This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 10 11 36.30 +15 37 56.5 11.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,11.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 11.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 10 20 07.69 +10 20 13.8 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 11 00 53.11 +10 40 44.3 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 11 04 08.71 +08 56 10.4 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 11 04 26.98 +10 46 16.9 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 11 02 03.37 +10 35 29.0 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,14.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 14.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2484* 10 12 38.84 +17 52 23.5 14.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7485,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2485 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461149.74882008 19.04.2026 05:58:08.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6443
Objects passed selection criteria: 6438
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5989.5
Average stars matched: 5820.5 (97.1784 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:00:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
First image: 2461058.87067979 18.01.2026 08:53:36.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Last image: 2461149.74882008 19.04.2026 05:58:08.055 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 39
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35026
Objects passed selection criteria: 34924
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33014.5
Average stars matched: 31702.2 (96.0252 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135356 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 01:01:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.74808623
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01364 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SbT99An5Zr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K803F4oRZs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GC4DHdDNxr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JaZSJlSZRA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4830 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.6604 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4830 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3437 out of 3596 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3596 out of 6443 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884591
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884591
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
2.1 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SbT99An5Zr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=439, passed=6443
Got 6443 stars (including 5991 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K803F4oRZs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=6432
Got 6432 stars (including 5975 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6432 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GC4DHdDNxr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=359, passed=5653
Got 5653 stars (including 5284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5653 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5521 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 870 stars left (next iteration limit 957)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JaZSJlSZRA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=5598
Got 5598 stars (including 5222 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 871 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 871 stars left (next iteration limit 958)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20423.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20423_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 20423_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20568_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 20568_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:10:14.76 +16:46:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:36.30 +15:37:56.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:40:00.041 +13:59:48.07
Second-epoch image center 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0095 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:40:01.096 +14:01:01.81
Second-epoch second image center 10:39:59.276 +14:00:20.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01364 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E3LDfIE5e6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b438Ds9xDz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BzJz7d1n1m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M3shdY98BU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits and wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec +8.4530 to +19.3311 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 151.5870 to 168.1630 deg, Dec 8.4530 to 19.3311 deg
Loaded 4366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3641 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3641 out of 34456 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.780204
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.780204
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
1.9 pix Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.E3LDfIE5e6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1356, passed=34443
Got 34443 stars (including 33015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34443 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 875 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 875 stars left (next iteration limit 962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b438Ds9xDz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1357, passed=34514
Got 34514 stars (including 33102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34514 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.5 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 878 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 878 stars left (next iteration limit 965)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits -region wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BzJz7d1n1m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1145, passed=32033
Got 32033 stars (including 30835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31301 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 873 stars left (next iteration limit 960)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M3shdY98BU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1138, passed=32042
Got 32042 stars (including 30849 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32042 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 872 stars left (next iteration limit 959)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-53-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0402.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-54-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0403.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-57-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0394.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_005906_TTUQ1b1x1_2374508_U1dTQDpl/wcs_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52290.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52292.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52294.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52295.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53624.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53823.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53785.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53095.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53867.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52289_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52289_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:46.20 +18:06:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52290_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:01:00.93 +15:50:14.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.269 3969749043747776256 165.25399483720 +15.83705575944 14.9315 14.4247 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.269#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52292_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:28.99 +15:47:12.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.251 621724557937893504 152.37080392155 +15.78687423573 14.6319 14.1024 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.251#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52294_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:02.76 +10:27:08.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.710 3868002471096559488 164.51143649813 +10.45228525727 14.4873 13.9687 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.710#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52295_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52295_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:57.03 +17:35:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.232 3982252140222828032 164.23827505757 +17.59193287759 14.9088 14.1842 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.232#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52296_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52296_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:28.97 +15:36:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:42.68 +18:46:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52299_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52299_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:32:04.62 +12:51:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52300_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:09:01.91 +09:34:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52301_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52301_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:55.73 +15:01:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52377_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:36.30 +15:37:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 52574_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 52816_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 52948_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:28:21.55 +15:46:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 53095_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53298_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:23.83 +11:22:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53325_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53325_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:31:36.80 +10:13:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53368_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 53368_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53407_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:50.08 +09:56:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53473_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:14:59.41 +12:33:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53516_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53516_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:00.26 +09:50:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53528_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:40.39 +11:51:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53537_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53537_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 53599_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53624_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:22.48 +10:28:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.464 3867442304281842944 167.59399536772 +10.47030885723 14.6293 13.6665 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.464#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53782_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:06.16 +18:26:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53785_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53785_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:01.92 +11:37:35.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53823_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:07.04 +11:59:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.607 3964653971288724096 166.27915588778 +11.99280011312 14.8827 14.2557 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.607#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53832_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53832_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:05.06 +17:54:35.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=15.00, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.98)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.028 3982296429925556992 164.27097293952 +17.91023769005 14.9813 14.4549 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.028#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53835_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:28.42 +12:55:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53838_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 53838_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:01.38 +17:10:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
Preparing report for the candidate 53867_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50263_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 50263_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:08.30 +18:04:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50025_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395
The candidate 50025_fd_Leo-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-58-08_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0395 did not pass the final checks