This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 11 11 08.94 +01 37 26.9 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 11 01 31.58 +03 06 33.3 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 11 01 59.39 -01 25 34.1 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 10 39 30.37 +00 11 06.5 13.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 10 42 00.59 -04 25 53.5 14.3 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2392* 11 25 50.03 -06 22 03.8 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7392,14.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2392 14.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461149.73951995 19.04.2026 05:44:44.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6468
Objects passed selection criteria: 6458
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6040.25
Average stars matched: 5870.75 (97.1938 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112184 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:46:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461149.73951995 19.04.2026 05:44:44.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35265
Objects passed selection criteria: 35199
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33511.2
Average stars matched: 32070.5 (95.7007 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:47:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.73884696
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00930 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2OhVdrAopz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lXri1QKHCI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EdKtqLTE55
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BCfLLlabMI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to +3.3133 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to 3.3133 deg
Loaded 3835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3372 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3372 out of 6399 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879752
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879752
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2OhVdrAopz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, passed=6399
Got 6399 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lXri1QKHCI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=6519
Got 6519 stars (including 6107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EdKtqLTE55 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=5766
Got 5766 stars (including 5356 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5704 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5703 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BCfLLlabMI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5647
Got 5647 stars (including 5233 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5647 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5595 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20415_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 20415_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:48.43 +02:33:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0202 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0194 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:34.707 -01:58:40.97
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:32.595 -01:58:51.84
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00930 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gNywKCQFjr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K2L2mQ575k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DhPwjyZr9S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DhUHcM4gGr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to +3.3144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to 3.3144 deg
Loaded 3852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 34371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774901
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774901
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 84 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gNywKCQFjr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1404, passed=34365
Got 34365 stars (including 32904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K2L2mQ575k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1420, passed=33111
Got 33111 stars (including 31640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DhPwjyZr9S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1314, passed=33652
Got 33652 stars (including 32279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33652 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 471 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DhUHcM4gGr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1389, passed=34033
Got 34033 stars (including 32584 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-43-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0386.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_004536_TTUQ1b1x1_1221060_Dz6hiwm5/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51729.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51734.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51744.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51748.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52948.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52951.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52960.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53022.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53024.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53041.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53042.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53054.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53152.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53162.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53168.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53170.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53178.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53181.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53213.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out53157.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52001.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52252.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52682.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51729_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51729_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:53.91 +00:29:13.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.985 3804328928098285184 167.47435288153 +00.48716506232 15.2387 14.6572 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.985#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:17:59.75 -04:19:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51732_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51732_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:56.50 +01:51:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51734_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51734_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:17.75 -05:17:55.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.589 3788189196914562048 167.07418043708 -05.29913196217 14.5532 14.0339 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.589#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51736_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51736_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:29.65 +02:20:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51737_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51737_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:49.34 +01:41:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51739_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51739_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:30.15 +02:10:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51741_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51741_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:30.16 +00:00:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51744_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51744_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:45.77 +01:30:55.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.184 3798666889892019072 171.44092006622 +01.51519270313 13.5158 12.8799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.184#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51745_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51745_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:25.87 -04:32:46.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.344 3786279035979291648 172.85802094456 -04.54657297661 13.8734 13.2973 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.344#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51746_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51746_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:43.01 +02:17:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51747_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51747_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:24.91 +02:04:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51748_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51748_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:14:33.15 -02:23:30.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.685 3791093144562315904 168.63825629842 -02.39183221490 13.1640 12.6666 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.685#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51749_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51749_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:19.08 -03:15:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:52.27 -05:07:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51793_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:48.40 +02:33:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51967_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 51967_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:17.22 +02:07:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52001_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52001_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52033_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52033_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:27.82 +02:36:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52163_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.35 -02:53:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52203_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52203_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:24.05 -01:03:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52228_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:33.39 +00:11:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52252_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52313_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52346_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52346_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52403_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52403_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52410_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52410_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:41.28 -03:54:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52448_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52448_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.69 -00:49:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52565_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:36.88 -05:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52602_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:50.56 -06:22:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52616_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:50.84 +01:39:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52623_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:26.11 +00:05:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52682_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52694_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52705_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52705_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:55.93 -00:56:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52719_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.67 -06:48:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52750_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:49.04 +02:21:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52777_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52777_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:12.41 +00:57:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
Preparing report for the candidate 52801_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52802_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:49.70 -06:16:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:03.28 -06:36:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52902_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52902_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:34.61 -02:16:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52929_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:52.77 -05:53:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52948_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:25.23 -05:25:12.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.202 3593787088627967616 174.60572919684 -05.42027849601 14.6892 14.1664 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.202#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52951_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:55.37 -04:48:16.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.895 3777019327007206272 162.98072769931 -04.80541505420 14.6609 13.8719 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.895#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52960_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:40.43 -05:35:26.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.222 3776545437495421824 160.91894122442 -05.59105382851 14.6871 14.0087 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.222#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:18.70 +02:37:00.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.771 3800168616617722496 173.82806241415 +02.61630778035 14.7511 14.2056 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.771#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 52978_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:13.40 -04:48:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53001_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53001_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:15.36 +00:28:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53009_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:19:49.06 +02:05:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53022_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:38.03 +01:10:51.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.222 3799116796306394624 174.15842551927 +01.18097546994 14.8663 14.2832 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.222#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:22.75 -00:53:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.531 3794120684189001344 173.84481872041 -00.89520058331 15.5952 15.1414 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.531#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53036_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:13.82 +01:11:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53037_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:30.19 -02:51:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53041_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53041_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:54.78 -02:56:34.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.335 3792512133037549568 174.47875556277 -02.94318477053 14.4382 13.4184 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.335#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53042_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53042_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:13.92 +01:14:24.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.452 3798470180390045952 172.30816698398 +01.23942300238 14.9039 14.3289 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.452#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53043_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:15.56 -05:45:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53054_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:52.43 +02:49:17.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.692 3809379569120096512 162.21826628329 +02.82148437329 14.9178 14.3488 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.692#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53058_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:18.67 -02:06:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53079_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:57.00 -05:20:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53086_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:19.24 -01:37:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53093_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:39.84 -04:53:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53094_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53094_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:00.22 -00:29:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53120_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53120_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:47.97 +00:20:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53125_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53125_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:31.79 -03:42:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53135_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:42.90 +02:30:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53139_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:23.74 +02:20:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53147_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53147_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:23.00 +01:29:59.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.711 3799926346101893248 173.09576716068 +01.49964731393 14.8838 14.3824 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53148_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:17.32 -06:38:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53151_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:15.61 -05:13:38.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.183 3788720089231772288 164.81506672021 -05.22732200424 14.7562 14.2239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.183#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53152_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:35.60 -03:29:28.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.609 3792372735578835584 173.89832547657 -03.49180805501 14.7762 14.2825 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53153_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:17:03.47 +01:58:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:39.93 -04:28:05.1 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53162_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53162_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:04.74 +02:16:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.212 3800132264014454656 173.51998225210 +02.27511703515 15.0006 14.4065 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.212#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53168_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:40.90 -05:08:56.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.487 3785813530244050304 171.67044483127 -05.14892318874 14.9466 14.4779 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53170_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:53.15 -05:54:21.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.554 3787766159815630336 166.22154957107 -05.90606884043 14.9737 14.4965 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53177_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53177_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.26 -05:01:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53178_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:16.47 -03:09:10.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.520 3781373358693294976 159.31858368170 -03.15280605215 14.8394 14.1867 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.520#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53179_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:47.78 -00:43:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53181_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:45.41 -02:47:20.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.837 3792522372239592320 174.68907115360 -02.78918781380 14.7603 13.9282 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.837#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53183_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53183_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:09.67 -01:06:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53204_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:01.16 +00:32:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53213_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53213_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:56.44 +01:35:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.127 3799940261795934720 172.98500328672 +01.58664948539 14.8848 14.2511 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.127#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387
The candidate 53217_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-44-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0387 did not pass the final checks