This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J274.1989+58.0123,2461149.9037,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J274.1989+58.0123 20260419.4036 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9037,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4036 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9037,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4036 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1421768113532275200,2461149.9037,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1421768113532275200 20260419.4036 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J270.1051+51.7666,2461149.9037,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J270.1051+51.7666 20260419.4036 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.94397310 22.03.2026 10:39:09.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
First image: 2461121.94397310 22.03.2026 10:39:09.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Last image: 2461149.90394889 19.04.2026 09:41:31.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12888
Objects passed selection criteria: 12876
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12228.2
Average stars matched: 11846.2 (96.8761 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 06:10:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.94397310 22.03.2026 10:39:09.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
First image: 2461121.94397310 22.03.2026 10:39:09.276 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Last image: 2461149.90394889 19.04.2026 09:41:31.184 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 78118
Objects passed selection criteria: 77959
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72966.2
Average stars matched: 70447 (96.5474 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2006048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 06:12:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.90335185
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88
Second-epoch image center 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88
Second-epoch image center 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71
Second-epoch second image center 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00976 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DaME1Ifc16
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wnAfpWPCnK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68HZGgejxd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits &> /tmp/tmp.83fUlzZXu4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17981 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.8200 to 289.6781 deg, Dec +47.7288 to +59.4196 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.8200 to 289.6781 deg, Dec 47.7288 to 59.4196 deg
Loaded 12498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8527 out of 9093 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9093 out of 17981 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.902628
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.902628
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.1 pix Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
2.7 pix fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
2.7 pix fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
15.4 mag. Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DaME1Ifc16 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1279, passed=17981
Got 17981 stars (including 16681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wnAfpWPCnK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1299, passed=17962
Got 17962 stars (including 16637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits -region wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.68HZGgejxd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1351, passed=16479
Got 16479 stars (including 15120 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.83fUlzZXu4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1390, passed=16532
Got 16532 stars (including 15132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16532 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16223 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20967.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20977.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20951_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 20951_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:07.60 +51:14:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20967_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 20967_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:54.29 +53:13:40.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.335 2148478259346545280 275.97558977435 +53.22793814692 12.3233 11.9323 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.335#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20969_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 20969_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:03.89 +51:06:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20977_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 20977_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:01.55 +54:42:05.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.539 2149214348022130304 275.50576298926 +54.70170115849 12.0411 11.1793 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.539#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04131_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 04131_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:00.88 +50:55:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88
Second-epoch image center 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0070 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:21:09.245 +53:59:43.88
Second-epoch image center 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0029 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:21:11.116 +54:00:02.71
Second-epoch second image center 18:21:08.251 +53:59:38.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00976 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r1YmwclpVC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iYGyuLp0bx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FzzSzC0Ru8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OHxUdZG2Ph
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits and wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 106689 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 259.7781 to 289.6982 deg, Dec +47.5716 to +59.4198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 259.7781 to 289.6982 deg, Dec 47.5716 to 59.4198 deg
Loaded 12709 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7495 out of 9168 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9168 out of 106689 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781369
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781369
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.1 pix Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
2.5 pix fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
2.5 pix fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r1YmwclpVC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=8733, passed=106668
Got 106668 stars (including 97773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 106668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 104948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iYGyuLp0bx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=8829, passed=106530
Got 106530 stars (including 97516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 106530 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105026 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 105027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits -region wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FzzSzC0Ru8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=9394, passed=82526
Got 82526 stars (including 73044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82526 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81762 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OHxUdZG2Ph (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=9906, passed=83482
Got 83482 stars (including 73503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83482 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-39-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_05-40-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0334.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-40-39_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0698.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_044220_TTUQ2b1x1_616216_ypGiGRhT/wcs_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out123098.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out123121.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out123131.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124225.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124245.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124359.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124377.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124487.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124494.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124576.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124761.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124796.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124820.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124932.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124937.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124952.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124982.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out124984.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125001.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125003.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125006.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125023.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125068.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out125100.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out123136.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out124345.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out124848.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out124958.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123102.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123120.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123134.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out123155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 118s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123098_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123098_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:23.77 +50:47:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.839 1367568306317111040 268.34823382660 +50.79918043225 14.9239 14.3285 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.839#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123102_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
Preparing report for the candidate 123102_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123113_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123113_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:35.43 +56:00:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123120_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
Preparing report for the candidate 123120_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123121_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123121_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:11.81 +53:12:00.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123131_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123131_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:03.81 +49:44:60.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.477 2123081744065251968 272.76520624931 +49.74913614564 14.6305 14.0960 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.477#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123134_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
Preparing report for the candidate 123134_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123136_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123136_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:27.72 +57:54:06.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123137_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123137_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:24.94 +54:36:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123148_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123148_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:52.40 +57:17:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123151_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
Preparing report for the candidate 123151_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123155_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
Preparing report for the candidate 123155_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123157_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123157_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:23.37 +49:43:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123509_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123509_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:48.27 +57:22:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123521_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123521_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:51.35 +51:22:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123598_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123598_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:26.43 +55:33:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123905_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 123905_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:27.23 +49:51:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124002_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124002_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:41.61 +57:01:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124019_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124019_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:32.06 +52:39:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124142_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124142_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:18.08 +51:18:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124178_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124178_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:05.52 +54:36:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124225_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124225_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:12:12.51 +52:05:13.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.698 2125197891631999872 273.05125597071 +52.08747012773 14.1384 13.5531 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.698#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124245_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124245_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:24.72 +58:13:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.433 2157506864719847040 276.10127987405 +58.23324282090 14.2658 13.7533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.433#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124287_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124287_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:29.35 +52:39:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124296_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124296_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:59.48 +56:21:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124332_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124332_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:41.73 +51:34:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124345_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124345_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:05.98 +51:29:38.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124359_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124359_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:11.95 +54:43:02.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124377_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124377_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:09.10 +51:47:24.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.789 2125176210636968320 273.28690351095 +51.78960011694 14.4323 13.9533 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.789#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124387_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124387_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:21.92 +58:04:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124394_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124394_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:55.05 +56:48:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124465_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124465_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:04.40 +52:42:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124487_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124487_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:11.97 +56:36:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.935 2150327985799152256 270.04848212300 +56.61469486654 14.6340 14.1038 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.935#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124494_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124494_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:07.89 +51:00:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.747 2124144628212355712 275.53223673147 +51.00361650506 14.2560 13.5780 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.747#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124519_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124519_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:22.42 +56:37:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124576_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124576_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:06.79 +56:36:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.475 1418586607918237056 268.02903406734 +56.60869772871 14.9346 14.3597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.475#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124594_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124594_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:32.21 +57:30:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124652_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124652_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:07.10 +53:49:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124665_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124665_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:26.70 +57:59:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124740_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124740_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:11.51 +50:41:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124761_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124761_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:21.17 +55:45:59.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.882 1418300837974157824 268.08700047403 +55.76686766231 14.9985 14.4641 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.882#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124796_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124796_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:18.68 +54:06:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.966 2125692053389001984 270.32773225017 +54.10718173119 14.9518 14.3206 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.966#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124805_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124805_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:38.13 +51:14:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124820_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124820_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:13.69 +57:47:28.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.809 2151441756718504448 274.30745637084 +57.79112579049 15.0395 14.3545 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.809#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124840_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124840_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:32.49 +50:36:26.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.853 1367471480574006656 267.88551614981 +50.60746921258 14.7451 14.2231 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.853#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124848_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124848_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:14.27 +49:42:42.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124931_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124931_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:39.61 +49:45:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124932_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124932_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:35.53 +54:52:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.755 1417926007588334976 263.89771180678 +54.86968854719 15.1819 14.6921 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.755#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124937_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124937_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:30.82 +56:58:04.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.837 1421740866259839232 266.62748740755 +56.96779909326 14.9589 14.3194 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124952_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124952_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:31.39 +56:28:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.309 1421302917034734848 263.87972947067 +56.48082397318 15.0183 14.4054 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.309#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124958_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124958_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:52.77 +56:44:09.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124982_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124982_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:47:39.06 +57:35:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.403 1421818038232297856 266.91216364013 +57.58461943521 15.1501 14.6315 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.403#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124984_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124984_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:55.93 +57:44:38.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.964 1421715818010691328 269.23202243861 +57.74393007825 15.1040 14.5579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.964#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124991_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 124991_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:52.86 +52:06:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125001_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125001_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:22.07 +55:21:04.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.802 1417490704063257728 269.09112792177 +55.35141616555 15.2039 14.7147 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.802#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125003_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125003_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:02.83 +50:09:48.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.739 1367104621647842816 266.51061427326 +50.16348359559 14.5558 13.6389 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.739#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125006_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125006_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:31.44 +55:49:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.953 2150236004779373824 271.63063553096 +55.81663780207 15.3137 14.8139 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.953#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125017_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125017_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:11.53 +54:40:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125023_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125023_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:25.12 +53:59:13.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.572 1417239431296140032 267.10533201088 +53.98829163882 15.2444 14.6094 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.572#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125028_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125028_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:30.89 +57:02:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125068_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125068_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:26.02 +58:05:21.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.438 2151452786194558592 274.35766411991 +58.08945415996 14.8700 13.9301 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.438#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125100_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 125100_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:24.24 +50:16:59.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.418 2123336487165182080 271.09999809325 +50.28334160814 15.0441 14.5246 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.418#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66662_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 66662_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21979_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 21979_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:00.87 +50:55:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 78328_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75258_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699
The candidate 75258_fd_Dra-11-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-41-31_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0699 did not pass the final checks