This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 20.1018* 05 45 21.62 +22 19 17.6 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461150.6018,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260420.1018 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 20.1018* 05 23 57.94 +22 13 55.5 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J052357.88+221355.6,2461150.6018,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J052357.88+221355.6 20260420.1018 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461150.60206059 20.04.2026 02:26:48.035 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15834
Objects passed selection criteria: 15721
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9635
Average stars matched: 8961.75 (93.0125 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121716 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 22:09:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
First image: 2461082.62137122 11.02.2026 02:54:36.473 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Last image: 2461150.60206059 20.04.2026 02:26:48.035 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 80
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 98 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 120818
Objects passed selection criteria: 120460
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75692.8
Average stars matched: 69750.8 (92.1498 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1888760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 22:15:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461150.60152083
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.1'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.1'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00848 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8wWwHDpvB0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kWztwyAPa5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2ifwlE3h6R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JhzoM3bn1v
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec +16.3328 to +27.3474 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1682 to 91.6910 deg, Dec 16.3328 to 27.3474 deg
Loaded 12326 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9058 out of 10254 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10254 out of 23525 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.945337
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.945337
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.3 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.6 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8wWwHDpvB0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2582, passed=23525
Got 23525 stars (including 20915 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23525 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 927 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kWztwyAPa5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2595, passed=23514
Got 23514 stars (including 20891 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 927 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 926 stars left (next iteration limit 1019)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2ifwlE3h6R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=218, passed=4040
Got 4040 stars (including 3821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4040 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JhzoM3bn1v (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=252, passed=4242
Got 4242 stars (including 3988 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4242 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Image size: 937.1'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Image size: 937.1'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.616 +22:00:01.42
Second-epoch image center 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0072 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:17.875 +22:00:37.87
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:19.926 +22:00:26.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00848 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6M1jDdlPoe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BjmcOs0cnm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IKoQ7ULWNx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v9M2HrQhCq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec +16.3196 to +27.3524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.1103 to 91.6919 deg, Dec 16.3196 to 27.3524 deg
Loaded 12375 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7170 out of 10499 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10499 out of 163644 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.769457
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.769457
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 63 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6M1jDdlPoe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=21410, passed=163589
Got 163589 stars (including 141908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BjmcOs0cnm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=54, blended=21418, passed=163772
Got 163772 stars (including 142086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 154755 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IKoQ7ULWNx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1278, passed=30448
Got 30448 stars (including 29136 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30448 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.v9M2HrQhCq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1423, passed=32207
Got 32207 stars (including 30740 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32207 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-54-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-55-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-01_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0020.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_215336_TTUQ2b1x1_3056747_kZ9nYXfh/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out191775.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out194887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185129_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 185129_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:08.80 +21:32:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 185131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.23 +24:54:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185132_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 185132_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.23 +20:47:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 185133_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:06.42 +22:35:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 185136_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:48.97 +20:33:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 189294_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.10 +22:38:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 190533_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.55 +23:20:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 190742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:12.48 +18:24:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 190939_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:35.67 +25:17:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 191326_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.69 +20:44:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191542_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 191542_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:35.98 +23:46:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 191775_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:20.21 +18:57:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.080 3398453006801081472 087.58513636382 +18.96107801577 12.4543 11.5013 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.080#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191809_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 191809_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:21.64 +18:36:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192472_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 192472_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.95 +25:05:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192796_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 192796_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:08.55 +21:18:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192889_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 192889_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.29 +18:59:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193035_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 193035_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:45.06 +23:44:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 193111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:50.28 +21:18:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193913_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 193913_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.81 +18:25:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 194012_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:40.15 +20:11:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 194171_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.90 +18:33:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 194622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:02.30 +20:08:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194682_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 194682_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.70 +22:27:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194887_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 194887_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 195420_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:52.41 +21:18:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 139525_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.73 +24:34:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88472_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 88472_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:16.92 +22:05:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70439_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 70439_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.42 +21:08:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 84179_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.14 +21:56:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 29777_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:00.47 +18:21:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65702_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 65702_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:38.10 +20:37:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 105052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:49.48 +23:06:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 111963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:59.12 +23:30:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90947_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
Preparing report for the candidate 90947_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 59246_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.34 +20:22:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107372_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 107372_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.72 +23:22:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 56342_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:29.04 +20:02:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 18025_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.42 +17:54:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 136341_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:58.48 +24:44:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 98863_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:25.39 +22:44:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 174837_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:41.63 +23:34:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 146579_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:19.13 +23:53:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91282_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 91282_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:43.43 +22:27:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64312_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 64312_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:10.40 +20:35:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80960_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 80960_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:26.99 +21:45:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 61340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.80 +20:28:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28652_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 28652_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:19.13 +18:21:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147296_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 147296_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:27.01 +24:02:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 94240_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:03.84 +22:39:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 58976_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:31.12 +20:07:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49940_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 49940_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:18.28 +19:34:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101923_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 101923_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:19.36 +23:12:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26784_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 26784_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:39.19 +18:14:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 118273_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:30.19 +25:56:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 53357_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:56.63 +19:48:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129173_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 129173_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.47 +25:08:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92795_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 92795_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:27.60 +22:17:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29037_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 29037_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.73 +18:35:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 58704_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:14.63 +20:08:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31463_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 31463_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.59 +18:32:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66169_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 66169_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.28 +20:52:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22263_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 22263_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.11 +17:57:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021
The candidate 119084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_21-26-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0021 did not pass the final checks