This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.3939* 12 48 38.99 +53 11 04.7 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1770410,2461149.8939,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1770410 20260419.3939 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.3939* 13 24 24.68 +54 41 02.4 13.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1563577866243408384,2461149.8939,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1563577866243408384 20260419.3939 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8939,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3939 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.3939* 12 20 09.43 +56 54 52.0 12.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
UU UMa,2461149.8939,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
UU UMa 20260419.3939 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.98752773 21.01.2026 11:41:52.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461061.98752773 21.01.2026 11:41:52.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461149.89415425 19.04.2026 09:27:24.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5106
Objects passed selection criteria: 5101
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4686.75
Average stars matched: 4568 (97.4663 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 04:30:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461061.98752773 21.01.2026 11:41:52.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
First image: 2461061.98752773 21.01.2026 11:41:52.396 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Last image: 2461149.89415425 19.04.2026 09:27:24.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24302
Objects passed selection criteria: 24258
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 22412.5
Average stars matched: 21663.5 (96.6581 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 04:31:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.89355910
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54
Second-epoch image center 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54
Second-epoch image center 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9cn0QT2mlb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kurh61Ydx3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qYFQuuVllb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6385sago80
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6598 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 176.1849 to 206.0577 deg, Dec +47.8548 to +59.3659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 176.1849 to 206.0577 deg, Dec 47.8548 to 59.3659 deg
Loaded 5030 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3547 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3547 out of 6598 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.939160
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.939160
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.3 pix UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
2.6 pix fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9cn0QT2mlb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=387, passed=6598
Got 6598 stars (including 6202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kurh61Ydx3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=367, passed=6692
Got 6692 stars (including 6315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qYFQuuVllb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, passed=5315
Got 5315 stars (including 4810 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6385sago80 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=464, passed=5302
Got 5302 stars (including 4834 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20412.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20270_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 20270_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:55:21.81 +51:38:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20412_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 20412_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:15:13.42 +52:15:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.146 1557047072115397120 198.80632728319 +52.25766557901 12.2977 11.4831 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.146#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54
Second-epoch image center 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0132 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:24.745 +53:59:19.54
Second-epoch image center 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:42:21.389 +53:59:56.68
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:24.189 +54:00:00.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00694 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z2upDtsEdg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l11ktczc7e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R1A6LYvqjy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KRot5MRBOi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31066 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 176.0715 to 206.0577 deg, Dec +47.6770 to +59.3689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 176.0715 to 206.0577 deg, Dec 47.6770 to 59.3689 deg
Loaded 5147 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3270 out of 3560 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3560 out of 31066 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832835
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832835
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
2.3 pix UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Z2upDtsEdg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1280, passed=31061
Got 31061 stars (including 29727 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l11ktczc7e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1263, passed=30697
Got 30697 stars (including 29384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30697 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R1A6LYvqjy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2171, passed=24028
Got 24028 stars (including 21836 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23194 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KRot5MRBOi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2116, passed=23893
Got 23893 stars (including 21753 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23230 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23229 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-41-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0572.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-01-21_05-42-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0573.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-26-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0684.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_042805_TTUQ2b1x1_3011473_KP7MsupG/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51518.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51819.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52372.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 47s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51518_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
Preparing report for the candidate 51518_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51590_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51590_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51605_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51605_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:15:42.36 +57:00:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51629_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51629_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51640_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51640_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:01:36.15 +56:58:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51645_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51645_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51674_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51674_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51686_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51686_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51727_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51727_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51773_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51773_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51778_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51778_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51797_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51797_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51819_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
Preparing report for the candidate 51819_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51835_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51835_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:39:03.73 +56:01:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51855_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51855_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51882_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51882_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51883_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51883_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:49:44.97 +51:33:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51893_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51893_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:24:08.36 +51:35:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51899_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51899_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51901_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51901_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51925_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51925_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51933_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51933_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51958_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51958_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51974_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 51974_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52001_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52001_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52041_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52041_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52042_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52042_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:22:52.53 +53:20:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52082_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52082_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:25:53.09 +56:58:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52088_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52088_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52106_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52106_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52114_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52125_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52125_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:48:18.66 +54:28:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52139_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52139_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52144_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52144_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52159_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52159_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52161_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52161_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52162_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52162_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52167_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52167_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52174_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52174_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52176_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52176_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52196_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52196_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52214_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52223_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52226_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52237_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52237_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52242_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52242_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52246_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52246_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52261_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52261_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52272_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52272_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52276_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52276_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52302_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52302_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52317_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52317_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52326_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52326_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52345_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52345_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52350_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52350_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52352_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52352_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52364_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52364_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52372_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
Preparing report for the candidate 52372_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52419_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52428_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52428_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52435_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52440_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52440_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52443_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52443_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52484_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52484_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52491_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52491_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52492_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52492_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52503_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685
The candidate 52503_fd_UMa-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_04-27-24_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0685 did not pass the final checks