This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.1759 2461153.6759 13.19 06:04:41.17 +30:11:33.6
181.00377 4.21404 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.94 Aurora 3 -1 3 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 06:04:41.17 +30:11:33.6: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits at 06:04:41.17 +30:11:33.6: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.6759,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.1759 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.1759 2461153.6759 13.37 06:08:16.94 +28:43:20.5
182.67375 4.18809 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.87 Sylvia 4 -3 5 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 06:08:16.94 +28:43:20.5: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits at 06:08:16.94 +28:43:20.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.6759,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.1759 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FQ Aur,2461153.6759,10.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FQ Aur 20260423.1759 10.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054320.10+315807.0,2461153.6759,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054320.10+315807.0 20260423.1759 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.1759* 06 00 19.25 +28 15 35.0 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 7073748,2461153.6759,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 7073748 20260423.1759 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.1759* 05 57 04.83 +25 44 52.8 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 7068270,2461153.6759,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 7068270 20260423.1759 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 16685,2461153.6759,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 16685 20260423.1759 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 23.1759 2461153.6759 12.37 05:44:45.40 +26:28:40.8
181.99773 -1.44534 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.196 Philomela 2 0 2 12.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits at 05:44:45.40 +26:28:40.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits at 05:44:45.40 +26:28:40.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.1759* 05 44 45.40 +26 28 40.8 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461153.6759,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260423.1759 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
LS Gem,2461153.6759,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
LS Gem 20260423.1759 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.1759* 05 40 49.34 +27 36 19.3 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J054049.14+273616.5,2461153.6759,12.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J054049.14+273616.5 20260423.1759 12.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054706.00+325125.4,2461153.6759,11.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054706.00+325125.4 20260423.1759 11.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J054746.96+284350.8,2461153.6759,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J054746.96+284350.8 20260423.1759 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0608398+320155,2461153.6759,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0608398+320155 20260423.1759 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0545015+304537,2461153.6759,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0545015+304537 20260423.1759 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 23.1759* 05 49 36.43 +25 59 54.9 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 6946067,2461153.6759,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 6946067 20260423.1759 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63556053 11.02.2026 03:15:02.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
First image: 2461082.63556053 11.02.2026 03:15:02.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Last image: 2461153.67616083 23.04.2026 04:13:30.296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22539
Objects passed selection criteria: 22418
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14728.5
Average stars matched: 13848.5 (94.0252 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 22 23:19:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.63556053 11.02.2026 03:15:02.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
First image: 2461082.63556053 11.02.2026 03:15:02.430 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Last image: 2461153.67616083 23.04.2026 04:13:30.296 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 165690
Objects passed selection criteria: 165168
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 111891
Average stars matched: 104451 (93.3507 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2386368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 22 23:24:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461153.67563774
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00720 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KKM7yYB8HP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rwXpr5HqUW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F06ewpzMQN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jAhOpiXX62
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2218 to 99.2622 deg, Dec +24.1609 to +35.3633 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2218 to 99.2622 deg, Dec 24.1609 to 35.3633 deg
Loaded 17436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12006 out of 13644 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13644 out of 29277 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924946
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924946
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2218 to 99.2622 deg, Dec +24.1609 to +35.3633 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2218 to 99.2622 deg, Dec 24.1609 to 35.3633 deg
Loaded 17436 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12006 out of 13644 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13644 out of 29277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 29211 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2217 to 99.2681 deg, Dec +24.2127 to +35.3729 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2217 to 99.2681 deg, Dec 24.2127 to 35.3729 deg
Loaded 17348 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12129 out of 13781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 13781 out of 29211 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.2 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KKM7yYB8HP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3369, passed=29277
Got 29277 stars (including 25874 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rwXpr5HqUW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3384, passed=29211
Got 29211 stars (including 25799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29211 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28609 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28607 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.F06ewpzMQN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, passed=8513
Got 8513 stars (including 8074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8232 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1017)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jAhOpiXX62 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, passed=8935
Got 8935 stars (including 8432 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8635 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8637 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32315_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 32315_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.62 +30:13:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32403_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 32403_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:21.27 +32:33:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30633_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 30633_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.02 +28:29:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10162_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 10162_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.77 +28:06:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11201_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 11201_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.07 +28:36:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51
Second-epoch image center 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0034 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:00:00.252 +29:59:49.51
Second-epoch image center 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0077 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:59:59.566 +29:59:57.70
Second-epoch second image center 06:00:01.029 +30:00:15.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00720 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BFYz2u3Cre
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wOFFc6KKGC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x6I3wbU5Nt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uXndTAQq31
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits and wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 211246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2053 to 99.3059 deg, Dec +24.1602 to +35.3669 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2053 to 99.3059 deg, Dec 24.1602 to 35.3669 deg
Loaded 17492 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8826 out of 14083 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14083 out of 211246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758897
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758897
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 211246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2053 to 99.3059 deg, Dec +24.1602 to +35.3669 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2053 to 99.3059 deg, Dec 24.1602 to 35.3669 deg
Loaded 17492 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8826 out of 14083 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14083 out of 211246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 211510 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.2051 to 99.3100 deg, Dec +24.1604 to +35.3774 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.2051 to 99.3100 deg, Dec 24.1604 to 35.3774 deg
Loaded 17510 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8920 out of 14245 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14245 out of 211510 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.0 pix Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
2.5 pix fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BFYz2u3Cre (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=72, blended=34580, passed=211174
Got 211174 stars (including 176288 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 211174 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-02_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0058.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wOFFc6KKGC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=76, blended=34947, passed=211434
Got 211434 stars (including 176194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 211434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 931 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 931 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits -region wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_21-15-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0059.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x6I3wbU5Nt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3849, passed=59303
Got 59303 stars (including 55389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uXndTAQq31 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4234, passed=62812
Got 62812 stars (including 58525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61147 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-12-45_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0003.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_231411_TTUQ2b1x1_2048865_Jh7OiEgJ/wcs_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out237006.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out237009.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out237019.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out61129.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out124692.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194358.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20458.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out225200.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out248470.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out248674.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out26945.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51027.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out61406.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out69514.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98810.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237006_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237006_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:21.21 +31:18:08.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237009_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237009_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:20.65 +28:24:14.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237013_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237013_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:13.09 +28:53:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237017_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237017_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:59.94 +29:56:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237019_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237019_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.70 +27:49:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.364 3436288095266210304 093.04395229138 +27.82226293807 12.8882 12.2419 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.364#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237020_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237020_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:08.65 +28:19:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237023_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 237023_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.37 +32:30:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238306_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 238306_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:21.41 +32:33:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238954_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 238954_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:18.04 +32:31:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239639_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 239639_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:15.84 +32:31:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 239877_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 239877_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:08.47 +32:32:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240035_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 240035_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:52.64 +27:35:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240083_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 240083_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:28.61 +27:48:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240460_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 240460_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.90 +25:55:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 240726_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 240726_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:16.42 +32:35:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 241724_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 241724_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:03.73 +26:04:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 242250_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:59.74 +26:00:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 242321_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:55.73 +27:25:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242503_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 242503_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:15.74 +31:22:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242568_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 242568_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:57.15 +26:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 242807_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 242807_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:58.57 +27:00:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243181_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:31.91 +27:49:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243197_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243197_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:10.44 +32:41:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243292_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:18.82 +29:32:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243503_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243503_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:52.14 +28:25:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243545_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243545_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243596_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243596_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:12.02 +29:29:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243702_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 243702_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:43.65 +27:49:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244009_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244009_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.61 +27:35:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244010_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244010_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:38.65 +32:31:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244332_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244332_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:39.06 +31:52:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244572_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244572_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:20.88 +32:38:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244821_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244821_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:03.05 +26:28:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244922_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244922_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:12.60 +28:17:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244963_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 244963_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:04.22 +30:32:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245014_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245014_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.41 +25:47:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245112_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245112_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:25.98 +27:28:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245173_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245173_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:27.83 +32:46:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245189_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245189_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:15.97 +32:18:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245229_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.87 +25:58:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245412_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245412_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:24.55 +28:37:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245509_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245509_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.91 +30:53:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245562_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245562_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:11.68 +30:58:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245618_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245618_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:11.44 +27:55:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245787_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245787_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:15.71 +26:58:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.25 +33:06:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245969_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 245969_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:29.01 +32:36:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 246313_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.39 +31:10:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246317_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 246317_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:15.29 +32:06:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246399_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 246399_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:02.75 +28:11:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246415_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 246415_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:45.26 +27:50:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 246801_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:00.96 +29:20:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247050_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247050_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:52.79 +26:32:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247236_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247236_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:27.18 +27:52:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247479_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247479_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:34.78 +30:30:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247525_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247525_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:32.73 +30:42:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247565_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:29.57 +33:25:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247616_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:14.84 +31:57:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247838_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 247838_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:29.08 +29:37:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248041_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 248041_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.32 +27:37:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248114_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 248114_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:40.90 +28:13:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248306_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 248306_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:36.25 +32:01:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248370_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 248370_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.17 +32:38:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248470_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 248470_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248674_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 248674_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249006_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 249006_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:54.31 +29:49:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249145_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 249145_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.30 +30:31:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 249167_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:43.49 +32:59:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249204_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 249204_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:54.87 +27:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78872_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 78872_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:21.10 +28:36:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153837_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 153837_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:14.74 +32:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124155_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 124155_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149761_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 149761_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69514_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 69514_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61129_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 61129_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:15.34 +27:47:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.578 3431070809514389120 088.56288138068 +27.79644708622 10.5929 9.2088 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.578#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20458_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 20458_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74267_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 74267_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:17.02 +28:29:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98810_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 98810_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225200_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 225200_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51027_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 51027_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 61406_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194358_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 194358_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 82884_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145564_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 145564_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 223115_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 223115_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.27 +32:22:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222948_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 222948_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:12.45 +28:50:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124692_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 124692_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
Preparing report for the candidate 26945_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109062_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 109062_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.60 +30:13:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149844_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 149844_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:03.17 +32:03:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74764_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004
The candidate 74764_fd_Aur-06-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_23-13-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0004 did not pass the final checks
