This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7561,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2561 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7561,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2561 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7561,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2561 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7561,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2561 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7561,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2561 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7561,14.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2561 14.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.69988903 20.03.2026 04:47:40.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
First image: 2461119.69988903 20.03.2026 04:47:40.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Last image: 2461149.75649014 19.04.2026 06:09:10.748 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7764
Objects passed selection criteria: 7754
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7095.25
Average stars matched: 6950.5 (97.9599 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113340 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:13:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461119.69988903 20.03.2026 04:47:40.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
First image: 2461119.69988903 20.03.2026 04:47:40.412 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Last image: 2461149.75649014 19.04.2026 06:09:10.748 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39222
Objects passed selection criteria: 39112
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37473.2
Average stars matched: 35961.5 (95.9658 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 139044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:14:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.75568006
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02
Second-epoch image center 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02
Second-epoch image center 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0628 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w8URa4oKGg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O8xJ8qtmTX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vI4sCGO9fb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xBJ7OpvUrT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7994 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.8736 to 157.9641 deg, Dec +32.2943 to +43.3198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.8736 to 157.9641 deg, Dec 32.2943 to 43.3198 deg
Loaded 5135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3738 out of 3900 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3900 out of 7994 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.911179
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.911179
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.4 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.1 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.1 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.4 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.2 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
15.2 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.w8URa4oKGg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=498, passed=7994
Got 7994 stars (including 7488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7994 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O8xJ8qtmTX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=508, passed=7909
Got 7909 stars (including 7391 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7909 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7842 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vI4sCGO9fb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=447, passed=6380
Got 6380 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6380 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6322 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xBJ7OpvUrT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=455, passed=6276
Got 6276 stars (including 5809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20544.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20336_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20336_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:23.41 +38:23:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:30.12 +33:10:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20437_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20437_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:43.65 +42:03:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20541_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20541_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:29.29 +37:49:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20544_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:14.81 +40:46:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.324 813394345470837120 143.06161566047 +40.77663824439 12.5357 11.9335 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.324#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01736_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 01736_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:43.18 +34:55:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02
Second-epoch image center 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:49:13.815 +38:02:24.02
Second-epoch image center 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0628 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:49:09.754 +37:59:15.46
Second-epoch second image center 09:49:12.999 +37:58:37.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01490 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yzGAM3wL1j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rLIpMUKPCr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RLYmhcdmJQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CYM0Xbj37j
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38498 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.7943 to 158.0650 deg, Dec +32.2943 to +43.3198 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.7943 to 158.0650 deg, Dec 32.2943 to 43.3198 deg
Loaded 5174 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3560 out of 3916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3916 out of 38498 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808609
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808609
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.0 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
1.9 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
15.6 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.4 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
15.4 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yzGAM3wL1j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits 567.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1909, passed=38479
Got 38479 stars (including 36521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38479 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rLIpMUKPCr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1877, passed=38848
Got 38848 stars (including 36924 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.3 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RLYmhcdmJQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1437, passed=36695
Got 36695 stars (including 35202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CYM0Xbj37j (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1435, passed=37011
Got 37011 stars (including 35515 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37011 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36663 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-47-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-19_23-48-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-08-00_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_011006_TTUQ1b1x1_3169224_Ls7EBSos/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52806.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52810.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52818.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52944.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53295.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53948.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53958.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53976.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54087.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54099.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54104.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54142.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54182.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54216.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53803.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53851.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53855.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53865.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53919.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53944.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53963.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53986.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54068.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out54085.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53790.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53886.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53971.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 46s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:54.92 +40:24:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.332 813288929793358848 142.72878842730 +40.41377997452 14.5954 13.6154 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52810_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:23:52.57 +40:42:50.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.138 812795455231216640 140.96908331397 +40.71402169913 14.6386 14.1992 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.138#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52815_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:44:52.50 +39:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52817_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:22.41 +39:19:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52818_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:29.35 +40:28:19.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.674 813108438087605504 144.37243612264 +40.47198730072 14.3123 13.8226 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.674#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52819_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:05.03 +39:29:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52820_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52820_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:45.88 +32:57:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52821_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:29.45 +33:13:44.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.05, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.03)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.607 746402648177713408 152.87265210864 +33.22910650376 14.1144 13.6436 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.607#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52822_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52822_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:08.37 +37:26:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52824_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:59:52.43 +33:08:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52826_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52826_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:35.55 +36:10:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52827_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52827_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:18.21 +40:10:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52828_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:23.43 +38:23:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52829_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:27.46 +32:35:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52831_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:05:30.12 +33:10:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52892_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:36.56 +43:03:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52910_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:57.29 +41:58:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52943_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52943_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:43.64 +42:03:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52944_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 52944_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:34.43 +41:04:15.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.325 813519483637844736 145.14384054428 +41.07066012284 11.9283 11.5034 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.325#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53000_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:11:31.51 +43:02:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53012_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:37:00.53 +41:54:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53039_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:02.04 +42:26:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53061_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:16.41 +36:36:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53157_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:11.87 +37:18:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53196_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53196_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:05.66 +41:18:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53254_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:27.97 +42:10:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53272_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:27:24.07 +39:30:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53295_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:57.99 +37:52:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.104 802821819617944192 150.74171655549 +37.87400741308 13.5209 13.0546 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.104#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53329_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:40:50.97 +40:03:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:53.92 +35:30:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53363_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:45.39 +41:58:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53376_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53376_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:58.64 +42:56:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53379_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53379_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:10.06 +38:10:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53470_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:58.35 +42:23:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53486_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53486_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:20:08.78 +39:09:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53491_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:40.70 +35:08:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53502_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53502_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:02:55.97 +37:52:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53514_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53514_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:55.41 +41:32:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53537_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:12.47 +38:05:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53587_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:26.36 +42:46:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53608_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:02.63 +40:01:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53721_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53721_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:24:06.98 +38:43:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53741_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53741_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:50.62 +40:01:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53768_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:25.35 +40:39:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53780_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:24:14.19 +32:50:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 53790_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:42.57 +33:15:35.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53823_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:24:18.08 +34:29:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53837_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:17:09.30 +32:51:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53842_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:28.91 +32:50:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53851_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53851_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:12:45.77 +42:45:32.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53855_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:07.83 +43:00:42.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53865_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53865_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:16:22.58 +42:57:01.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53878_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 53878_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53879_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53879_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:38:03.91 +42:58:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53886_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 53886_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53889_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53889_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:19:29.72 +40:30:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53890_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:51.02 +41:41:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53901_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:14:03.28 +40:05:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53907_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 53907_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53911_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53911_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:55.08 +41:07:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53916_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53916_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:32:39.70 +42:21:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53919_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53919_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:16.59 +42:26:28.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53944_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53944_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:29:50.12 +40:02:33.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53948_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:11.18 +43:02:27.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.330 817568332127532416 141.29609338713 +43.04106368239 15.0206 14.4671 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.330#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53958_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53958_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:15:49.11 +42:36:58.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.053 816221739621377408 138.95496700636 +42.61621190679 14.7885 14.2436 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.053#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53962_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:21:01.08 +32:23:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53963_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:13:41.40 +42:08:35.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53971_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 53971_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53976_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:35.47 +37:54:15.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.377 716012868341382912 137.64825872027 +37.90420345037 14.6305 14.0171 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.377#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53982_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53982_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:02.77 +32:44:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53986_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53986_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:19:33.29 +42:10:22.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53989_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53989_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:10:27.35 +39:58:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53992_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 53992_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:15.50 +35:10:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.196 752731677624977664 156.31456786960 +35.17669717695 15.0052 14.4835 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.196#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54015_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54015_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:57.12 +33:51:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54025_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:22:36.68 +34:31:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54028_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54028_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:36.01 +43:06:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54037_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54037_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:21:17.69 +33:18:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54047_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:24:21.17 +35:16:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54055_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 54055_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54068_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54068_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:20:20.36 +33:19:32.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54081_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:25.12 +32:30:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54085_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:43.84 +32:34:27.0 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54087_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54087_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:23:39.93 +39:40:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.652 812403788574157696 140.91654769089 +39.67273801921 14.7968 14.3083 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.652#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54089_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54089_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:24:00.12 +34:48:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54099_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:11.49 +32:53:07.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.408 747036035594424064 151.79788143429 +32.88535889664 15.0745 14.6751 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.408#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54104_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54104_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:14:58.32 +37:38:52.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.121 715772040935181056 138.74261420243 +37.64791245490 14.8582 14.1748 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54111_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54111_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:39.36 +32:40:37.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.944 749049310104831744 155.91456195487 +32.67723257206 15.0937 14.5711 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.944#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54142_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:23:43.17 +32:57:13.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.142 749057590801726080 155.92977767784 +32.95318853696 14.9688 14.3172 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.142#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54175_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:18:45.46 +33:22:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54182_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54182_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:57.27 +35:23:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.691 753017103971741568 154.98852363434 +35.38611765585 15.2084 14.5599 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.691#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54216_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 54216_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:24:40.53 +35:19:29.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.672 798565781903446144 141.16910337261 +35.32490457845 14.9597 14.3290 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.672#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07383_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 07383_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-09-10_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks