######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing Gem-05-Q1b1x1 WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 26536 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 26536 MB free at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
renamed 'Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.png' -> 'transient_report/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits_preview.png'
Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 805.1367 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 849.5943 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2377.6294 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 458.5927 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2406.2615 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 454.9418 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.95308 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.008 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-19T22:43:05.2387247' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-20T03:43:05.2387247' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61150.1549217361 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-20T03:43:15.1390926' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61150.1550363312 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.66527420088 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0001820084905 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.5522222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 262.288333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.67618734446849 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 22.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits :) Spent 0.665483 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-19T22:44:01.7036517' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-20T03:44:01.7036517' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61150.1555752661 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-20T03:44:11.6068880' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61150.1556898844 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 106.665274217282 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 14.0001820155469 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.3608333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 262.436666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.68374262211856 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Gem-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 06 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 17.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -6.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 22.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 906.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 14.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 9.700776 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits :) Spent 0.605708 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/d_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461150.65503748 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 Second-epoch image center 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 Second-epoch image center 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00544 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sjSRQLGnZD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4YQNYowReh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nxWCPPp1KE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SQ05nvl3Px Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 27436 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.4015 to 114.9663 deg, Dec +8.6447 to +19.2847 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.4015 to 114.9663 deg, Dec 8.6447 to 19.2847 deg Loaded 18551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13947 out of 15446 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 15446 out of 27436 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923424 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923424 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.86 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 2.8 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 2.1 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 2.0 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 15.0 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 10.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 10.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 10.8 (SNR ) 8.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.sjSRQLGnZD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2920, passed=27436 Got 27436 stars (including 24487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27436 stars from the SExtractor catalog /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26329 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26331 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26326 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.4YQNYowReh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=13, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3193, passed=30920 Got 30920 stars (including 27706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30920 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29783 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29782 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29784 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94" Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1009) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nxWCPPp1KE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=47, passed=1096 Got 1096 stars (including 1048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1039 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1035 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1035 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 891 stars left (next iteration limit 984) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.SQ05nvl3Px (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=40, passed=900 Got 900 stars (including 859 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 900 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 765 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 713 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 548 (Dec 8.3 to 19.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 766 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 835 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 761 stars left (next iteration limit 837) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 Second-epoch image center 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0128 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 Second-epoch image center 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0177 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:06:37.338 +13:59:50.38 Second-epoch second image center 07:06:36.333 +13:59:37.38 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00544 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dgYMiPy2l7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NkK8urr0LO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lKmveZPw83 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TAzhGPLPSV Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 196101 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3885 to 114.9762 deg, Dec +8.6207 to +19.2891 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3885 to 114.9762 deg, Dec 8.6207 to 19.2891 deg Loaded 18620 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11164 out of 16422 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 16422 out of 196101 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758071 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758071 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 47 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 2.5 pix Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 1.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 1.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 12.0 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 11.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.8 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.dgYMiPy2l7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=28366, passed=196059 Got 196059 stars (including 167396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 196059 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190797 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190796 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190797 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NkK8urr0LO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=30058, passed=171965 Got 171965 stars (including 141774 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 171965 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.0 to 19.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168469 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.0 to 19.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168469 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168470 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92" Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1014) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.lKmveZPw83 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=205, passed=15990 Got 15990 stars (including 15758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15990 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 853 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15148 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.1 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15151 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15151 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 985) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.TAzhGPLPSV (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=175, passed=14086 Got 14086 stars (including 13889 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14086 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 851 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13348 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13344 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13343 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 887 stars left (next iteration limit 975) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-43-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0047.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out246934.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246786_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246786_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checksRejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246787_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.31 07:10:54.15 +16:10:36.0 4262 1839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246796_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.30 07:00:50.81 +16:33:39.0 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246797_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246797_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.15 07:32:39.21 +15:24:07.1 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246799_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246799_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.56 07:10:21.15 +09:26:16.1 4039 5898 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246804_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.65 07:08:47.50 +09:29:06.6 4273 5886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246810_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246810_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.55 07:02:23.04 +10:07:04.6 5250 5569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246811_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246811_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.09 07:08:03.59 +19:05:20.4 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246821_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.70 06:43:59.26 +17:09:01.2 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246830_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.67 07:26:45.59 +17:14:02.3 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246834_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246834_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.56 07:28:21.55 +11:52:15.7 1492 4215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:31:35.35 +15:20:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246835_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246835_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.98 07:31:35.30 +15:20:19.9 1216 2079 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246848_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.00 06:42:33.88 +17:39:43.5 8410 1173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246877_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246877_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.11 07:37:53.79 +18:24:11.9 0477 0121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246881_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246881_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.73 06:52:16.94 +18:30:55.9 7031 0595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246891_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.17 07:35:19.43 +12:20:04.8 0482 3839 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246903_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246903_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.59 06:41:15.92 +17:25:16.9 8593 1326 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246918_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246918_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.60 07:38:28.08 +14:11:04.4 0129 2673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:00:57.92 +14:06:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246922_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246922_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.02 07:00:58.02 +14:06:05.7 5614 3185 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246934_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.49 07:36:13.45 +10:47:23.2 0250 4763 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:13:25.71 +16:11:53.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.061 3360278581558316672 108.35698385292 +16.19848380886 11.5178 11.0661 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.061#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246943_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246943_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.33 07:13:25.68 +16:11:54.0 3899 1798 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246950_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.05 06:55:36.78 +11:46:43.4 6313 4631 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 246961_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 246961_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.44 07:06:35.52 +14:42:14.6 4821 2769 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47887_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 47887_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.41 07:03:37.43 +16:54:49.3 5341 1470 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:18:05.34 +16:32:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 184807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 184807_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.31 07:18:05.32 +16:32:22.0 3243 1537 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:00:39.28 +10:34:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 222150_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 222150_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 11.33 07:00:39.26 +10:34:50.1 5524 5307 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39555_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 39555_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.35 07:35:17.00 +09:22:40.3 0303 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91728_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 91728_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 9.16 06:41:13.00 +16:45:44.5 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 125065_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 125065_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 10.05 06:48:39.85 +14:03:32.4 7411 3314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:03:51.65 +12:35:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 58229_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 58229_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.91 07:03:51.65 +12:35:39.3 5132 4062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:08:22.06 +15:55:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 55823_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.85 07:08:22.05 +15:55:45.7 4617 2015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:00:15.92 +16:04:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 56798_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.83 07:00:15.90 +16:04:42.7 5792 2004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:13:22.44 +16:09:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 112305_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 112305_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.46 07:13:22.41 +16:09:28.7 3905 1823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:54:38.96 +13:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 146108_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 146108_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.28 06:54:38.93 +13:10:37.5 6504 3797 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:03:37.99 +10:57:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 107836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 107836_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.34 07:03:37.97 +10:57:07.3 5099 5053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:50:25.59 +13:24:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 135794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 135794_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.81 06:50:25.58 +13:24:46.7 7132 3690 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:27:09.16 +11:57:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120466_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 120466_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 7.07 07:27:09.15 +11:57:17.0 1676 4180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:31:59.29 +12:39:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 150416_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 150416_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 7.03 07:31:59.28 +12:39:38.6 0999 3689 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:31:08.81 +11:12:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 156884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 156884_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.94 07:31:08.80 +11:12:10.1 1038 4582 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:05:39.15 +09:11:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 142033_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 142033_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.57 07:05:39.14 +09:11:07.9 4727 6100 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:24:58.17 +11:40:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 120214_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 120214_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.60 07:24:58.15 +11:40:09.6 1984 4380 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:45:17.31 +12:53:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153988_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 153988_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 5.77 06:45:17.30 +12:53:38.5 7875 4042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:28:09.65 +08:55:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 171753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 171753_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.29 07:28:09.67 +08:55:31.7 1352 6002 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:40:58.77 +09:53:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 57206_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 57206_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 5.87 06:40:58.74 +09:53:41.6 8439 5895 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:33:36.44 +15:49:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 136187_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 136187_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.71 07:33:36.44 +15:49:34.6 0948 1754 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 07:29:47.68 +12:00:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51178_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 51178_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.32 07:29:47.68 +12:00:23.6 1287 4114 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:37:43.03 +16:23:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 112428_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 The candidate 112428_fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 5.57 06:37:43.00 +16:23:55.4 9087 1966 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits **** FOUND 06:43:59.37 +13:13:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Gem-05-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 07:13:25.71 +16:11:53.6 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461150.65503748 -observatory V36 00:30:04.00 +00:23:45.3 Mercury (-0.1mag) 03:29:07.32 +19:20:46.8 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:29:37.83 +02:09:31.8 Mars (1.2mag) 07:14:36.57 +22:42:55.6 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:31:01.16 +01:00:24.0 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:48:35.20 +19:50:18.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:11:22.59 -00:12:00.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:55.15 -22:52:51.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 04:11:56.78 +25:55:39.4 Moon (-9.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 19 22:46 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461150.65503748: 07:14:44.09 +22:42:38.7 Io (5.8mag) 07:14:48.66 +22:42:30.0 Europa (5.9mag) 07:14:25.69 +22:43:24.4 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:14:39.88 +22:42:39.2 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:17:45.33 +22:28:41.6 Himalia (15.4mag) 07:14:35.26 +22:42:56.4 Thebe (16.3mag) 07:18:01.74 +22:59:01.7 Elara (17.3mag) 07:13:46.39 +23:20:45.5 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:22:50.52 +22:41:20.0 Carme (18.5mag) 00:30:51.71 +01:00:39.1 Titan (8.8mag) 00:30:57.87 +01:00:33.6 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:30:35.21 +00:59:53.5 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:30:53.90 +01:00:50.3 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:32:34.67 +01:08:44.7 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 19 22:46 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461150.65503748: 15:55:35.35 -19:00:30.3 JWST 18:12:40.97 +31:47:06.4 Chandra 07:58:07.80 -37:35:18.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 19 22:46 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461150.65503748 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:53:30.47 -29:01:47.0 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:09:47.73 -69:28:13.7 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:33:23.55 +31:28:00.7 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:29:56.09 +11:02:03.5 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:11:15.86 +29:23:55.1 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:34:06.84 +26:08:55.7 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:04:25.78 +32:01:53.0 16.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:31:48.10 +00:16:36.1 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:52:38.61 +18:52:34.3 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:39:15.79 -11:27:37.1 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:05:51.28 -11:13:50.6 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:58:10.97 +63:09:26.8 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:15:18.63 -03:48:39.4 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:20:59.66 +86:29:39.6 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:20:04.52 +63:30:04.9 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:21:58.91 +19:36:13.2 11.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:16:30.44 +07:04:03.6 17.3mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:21:51.06 +16:25:05.9 14.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:30:08.46 -21:45:49.7 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:20:17.71 +44:16:56.4 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:21:47.78 +47:52:10.7 15.4mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:31:58.66 -26:52:39.6 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 00:32:00.34 +16:15:31.6 8.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:52:20.43 +03:15:28.1 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:57:55.90 +02:15:33.0 14.4mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:11:08.97 +37:57:00.0 14.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:51:00.51 -09:29:35.6 11.6mag 10P/Tempel 14:54:38.21 +02:44:59.0 14.4mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:01:46.66 -01:23:54.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 10:37:36.08 -03:47:14.6 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:55:07.11 +18:11:25.4 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:18:34.06 +36:06:34.3 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:34:17.80 -10:57:31.6 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:14:30.01 +22:38:47.8 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:14:48.47 +09:02:22.9 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels 23:15:24.72 -08:09:42.4 14.7mag 88P/Howell 02:22:16.99 +21:43:39.7 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 05:02:46.41 +32:29:56.9 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:33:28.42 +36:26:50.7 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:39:40.41 +14:49:40.7 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:55:42.77 +14:59:19.5 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:48:13.87 +14:36:10.1 10.5mag 141P/Machholz 01:56:30.67 +06:25:13.7 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:39:58.92 +02:12:39.0 12.3mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:27:04.96 +08:10:17.6 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:14:00.53 +00:34:15.2 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:44:06.02 +00:19:41.4 17.8mag 210P/Christensen 21:50:31.31 -10:27:15.6 17.7mag 218P/LINEAR 17:17:16.17 -13:25:39.2 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:43:31.97 +34:59:25.1 16.8mag 240P/NEAT 07:40:39.14 -04:43:54.4 17.8mag 242P/Spahr 22:27:18.26 -19:50:39.1 17.8mag 260P/McNaught 02:06:45.92 +21:29:58.9 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR 15:40:55.22 +07:15:13.1 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:35:54.01 +21:22:23.6 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:42:00.50 +44:47:24.2 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Apr 19 22:46 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 19 22:46 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 19 22:46 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 09:53:48.141 +08:12:51.52 AT 2026jjq 2026-04-11.92 20.219 12:47:33.422 +00:05:56.15 AT 2026jjp 2026-04-12.03 20.061 16:10:20.836 -68:49:59.48 AT 2026jjo 2026-04-12.26 19.161 18:36:22.563 -76:59:23.30 AT 2026jjn 2026-04-12.30 18.78 18:56:03.327 -40:52:01.58 AT 2026jjm 2026-04-12.35 18.51 16:42:43.663 -75:30:11.13 AT 2026jjl 2026-04-12.27 19.255 13:20:48.826 -05:22:30.04 SN 2026jjk 2026-04-12.03 19.601 14:35:27.359 -08:37:31.84 AT 2026jjj 2026-04-12.09 19.318 10:06:01.880 +03:05:43.66 AT 2026jji 2026-04-06.02 22.71 17:37:45.700 +39:48:28.26 AT 2026jjh 2026-04-07.87 20.39 16:35:21.390 +30:27:47.12 AT 2026jjg 2026-04-07.79 20.91 17:02:03.120 +41:30:38.89 AT 2026jjf 2026-04-03.89 21.38 17:08:30.580 +41:56:13.61 AT 2026jje 2026-04-03.89 21.47 16:48:25.780 +33:00:44.35 AT 2026jjd 2026-04-03.85 21.29 16:46:02.450 +30:55:42.15 AT 2026jjc 2026-04-03.80 19.57 16:51:04.120 +44:26:50.06 AT 2026jjb 2026-03-30.84 21.02 12:10:02.030 +43:26:37.06 AT 2026jja 2026-03-28.87 21.46 17:56:59.910 +48:20:04.31 AT 2026jiz 2026-03-27.87 20.99 15:23:12.550 +15:30:01.81 AT 2026jiy 2026-03-27.82 21.09 12:45:41.400 +53:52:15.13 AT 2026jix 2026-03-24.70 20.56 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 19 22:46 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 3 2026 04 20.15569 2461150.65569 6.21 06:43:59.33 +13:13:38.1 8077 3850 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_224454_TTUQ1b1x1_3725767_NwBcQEcM/fd_Gem-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_22-44-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0048.fits
