This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2295713449106304000,2461149.8637,13.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2295713449106304000 20260419.3637 13.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2289649062660454400,2461149.8637,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2289649062660454400 20260419.3637 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2269021498670875264,2461149.8637,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2269021498670875264 20260419.3637 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2293946847453185408,2461149.8637,14.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2293946847453185408 20260419.3637 14.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1657214166250073472,2461149.8637,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1657214166250073472 20260419.3637 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2294370021991306752,2461149.8637,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2294370021991306752 20260419.3637 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180808.36+754512.3,2461149.8637,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180808.36+754512.3 20260419.3637 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2266249840313327488,2461149.8637,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2266249840313327488 20260419.3637 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2202742,2461149.8637,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2202742 20260419.3637 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2198726,2461149.8637,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2198726 20260419.3637 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx2202035,2461149.8637,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx2202035 20260419.3637 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2289870270654973824,2461149.8637,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2289870270654973824 20260419.3637 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,9.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 9.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.8637,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.3637 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.95775807 19.03.2026 10:59:00.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461118.95775807 19.03.2026 10:59:00.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461149.86402944 19.04.2026 08:44:02.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9662
Objects passed selection criteria: 9652
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9103.25
Average stars matched: 8834.75 (97.0505 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115316 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 03:47:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.95775807 19.03.2026 10:59:00.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461118.95775807 19.03.2026 10:59:00.297 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461149.86402944 19.04.2026 08:44:02.144 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 393
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 44 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 62143
Objects passed selection criteria: 61995
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57257.5
Average stars matched: 55076.5 (96.1909 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 164060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 03:58:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.86344497
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Image size: 924.0'x627.2' 15.4(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Image size: 924.0'x627.2' 15.4(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00330 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uAHj4TRDUb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q5dxOr3LHo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wjE0K9kd6N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CjUZnMewqD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.4096 to 346.4619 deg, Dec +70.4651 to +82.7909 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.4096 to 346.4619 deg, Dec 70.4651 to 82.7909 deg
Loaded 14571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6915 out of 7265 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7265 out of 12067 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.869160
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.869160
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.72
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
2.4 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
2.3 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.1 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uAHj4TRDUb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=797, passed=12067
Got 12067 stars (including 11253 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q5dxOr3LHo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=800, passed=12084
Got 12084 stars (including 11268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12084 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wjE0K9kd6N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=746, passed=10662
Got 10662 stars (including 9908 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012833 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010267 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 251 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.00"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 205 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 312 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 287 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.05"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 285 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.83"
Excluding outliers - 285 stars left (next iteration limit 225)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CjUZnMewqD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=798, passed=10659
Got 10659 stars (including 9850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012833 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010267 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 248 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 209 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 204 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.15"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 308 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 281 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.95"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 281 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.13"
Excluding outliers - 281 stars left (next iteration limit 224)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20724.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20724_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 20724_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Image size: 924.0'x627.2' 15.4(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0332 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Image size: 924.0'x627.2' 15.4(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:00:00.947 +77:30:25.41
Second-epoch image center 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0303 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:59:24.862 +77:30:01.17
Second-epoch second image center 19:59:27.679 +77:30:08.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00330 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.623zt9MU4z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1CGLfwia2R
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6RWUNf1OiB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits &> /tmp/tmp.anyWWaGlA6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 74965 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 252.0295 to 346.5832 deg, Dec +70.4215 to +82.7934 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 252.0295 to 346.5832 deg, Dec 70.4215 to 82.7934 deg
Loaded 14717 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6431 out of 7491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7491 out of 74965 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.711257
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.711257
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 274 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
2.1 pix Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.3 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
2.2 pix fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.3 mag. Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.623zt9MU4z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=5016, passed=74949
Got 74949 stars (including 69842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1CGLfwia2R (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5096, passed=74368
Got 74368 stars (including 69181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74368 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6RWUNf1OiB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4905, passed=60703
Got 60703 stars (including 55724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012833 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010267 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 265 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 217 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.13"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 210 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16226 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.98"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 329 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 306 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.96"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 302 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.09"
Excluding outliers - 302 stars left (next iteration limit 231)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.anyWWaGlA6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4844, passed=61087
Got 61087 stars (including 56162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012833 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010267 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 259 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 206 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 324 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 298 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16292 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 292 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.33"
Excluding outliers - 292 stars left (next iteration limit 226)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-59-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_06-00-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-43-11_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0653.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_034450_TTUQ2b1x1_1494845_SfPpuxc9/wcs_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89771.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out89787.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90744.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91311.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91448.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91504.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91756.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91791.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91793.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91883.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91899.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91931.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91938.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91991.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92028.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92035.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92061.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92072.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92093.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92186.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out92246.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out30850.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39104.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out89805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90214.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90528.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90560.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91410.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91425.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91815.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91818.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91898.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91911.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91918.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91962.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91963.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91967.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out91985.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92001.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92006.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92021.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92029.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92030.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92058.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92059.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92074.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92188.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92190.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92273.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92355.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 281s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 44s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89761_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89761_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89762_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89762_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89764_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89764_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89768_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89768_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89769_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 89769_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:34.80 +78:04:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89771_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 89771_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:59.37 +79:08:23.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.551 1706443734231776896 264.49973157375 +79.13909152276 14.4639 13.9584 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.551#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89787_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 89787_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:38.43 +75:44:33.8 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89802_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89802_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89805_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 89805_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89902_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 89902_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90009_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90009_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90106_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90106_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90143_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90143_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90162_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90162_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90170_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90170_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90197_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90197_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90210_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90210_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90214_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90214_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90217_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90217_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90219_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90219_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90224_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90224_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90228_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90228_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90244_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90244_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90254_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90254_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90263_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90263_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90274_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90274_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90277_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90277_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90288_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90288_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90290_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90290_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90318_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90318_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:14.63 +73:45:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90323_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90323_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90333_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90333_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90334_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90334_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90345_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90345_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90347_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90347_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90353_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90353_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90358_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90358_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90382_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90382_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90385_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90385_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90388_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90388_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90399_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90399_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90424_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90424_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90433_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90433_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90434_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90434_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:19:30.20 +76:35:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90444_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90444_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90457_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90457_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90462_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90462_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90470_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90470_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90485_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90485_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90488_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90488_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90494_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90494_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90499_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90499_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90509_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90509_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90517_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90517_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90523_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90523_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:57.32 +74:38:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90528_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90528_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90556_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90556_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90560_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90560_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90571_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90571_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90586_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90586_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90589_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90589_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90593_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90593_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90607_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90607_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90609_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 90609_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90618_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90618_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90644_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90644_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90647_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90647_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90678_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90678_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90685_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90685_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90698_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90698_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90701_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90701_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90705_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90705_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90722_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90722_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90723_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90723_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90731_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90731_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90744_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90744_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:25.92 +74:06:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.176 2267826711786455936 283.35919398805 +74.09913707533 13.7619 13.2453 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.176#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90746_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90746_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90749_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90749_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90784_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90784_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90788_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90788_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90822_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90822_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90844_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90844_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90846_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90846_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90872_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90872_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90875_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90875_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90889_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90889_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90897_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90897_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90903_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90903_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90908_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90908_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90920_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90920_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90928_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90928_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90929_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90929_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90935_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90935_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90938_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90938_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90948_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90948_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90954_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90954_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90962_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90962_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90980_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90980_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90987_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90987_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90995_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90995_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90996_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 90996_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91005_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91005_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91020_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91020_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91026_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91026_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91030_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91030_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91036_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91036_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91091_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91091_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91112_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91112_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91132_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91132_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91162_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91162_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91183_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91183_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91211_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91211_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91218_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91218_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91240_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91240_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91241_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91241_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91242_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91242_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91247_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91247_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91299_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91299_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91303_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91303_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91311_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91311_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:15:04.67 +80:34:24.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.462 2294503956251265920 273.76698268935 +80.57335352365 14.3461 13.8417 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.462#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91317_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91317_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91328_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91328_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91345_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91345_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:00.53 +75:03:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91360_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91360_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91369_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91369_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:42.83 +80:00:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91375_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91375_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91388_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91388_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91393_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91393_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91395_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91395_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91396_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91396_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:46.13 +78:28:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91399_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91399_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:21.33 +79:55:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91410_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91410_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91412_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91412_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91423_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91423_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:05:14.44 +76:51:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91425_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91425_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91426_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91426_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91434_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91434_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91448_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91448_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:00.07 +74:55:46.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.299 2268286204566769792 286.25259210522 +74.92894470910 14.3990 13.8488 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.299#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91463_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91463_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91468_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91468_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91470_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91470_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91479_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91479_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91494_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91494_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91504_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91504_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:51.61 +79:29:36.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.028 1705728914234839808 267.96468244830 +79.49216051154 14.5735 14.0005 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.028#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91510_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91510_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91511_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91511_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91539_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91539_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91543_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91543_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91550_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91550_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91559_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91559_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91564_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91564_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91572_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91572_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91580_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91580_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91583_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91583_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91591_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91591_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91615_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91615_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91629_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91629_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91634_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91634_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91635_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91635_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91645_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91645_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91648_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91648_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91655_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91655_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91678_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91678_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91688_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91688_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91706_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91706_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91722_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91722_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:11:45.59 +76:23:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91726_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91726_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91756_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91756_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:37.62 +74:41:12.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.530 2268739718753055616 277.91003004610 +74.68642943147 14.9214 14.4132 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.530#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91759_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91759_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91764_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91764_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91767_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91767_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91773_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91773_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:35.10 +77:51:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91782_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91782_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91791_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91791_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:05.09 +76:29:54.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.564 2269380871471109760 275.02130104789 +76.49678788643 14.6062 14.0508 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.564#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91793_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91793_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:53.85 +79:07:00.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.472 2293981482069383168 270.72152307125 +79.11608883450 14.5782 13.9198 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.472#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91801_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91801_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91805_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91805_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91813_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91813_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91815_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91815_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91818_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91818_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91826_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91826_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91833_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91833_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91839_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91839_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91841_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91841_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91847_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91847_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91855_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91855_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91857_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91857_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91860_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91860_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91864_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91864_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91865_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91865_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:14:30.74 +75:34:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91866_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91866_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91876_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91876_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91878_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91878_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91883_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91883_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:20.87 +78:50:29.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.829 2293876684867407872 270.58546690512 +78.84053197562 14.7701 14.1972 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91890_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91890_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91898_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91898_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91899_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91899_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:43.29 +79:49:36.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.383 2294364730591479936 274.68469278894 +79.82549174814 14.7597 14.1527 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.383#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91902_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91902_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91908_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91908_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91911_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91911_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91914_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91914_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91918_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91918_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91923_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91923_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91927_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91927_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91931_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91931_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:13:57.00 +76:11:34.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.658 2269174369443814656 273.48711702007 +76.19140322330 14.7369 13.9258 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.658#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91936_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91936_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91937_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91937_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91938_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91938_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:18:50.36 +75:50:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.299 2268960411352554880 274.70838060954 +75.83923820686 15.0050 14.4009 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.299#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91940_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91940_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91944_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91944_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91957_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91957_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91958_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91958_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91960_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91960_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91962_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91962_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91963_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91963_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91967_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91967_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91976_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91976_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91984_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91984_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91985_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 91985_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91991_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91991_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:25.42 +75:36:06.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91993_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 91993_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92001_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92001_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92006_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92006_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92012_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92012_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92014_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92014_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92018_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92018_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92021_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92021_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92023_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92023_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92028_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92028_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:01.34 +77:58:30.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92029_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92029_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92030_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92030_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92033_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92033_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92035_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92035_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:06.03 +76:31:59.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.891 1656191242479195392 269.02987818306 +76.53246249266 14.9712 14.3785 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.891#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92045_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92045_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:52.21 +78:32:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92051_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92051_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92058_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92058_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92059_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92059_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92061_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92061_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:35.93 +78:11:25.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.201 2293069574613250816 290.14736159142 +78.18958492432 14.6818 14.0518 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.201#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92063_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92063_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92066_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92066_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92072_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92072_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:05.32 +75:27:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.859 2269076890866224000 271.77421772206 +75.45687287073 14.8430 14.1466 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.859#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92074_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92074_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92084_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92084_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92085_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92085_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92093_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92093_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:10:33.81 +76:43:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.738 2269566929454391040 272.64370500633 +76.71694036515 14.8607 14.3159 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.738#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92097_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92097_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92098_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92098_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92108_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92108_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92114_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92114_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:10.20 +76:36:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92116_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92116_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92117_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92117_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:05.84 +77:30:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.557 2292976219204137600 288.02868394140 +77.51479168133 14.8626 14.2262 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.557#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92165_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92165_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92182_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92182_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:42.35 +79:35:01.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.654 2294238797854393856 278.66995704767 +79.58434415543 12.8372 12.1828 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.654#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92186_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92186_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:02.02 +78:13:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.486 2293656060987992448 279.01195935665 +78.22040871720 15.0874 14.5878 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.486#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92188_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92188_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92190_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92190_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92197_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92197_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92208_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92208_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92246_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92246_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:45.95 +77:51:58.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.489 2293009101473934336 287.93817963006 +77.86512737405 14.8573 14.2715 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.489#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92273_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92273_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92279_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92279_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92285_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92285_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92297_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92297_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92343_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92343_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92355_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 92355_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92358_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92358_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92371_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92371_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92397_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 92397_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 52922_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12352_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 12352_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:45.57 +73:25:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30850_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 30850_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32231_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 32231_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39104_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
Preparing report for the candidate 39104_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59478_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654
The candidate 59478_fd_Dra-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_03-44-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0654 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 4s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 329s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2
21:07:27.95 +75:55:52.8
19:48:35.15 +77:43:49.2
21:17:27.64 +77:51:32.3
20:59:41.98 +77:52:05.2
19:23:04.73 +74:55:35.5
19:22:14.99 +79:00:48.8
18:53:40.23 +77:46:53.5
19:15:27.71 +79:27:51.8
19:44:15.55 +80:28:15.3
18:42:09.02 +80:17:52.5
19:05:50.04 +80:29:06.3
18:49:59.83 +79:56:42.5
19:39:07.50 +76:34:59.4
19:06:45.12 +80:56:14.3
18:39:56.91 +77:29:32.5
19:18:38.57 +81:19:30.6
18:14:41.40 +75:23:40.2
20:07:43.68 +81:31:57.9
18:14:58.36 +79:09:14.8
19:41:50.90 +80:28:03.0
20:23:04.36 +80:11:53.9
17:48:32.00 +77:22:32.9
18:13:38.42 +79:56:38.9
19:04:21.14 +81:00:44.0
19:04:29.54 +79:37:29.4
17:30:29.37 +78:44:38.1
18:49:38.05 +75:54:07.5
17:32:56.11 +78:54:55.3
18:01:14.97 +77:42:01.3
18:02:51.34 +77:15:02.5
18:08:09.19 +75:45:19.1
19:06:42.74 +80:29:31.6
17:41:53.74 +78:45:18.3
17:40:59.77 +79:39:35.1
18:50:21.30 +79:05:45.5
19:32:49.77 +75:35:41.7
20:51:09.58 +76:27:48.7
17:38:50.31 +79:28:45.8
17:47:57.21 +77:17:12.2
18:05:54.57 +80:09:04.8
17:31:12.81 +78:31:43.0
17:57:41.80 +77:34:42.1
19:10:36.24 +80:54:09.1
18:34:46.51 +76:47:53.1
18:31:46.25 +72:26:33.9
17:50:45.48 +77:48:44.1
18:23:06.18 +80:31:28.0
18:30:15.76 +77:53:49.8
18:49:38.64 +80:02:52.9
17:56:37.72 +77:31:58.3
19:10:20.24 +80:44:00.2
19:28:00.08 +79:09:28.6
17:50:58.51 +79:10:24.8
19:27:30.25 +76:32:20.8
17:59:20.90 +79:38:02.5
18:53:31.26 +72:52:41.1
18:24:28.64 +73:05:05.6
19:45:57.69 +79:27:33.6
19:17:06.09 +75:20:10.6
20:02:27.65 +80:50:41.0
19:08:33.53 +75:20:16.9
19:36:20.26 +74:59:59.0
19:50:28.22 +74:45:51.1
########### Completed Dra-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2
20:59:41.98 +77:52:05.2
19:23:04.73 +74:55:35.5
19:22:14.99 +79:00:48.8
18:53:40.23 +77:46:53.5
19:15:27.71 +79:27:51.8
19:44:15.55 +80:28:15.3
18:42:09.02 +80:17:52.5
19:05:50.04 +80:29:06.3
18:49:59.83 +79:56:42.5
19:39:07.50 +76:34:59.4
19:06:45.12 +80:56:14.3
18:39:56.91 +77:29:32.5
19:18:38.57 +81:19:30.6
18:14:41.40 +75:23:40.2
20:07:43.68 +81:31:57.9
18:14:58.36 +79:09:14.8
19:41:50.90 +80:28:03.0
20:23:04.36 +80:11:53.9
17:48:32.00 +77:22:32.9
18:13:38.42 +79:56:38.9
19:04:21.14 +81:00:44.0
19:04:29.54 +79:37:29.4
17:30:29.37 +78:44:38.1
18:49:38.05 +75:54:07.5
17:32:56.11 +78:54:55.3
18:01:14.97 +77:42:01.3
18:02:51.34 +77:15:02.5
18:08:09.19 +75:45:19.1
19:06:42.74 +80:29:31.6
17:41:53.74 +78:45:18.3
17:40:59.77 +79:39:35.1
18:50:21.30 +79:05:45.5
19:32:49.77 +75:35:41.7
20:51:09.58 +76:27:48.7
17:38:50.31 +79:28:45.8
17:47:57.21 +77:17:12.2
18:05:54.57 +80:09:04.8
17:31:12.81 +78:31:43.0
17:57:41.80 +77:34:42.1
19:10:36.24 +80:54:09.1
18:34:46.51 +76:47:53.1
18:31:46.25 +72:26:33.9
17:50:45.48 +77:48:44.1
18:23:06.18 +80:31:28.0
18:30:15.76 +77:53:49.8
18:49:38.64 +80:02:52.9
17:56:37.72 +77:31:58.3
19:10:20.24 +80:44:00.2
19:28:00.08 +79:09:28.6
17:50:58.51 +79:10:24.8
19:27:30.25 +76:32:20.8
17:59:20.90 +79:38:02.5
18:53:31.26 +72:52:41.1
18:24:28.64 +73:05:05.6
19:45:57.69 +79:27:33.6
19:17:06.09 +75:20:10.6
20:02:27.65 +80:50:41.0
19:08:33.53 +75:20:16.9
19:36:20.26 +74:59:59.0
19:50:28.22 +74:45:51.1
21:17:27.64 +77:51:32.3
21:07:27.95 +75:55:52.8
19:48:35.15 +77:43:49.2
###################################################################################
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:59:41.98 +77:52:05.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:23:04.73 +74:55:35.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:22:14.99 +79:00:48.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:53:40.23 +77:46:53.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:27.71 +79:27:51.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:15.55 +80:28:15.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:42:09.02 +80:17:52.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:50.04 +80:29:06.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:59.83 +79:56:42.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:07.50 +76:34:59.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:06:45.12 +80:56:14.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:39:56.91 +77:29:32.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:38.57 +81:19:30.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:14:41.40 +75:23:40.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:07:43.68 +81:31:57.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:14:58.36 +79:09:14.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:41:50.90 +80:28:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:23:04.36 +80:11:53.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:48:32.00 +77:22:32.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:13:38.42 +79:56:38.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:21.14 +81:00:44.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:29.54 +79:37:29.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:30:29.37 +78:44:38.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:38.05 +75:54:07.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:32:56.11 +78:54:55.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:14.97 +77:42:01.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:51.34 +77:15:02.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:08:09.19 +75:45:19.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:06:42.74 +80:29:31.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:53.74 +78:45:18.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:40:59.77 +79:39:35.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:50:21.30 +79:05:45.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:32:49.77 +75:35:41.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:51:09.58 +76:27:48.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:38:50.31 +79:28:45.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:47:57.21 +77:17:12.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:54.57 +80:09:04.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:31:12.81 +78:31:43.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:57:41.80 +77:34:42.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:36.24 +80:54:09.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:34:46.51 +76:47:53.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:31:46.25 +72:26:33.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:45.48 +77:48:44.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:23:06.18 +80:31:28.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:30:15.76 +77:53:49.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:38.64 +80:02:52.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:56:37.72 +77:31:58.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:20.24 +80:44:00.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:28:00.08 +79:09:28.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:58.51 +79:10:24.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:30.25 +76:32:20.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:20.90 +79:38:02.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:53:31.26 +72:52:41.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:24:28.64 +73:05:05.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:57.69 +79:27:33.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:06.09 +75:20:10.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:27.65 +80:50:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:33.53 +75:20:16.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:20.26 +74:59:59.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:50:28.22 +74:45:51.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:17:27.64 +77:51:32.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
21:07:27.95 +75:55:52.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:35.15 +77:43:49.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
17:30:29.37 +78:44:38.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:31:12.81 +78:31:43.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:32:56.11 +78:54:55.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:38:50.31 +79:28:45.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:40:59.77 +79:39:35.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:41:53.74 +78:45:18.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:47:57.21 +77:17:12.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:48:32.00 +77:22:32.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:45.48 +77:48:44.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:58.51 +79:10:24.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:56:37.72 +77:31:58.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:57:41.80 +77:34:42.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:20.90 +79:38:02.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:14.97 +77:42:01.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:51.34 +77:15:02.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:54.57 +80:09:04.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:08:09.19 +75:45:19.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:13:38.42 +79:56:38.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:14:41.40 +75:23:40.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:14:58.36 +79:09:14.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:23:06.18 +80:31:28.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:24:28.64 +73:05:05.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:30:15.76 +77:53:49.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:31:46.25 +72:26:33.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:34:46.51 +76:47:53.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:39:56.91 +77:29:32.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:42:09.02 +80:17:52.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:38.05 +75:54:07.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:38.64 +80:02:52.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:49:59.83 +79:56:42.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:50:21.30 +79:05:45.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:53:31.26 +72:52:41.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:53:40.23 +77:46:53.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:21.14 +81:00:44.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:04:29.54 +79:37:29.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:05:50.04 +80:29:06.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:06:42.74 +80:29:31.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:06:45.12 +80:56:14.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:08:33.53 +75:20:16.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:20.24 +80:44:00.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:10:36.24 +80:54:09.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:15:27.71 +79:27:51.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:17:06.09 +75:20:10.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:18:38.57 +81:19:30.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:22:14.99 +79:00:48.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:23:04.73 +74:55:35.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:27:30.25 +76:32:20.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:28:00.08 +79:09:28.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:32:49.77 +75:35:41.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:36:20.26 +74:59:59.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:39:07.50 +76:34:59.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:41:50.90 +80:28:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:44:15.55 +80:28:15.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:45:57.69 +79:27:33.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:48:35.15 +77:43:49.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
19:50:28.22 +74:45:51.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:02:27.65 +80:50:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:07:43.68 +81:31:57.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:23:04.36 +80:11:53.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:51:09.58 +76:27:48.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
20:59:41.98 +77:52:05.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:07:27.95 +75:55:52.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
21:17:27.64 +77:51:32.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
17:30:29.37 +78:44:38.1 -- not a known variable star
17:31:12.81 +78:31:43.0 -- not a known variable star
17:32:56.11 +78:54:55.3 -- not a known variable star
17:38:50.31 +79:28:45.8 -- not a known variable star
17:40:59.77 +79:39:35.1 -- not a known variable star
17:41:53.74 +78:45:18.3 -- not a known variable star
17:47:57.21 +77:17:12.2 -- not a known variable star
17:48:32.00 +77:22:32.9 -- not a known variable star
17:50:45.48 +77:48:44.1 -- not a known variable star
17:50:58.51 +79:10:24.8 -- not a known variable star
17:56:37.72 +77:31:58.3 -- not a known variable star
17:57:41.80 +77:34:42.1 -- not a known variable star
17:59:20.90 +79:38:02.5 -- not a known variable star
18:01:14.97 +77:42:01.3 -- not a known variable star
18:02:51.34 +77:15:02.5 -- not a known variable star
18:05:54.57 +80:09:04.8 -- not a known variable star
18:08:09.19 +75:45:19.1 -- a known variable star
18:13:38.42 +79:56:38.9 -- not a known variable star
18:14:41.40 +75:23:40.2 -- not a known variable star
18:14:58.36 +79:09:14.8 -- not a known variable star
18:23:06.18 +80:31:28.0 -- not a known variable star
18:24:28.64 +73:05:05.6 -- not a known variable star
18:30:15.76 +77:53:49.8 -- not a known variable star
18:31:46.25 +72:26:33.9 -- not a known variable star
18:34:46.51 +76:47:53.1 -- not a known variable star
18:39:56.91 +77:29:32.5 -- not a known variable star
18:42:09.02 +80:17:52.5 -- not a known variable star
18:49:38.05 +75:54:07.5 -- not a known variable star
18:49:38.64 +80:02:52.9 -- not a known variable star
18:49:59.83 +79:56:42.5 -- not a known variable star
18:50:21.30 +79:05:45.5 -- not a known variable star
18:53:31.26 +72:52:41.1 -- not a known variable star
18:53:40.23 +77:46:53.5 -- not a known variable star
19:04:21.14 +81:00:44.0 -- not a known variable star
19:04:29.54 +79:37:29.4 -- not a known variable star
19:05:50.04 +80:29:06.3 -- not a known variable star
19:06:42.74 +80:29:31.6 -- not a known variable star
19:06:45.12 +80:56:14.3 -- not a known variable star
19:08:33.53 +75:20:16.9 -- not a known variable star
19:10:20.24 +80:44:00.2 -- not a known variable star
19:10:36.24 +80:54:09.1 -- not a known variable star
19:15:07.92 +79:18:31.2 -- not a known variable star
19:15:27.71 +79:27:51.8 -- not a known variable star
19:17:06.09 +75:20:10.6 -- not a known variable star
19:18:38.57 +81:19:30.6 -- not a known variable star
19:22:14.99 +79:00:48.8 -- not a known variable star
19:23:04.73 +74:55:35.5 -- not a known variable star
19:27:30.25 +76:32:20.8 -- not a known variable star
19:28:00.08 +79:09:28.6 -- not a known variable star
19:32:49.77 +75:35:41.7 -- not a known variable star
19:36:20.26 +74:59:59.0 -- not a known variable star
19:39:07.50 +76:34:59.4 -- not a known variable star
19:41:50.90 +80:28:03.0 -- not a known variable star
19:44:15.55 +80:28:15.3 -- not a known variable star
19:45:57.69 +79:27:33.6 -- not a known variable star
19:48:35.15 +77:43:49.2 -- not a known variable star
19:50:28.22 +74:45:51.1 -- not a known variable star
20:02:27.65 +80:50:41.0 -- not a known variable star
20:07:43.68 +81:31:57.9 -- not a known variable star
20:23:04.36 +80:11:53.9 -- not a known variable star
20:51:09.58 +76:27:48.7 -- not a known variable star
20:59:41.98 +77:52:05.2 -- not a known variable star
21:07:27.95 +75:55:52.8 -- not a known variable star
21:17:27.64 +77:51:32.3 -- not a known variable star
Found 63 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
64 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
ERROR: too many candidates -- 64 (excluding asteroids and hot pixels, 63 new), not updating the exclusion list!
###################################################################################
Not allowed to update the exclusion list IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= NO
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461149.86344497 -observatory V36
00:25:36.52 -00:05:46.7 Mercury (-0.1mag)
03:25:12.15 +19:04:23.6 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:27:23.42 +01:54:47.0 Mars (1.2mag)
07:14:13.09 +22:43:34.7 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:30:40.33 +00:58:14.6 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:48:24.90 +19:49:46.0 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:11:16.55 -00:12:38.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:53.45 -22:52:47.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
03:25:09.30 +22:59:26.9 Moon (-8.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 19 03:47 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461149.86344497:
07:14:07.31 +22:43:48.3 Io (5.8mag)
07:14:12.05 +22:43:39.8 Europa (5.9mag)
07:13:54.46 +22:44:15.9 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:14:26.38 +22:42:58.1 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:17:24.13 +22:29:41.2 Himalia (15.4mag)
07:14:15.96 +22:43:26.4 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:17:39.63 +23:00:01.1 Elara (17.3mag)
07:13:19.72 +23:21:49.4 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:22:28.19 +22:41:54.9 Carme (18.5mag)
00:30:31.17 +00:58:35.2 Titan (8.8mag)
00:30:38.41 +00:58:30.6 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:30:15.33 +00:57:51.6 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:30:35.65 +00:58:42.4 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:32:14.49 +01:06:40.6 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 19 03:47 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461149.86344497:
15:51:43.01 -18:33:34.2 JWST
16:40:26.36 +47:56:53.2 Chandra
19:08:29.08 -08:38:39.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 19 03:47 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461149.86344497 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:53:14.90 -28:58:52.8 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:09:12.14 -69:30:21.7 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:33:12.33 +31:27:39.4 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:02.53 +10:56:32.9 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:11:04.60 +29:21:56.7 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:33:10.87 +26:07:40.6 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:04:13.21 +32:01:48.0 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:31:38.99 +00:11:46.2 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:52:51.89 +18:48:41.3 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:39:32.36 -11:28:19.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:06:10.44 -11:21:11.6 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:57:27.46 +63:06:32.0 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:16:05.60 -03:47:40.7 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:23:43.98 +86:22:59.0 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:19:37.72 +63:30:07.8 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:20:21.16 +19:22:05.3 11.3mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:17:02.79 +06:56:21.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:40.27 +16:11:54.4 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:29:25.09 -21:52:50.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:19:36.40 +44:28:16.3 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:24:59.48 +47:27:40.8 15.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:30:41.13 -26:44:53.3 17.9mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
00:20:51.90 +16:52:21.8 8.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:52:40.46 +03:12:43.6 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:52:45.56 +02:19:02.1 14.2mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:08:58.73 +37:48:55.7 14.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:49:28.32 -09:32:12.8 11.6mag 10P/Tempel
14:55:42.45 +02:50:27.7 14.3mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:01:57.58 -01:25:18.6 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
10:37:33.79 -03:50:39.0 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:53:53.49 +18:03:25.8 17.3mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:17:03.81 +36:16:56.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:33:18.52 -11:03:05.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:12:20.41 +22:23:10.0 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:13:02.76 +08:53:09.3 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
23:13:04.54 -08:23:45.3 14.7mag 88P/Howell
02:20:00.42 +21:31:26.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
05:01:14.33 +32:27:35.7 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:32:28.11 +36:48:38.4 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:38:26.46 +14:44:29.1 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:54:09.30 +14:53:44.7 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:44:00.27 +14:21:10.4 10.5mag 141P/Machholz
01:52:24.97 +06:07:40.5 10.5mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:36:12.64 +01:56:11.6 12.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:22:57.29 +07:52:58.0 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:11:47.51 +00:10:15.1 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:45:28.88 +00:15:25.6 17.8mag 210P/Christensen
21:48:20.87 -10:38:34.4 17.7mag 218P/LINEAR
17:17:10.69 -13:31:29.8 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:41:48.04 +34:56:14.6 16.8mag 240P/NEAT
07:40:13.53 -04:48:46.1 17.8mag 242P/Spahr
22:25:19.58 -20:03:53.8 17.8mag 260P/McNaught
02:05:07.16 +21:18:07.9 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR
15:41:15.68 +07:12:18.2 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:35:33.65 +21:22:20.8 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:40:49.85 +44:50:09.3 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Apr 19 03:47 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 19 03:47 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 19 03:47 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:35:21.390 +30:27:47.12 AT 2026jjg 2026-04-07.79 20.91
17:02:03.120 +41:30:38.89 AT 2026jjf 2026-04-03.89 21.38
17:08:30.580 +41:56:13.61 AT 2026jje 2026-04-03.89 21.47
16:48:25.780 +33:00:44.35 AT 2026jjd 2026-04-03.85 21.29
16:46:02.450 +30:55:42.15 AT 2026jjc 2026-04-03.80 19.57
16:51:04.120 +44:26:50.06 AT 2026jjb 2026-03-30.84 21.02
12:10:02.030 +43:26:37.06 AT 2026jja 2026-03-28.87 21.46
17:56:59.910 +48:20:04.31 AT 2026jiz 2026-03-27.87 20.99
15:23:12.550 +15:30:01.81 AT 2026jiy 2026-03-27.82 21.09
12:45:41.400 +53:52:15.13 AT 2026jix 2026-03-24.70 20.56
12:05:28.040 +47:18:05.03 AT 2026jiw 2026-03-24.69 20.17
12:49:49.680 +44:27:28.62 AT 2026jiv 2026-03-24.69 21.87
12:17:57.600 +45:03:04.77 AT 2026jiu 2026-03-24.69 20.4
11:39:16.940 +45:15:03.67 AT 2026jit 2026-03-24.66 21.06
14:17:33.100 +43:22:03.41 AT 2026jis 2026-03-22.80 20.74
14:45:33.130 +38:26:13.04 AT 2026jir 2026-03-22.80 21.14
14:42:55.800 +38:18:34.13 AT 2026jiq 2026-03-22.80 21.14
12:43:36.900 +28:13:26.06 AT 2026jip 2026-03-20.69 21.81
13:50:42.590 +38:45:33.09 AT 2026jio 2026-03-29.93 20.87
19:45:48.257 -49:40:35.86 AT 2026jin 2026-04-12.35 18.142
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 19 03:47 tns_transients_list.txt
