This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8676,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3676 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.96146487 19.03.2026 11:04:20.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
First image: 2461118.96146487 19.03.2026 11:04:20.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Last image: 2461149.86792689 19.04.2026 08:49:38.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6623
Objects passed selection criteria: 6621
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6388.5
Average stars matched: 6272 (98.1764 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112808 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 03:56:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.96146487 19.03.2026 11:04:20.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
First image: 2461118.96146487 19.03.2026 11:04:20.565 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Last image: 2461149.86792689 19.04.2026 08:49:38.883 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 198
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36453
Objects passed selection criteria: 36346
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 34994.8
Average stars matched: 33602 (96.0201 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138712 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 03:57:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.86733143
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82
Second-epoch image center 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48
Second-epoch second image center 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00646 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.13wRnHZLyH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pacpgtdNRs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K7qLIO5Aif
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9x8f8ms22Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8574 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.8188 to 244.1863 deg, Dec +63.6212 to +75.2465 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.8188 to 244.1863 deg, Dec 63.6212 to 75.2465 deg
Loaded 8195 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4871 out of 5074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5074 out of 8574 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.882878
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.882878
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.25
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.4 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
15.2 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.13wRnHZLyH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=565, passed=8574
Got 8574 stars (including 8006 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8574 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pacpgtdNRs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, passed=8513
Got 8513 stars (including 7944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8400 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8399 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K7qLIO5Aif (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, passed=7945
Got 7945 stars (including 7439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9x8f8ms22Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, passed=7905
Got 7905 stars (including 7405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20307_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:47:14.52 +71:02:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20308_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20308_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:42.17 +66:11:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20325_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20325_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:52.97 +67:01:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20337_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:23:39.92 +72:30:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20338_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20338_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:24.73 +71:12:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20356_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 20356_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:40:26.70 +67:56:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0149 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:02.612 +70:00:26.82
Second-epoch image center 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:24:01.598 +69:59:33.48
Second-epoch second image center 14:23:59.605 +69:59:12.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00646 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qzlPI3agkz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zSXutDaFgL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pCCPjpfuUX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OvwoNVW9Y3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43499 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.8188 to 244.1862 deg, Dec +63.6212 to +75.2751 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.8188 to 244.1862 deg, Dec 63.6212 to 75.2751 deg
Loaded 8213 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4619 out of 5140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5140 out of 43499 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.750080
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.750080
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 130 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.2 pix UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
15.4 mag. UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.4 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
15.4 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.qzlPI3agkz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2230, passed=43481
Got 43481 stars (including 41183 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43481 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43086 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zSXutDaFgL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2297, passed=43757
Got 43757 stars (including 41401 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43757 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pCCPjpfuUX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2144, passed=41514
Got 41514 stars (including 39324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OvwoNVW9Y3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2188, passed=41435
Got 41435 stars (including 39206 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41435 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-04-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-05-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_035020_TTUQ2b1x1_1731897_vAIEvvA0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52611.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52615.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52616.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53181.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53264.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53275.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53281.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52606.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53180.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53186.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53209.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53226.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53245.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 64s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 52606_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52611_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52611_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:57.88 +65:07:21.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.525 1644021229307143552 232.23974105547 +65.12192027960 14.3375 13.8294 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.525#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52614_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52614_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:14.70 +73:51:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52615_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:03.07 +67:59:19.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.466 1693696717973561216 224.26354172490 +67.98901692050 14.6504 14.0694 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.466#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52616_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:28.61 +65:28:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.333 1644218419846013696 229.36948225800 +65.47578661949 14.3614 13.8073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.333#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52618_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:38.97 +66:34:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52642_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52642_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:52.97 +67:01:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52651_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52670_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:03:35.65 +66:30:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52677_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52677_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52690_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52690_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52693_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52695_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52705_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52716_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52726_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:36:47.24 +66:46:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52745_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52755_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52755_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52757_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52759_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52765_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52769_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52771_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52771_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52784_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:22:15.49 +68:45:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52788_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52795_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52795_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52804_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52805_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52807_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52808_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52815_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52821_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52835_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52835_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52836_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52836_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52837_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52837_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:59.76 +67:00:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52848_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52854_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52857_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52875_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52877_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52877_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52887_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52887_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52899_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52911_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52911_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:48.25 +69:15:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52912_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52912_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52924_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:18.88 +71:48:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52926_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52926_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52927_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:56.76 +65:33:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52935_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:19:30.21 +66:45:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52953_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:42:57.72 +70:48:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52957_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52958_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52964_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52968_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:31.17 +69:44:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52970_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52975_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52975_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:58.83 +67:52:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52978_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52985_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:02.32 +70:15:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52990_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52991_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52992_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 52998_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53004_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:18.32 +68:37:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53005_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53007_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53008_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:50.41 +72:41:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53012_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:27:54.14 +69:16:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53013_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53017_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53024_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53028_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53032_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:58.69 +65:57:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53033_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53036_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53041_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:06:15.06 +69:09:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53043_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:38.77 +65:51:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53045_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53051_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53051_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53063_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:11.85 +69:11:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53067_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53071_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:24.98 +65:59:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53080_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53084_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:26:37.40 +67:39:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53085_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53087_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:00.52 +65:16:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53092_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53098_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53098_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53102_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53105_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53105_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53106_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53106_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53111_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53111_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53136_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53143_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53153_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53157_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:14:56.48 +66:56:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53162_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53175_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53175_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53180_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53180_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53181_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:41.85 +66:01:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.328 1644306277696677120 231.17547990417 +66.02692360049 14.9269 14.4846 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.328#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53186_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53191_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53191_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:42:26.20 +65:48:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53193_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53193_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53198_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:24.83 +68:31:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53199_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53200_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:43:55.99 +66:45:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53207_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53209_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53214_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53214_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53222_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53226_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53226_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53233_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53234_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:14.05 +67:37:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53245_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53245_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53249_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
Preparing report for the candidate 53252_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53253_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53253_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53258_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53262_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53264_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:57.13 +71:33:56.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.035 1648266340622923520 237.98868183234 +71.56560154634 14.9514 14.4697 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.035#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53271_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:59.29 +71:08:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53275_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53275_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:08.39 +67:46:24.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.761 1693673387711156096 224.53513751006 +67.77329968955 14.9247 14.4448 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.761#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53281_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:55.42 +70:38:15.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.056 1695782663330495488 234.23179561528 +70.63766002453 14.9146 14.2762 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.056#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53295_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:30:00.37 +68:23:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53306_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53308_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53308_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53323_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53323_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53331_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53331_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53384_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 53384_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51703_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 51703_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42116_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 42116_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:40:26.68 +67:56:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12189_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660
The candidate 12189_fd_UMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660 did not pass the final checks
