This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1524434,2461149.7545,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1524434 20260419.2545 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
WISE J072355.3+694603,2461149.7545,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
WISE J072355.3+694603 20260419.2545 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1526026,2461149.7545,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1526026 20260419.2545 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1529615,2461149.7545,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1529615 20260419.2545 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1525277,2461149.7545,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1525277 20260419.2545 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1529588,2461149.7545,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1529588 20260419.2545 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1656711,2461149.7545,14.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1656711 20260419.2545 14.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7545,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2545 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 499658696872693376,2461149.7545,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 499658696872693376 20260419.2545 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1524679,2461149.7545,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1524679 20260419.2545 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J107.8216+71.8380,2461149.7545,14.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J107.8216+71.8380 20260419.2545 14.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461149.75487448 19.04.2026 06:06:51.155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13041
Objects passed selection criteria: 13009
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11584.8
Average stars matched: 11290.2 (97.4579 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:13:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461058.79056218 18.01.2026 06:58:14.572 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461149.75487448 19.04.2026 06:06:51.155 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 81115
Objects passed selection criteria: 80935
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 75501
Average stars matched: 72840.2 (96.4759 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1872440 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:14:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.75415535
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0567 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16
Second-epoch second image center 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00800 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1zcpQH4JAN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sXcrHogGVE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7FPhRB942
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cSfuCSv4bo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8991 to +75.4715 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8991 to 75.4715 deg
Loaded 12879 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7120 out of 7567 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7567 out of 13381 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.880418
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.880418
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.1 pix Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1zcpQH4JAN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=962, passed=13381
Got 13381 stars (including 12404 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13381 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sXcrHogGVE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=976, passed=13412
Got 13412 stars (including 12421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q7FPhRB942 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=719, passed=9932
Got 9932 stars (including 9195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9932 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cSfuCSv4bo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=698, passed=9881
Got 9881 stars (including 9165 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9881 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21080.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21107.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21111.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20963_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 20963_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.90 +73:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 21016_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:05.67 +67:32:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21080_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 21080_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:48.96 +71:00:15.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.45, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.43)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.188 1098516196092566400 123.45484572436 +71.00409596533 12.4457 12.0424 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.188#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21107_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 21107_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:52.67 +67:44:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.639 1105390926907270144 092.72027519260 +67.74369229110 12.4746 11.8898 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.639#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21111_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 21111_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:58.70 +67:12:36.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.981 1104416450365121024 098.24388474508 +67.21028192281 12.6867 12.4768 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.981#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00955_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 00955_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:33.28 +74:30:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01931_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 01931_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:12.75 +73:54:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0597 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Image size: 941.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:12:16.600 +69:59:24.05
Second-epoch image center 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0567 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:12:57.168 +70:00:17.16
Second-epoch second image center 07:12:56.052 +69:59:48.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00800 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.STeaiC9d5y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rtCiPeonji
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IM5WJ6bMFb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5g3FMawszl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 82728 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec +62.8276 to +75.4772 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 80.6338 to 136.4973 deg, Dec 62.8276 to 75.4772 deg
Loaded 12987 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6447 out of 7633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7633 out of 82728 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.756409
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.756409
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 99 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.0 pix Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.STeaiC9d5y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=5466, passed=82707
Got 82707 stars (including 77099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82707 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rtCiPeonji (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=5467, passed=82674
Got 82674 stars (including 77075 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 82674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81117 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IM5WJ6bMFb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3841, passed=69495
Got 69495 stars (including 65509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5g3FMawszl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3796, passed=69294
Got 69294 stars (including 65384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69294 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.2 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-58-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-05-49_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_010751_TTUQ1b1x1_2944487_8A06APrN/wcs_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100588.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100786.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100806.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100847.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100933.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100936.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100964.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101125.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101256.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101500.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101521.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101584.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101603.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101604.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101697.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101722.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101726.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101814.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out101833.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out99117.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out100235.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out100479.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out101128.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out99938.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101397.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99072.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99095.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99110.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99115.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 139s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99072_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99072_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99088_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99088_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99089_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99089_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99091_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99091_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99094_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99094_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:13.54 +70:29:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99095_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99095_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99098_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99098_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:45.46 +70:19:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99100_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99100_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:35.34 +72:46:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99107_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99107_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99110_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99110_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99111_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99111_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99112_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99112_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99115_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 99115_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99117_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99117_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:37.26 +67:29:35.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99119_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99119_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:05.57 +67:17:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99120_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99120_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:14.14 +73:14:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99126_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99126_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:47:14.92 +70:45:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99128_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99128_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:35.14 +65:04:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99129_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99129_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:39.70 +71:45:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99136_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99136_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:42.82 +74:36:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99137_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99137_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:13.28 +69:51:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99139_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99139_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:46.59 +70:29:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99142_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99142_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:27.70 +70:32:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99143_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99143_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:37.25 +66:41:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99144_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99144_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:02.22 +72:38:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99145_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99145_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:34.97 +68:10:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99149_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99149_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:42:51.00 +73:10:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99381_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99381_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:40.35 +73:10:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99563_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99563_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:02.71 +74:00:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99765_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99765_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:47.84 +65:39:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99798_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99798_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.73 +74:09:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99893_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99893_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:23.78 +66:32:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99926_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99926_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:04.47 +68:11:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99938_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 99938_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:44.81 +72:31:35.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100044_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100044_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:58.15 +70:31:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100069_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100069_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:46.52 +74:35:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100078_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100078_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:28.30 +70:24:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100162_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100162_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:02.87 +74:43:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100235_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100235_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:10.17 +68:03:12.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100393_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100393_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:10.73 +72:41:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100450_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100450_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:14.53 +68:41:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100476_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100476_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:08.24 +70:57:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100479_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100479_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:31.92 +69:51:14.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.01)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100531_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100531_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:58.45 +69:28:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100573_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100573_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:54.81 +71:28:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100585_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100585_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:20.85 +67:40:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100588_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100588_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:36.43 +73:33:44.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100720_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100720_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.14 +75:08:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100729_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100729_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:56.84 +71:40:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100769_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100769_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:12.17 +65:35:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100786_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100786_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:43.60 +73:14:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.912 1113998281884882048 092.18305014882 +73.24164934151 14.3121 13.6606 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.912#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100799_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100799_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:52.68 +66:02:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100806_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100806_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:51.09 +71:14:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.359 1098724690985643392 118.46346089718 +71.23464525519 14.4738 13.9222 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.359#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100813_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100813_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:16.12 +66:22:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100816_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100816_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:26.30 +75:07:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100822_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100822_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:02.15 +68:39:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100847_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100847_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:14.82 +66:23:34.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.446 1104307323835984128 096.81273729769 +66.39304321217 14.5419 13.6970 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.446#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100853_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100853_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:42.12 +68:45:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100889_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100889_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:07.77 +66:00:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100933_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100933_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:39.73 +72:11:13.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.655 498530945837120640 084.91518276981 +72.18674791153 14.5928 14.0536 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100936_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100936_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:01.96 +73:53:32.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.724 1112189997574074112 108.25822830609 +73.89216086309 14.4669 13.9585 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.724#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100938_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100938_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:51.11 +66:38:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100964_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100964_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:40.24 +73:59:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.725 1114501239736149760 093.91929005258 +73.98960697145 14.5158 13.8239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.725#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100986_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100986_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:09.05 +73:17:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100994_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100994_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:21.84 +72:41:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100995_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100995_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:32.16 +68:37:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100996_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 100996_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:13.18 +71:45:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101103_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101103_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:39:48.32 +71:32:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101121_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101121_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:46.08 +69:54:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101125_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101125_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.29 +69:46:40.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.136 1109257600060586624 106.41955802891 +69.77808918566 14.6924 13.6800 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.136#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101128_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101128_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:58.44 +69:00:47.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101147_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101147_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:06.35 +69:02:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101212_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101212_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:57.86 +73:14:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101256_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101256_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:27.10 +73:16:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.529 1113482576571108352 099.86568458094 +73.27426212906 14.8009 14.2888 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.529#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101308_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101308_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:51.42 +66:07:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101375_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101375_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:36.64 +74:45:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101397_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
Preparing report for the candidate 101397_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101454_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101454_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:09.03 +73:17:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101479_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101479_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:50.98 +71:55:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101500_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101500_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:31.20 +72:50:27.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.579 1122231184434609920 132.38144769819 +72.84095534706 14.9106 14.2986 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.579#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101521_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101521_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:00.29 +73:11:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.695 498725181438208768 087.00173422044 +73.19225795928 14.7640 14.2415 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101546_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101546_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:15.97 +73:40:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101557_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101557_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:36.16 +72:04:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101559_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101559_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101584_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101584_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:47.19 +70:05:36.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.617 485167790751717376 089.44775439517 +70.09329574742 14.8542 14.3762 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.617#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101603_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101603_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:38.11 +74:32:39.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.686 1115109578902420736 102.65872039104 +74.54400479436 14.8675 13.9623 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.686#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101604_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101604_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:03.30 +69:40:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.419 1097994202946975232 119.76397457301 +69.67397473090 14.9254 14.5105 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.419#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101618_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101618_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:13.78 +73:00:48.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.111 1114156061803159552 095.05659025118 +73.01372019093 14.8462 14.3438 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.111#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101631_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101631_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:57.25 +71:47:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101644_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101644_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101677_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101677_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:54.97 +72:58:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101697_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101697_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:08.57 +66:08:56.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.861 1093379793163970560 126.28625358559 +66.14901835637 14.8985 14.3407 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.861#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101722_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101722_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:04.57 +69:29:06.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.698 1107103072669289984 092.26789597035 +69.48497467756 15.0295 14.4815 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.698#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101726_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101726_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:14.26 +74:41:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.116 1115149711076793600 100.06192897187 +74.68911051491 14.8863 14.3235 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.116#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101814_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101814_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:59.42 +72:52:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.785 1114150014489197696 095.49866973276 +72.87520453649 14.8974 14.2311 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.785#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101833_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 101833_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:59.31 +69:45:27.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.921 485134221287271424 087.99938012086 +69.75727747984 14.5786 13.9622 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.921#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04833_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 04833_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:33.28 +74:30:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10540_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 10540_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:12.75 +73:54:56.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65330_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403
The candidate 65330_fd_Cam-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_01-06-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0403 did not pass the final checks
