This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J122528-3016.8,2461152.7331,10.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J122528-3016.8 20260422.2331 10.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J122206-3119.4,2461152.7331,10.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J122206-3119.4 20260422.2331 10.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.81345407 19.03.2026 07:31:12.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
First image: 2461118.81345407 19.03.2026 07:31:12.432 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Last image: 2461152.73342942 22.04.2026 05:35:58.302 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5125
Objects passed selection criteria: 5102
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3067
Average stars matched: 2858.75 (93.21 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111292 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Apr 22 00:39:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR running VaST on the field Cen-01-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus?)
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461152.73280714
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.4'x625.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:31:12.366 -34:04:42.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 936.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:31:14.861 -34:03:44.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:31:12.366 -34:04:42.32
Second-epoch image center 12:31:14.861 -34:03:44.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0181 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Image size: 936.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:31:17.995 -34:04:08.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:31:12.366 -34:04:42.32
Second-epoch image center 12:31:17.995 -34:04:08.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0216 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:31:14.861 -34:03:44.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:31:17.995 -34:04:08.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01269 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a4TIKgteIm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5RXPOaNMCI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WIMTQNYat2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yQWeCGSnuC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits and wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits and wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits and wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6451 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 177.8332 to 197.6704 deg, Dec -39.3637 to -28.5097 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 177.8332 to 197.6704 deg, Dec -39.3637 to -28.5097 deg
Loaded 9014 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5338 out of 5445 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5445 out of 6451 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.667014
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.667014
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6451 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 177.8332 to 197.6704 deg, Dec -39.3637 to -28.5097 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 177.8332 to 197.6704 deg, Dec -39.3637 to -28.5097 deg
Loaded 9014 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5338 out of 5445 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5445 out of 6451 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6452 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 177.7978 to 197.6462 deg, Dec -39.3641 to -28.5094 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 177.7978 to 197.6462 deg, Dec -39.3641 to -28.5094 deg
Loaded 9025 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5344 out of 5440 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5440 out of 6452 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
2.4 pix Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
7.2 pix fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
7.2 pix fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
14.3 mag. Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.a4TIKgteIm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=6451
Got 6451 stars (including 6047 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.4 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.4 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5RXPOaNMCI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits' -> 'wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=6452
Got 6452 stars (including 6059 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.4 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.4 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits -region wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WIMTQNYat2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=500, passed=1646
Got 1646 stars (including 1146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013004 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010403 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.82"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1562 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.99"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.03"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1560 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.07"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yQWeCGSnuC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=479, passed=1562
Got 1562 stars (including 1083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013003 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010402 (37.4 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.95"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.03"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.05"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/wcs_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cen-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20267.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05035.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05901.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 20267_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:17.83 -31:17:38.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.124 3472608846979862016 182.57462522156 -31.29421107550 9.1621 8.8437 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.124#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 20270_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:12:54.14 -31:18:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20683_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 20683_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:44:00.92 -30:42:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04766_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 04766_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:28:41.06 -31:51:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05901_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 05901_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05035_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
Preparing report for the candidate 05035_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03481_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 03481_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:50:41.22 -33:59:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05782_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120
The candidate 05782_fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:50:52.84 -29:50:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cen-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Last image: 2461152.73280714 22.04.2026 05:35:04.537 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Cen-01-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3586.0 4005.0 3588.0 4007.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 14 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q219_02-31-54_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0028.fits
b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3586.0 4005.0 3588.0 4007.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 14 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3322.0 3744.0 3324.0 3746.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 3586.0 4005.0 3588.0 4007.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 14 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 8.5,8.5,7.7,9.4,10.2,11.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 8.6,8.6,7.7,9.4,10.3,11.1 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-19T07:31:12.4322674
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-19T07:31:12.4322674
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-03-19T07:31:12.432
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_02-31-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 19.03.2026 07:31:12.432 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461118.81345407 mid. exp.
The reference image star 9408.764 18.470 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8269.029 14.829 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9123.670 14.372 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8066.329 14.500 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9107.117 11.046 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9109.394 11.031 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9505.610 5.276 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7954.593 7.664 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8151.507 6.471 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8393.675 4.763 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 34203, (34203 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 1
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 7
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 8393
* rejected close to frame edge: 125
* rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 101
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.04
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -8.0 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -7.3
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.5
Selected detection limit= -8.5
Final detection limit= -8.5 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.8 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 114
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
34595 * detected, using 505/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001879, number_of_ambiguous_matches=65
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001821, number_of_ambiguous_matches=63
31597 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001821, number_of_ambiguous_matches=63
31597 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001821, number_of_ambiguous_matches=63
31597 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 0.002
34595 stars detected, 31597 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 30326, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 30326 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 30326 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00249
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 28661 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.02
37201 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 125352 kB used, 137620 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-22T05:35:04.5375182
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-22T05:35:04.5375182
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-04-22T05:35:04.537
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
The star 8953.712 26.923 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8838.045 21.005 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8840.970 17.583 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8022.522 21.411 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8025.850 20.136 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7918.087 18.889 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8722.338 15.834 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8721.788 12.185 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8140.902 11.625 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8138.027 14.004 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 6657
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1441
* rejected close to frame edge: 48
* rejected as being too small (<2.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>8.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 573
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
6657 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002876, number_of_ambiguous_matches=107
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002715, number_of_ambiguous_matches=101
4063 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002661, number_of_ambiguous_matches=99
4063 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002661, number_of_ambiguous_matches=99
4063 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -178.016
6657 stars detected, 4063 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 3426, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 3426 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2932 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00008*X_pix +0.00028*Y_pix -0.89881
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 2932 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.66
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
37201 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 127172 kB used, 137620 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-22T05:35:58.3025387
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-04-22T05:35:58.3025387
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-04-22T05:35:58.302
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-22_CI_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_003637_TTUQ2b1x1_119819_XM7Tbckd/fd_Cen-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-22_00-35-58_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
The star 8959.201 20.026 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8963.987 25.088 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8958.684 24.429 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8847.511 15.169 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8031.094 16.910 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8032.803 15.178 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7924.575 14.720 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8729.068 11.852 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8729.655 7.620 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8145.461 10.041 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 6465
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 1
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1382
* rejected close to frame edge: 49
* rejected as being too small (<2.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>8.5 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 536
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
6465 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002849, number_of_ambiguous_matches=106
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002930, number_of_ambiguous_matches=109
3826 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002903, number_of_ambiguous_matches=108
3826 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002903, number_of_ambiguous_matches=108
3826 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -178.022
6465 stars detected, 3826 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 3181, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 3181 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 2627 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00009*X_pix +0.00029*Y_pix -0.91564
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 2627 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -8.65
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
37201 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
memory: 127172 kB used, 137620 kB peak, 65263856 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 68798 (68798 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7174 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 8146 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4904 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4255 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7118 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 31469 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
Variability index idx00_STD is enabled
Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled
Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled
Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled
Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled
Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled
Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled
Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled
Variability index idx21_eta is enabled
Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled
Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled
Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude
..........
..........
..........
..........
Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
########### Completed Cen-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1
###################################################################################
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1 -- a known variable star
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
2 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
12:22:06.35 -31:19:27.1
12:25:28.09 -30:16:51.4
12:10:17.83 -31:17:38.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461152.73280714 -observatory V36
00:42:04.91 +01:44:20.3 Mercury (-0.2mag)
03:39:28.69 +20:02:12.2 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:35:31.24 +02:48:07.3 Mars (1.2mag)
07:15:39.87 +22:41:06.9 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:31:55.71 +01:06:01.0 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:49:02.51 +19:51:45.5 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:11:38.37 -00:10:21.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:59.34 -22:53:01.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
06:28:44.52 +27:09:30.9 Moon (-9.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 22 00:39 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461152.73280714:
07:15:41.20 +22:41:01.4 Io (5.8mag)
07:15:28.44 +22:41:32.8 Europa (5.9mag)
07:15:58.46 +22:40:29.2 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:15:18.34 +22:41:45.1 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:18:42.56 +22:26:00.2 Himalia (15.4mag)
07:15:37.07 +22:41:12.0 Thebe (16.3mag)
07:19:01.22 +22:56:18.4 Elara (17.3mag)
07:14:58.14 +23:17:51.6 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:23:50.81 +22:39:42.1 Carme (18.6mag)
00:31:50.31 +01:05:59.2 Titan (8.8mag)
00:32:01.55 +01:06:03.7 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:31:27.74 +01:05:11.4 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:31:44.89 +01:06:16.9 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:33:27.47 +01:14:07.6 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 22 00:39 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461152.73280714:
16:03:11.64 -20:18:37.3 JWST
17:18:22.92 +43:02:03.9 Chandra
08:11:58.14 -42:38:58.1 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 22 00:39 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461152.73280714 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
05:30:37.90 +30:49:39.5 18.0mag P/2009 WX51 (Catalina)
18:54:07.68 -29:09:36.2 13.8mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:11:22.55 -69:22:41.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:33:53.80 +31:28:56.5 17.3mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:29:37.34 +11:16:25.2 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:11:44.48 +29:29:12.0 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:36:34.52 +26:12:08.1 16.1mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:05:00.72 +32:01:52.1 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:32:13.46 +00:29:05.8 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:52:01.91 +19:02:39.8 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:38:30.99 -11:25:46.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:05:03.42 -10:54:48.1 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
22:00:01.94 +63:17:16.6 17.6mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:13:09.81 -03:51:26.5 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:12:22.26 +86:47:13.8 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:21:19.17 +63:29:59.4 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:26:12.40 +20:11:48.2 11.4mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:15:03.64 +07:24:11.8 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:22:17.21 +17:00:01.3 14.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:32:03.24 -21:27:35.9 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:22:07.32 +43:47:31.1 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:13:30.49 +48:50:52.7 15.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:35:25.16 -27:13:20.8 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
01:05:44.09 +14:10:12.7 7.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:51:28.10 +03:22:30.5 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
04:10:31.91 +02:07:27.1 14.9mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:16:47.78 +38:17:37.8 14.8mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:55:02.09 -09:22:45.6 11.5mag 10P/Tempel
14:51:48.07 +02:30:09.9 14.5mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:01:19.34 -01:20:19.3 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:37:45.13 -03:38:38.8 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:58:20.98 +18:32:17.8 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:22:33.01 +35:39:02.0 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:36:52.75 -10:43:02.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:20:13.28 +23:19:05.9 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:19:27.30 +09:26:28.6 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
23:21:30.49 -07:32:53.5 14.7mag 88P/Howell
02:28:18.25 +22:15:18.8 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
05:06:50.64 +32:35:51.8 16.1mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:36:09.46 +35:29:33.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:42:55.54 +15:03:12.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:59:48.93 +15:13:44.8 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:59:23.61 +15:14:04.0 10.5mag 141P/Machholz
02:07:18.72 +07:10:53.5 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:49:59.48 +02:56:04.2 12.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:37:56.31 +08:55:02.7 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:19:51.28 +01:37:18.5 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:40:29.42 +00:30:14.5 17.8mag 210P/Christensen
21:56:08.64 -09:57:47.5 17.8mag 218P/LINEAR
17:17:23.91 -13:10:19.3 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:48:06.19 +35:07:14.8 16.8mag 240P/NEAT
07:41:48.21 -04:31:24.4 17.8mag 242P/Spahr
22:32:30.66 -19:15:23.5 17.7mag 260P/McNaught
02:11:07.81 +22:00:59.3 17.9mag 295P/LINEAR
15:39:59.49 +07:22:39.4 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:36:49.22 +21:22:23.3 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:45:07.33 +44:40:06.8 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 22 00:39 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 22 00:39 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 22 00:39 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:06:16.602 -06:52:59.29 AT 2026jpa 2026-04-13.89 19.276
06:42:32.732 -34:30:04.15 AT 2026joz 2026-04-14.77 18.707
13:06:33.339 -08:24:24.46 AT 2026joy 2026-04-14.02 19.307
21:07:11.613 -12:36:56.09 AT 2026jox 2026-04-14.14 18.849
05:34:42.408 -28:21:31.62 AT 2026jow 2026-04-14.74 18.902
12:30:54.108 -14:11:53.07 AT 2026jov 2026-04-14.03 19.309
05:52:53.155 -34:43:22.49 AT 2026jou 2026-04-14.75 19.398
05:40:18.921 -24:52:33.50 AT 2026jot 2026-04-14.77 18.65
15:53:02.304 +04:30:53.21 AT 2026jos 2026-04-14.09 19.566
11:19:37.053 +36:36:59.54 AT 2026jor 2026-04-11.94 20.14
08:17:15.784 +16:04:01.41 AT 2026joq 2026-04-11.86 19.95
15:52:58.319 -17:01:02.93 AT 2026jop 2026-04-09.53 19.69
09:28:29.338 +17:46:10.46 AT 2026joo 2026-04-11.90 19.1
14:08:31.151 +20:01:29.32 AT 2026jon 2026-04-08.02 19.9
08:15:22.510 -21:29:08.39 AT 2026jom 2026-04-12.37 19.76
12:13:11.990 +05:30:27.70 AT 2026jol 2026-04-08.25 16.6
09:57:55.902 +03:33:01.27 AT 2026jok 2026-03-06.10 21.72
15:47:58.800 -16:07:43.45 AT 2026joj 2026-04-10.44 20.1583
09:57:44.859 +01:08:42.73 AT 2026joi 2026-04-06.02 22.85
14:40:55.647 +05:24:36.73 SN 2026joh 2026-04-14.03 17.708
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 22 00:39 tns_transients_list.txt
