This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx994127,2461149.9008,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx994127 20260419.4008 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx994123,2461149.9008,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx994123 20260419.4008 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.4008* 16 17 23.93 +50 38 08.8 14.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J244.3481+50.6359,2461149.9008,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J244.3481+50.6359 20260419.4008 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 04 19.4008 2461149.9008 14.82 17:02:25.23 +52:55:50.1
80.40584 37.55361 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1419764219230907648 | 17:02:25.23 +52:55:50.1 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification) J-Ks=1.221+/-0.082 (M)
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1419764219230907648,2461149.9008,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 1419764219230907648 20260419.4008 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.9008,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.4008 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
First image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Last image: 2461149.90115615 19.04.2026 09:37:29.891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8323
Objects passed selection criteria: 8314
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7453.75
Average stars matched: 6860.75 (92.0443 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114048 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 05:04:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
First image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Last image: 2461149.90115615 19.04.2026 09:37:29.891 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 239
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43802
Objects passed selection criteria: 43706
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 40505.8
Average stars matched: 37832 (93.3991 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 05:05:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.90053329
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87
Second-epoch second image center 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01122 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fo2HM4jNK3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LnLoGkWTtP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits &> /tmp/tmp.168GV9gger
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2vqeCGd1XW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9047 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 240.4666 to 269.6503 deg, Dec +47.2686 to +59.6936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 240.4666 to 269.6503 deg, Dec 47.2686 to 59.6936 deg
Loaded 8455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5174 out of 5454 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5454 out of 9047 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.829807
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.829807
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
2.6 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
2.6 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
15.1 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Fo2HM4jNK3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=799, passed=9047
Got 9047 stars (including 8238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LnLoGkWTtP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=760, passed=9068
Got 9068 stars (including 8305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.168GV9gger (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, passed=10853
Got 10853 stars (including 10110 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10853 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2vqeCGd1XW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=762, passed=10869
Got 10869 stars (including 10100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10869 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20501_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 20501_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:15.09 +53:11:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20694_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 20694_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:08.75 +50:28:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20730_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 20730_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:20.93 +55:01:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20768_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 20768_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:11.81 +53:23:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 20769_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:45.70 +52:41:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03070_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 03070_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:49.62 +52:19:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0207 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:56:29.354 +54:00:05.87
Second-epoch second image center 16:56:28.713 +53:59:25.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01122 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4HL7DaH10y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMPl8E3hCO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8oIyapBuhf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IrKWl0oK9z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47455 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 240.3445 to 269.7260 deg, Dec +47.2686 to +59.7071 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 240.3445 to 269.7260 deg, Dec 47.2686 to 59.7071 deg
Loaded 8519 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5478 out of 47455 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.649106
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.649106
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 110 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
2.4 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
2.5 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
2.5 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
15.2 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4HL7DaH10y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4183, passed=47438
Got 47438 stars (including 43201 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YMPl8E3hCO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4149, passed=47216
Got 47216 stars (including 43015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8oIyapBuhf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=4404, passed=52614
Got 52614 stars (including 48159 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IrKWl0oK9z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=4355, passed=52606
Got 52606 stars (including 48194 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-36-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0694.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043820_TTUQ2b1x1_198778_J1KKJQ43/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55136.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55193.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55198.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55301.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55412.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55439.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55450.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55507.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55518.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55585.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55611.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55617.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55647.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55652.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55670.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55696.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55706.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55715.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55784.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55787.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55820.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52966.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out55171.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out55271.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out55567.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out55674.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out55801.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52942.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54869.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54949.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55733.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55756.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 140s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 8s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 52936_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52942_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 52942_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 52943_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 52945_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:12.42 +50:57:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52947_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 52947_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 52952_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 52962_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:27.49 +56:57:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 52963_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:19.84 +55:46:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 52965_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 52966_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:59.74 +52:31:59.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54140_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54140_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:13.87 +57:23:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54811_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54811_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:59.80 +50:36:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:23.19 +50:53:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54825_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:45.59 +57:11:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54827_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54827_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:37.14 +57:38:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54869_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 54869_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54949_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 54949_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 54951_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:19.77 +50:34:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55113_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55113_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:28.62 +54:38:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55122_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55122_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:09.84 +57:25:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55129_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55129_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.10 +50:11:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55133_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55133_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:17.92 +49:59:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55136_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55136_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:06.59 +52:37:16.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.185 1416036840453402624 261.27663387168 +52.62153790444 14.3704 13.7574 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.185#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55171_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55171_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:30.56 +51:13:41.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55191_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55191_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:33.04 +50:22:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55193_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55193_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:49.42 +51:44:15.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.386 1412712810643866752 255.45549583147 +51.73697386717 14.8019 14.2504 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.386#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55198_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55198_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:59.91 +50:21:13.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.963 1423601927129112576 245.74884217456 +50.35405207646 14.5687 14.0469 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.963#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55205_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55205_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:27.92 +49:48:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55215_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55215_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:40.10 +50:27:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55223_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55223_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:25.95 +54:32:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55242_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55242_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:16.86 +50:42:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55253_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55253_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:31.84 +50:20:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55256_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55256_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:27.09 +49:41:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55267_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55267_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:20:37.92 +57:11:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55271_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55271_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:26.09 +55:55:48.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55287_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55287_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:46.55 +50:26:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55301_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55301_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:00.07 +54:40:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.168 1428414730041411968 247.24966348501 +54.66739694488 14.7121 14.1814 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.168#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55304_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55304_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:26.50 +49:44:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55318_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55318_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:54.86 +51:20:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55321_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55321_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:21.51 +50:01:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55355_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55355_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:17.93 +52:07:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55363_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55363_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:49.18 +50:17:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55369_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55369_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:41.39 +52:00:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55371_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55371_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:32.16 +50:02:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55393_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55393_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:48.71 +54:47:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55412_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55412_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:25.59 +49:52:34.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.717 1423703116558883200 246.85640383867 +49.87633349428 14.7746 14.2691 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.717#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55434_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55434_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:10.58 +50:23:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55439_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55439_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:17.35 +51:10:50.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.704 1415056110440980224 260.32164196946 +51.18079683612 14.4737 13.7985 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.704#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55450_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55450_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:36.66 +55:31:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.880 1429646629741417216 243.90239534744 +55.51866717190 14.8566 14.0814 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.880#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55455_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55455_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:17.75 +50:00:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55456_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55456_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:16.33 +50:01:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55459_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55459_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:20.39 +52:54:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55469_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55469_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:33:45.02 +56:01:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55471_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55471_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:29.13 +51:09:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55476_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55476_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:36.03 +54:37:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55482_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55482_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:02.01 +51:54:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55505_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55505_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:13.68 +50:08:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55507_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55507_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:16.86 +57:05:19.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.461 1431230338802199040 247.81962154907 +57.08908048567 14.9757 14.4276 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.461#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55508_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55508_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:03.74 +51:41:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55518_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55518_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:23.58 +51:40:35.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.821 1415842742291458944 259.59763525189 +51.67697152676 14.4912 14.0541 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.821#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55521_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55521_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:34.76 +54:12:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55543_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55543_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:02.09 +50:21:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55552_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55552_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:08.94 +50:07:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55558_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55558_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:06.42 +49:41:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55561_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55561_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:33.26 +53:16:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55567_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55567_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:29.62 +55:52:30.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55581_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55581_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:22.57 +51:26:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55585_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55585_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:59.49 +49:46:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.423 1409290821220684928 255.74703167621 +49.77447876436 14.5893 14.1199 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.423#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55586_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55586_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:41.74 +51:05:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55587_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55587_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:38.59 +55:13:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55597_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55597_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:56.95 +51:34:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55611_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55611_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:52.11 +52:01:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.483 1415866759748545024 260.96685569762 +52.02757158700 14.4863 13.9405 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.483#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55617_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55617_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:05.61 +51:37:04.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.623 1415830578944092672 260.27303217236 +51.61836974064 14.7719 14.3206 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55618_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55618_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:19.50 +50:40:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55619_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55619_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:30.63 +50:30:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55620_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55620_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:45.70 +50:20:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55639_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55639_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:43.12 +50:00:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55647_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55647_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:23.62 +54:37:22.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.156 1429021316863314176 242.84896579217 +54.62290006416 15.1263 14.6027 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.156#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55648_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55648_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:20.08 +51:02:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55652_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55652_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:58.86 +52:05:21.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.200 1415740350270988800 258.99577910352 +52.08926781890 14.9145 14.4724 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.200#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55664_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55664_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:18.17 +49:58:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55670_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55670_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:24.79 +51:38:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.841 1415094833866173056 260.85257384892 +51.63509584237 14.7104 14.1612 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.841#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55674_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55674_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:29.49 +50:22:38.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55678_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 55678_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55679_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55679_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:47.37 +52:51:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55686_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55686_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:39.04 +50:08:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55692_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55692_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:41.16 +50:03:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55696_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55696_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:40.93 +52:07:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.245 1415730420306611200 259.17043718528 +52.12394917344 14.5847 13.8153 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.245#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55703_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55703_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:48.51 +51:03:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55705_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55705_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:08.61 +51:55:03.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.782 1423980537086137728 248.78470619693 +51.91738800108 15.1174 14.8756 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.782#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55706_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55706_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:19.95 +56:28:27.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55715_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55715_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:24.66 +57:47:30.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.353 1431603004524882688 249.60241111801 +57.79150388975 15.0064 14.4832 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.353#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55725_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55725_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:01.19 +57:39:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55733_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 55733_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55735_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55735_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:42.37 +52:10:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55743_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55743_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:21.99 +51:36:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55744_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55744_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:59.91 +51:06:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55751_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55751_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:38.43 +53:09:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55754_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55754_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:30.39 +50:39:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55756_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 55756_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55757_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
Preparing report for the candidate 55757_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55764_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55764_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.17 +49:57:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55784_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55784_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:13.67 +49:54:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.787 1414512023984284160 257.30644078339 +49.90400428446 14.7299 14.1970 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55787_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55787_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:31.44 +54:18:44.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.951 1419422271114843648 261.13008498960 +54.31234312152 14.7914 14.2857 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.951#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55793_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55793_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:33.95 +49:48:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55801_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55801_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:04.33 +50:31:49.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:47.04 +50:41:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.623 1414617199143238016 259.69508677812 +50.68688723422 14.9585 14.5015 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.623#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55820_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 55820_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:09.51 +54:40:48.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.161 1419463124843814912 261.79057201043 +54.67892493766 14.6979 14.1102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.161#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14870_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 14870_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:49.65 +52:19:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695
The candidate 17921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-37-29_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0695 did not pass the final checks
