This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 03 02.06 +04 49 33.9 11.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 27 00.11 +05 51 46.8 11.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 15 21.66 +05 40 43.1 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 01 31.73 +03 06 31.0 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 04 09.08 +08 56 10.1 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 28 17.14 +09 34 29.1 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7332,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2332 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2332* 11 34 33.76 +09 02 35.8 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7332,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2332 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461149.73343896 19.04.2026 05:35:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4367
Objects passed selection criteria: 4364
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4197.5
Average stars matched: 4069.25 (96.9446 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110832 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:41:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461149.73343896 19.04.2026 05:35:59.126 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 223
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25034
Objects passed selection criteria: 24957
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23873.2
Average stars matched: 22990 (96.3003 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:42:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.73290969
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1309 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1281 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TMYxD8Luy2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zvs5KfFrBa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AZCwHEgjTE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lq1vuwzZcf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5629 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0658 to 175.0329 deg, Dec +0.7091 to +11.2821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0658 to 175.0329 deg, Dec 0.7091 to 11.2821 deg
Loaded 3938 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3214 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 5629 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832371
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832371
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.4 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TMYxD8Luy2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=5629
Got 5629 stars (including 5225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zvs5KfFrBa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=431, passed=5671
Got 5671 stars (including 5234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AZCwHEgjTE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5626
Got 5626 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lq1vuwzZcf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=369, passed=5668
Got 5668 stars (including 5294 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5668 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20255.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20259.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20229_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 20229_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:44.76 +03:00:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 20255_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 20259_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:03:02.06 +04:49:33.9
11:27:00.11 +05:51:46.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1309 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1281 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:40.930 +05:57:32.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GXz4M4Gsud
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.owe328yOZj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1suMR4UNal
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vxP77ImzmL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0537 to 175.0351 deg, Dec +0.7036 to +11.2819 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0537 to 175.0351 deg, Dec 0.7036 to 11.2819 deg
Loaded 3942 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 31032 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714936
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714936
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 141 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.0 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.GXz4M4Gsud (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1190, passed=31016
Got 31016 stars (including 29781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.owe328yOZj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1251, passed=31400
Got 31400 stars (including 30103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1suMR4UNal (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1187, passed=29691
Got 29691 stars (including 28463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vxP77ImzmL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1146, passed=29551
Got 29551 stars (including 28369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_003720_TTUQ2b1x1_824631_3EXTzEvG/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51824.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out51829.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52183.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52220.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52225.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51928.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52033.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51820_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51820_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51822_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51822_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:17.90 +06:43:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51824_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51824_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:09.59 +06:10:47.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.295 3814333315680204544 171.28959694419 +06.17990464169 13.8562 13.4231 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.295#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51829_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51829_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:54.91 +09:46:39.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.943 3867859568944673024 163.72873623633 +09.77727149303 13.4948 12.4930 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.943#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51831_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51831_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:44.77 +03:00:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51840_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51840_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51855_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51855_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:02.05 +04:49:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51857_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51857_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51864_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51864_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:00.11 +05:51:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51878_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51878_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51887_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51887_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51897_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51897_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51899_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51899_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51900_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51900_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51905_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51905_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51911_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51911_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51916_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51916_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51920_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51920_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51922_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51922_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:21.83 +02:00:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51927_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51927_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51928_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 51928_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51930_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51930_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51931_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51931_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51932_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51932_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51936_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51936_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51937_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51937_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51938_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51938_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51942_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51942_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51944_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51944_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51947_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51947_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51950_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51950_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51953_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51953_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51957_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 51957_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51958_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51958_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51960_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51960_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51963_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51963_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51970_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51970_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51971_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51976_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51976_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:53.71 +02:39:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51981_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51981_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51982_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51982_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51983_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51983_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51984_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51984_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51985_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51985_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51986_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51986_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51989_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51989_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51992_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51992_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:07:23.33 +06:22:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51995_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51995_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51996_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51996_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51997_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 51997_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52002_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52002_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52007_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52007_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52012_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52012_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52014_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52014_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52019_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52019_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52023_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52023_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52024_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52024_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52025_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52025_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52027_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52027_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52028_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52028_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52029_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52029_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52030_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52030_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52031_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52031_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52033_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 52033_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52034_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52034_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52038_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52038_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52039_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52039_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52043_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52043_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52044_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52044_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52045_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52045_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52046_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52046_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52047_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52049_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:39.61 +03:01:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52051_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52051_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52052_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52052_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52059_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52059_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52063_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52063_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52064_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52064_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52070_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52070_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52074_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52074_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52077_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52077_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52078_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52078_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52079_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52079_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52080_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52080_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:50.16 +09:56:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52083_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52083_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52086_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52087_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52087_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52090_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52092_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52092_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52093_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52093_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52094_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52094_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52096_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52096_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52098_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52098_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52103_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52105_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52110_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52110_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52114_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52114_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52115_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52116_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52116_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52117_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52117_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52120_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52120_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52124_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52124_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52132_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52132_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52134_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52134_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:15.44 +04:41:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52135_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52135_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52136_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52136_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52138_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52138_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52146_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52161_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52161_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52163_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52167_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52167_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52168_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52174_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52174_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52177_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52177_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52183_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:36.40 +07:23:17.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.322 3865002213101945600 164.15254293084 +07.38791196162 14.9925 14.3976 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.322#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52186_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52191_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52191_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52194_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52194_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52196_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52196_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52198_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52198_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:12:01.42 +08:11:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52199_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52199_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:31.90 +08:50:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52200_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52200_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:43.03 +02:30:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52201_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52201_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52203_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52203_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52204_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52204_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52205_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52205_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52207_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52207_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52213_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52213_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52214_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52217_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 52217_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52218_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52218_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52220_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52220_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:01:13.40 +02:37:58.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.625 3808615988359354496 165.30577007112 +02.63318950061 15.0049 14.4964 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.625#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52221_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52221_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52222_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52222_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:59.47 +02:41:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52223_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:26.21 +07:08:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52225_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52225_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:15.20 +09:15:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.848 3866328189765283328 162.81328437684 +09.26335011179 14.7514 14.3070 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.848#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52232_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52232_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52238_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52238_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52290_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52290_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
Preparing report for the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504
The candidate 52323_fd_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-59_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0504 did not pass the final checks