This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2208 2461153.7208 13.71 07:29:23.30 +34:12:37.3
184.68465 22.19050 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.751 Faina -1 -0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 07:29:23.30 +34:12:37.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 07:29:23.30 +34:12:37.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7208,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2208 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.2208 2461153.7208 14.12 07:52:51.60 +32:35:54.9
187.99388 26.37280 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.186 Celuta -2 0 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits at 07:52:51.60 +32:35:54.9: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 07:52:51.60 +32:35:54.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.7208,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.2208 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461153.7208,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260423.2208 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461153.72110726 23.04.2026 05:18:13.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13830
Objects passed selection criteria: 13765
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9822.25
Average stars matched: 9558.5 (97.3148 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 00:22:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461153.72110726 23.04.2026 05:18:13.667 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 35
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 86317
Objects passed selection criteria: 86064
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 63579.5
Average stars matched: 61220.5 (96.2897 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1928620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Apr 23 00:24:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461153.72039626
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0278 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0226 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tSJKypPv9m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hepiTHtkp8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.acf1OzSLxd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kiLIUdMkOt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1952 to 129.2997 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1952 to 129.2997 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9867 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7201 out of 7787 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7787 out of 14315 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tSJKypPv9m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hepiTHtkp8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.acf1OzSLxd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, passed=5508
Got 5508 stars (including 5001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5508 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5397 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kiLIUdMkOt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, passed=5302
Got 5302 stars (including 4792 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.94 +33:22:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.02 +29:09:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0278 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0226 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.718 +30:01:31.46
Second-epoch second image center 07:59:56.831 +30:01:06.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00767 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.k5WcUAJBna
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UIUVqXbPSA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CzqqNCmqZF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cICkYBURaM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 92169 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1951 to 129.3147 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3666 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1951 to 129.3147 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3666 deg
Loaded 9884 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6480 out of 7925 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7925 out of 92169 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 35 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
27.2 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
15.7 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.7 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.k5WcUAJBna (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UIUVqXbPSA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CzqqNCmqZF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1483, passed=35697
Got 35697 stars (including 34140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cICkYBURaM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1479, passed=35741
Got 35741 stars (including 34208 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-17-12_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0053.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-23_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_001907_TTUQ1b1x1_792006_uGTQ8McU/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109965.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109979.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110048.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110398.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110460.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110528.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110570.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110673.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110701.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out110704.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111099.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109311_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:16.42 +31:50:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109314_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109314_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:52.06 +31:52:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109756_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.67 +25:46:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109873_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:37.11 +26:45:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109965_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109965_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:08.73 +29:50:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.316 877398669670435200 119.03633676861 +29.84889107248 12.5522 11.8674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.316#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109979_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 109979_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:37.21 +32:27:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.920 881882237570643328 115.90533350343 +32.45848504529 12.6200 12.0236 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.920#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110031_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110031_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:25.44 +26:44:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110048_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110048_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:12.68 +29:49:10.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.480 877398291713314176 119.05298636145 +29.81956836877 12.5731 11.8604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.480#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110133_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.91 +31:51:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110171_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110171_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.67 +34:00:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110194_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110194_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:13.24 +28:51:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110284_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.33 +25:02:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110305_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110305_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:30.03 +35:02:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:59.51 +27:14:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110398_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110398_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:20:02.30 +28:27:17.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.862 683418258452258432 125.00945107122 +28.45495931868 13.2535 12.6016 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.862#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110417_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:32.55 +32:29:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110450_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110450_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:32.62 +33:27:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.973 882056338364535680 116.88695014394 +33.45036671659 13.8024 13.3452 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.973#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110460_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:13.93 +31:55:37.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.003 881609867924215808 116.80869565344 +31.92714981401 13.1247 12.1392 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110528_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:03.84 +31:35:40.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.317 880803479224330880 117.76616607720 +31.59384439290 13.4612 13.0160 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.317#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110532_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110532_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:53.99 +26:56:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110541_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:56.11 +35:13:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110570_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110570_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:49.32 +29:44:15.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.719 875942057281657984 118.20562798936 +29.73736190250 13.7503 13.1374 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.719#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110597_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110597_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:20.19 +32:28:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110673_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110673_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:17.18 +30:49:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.375 877784357733357440 121.57156297533 +30.83059168839 13.7327 13.1893 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.375#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110684_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110684_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.75 +27:56:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110701_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110701_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:47.88 +27:46:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.408 875978616043711104 120.94959122443 +27.77278170042 13.7520 13.2773 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.408#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110704_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110704_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:50.57 +30:10:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.705 880457579739160576 118.21059061633 +30.17732366687 13.8545 13.3922 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110863_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 110863_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:00.64 +34:54:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110864_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 110864_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 111076_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:10.53 +32:11:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111099_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 111099_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
Preparing report for the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.96 +33:22:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_00-18-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0054 did not pass the final checks