This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.4585* 00 19 02.39 +41 37 37.3 9.3 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 3654976,2461149.9585,9.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 3654976 20260419.4585 9.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.4585* 23 44 21.36 +39 19 18.4 11.3 U And 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2344211+391922,2461149.9585,11.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2344211+391922 20260419.4585 11.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.57228694 27.12.2025 01:43:55.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
First image: 2461036.57228694 27.12.2025 01:43:55.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Last image: 2461149.95874019 19.04.2026 11:00:25.152 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11885
Objects passed selection criteria: 11822
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8184.25
Average stars matched: 7533.75 (92.0518 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116604 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 06:04:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.57228694 27.12.2025 01:43:55.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
First image: 2461036.57228694 27.12.2025 01:43:55.592 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Last image: 2461149.95874019 19.04.2026 11:00:25.152 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 113
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 74609
Objects passed selection criteria: 74391
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52903.8
Average stars matched: 48346.5 (91.3858 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 169776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 06:06:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.95821214
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits'
wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Image size: 939.2'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91
Second-epoch image center 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0741 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Image size: 939.1'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91
Second-epoch image center 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00465 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EnRsJkpLdI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uzPqrRdimu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Yn1D5cbJA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hii7LCxwAF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14288 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0024 to 359.9989 deg, Dec +32.1534 to +43.3239 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0024 to 359.9989 deg, Dec 32.1534 to 43.3239 deg
Loaded 202487 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8245 out of 8883 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8883 out of 14288 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.943916
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.943916
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.84
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.5 pix And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.7 pix fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
2.7 pix fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.1 mag. And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
14.1 mag. fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
14.1 mag. fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EnRsJkpLdI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1221, passed=14288
Got 14288 stars (including 13048 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14288 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5538 through 0 to 10.8087, gap 10.8087 to 349.5538
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5538 through 0 to 10.8098, gap 10.8098 to 349.5538
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14157 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uzPqrRdimu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1196, passed=14234
Got 14234 stars (including 13017 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5540 through 0 to 10.8414, gap 10.8414 to 349.5540
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5540 through 0 to 10.8422, gap 10.8422 to 349.5540
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Yn1D5cbJA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=450, passed=6901
Got 6901 stars (including 6444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013044 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010436 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2479 through 0 to 10.5462, gap 10.5462 to 349.2479
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2482 through 0 to 10.5472, gap 10.5472 to 349.2482
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6782 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hii7LCxwAF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, passed=6826
Got 6826 stars (including 6322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013043 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010434 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2478 through 0 to 10.5466, gap 10.5466 to 349.2478
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2482 through 0 to 10.5477, gap 10.5477 to 349.2482
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20591_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 20591_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:20.06 +40:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07174_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 07174_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:02.47 +38:30:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field And-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Image size: 939.2'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91
Second-epoch image center 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0741 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Image size: 939.1'x624.3' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.806 +37:59:59.91
Second-epoch image center 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0705 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:12.944 +38:03:36.78
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:11.582 +38:03:32.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00465 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uV55yAKBJt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f1AIG6QGRG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BwotPSnW46
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SxxlV7OgSx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits) and catalog (wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat) found
'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 89935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +32.1251 to +43.3294 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 32.1251 to 43.3294 deg
Loaded 203158 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7394 out of 9233 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9233 out of 89935 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.760621
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.760621
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.2 pix And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.5 pix fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
2.6 pix fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.3 mag. And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
14.2 mag. fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
14.2 mag. fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uV55yAKBJt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=7843, passed=89904
Got 89904 stars (including 81898 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89904 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5196 through 0 to 10.9064, gap 10.9064 to 349.5196
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89046 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5197 through 0 to 10.9074, gap 10.9074 to 349.5197
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 89047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f1AIG6QGRG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=7787, passed=89109
Got 89109 stars (including 81193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5235 through 0 to 10.9070, gap 10.9070 to 349.5235
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88188 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.5235 through 0 to 10.9079, gap 10.9079 to 349.5235
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 88189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BwotPSnW46 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2668, passed=41209
Got 41209 stars (including 38499 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41209 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013044 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010436 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2463 through 0 to 10.5508, gap 10.5508 to 349.2463
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 597 to 668 (Dec 29.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2465 through 0 to 10.5511, gap 10.5511 to 349.2465
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 597 to 668 (Dec 29.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40479 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SxxlV7OgSx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2705, passed=40329
Got 40329 stars (including 37585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013043 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010434 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2385 through 0 to 10.5504, gap 10.5504 to 349.2385
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 349.2387 through 0 to 10.5506, gap 10.5506 to 349.2387
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39605 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits -region wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-43-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_And-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_19-44-58_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_05-59-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0763.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_And-04-Q2b1x1_060105_TTUQ2b1x1_2272333_8wUv3826/wcs_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field And-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105521.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105529.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105531.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112823.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113095.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113180.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113649.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113787.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out114319.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out114630.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out114773.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out115288.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out116780.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13700.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38349.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105521_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 105521_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:40.48 +38:19:53.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.475 1919073237048534784 354.66826548356 +38.33167889436 14.0761 13.5840 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.475#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105529_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 105529_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:05.70 +42:01:13.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.063 1922301849864831104 355.27298790077 +42.02018888606 13.3071 12.7538 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.063#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105530_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 105530_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:07.52 +37:43:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105531_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 105531_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:08.02 +34:05:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.406 2872948914726844288 354.78324406978 +34.08679174414 12.5125 11.9891 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.406#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107051_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 107051_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108068_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 108068_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108174_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 108174_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108322_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 108322_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108480_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 108480_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:07.52 +40:36:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109051_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109051_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109139_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109139_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109208_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109208_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109270_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109270_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:18:16.09 +36:48:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109454_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109454_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109665_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109665_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109671_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109671_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109842_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109842_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109906_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109906_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109918_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 109918_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110028_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110028_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:51:27.08 +40:12:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110065_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110065_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:01.89 +40:23:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110077_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110077_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110260_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110260_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110329_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110329_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:11.58 +40:49:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110346_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110346_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:53:53.86 +39:15:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110356_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110356_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110366_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110366_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110409_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110409_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110587_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110587_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110644_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110644_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110821_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110821_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110918_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 110918_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111012_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111012_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111052_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111052_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111305_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111305_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111554_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111554_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111590_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111590_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111863_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 111863_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:53:02.98 +36:56:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112238_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112238_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112519_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112519_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:02.31 +41:11:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112668_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112668_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112823_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112823_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:09.17 +40:07:45.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.286 2881961611538981376 000.53833731696 +40.12893432642 13.3473 12.8664 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.286#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112834_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112834_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112862_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112862_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112996_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 112996_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:07:29.51 +34:19:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113009_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113009_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113066_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113066_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113095_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113095_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:08.88 +39:11:35.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.836 1919499847560084736 355.28605630685 +39.19399698375 13.5153 12.9597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.836#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113180_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113180_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:55.04 +40:07:59.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.338 1921006041048574720 357.72921885862 +40.13308984991 13.5675 13.1386 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.338#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113377_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113377_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113418_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113418_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:49.45 +40:27:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113649_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113649_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:53.61 +41:01:16.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.189 2882247862519824000 359.72340269457 +41.02125729835 13.3489 12.6413 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113708_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113708_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113787_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113787_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:08:45.57 +40:28:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.421 383197158245048704 002.18919900477 +40.46648330294 13.2897 12.7242 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.421#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113791_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 113791_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114319_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 114319_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:09.22 +41:30:44.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.401 1922088475887157632 356.78731353441 +41.51190242676 13.8603 13.4010 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114431_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 114431_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114465_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 114465_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114630_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 114630_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:59.92 +40:08:33.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.202 2881962058215575936 000.49959620666 +40.14254370933 13.4639 12.9217 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.202#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114773_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 114773_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:52:04.86 +37:52:31.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.374 2881270392386043264 358.02029704341 +37.87587984808 13.4692 12.6915 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.374#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115067_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115067_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115288_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115288_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:10.32 +40:43:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.268 1920484941259528704 355.29302983166 +40.72487937125 13.9003 13.3783 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.268#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115450_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115450_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115523_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115523_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115876_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115876_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115998_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 115998_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116007_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116007_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116195_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116195_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116205_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116205_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116274_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116274_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116609_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116609_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116642_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116642_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116780_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116780_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:45.34 +38:21:09.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.926 1919402231543069184 354.93959144343 +38.35242188091 14.2192 13.6513 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.926#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116805_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116805_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116837_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 116837_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117075_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 117075_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117116_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 117116_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117184_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 117184_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117204_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 117204_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117212_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 117212_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76956_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 76956_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13700_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
Preparing report for the candidate 13700_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10314_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 10314_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:30.32 +42:07:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30119_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 30119_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:20.04 +40:06:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38349_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
Preparing report for the candidate 38349_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44720_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764
The candidate 44720_fd_And-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_06-00-25_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0764 did not pass the final checks