52628_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52628_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52640_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:37.43 -05:07:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52665_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52665_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:20.66 -02:03:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52700_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:49.03 +02:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52722_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52756_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:07.53 -06:40:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 52758_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52775_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:13:36.19 -03:54:59.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.702 3789884506405726720 168.40121750424 -03.91684600863 14.4582 13.7430 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.702#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52785_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:42.93 +02:30:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52788_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.66 -06:48:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52791_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:05.45 -05:41:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52802_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:01.40 +01:39:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52811_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:22.93 +03:14:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52812_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52846_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:12.84 +02:19:04.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.795 3810783370591203584 170.80370705469 +02.31775578731 14.9380 14.4071 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.795#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52848_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:13.44 -04:48:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52861_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:12.93 +01:36:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52881_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:20.48 +01:18:18.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52883_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:23.73 +02:20:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52892_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:06.35 +01:32:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 52897_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_01-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks