This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4131988336682209408,2461149.7749,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4131988336682209408 20260419.2749 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
T Oph,2461149.7749,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
T Oph 20260419.2749 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4330261176874003328,2461149.7749,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4330261176874003328 20260419.2749 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4325614365856131584,2461149.7749,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4325614365856131584 20260419.2749 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EPIC 205275157,2461149.7749,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EPIC 205275157 20260419.2749 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7749,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2749 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7749,13.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2749 13.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J165620.13-204658.8,2461149.7749,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J165620.13-204658.8 20260419.2749 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
First image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Last image: 2461149.77521332 19.04.2026 06:36:08.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3871
Objects passed selection criteria: 3859
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3367.5
Average stars matched: 3303.5 (98.0995 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110872 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 02:25:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
First image: 2461099.01590147 27.02.2026 12:22:43.887 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Last image: 2461149.77521332 19.04.2026 06:36:08.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 132
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47079
Objects passed selection criteria: 47005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41845
Average stars matched: 40377.2 (96.4924 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 155636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 02:27:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.77467725
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0088 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00649 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7ym1DZApuU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ajXFsuFyl1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s02oL0dSQO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iuNoB2A8lU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6528 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.8483 to 261.6981 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.8483 to 261.6981 deg, Dec -23.2771 to -12.5709 deg
Loaded 6005 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4226 out of 4388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4388 out of 6528 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922522
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922522
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.3 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.5 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7ym1DZApuU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, passed=6528
Got 6528 stars (including 6093 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ajXFsuFyl1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=428, passed=6260
Got 6260 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6063 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6064 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s02oL0dSQO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, passed=4025
Got 4025 stars (including 3769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4025 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iuNoB2A8lU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, passed=4012
Got 4012 stars (including 3759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4012 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20198.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20199.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 20198_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:52.59 -17:21:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.665 4135534948886952704 256.96915089025 -17.36562158367 11.0798 10.1737 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.665#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20199_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 20199_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20222_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 20222_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:18.23 -15:36:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20136_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 20136_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:02.53 -19:27:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 19s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:39:29.79 -17:43:46.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Image size: 938.9'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:53:19.722 -18:00:16.64
Second-epoch image center 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0088 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:53:21.021 -18:00:14.06
Second-epoch second image center 16:53:20.997 -17:59:50.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00649 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.P5ggZ1p9oB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits &> /tmp/tmp.md6JcXfOP4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NpQsooDdfy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kmMIapIfSQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits and wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 75508 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 244.7958 to 261.7403 deg, Dec -23.2809 to -12.5618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 244.7958 to 261.7403 deg, Dec -23.2809 to -12.5618 deg
Loaded 6050 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4660 out of 5263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5263 out of 75508 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.684879
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.684879
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.99
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.69
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 96 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
2.0 pix Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.P5ggZ1p9oB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=4239, passed=75506
Got 75506 stars (including 71154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.md6JcXfOP4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=4544, passed=72943
Got 72943 stars (including 68297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71100 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits -region wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NpQsooDdfy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2025, passed=48324
Got 48324 stars (including 46234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kmMIapIfSQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2058, passed=48792
Got 48792 stars (including 46669 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013040 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010432 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47406 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-22-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-23-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0322.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-35-22_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0549.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_013650_TTUQ2b1x1_462151_TwQcRI8t/wcs_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90480.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90486.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90488.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90491.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90523.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90525.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90527.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90528.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90546.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out90852.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out91082.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90543.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90549.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90661.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out90951.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90480_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90480_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:12.98 -17:30:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.842 4324641779103366528 246.30516788196 -17.50268132570 13.3044 12.6556 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90486_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90486_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:55.66 -17:16:26.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90488_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90488_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:39.23 -18:16:55.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.881 4134666059814370432 257.91391561631 -18.28176490784 13.7271 12.9130 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90489_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90489_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:19.50 -21:35:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90491_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90491_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:44.86 -18:50:53.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.911 4129322300177576064 255.68692699534 -18.84853069639 13.5068 12.5950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.911#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90492_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90492_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:50.43 -19:31:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90498_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90498_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.19 -14:16:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90507_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90507_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:48.99 -14:05:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90508_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90508_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:53.95 -20:02:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90510_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90510_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:30.03 -18:16:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90513_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90513_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90521_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:59.69 -20:33:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90523_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90523_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:06.66 -18:55:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.043 4132130143629361536 252.77700651897 -18.92617747923 13.1478 12.2787 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.043#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90525_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90525_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:52.48 -21:34:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.234 4115615513359349888 257.46903346441 -21.57124355963 12.6129 11.6485 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.234#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90526_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90526_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:15.08 -21:40:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90527_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:03.62 -21:30:45.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.457 4115580844382091520 256.76440894858 -21.51225927472 13.3254 12.6992 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.457#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90528_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90528_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:34.62 -21:36:52.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.626 4127011706537443072 252.89432668715 -21.61434131018 12.5969 11.6203 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.626#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90530_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90530_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:38.75 -15:35:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90532_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:21.29 -14:23:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90538_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90538_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:26.88 -16:56:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90543_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90543_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90544_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90544_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:21.82 -15:38:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90546_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90546_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:05.56 -20:09:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.886 4128190005048195712 257.02330282186 -20.15735292370 12.2782 11.4691 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.886#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90547_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90547_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:05.77 -15:26:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90549_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90551_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90551_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90568_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90568_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90605_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90605_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90631_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90631_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90651_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90651_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90661_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90661_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90663_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90663_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:22.21 -18:24:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90670_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90670_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.03 -20:12:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90671_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90671_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90677_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90677_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:39.22 -21:46:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90681_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90681_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90688_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90688_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:39.92 -19:08:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90689_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90689_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90692_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90692_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90698_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90698_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:33.03 -21:29:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90714_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90714_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90735_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90735_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90740_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90740_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90743_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90743_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90759_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90759_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:20.46 -21:34:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90766_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90766_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:58.61 -21:52:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90781_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90781_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:02.75 -20:00:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90784_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90784_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90802_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90802_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:06.24 -17:28:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90809_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90809_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90810_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90810_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90813_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90813_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:10.74 -22:04:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90829_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90829_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90842_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90842_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:46.14 -21:01:35.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.503 6052439433602064512 247.94322390808 -21.02575177869 12.9258 12.0396 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.503#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90851_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90851_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90852_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90852_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:08.40 -20:07:41.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.356 4128204955860795392 256.78497954950 -20.12870968399 13.7922 13.1388 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.356#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90860_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90860_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:30.81 -19:24:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90866_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90866_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:09.40 -21:29:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90875_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90875_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:29.71 -21:07:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90876_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90876_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90879_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90879_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:58.83 -18:53:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90881_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90881_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90884_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90884_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:07.16 -22:05:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90887_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90887_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90892_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90892_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90900_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90900_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90916_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90916_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:04.84 -20:44:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90919_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90919_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90937_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90937_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90940_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90940_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:23.92 -19:04:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90951_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 90951_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90966_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90966_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90969_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90969_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:02.58 -20:11:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90997_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 90997_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91001_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91001_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:24.24 -17:34:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91013_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91013_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91028_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91028_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91039_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91052_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91052_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91053_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91053_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91065_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91065_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:21.69 -14:10:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91080_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91080_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91082_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91082_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:10.26 -14:16:53.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.735 4139718251324381568 257.04324549952 -14.28159762411 13.9482 13.1594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.735#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91092_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91092_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91096_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91096_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:59.50 -19:46:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91103_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 91103_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27735_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 27735_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:02.53 -19:27:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 25341_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:43.53 -19:48:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36063_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 36063_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:08.89 -18:40:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68777_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 68777_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:18.20 -15:36:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88492_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 88492_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:28.23 -20:27:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16900_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
Preparing report for the candidate 16900_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29642_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 29642_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:03:36.97 -19:22:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 27431_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:35.47 -19:38:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48950_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 48950_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:34:15.60 -17:09:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23203_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550
The candidate 23203_fd_Oph-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_01-36-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0550 did not pass the final checks
