This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.21 07:15:38.23 +22:41:10.0
194.88664 15.21290 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 1.5 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 37.6" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.6.8" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:38.23 +22:41:10.0: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:38.23 +22:41:10.0: 14.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.24 07:15:56.06 +22:40:33.4
194.92461 15.27172 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 1.5 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 2.9" Ganymede (5.4mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.256.3" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:56.06 +22:40:33.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:56.06 +22:40:33.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.33 07:15:26.32 +22:41:36.3
194.86079 15.17382 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.6 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 4.2" Europa (5.9mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.160.1" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:26.32 +22:41:36.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:26.32 +22:41:36.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.54 07:15:17.12 +22:41:46.6
194.84346 15.14253 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.6 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 123.5" Europa (5.9mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287.6" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:17.12 +22:41:46.6: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:17.12 +22:41:46.6: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.73 07:15:56.04 +22:40:33.4
194.92458 15.27165 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 1.5 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 2.6" Ganymede (5.4mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.256.0" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:56.04 +22:40:33.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:56.04 +22:40:33.4: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.79 07:15:38.21 +22:41:09.7
194.88669 15.21279 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.4 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 37.8" Io (5.8mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.6.6" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:38.21 +22:41:09.7: 15.57 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:38.21 +22:41:09.7: 15.47 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.79 07:15:26.25 +22:41:36.4
194.86065 15.17358 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 1.6 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 3.2" Europa (5.9mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.161.0" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:26.25 +22:41:36.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:26.25 +22:41:36.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 7.80 07:15:17.07 +22:41:46.7
194.84335 15.14236 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.6 pix This object is listed in moons.txt 124.2" Europa (5.9mag)
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.288.3" Jupiter (-2.1mag)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:17.07 +22:41:46.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:17.07 +22:41:46.7: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,7.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 7.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 11.96 07:17:49.28 +24:51:29.7
193.01381 16.52546 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.40 Harmonia 0 0 1 11.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:17:49.28 +24:51:29.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:17:49.28 +24:51:29.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 12.66 07:49:16.63 +23:46:57.3
196.89438 22.78304 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.82 Alkmene -0 1 1 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:49:16.63 +23:46:57.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:49:16.63 +23:46:57.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1637 2461152.6637 14.03 07:15:24.02 +24:02:45.4
193.56871 15.70132 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.133 Cyrene 2 0 2 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:15:24.02 +24:02:45.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:15:24.02 +24:02:45.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6637,14.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1637 14.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461152.66394997 22.04.2026 03:55:55.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15004
Objects passed selection criteria: 14949
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12335
Average stars matched: 12084.8 (97.9712 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 21 23:17:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
First image: 2461083.70160177 12.02.2026 04:50:08.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Last image: 2461152.66394997 22.04.2026 03:55:55.277 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 155
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 68 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 103466
Objects passed selection criteria: 103251
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88563.8
Average stars matched: 85743.2 (96.8153 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1945404 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 21 23:21:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461152.66342968
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0474 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00254 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3gsw2eGlCB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mPI5pLj2eR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YEC4DfYRJB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0gVQ04eCQ3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec +16.4821 to +27.2938 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec 16.4821 to 27.2938 deg
Loaded 13967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10770 out of 11768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11768 out of 24052 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914404
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914404
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24052 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec +16.4821 to +27.2938 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0354 to 119.5901 deg, Dec 16.4821 to 27.2938 deg
Loaded 13967 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10770 out of 11768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11768 out of 24052 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 23896 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0544 to 119.6220 deg, Dec +16.5002 to +27.2948 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0544 to 119.6220 deg, Dec 16.5002 to 27.2948 deg
Loaded 13936 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10723 out of 11730 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11730 out of 23896 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
2.6 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3gsw2eGlCB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2144, passed=24052
Got 24052 stars (including 21876 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24052 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mPI5pLj2eR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2184, passed=23896
Got 23896 stars (including 21676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23896 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22789 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YEC4DfYRJB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=989, passed=12672
Got 12672 stars (including 11671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12672 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12383 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12384 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0gVQ04eCQ3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=993, passed=12612
Got 12612 stars (including 11604 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out30921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 30871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:43.97 +18:03:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30872_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 30872_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 30873_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 30874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 30875_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 30890_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:30.04 +22:51:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30893_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 30893_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.46 +22:47:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 30921_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:33.24 +26:08:52.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.731 871136572991536000 110.38868598378 +26.14754900281 11.1854 10.7253 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.731#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 30964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:20.96 +22:51:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 07610_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.38 +23:26:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 09360_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:21.63 +22:42:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0474 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:04.817 +21:59:59.72
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.165 +22:02:04.95
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:13.179 +22:01:55.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00254 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SwYhd2BVOj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UtFgguceYQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NNhk7S1U3U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UvRSrzE4K4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 150538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec +16.4753 to +27.2952 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec 16.4753 to 27.2952 deg
Loaded 13999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9026 out of 11981 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11981 out of 150538 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774089
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774089
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 150538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec +16.4753 to +27.2952 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0340 to 119.6236 deg, Dec 16.4753 to 27.2952 deg
Loaded 13999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9026 out of 11981 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11981 out of 150538 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153565 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0414 to 119.6586 deg, Dec +16.4864 to +27.3034 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0414 to 119.6586 deg, Dec 16.4864 to 27.3034 deg
Loaded 14000 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8957 out of 11986 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11986 out of 153565 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 124 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.0 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SwYhd2BVOj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=16511, passed=150509
Got 150509 stars (including 133763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 147844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UtFgguceYQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=16925, passed=153524
Got 153524 stars (including 136352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153524 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 149227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NNhk7S1U3U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=6389, passed=81385
Got 81385 stars (including 74891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79555 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UvRSrzE4K4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=6373, passed=81770
Got 81770 stars (including 75302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 81770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0089.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_225637_TTUQ2b1x1_974106_HJ4sSLOK/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170810.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171027.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171164.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171169.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171240.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171301.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171319.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171348.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171365.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out171530.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171023.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out171353.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 24s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170762_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:57.15 +25:04:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170778_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.94 +19:49:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:09.61 +21:20:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170790_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:20.65 +20:29:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170799_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:49.01 +21:16:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170802_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.22 +21:42:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170806_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:30.82 +23:40:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170810_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:25.05 +24:27:54.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.187 870678179724149760 107.10352080063 +24.46474313238 13.5021 12.8935 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.187#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170813_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.29 +19:58:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170815_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:01.85 +19:06:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170818_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:36.74 +17:57:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170819_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:29.66 +19:50:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 170824_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 170825_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 170826_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 170827_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170844_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.48 +22:47:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170860_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170860_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170915_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:21.00 +22:51:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 170938_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.24 +24:07:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170945_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:01.49 +22:51:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170963_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:55.99 +22:53:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170969_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170969_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:47.64 +22:50:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170981_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170981_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170986_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 170986_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:04.71 +22:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171023_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 171023_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171024_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171024_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.40 +25:56:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171027_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.11 +22:10:17.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.699 866066175122751232 111.92564176311 +22.17137842912 12.7251 12.3556 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.699#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171030_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171030_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.80 +22:50:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171048_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.79 +23:56:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171065_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171065_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:00.64 +22:44:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171070_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171082_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171082_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171100_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.39 +21:47:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:44.03 +22:47:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171107_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171107_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.33 +24:32:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171120_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.49 +21:31:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171125_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171125_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:43.91 +22:52:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:29.02 +19:15:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171151_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171151_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.60 +20:26:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171158_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171158_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:33.16 +18:14:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171159_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171159_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:28.35 +18:20:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:10.92 +24:39:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171161_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171161_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:45.70 +17:55:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171164_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171164_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:50.39 +25:56:35.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.670 871118053095045760 109.70996224066 +25.94349159797 13.6995 13.2227 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171166_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.49 +19:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171169_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:15.42 +24:11:34.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.043 3368665106499374976 106.81402503086 +24.19306548026 13.4718 12.9832 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.043#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171179_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171179_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171194_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:09.74 +22:42:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171197_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.70 +22:58:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.40 +24:08:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171203_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.68 +19:56:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171204_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:47.08 +22:45:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:28.20 +22:46:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171229_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.08 +20:06:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171240_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171240_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:39.67 +26:00:24.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.025 874825400144577024 116.66381419969 +26.00637502908 13.9696 13.5824 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.025#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171252_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:41.70 +20:16:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171253_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:24.63 +19:09:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171264_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171264_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:13.57 +22:40:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171269_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171269_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171275_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:40.96 +22:08:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171276_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171276_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.69 +20:16:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171280_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171280_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:22.89 +18:10:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171283_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171283_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.70 +21:27:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171287_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171287_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 07:21:48.22 +25:23:10.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_22-50-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 07:21:48.22 +25:23:10.1: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171289_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171289_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:51.64 +20:05:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171293_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171293_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:29.39 +18:53:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171295_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171295_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:19.06 +18:19:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171301_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171301_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:38.87 +24:17:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.184 866907640817519232 112.16129514592 +24.28436635038 13.8404 13.3466 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.184#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171306_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171306_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:09.54 +19:03:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171310_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.64 +20:00:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171311_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171311_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171314_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171314_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.79 +19:37:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171319_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171319_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:10.35 +21:53:59.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.162 3367373420854963712 107.04335722971 +21.89927285945 13.9646 13.7259 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.162#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171320_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171320_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.14 +22:26:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171321_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171321_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:41.33 +22:45:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171328_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171328_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:47.33 +18:57:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:37.96 +20:47:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171336_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:40.02 +21:25:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171342_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:38.92 +22:44:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171348_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171348_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:26.54 +21:00:07.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.985 3363976651479531776 109.36099587768 +21.00166084766 13.8931 13.4367 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.985#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171351_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171351_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:28.10 +25:27:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171353_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
Preparing report for the candidate 171353_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171363_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171363_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:40.59 +21:21:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171365_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.88 +22:53:12.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.040 866448392851782912 112.87364820631 +22.88635494458 13.9925 13.4333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.040#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171385_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171385_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:09.12 +22:50:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171387_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:30.92 +19:26:17.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.518 3362698400492465152 111.87819320780 +19.43770211484 14.3072 13.8797 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.518#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171389_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171389_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:21.65 +22:54:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171395_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:42.91 +26:00:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171396_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171396_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.94 +18:21:52.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 671464264957357056 115.19551324810 +18.36474453483 14.1000 13.6811 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171398_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171398_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171407_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171407_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:48.27 +22:46:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171410_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171410_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:47.09 +22:52:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171414_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171414_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.30 +21:13:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171426_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171426_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:37.58 +23:35:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171436_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171436_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:08.36 +24:52:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171444_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171444_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:42.66 +20:49:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171464_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:40.63 +22:45:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171466_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:38.53 +22:50:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171468_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171468_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:22.25 +21:31:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171475_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171475_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:19.98 +20:47:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171477_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171477_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:36.93 +24:45:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171486_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.75 +24:30:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171495_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171495_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:39.42 +22:48:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171502_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:22.60 +22:55:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171505_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171505_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:07.44 +22:49:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171506_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.81 +20:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171508_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171508_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:19.22 +22:50:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171511_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:20.47 +19:04:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171520_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:49.60 +22:36:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171524_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:00.13 +20:18:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171528_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.14 +22:43:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171529_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:29.67 +21:58:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171530_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:51.74 +20:25:33.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.498 864809089733813760 112.71476735330 +20.42651619042 14.6921 14.0981 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.498#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171536_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:47.23 +22:52:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171541_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:33.81 +22:46:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171543_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:03.62 +22:43:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171545_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:29.91 +22:42:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171547_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171547_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:25.62 +22:57:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171553_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171553_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:08.75 +22:46:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 171567_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:41.15 +22:51:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 47884_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:02.38 +23:26:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090
The candidate 61021_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-21_22-55-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0090 did not pass the final checks
