This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J065023+1332.3,2461150.6333,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J065023+1332.3 20260420.1333 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J064925+1429.1,2461150.6333,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J064925+1429.1 20260420.1333 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.79930391 09.01.2026 07:10:49.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
First image: 2461049.79930391 09.01.2026 07:10:49.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Last image: 2461150.63363791 20.04.2026 03:12:16.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.86
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15700
Objects passed selection criteria: 15639
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12644.2
Average stars matched: 9932.5 (78.5535 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 127028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 22:23:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.79930391 09.01.2026 07:10:49.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
First image: 2461049.79930391 09.01.2026 07:10:49.858 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Last image: 2461150.63363791 20.04.2026 03:12:16.315 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 34
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104910
Objects passed selection criteria: 104659
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85785.2
Average stars matched: 72497.5 (84.5104 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1909328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 22:26:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461150.63291093
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43
Second-epoch image center 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43
Second-epoch image center 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0807 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01112 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E4d1Wepmg7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z7SBCvHWeY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4mG4XJ94K9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C4F6UrFfgO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27436 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.4015 to 114.9663 deg, Dec +8.6447 to +19.2847 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.4015 to 114.9663 deg, Dec 8.6447 to 19.2847 deg
Loaded 18551 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13947 out of 15446 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15446 out of 27436 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923424
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923424
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.86
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.8 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.9 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.8 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
15.0 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
11.8 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.8 (SNR ) 10.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E4d1Wepmg7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2920, passed=27436
Got 27436 stars (including 24487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27436 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 923 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z7SBCvHWeY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=13, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3193, passed=30920
Got 30920 stars (including 27706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30920 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.1 to 19.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29799 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.93"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1009)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4mG4XJ94K9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=140, passed=2823
Got 2823 stars (including 2681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2823 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C4F6UrFfgO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=116, passed=2575
Got 2575 stars (including 2457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2575 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 896 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43
Second-epoch image center 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0698 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:06:40.458 +13:59:58.43
Second-epoch image center 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0807 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:06:26.930 +14:02:34.56
Second-epoch second image center 07:06:24.463 +14:02:52.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01112 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OJURx5DQgZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8eCHkEKMTP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZEuzZoDs4T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YiEUTAS3sx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits and wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 196101 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 98.3885 to 114.9762 deg, Dec +8.6207 to +19.2891 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 98.3885 to 114.9762 deg, Dec 8.6207 to 19.2891 deg
Loaded 18620 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11164 out of 16422 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16422 out of 196101 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758071
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758071
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.5 pix Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.OJURx5DQgZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=28366, passed=196059
Got 196059 stars (including 167396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 196059 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190796 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 190797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8eCHkEKMTP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=30058, passed=171969
Got 171969 stars (including 141778 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 171969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.0 to 19.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.0 to 19.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZEuzZoDs4T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1271, passed=23737
Got 23737 stars (including 22441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 895 stars left (next iteration limit 984)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YiEUTAS3sx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=973, passed=21493
Got 21493 stars (including 20493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 987)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-01-09_01-10-49_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_21-17-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-11-13_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0060.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_221743_TTUQ2b1x1_3483138_hafdXlqW/wcs_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out259048.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out259049.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259046_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259046_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259048_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259048_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:23.47 +13:42:43.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.72)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259049_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:49.04 +15:26:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.248 3354610526100519040 102.70414055934 +15.44777916789 11.9696 11.2550 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.248#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259096_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259096_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:35.43 +15:20:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259118_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:25.72 +16:11:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259135_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.94 +14:13:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259144_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 259144_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.11 +16:04:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86895_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 86895_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:22.34 +14:17:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 102258_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83486_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
Preparing report for the candidate 83486_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69422_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 69422_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:17.55 +15:20:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58229_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 58229_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:21.99 +15:55:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55823_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 55823_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:15.89 +16:04:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56798_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 56798_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:22.24 +16:09:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45928_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 45928_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:33.35 +16:40:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112305_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 112305_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:38.99 +13:10:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26713_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 26713_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:25.64 +17:45:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107836_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 107836_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:25.66 +13:24:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47887_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 47887_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:05.31 +16:32:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118857_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 118857_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:11.37 +12:45:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120466_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 120466_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:59.23 +12:39:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 52200_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.76 +16:12:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193803_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 193803_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:41.27 +11:00:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71386_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 71386_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:47.29 +15:06:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142033_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 142033_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:58.18 +11:40:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57206_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 57206_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:36.54 +15:49:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136187_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 136187_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:47.66 +12:00:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35744_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061
The candidate 35744_fd_Gem-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_22-12-16_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0061 did not pass the final checks