This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1074 2461152.6074 12.49 05:04:32.16 +27:47:13.9
175.89128 -8.13545 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.68 Leto 1 0 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits at 05:04:32.16 +27:47:13.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:04:32.16 +27:47:13.9: 16.16 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 16.16 +/- 0.30
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 22.1074* 05 04 32.16 +27 47 13.9 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6074,12.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1074 12.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1074 2461152.6074 13.86 05:09:41.46 +30:03:20.4
174.72402 -5.88244 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.925 Alphonsina 1 0 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits at 05:09:41.46 +30:03:20.4: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 05:09:41.46 +30:03:20.4: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6074,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1074 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 22.1074 2461152.6074 14.25 04:45:30.26 +28:34:42.7
172.64274 -10.95524 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.84 Klio 1 -1 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits at 04:45:30.26 +28:34:42.7: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits at 04:45:30.26 +28:34:42.7: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 22.1074* 04 45 30.26 +28 34 42.7 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6074,14.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1074 14.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 22.1074* 05 10 23.75 +25 41 59.1 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461152.6074,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260422.1074 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461152.60772100 22.04.2026 02:34:57.094 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15255
Objects passed selection criteria: 15190
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11608.5
Average stars matched: 11279 (97.1616 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120368 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 21 22:00:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461152.60772100 22.04.2026 02:34:57.094 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 115
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125626
Objects passed selection criteria: 125328
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 102086
Average stars matched: 98173.8 (96.1679 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1955508 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Apr 21 18:08:25 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-27-g1ba0f777
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Apr 21 22:05:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461152.60708336
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0043 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00505 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.arBb3kNLgi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8iKN4fYuSX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wV3ZXQE8jL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Hh4oipzwdr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (aperture=5.7)
Read 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5938 to 84.6914 deg, Dec +24.3653 to +35.3120 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5938 to 84.6914 deg, Dec 24.3653 to 35.3120 deg
Loaded 8470 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6008 out of 6752 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6752 out of 16335 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=5.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.arBb3kNLgi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8iKN4fYuSX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wV3ZXQE8jL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=563, passed=6950
Got 6950 stars (including 6383 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6950 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6648 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6650 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Hh4oipzwdr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=576, passed=7028
Got 7028 stars (including 6444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 21232_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.43 +31:18:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 12472_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.46 +28:30:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.27 +32:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0043 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0071 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.022 +29:59:57.38
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:00.727 +30:00:13.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00505 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZFBRuy198d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X86EhHtC4w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vks6rwwJLZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rE5ss28szM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (aperture=4.3)
Read 138073 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5692 to 84.7092 deg, Dec +24.3529 to +35.3137 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5692 to 84.7092 deg, Dec 24.3529 to 35.3137 deg
Loaded 8498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4929 out of 6891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6891 out of 138073 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits via Tycho-2
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits (aperture=4.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
1.7 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZFBRuy198d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.X86EhHtC4w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vks6rwwJLZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3964, passed=67208
Got 67208 stars (including 63126 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 738 (Dec 24.0 to 57.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 738 (Dec 24.0 to 57.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64547 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 64546 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rE5ss28szM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=4168, passed=68223
Got 68223 stars (including 63929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-02_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0011.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-21_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213547_TTUQ1b1x1_2934762_jruG1cPp/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160910.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160916.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160924.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160933.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160944.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160969.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160974.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162001.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162207.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162245.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162281.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162081.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162448.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160910_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:47.40 +30:17:19.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.176 156905776779006080 073.69777011906 +30.28838225567 14.5935 13.9735 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.176#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160916_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160916_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:49.13 +30:08:52.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.040 156306508582182272 076.45536321564 +30.14781348776 13.9500 13.3118 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.040#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:41.78 +32:01:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160924_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:00.36 +34:16:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.713 184836464502912128 077.25161811202 +34.27441105911 13.6282 12.6940 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.713#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:00.64 +29:52:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160931_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160931_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:25.08 +29:02:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:49.88 +29:05:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.365 156537779684461824 074.95819125638 +29.09270223714 14.0917 13.2557 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.365#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160934_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:18.30 +31:24:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:40.88 +32:42:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160944_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:44.43 +25:22:40.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.538 150934363487341184 067.93480816309 +25.37812272070 13.5476 12.6547 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.538#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:55.04 +33:10:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:40.38 +28:23:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160953_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.58 +33:02:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:04.24 +32:55:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:26.85 +34:24:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160969_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160969_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:55.99 +29:24:09.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.886 3422693935361665024 078.48312564752 +29.40238431967 13.5642 13.0696 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160974_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:57.59 +32:22:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.118 181385578537970560 077.48995629474 +32.36643948757 13.3910 12.4985 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.118#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:31.07 +27:42:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160977_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160977_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.67 +28:44:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160979_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:16.94 +34:38:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160980_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160980_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:25.62 +34:37:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:51.94 +31:06:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 160985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.56 +26:37:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.66 +34:09:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161128_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161136_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.45 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161138_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:46.82 +32:32:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161155_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.28 +34:07:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161170_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161224_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161224_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161251_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161262_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161277_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.68 +28:37:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161280_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.61 +34:23:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161285_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161285_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:25.46 +34:49:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
Preparing report for the candidate 161287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161341_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161341_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:26.53 +34:06:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161345_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:43.72 +28:19:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161364_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161364_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.17 +32:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.81 +26:55:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161373_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161389_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.92 +28:31:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161416_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.18 +34:24:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:21.67 +33:35:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161462_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161477_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161477_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.45 +33:11:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161504_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.05 +34:06:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161505_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161505_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161510_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:57.17 +34:10:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161518_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.69 +30:29:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161523_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161523_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.69 +33:12:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161525_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161525_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161542_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:01.02 +33:49:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161570_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.36 +32:33:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161590_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161590_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:16.50 +27:54:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161601_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.33 +34:07:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.84 +33:11:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161654_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161654_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.78 +29:47:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.18 +33:59:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161662_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161662_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.32 +34:10:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161663_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161663_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161664_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.94 +34:09:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161676_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161676_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161691_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:35.22 +32:47:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161702_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161702_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:09.03 +33:24:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161715_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.61 +29:45:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161717_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.65 +29:10:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161737_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:58.64 +32:57:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161794_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161794_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.24 +31:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:10.63 +34:12:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161812_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.61 +30:48:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161838_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.66 +30:49:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161860_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.94 +33:23:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161899_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:35.46 +31:49:03.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161986_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 161986_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.01 +32:25:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162001_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:33.14 +29:46:39.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.777 158402521341850880 072.13757934706 +29.77792301812 14.0191 13.1709 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.777#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:33.35 +34:20:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162037_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:49.98 +33:40:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.508 182117234808191360 078.20974445144 +33.68239774569 13.6566 12.6286 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162078_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162078_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.14 +33:52:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162081_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
Preparing report for the candidate 162081_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162086_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.97 +32:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162117_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.06 +31:04:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.83 +26:10:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162186_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.86 +30:56:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162207_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:39.00 +32:11:20.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.820 157545589467933696 076.16212452306 +32.18871776003 13.9014 13.2231 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.820#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162219_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.53 +28:40:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162245_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:17.52 +34:47:02.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.531 185251628924523904 077.57327427410 +34.78369470369 14.1105 13.4317 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.531#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162263_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.40 +34:32:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162268_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:13.48 +29:18:01.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.340 158236357647372032 072.30654178059 +29.30021114270 14.1399 13.2378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.340#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162276_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.87 +32:23:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:42.37 +33:35:55.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.534 184754413446459648 075.92659252847 +33.59909076544 13.7046 12.7113 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.534#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162296_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.09 +31:15:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162376_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:17.28 +33:06:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162392_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.60 +32:25:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
Preparing report for the candidate 162448_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162464_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:04.72 +33:38:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162584_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:25.43 +31:04:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162591_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162591_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.47 +32:27:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162624_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.95 +32:27:02.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.138 161156175198864256 072.73777006236 +32.45017540885 14.0846 13.1594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.138#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 162643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:16.54 +32:27:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 119951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:51.46 +26:06:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.44 +32:53:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116043_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
Preparing report for the candidate 116043_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 133823_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:57.45 +28:30:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.46 +31:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.23 +32:10:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012
The candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-21_21-34-57_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0012 did not pass the final checks