This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 10 11 36.31 +15 37 57.6 11.0 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,10.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 10.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 10 00 13.01 +12 01 59.8 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7282,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2282 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 09 49 27.92 +16 20 25.1 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 09 32 40.07 +09 23 51.8 12.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,12.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 12.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 10 04 34.55 +18 33 49.7 13.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 09 37 49.64 +16 46 16.6 13.7 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 10 07 44.84 +10 10 46.4 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.7282,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.2282 14.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.2282* 09 22 19.55 +18 27 36.2 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.7282,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.2282 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461149.72854464 19.04.2026 05:28:56.257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7716
Objects passed selection criteria: 7707
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6823.75
Average stars matched: 6660.75 (97.6113 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:32:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
First image: 2461058.86919819 18.01.2026 08:51:28.724 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Last image: 2461149.72854464 19.04.2026 05:28:56.257 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 235
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41620
Objects passed selection criteria: 41494
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35209.2
Average stars matched: 34161.8 (97.0249 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 142876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 00:33:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.72792185
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0323 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0339 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00288 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gkWqg6CqKf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XAVgg4txuN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rSgf5WFfKb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HZft7qN9fB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec +8.6225 to +19.2659 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3852 to 154.9366 deg, Dec 8.6225 to 19.2659 deg
Loaded 4773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3901 out of 4125 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4125 out of 7958 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.893593
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.893593
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
3.9 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
4.0 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gkWqg6CqKf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=534, passed=7958
Got 7958 stars (including 7414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7958 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 915 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XAVgg4txuN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=535, passed=8039
Got 8039 stars (including 7496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7745 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rSgf5WFfKb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, passed=5766
Got 5766 stars (including 5446 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5766 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HZft7qN9fB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=5718
Got 5718 stars (including 5377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5718 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20525.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 20525_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:11:36.31 +15:37:57.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0323 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:46:34.262 +13:59:45.34
Second-epoch image center 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0339 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:46:41.465 +14:00:35.54
Second-epoch second image center 09:46:42.060 +14:00:29.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00288 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HuDamzvzRR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits &> /tmp/tmp.37Dh6T4a4Y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7CSQtSjKns
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5QcNkIxUR2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits and wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43775 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec +8.6120 to +19.2857 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 138.3793 to 154.9626 deg, Dec 8.6120 to 19.2857 deg
Loaded 4796 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3707 out of 4153 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4153 out of 43775 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.782622
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.782622
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 215 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
3.4 pix fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HuDamzvzRR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1969, passed=43753
Got 43753 stars (including 41699 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43753 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 912 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.37Dh6T4a4Y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1988, passed=43712
Got 43712 stars (including 41658 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 998)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits -region wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7CSQtSjKns (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1622, passed=27268
Got 27268 stars (including 25610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 911 stars left (next iteration limit 1002)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5QcNkIxUR2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=1733, passed=27568
Got 27568 stars (including 25803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 550 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 997)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-51-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-52-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0401.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0375.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-19_CI_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_002951_TTUQ1b1x1_556243_mhBRvsLN/wcs_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52934.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52940.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52960.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52957.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53207.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53296.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53852.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53856.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 52934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:33:27.64 +09:26:23.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.150 588279196631960448 143.36548755302 +09.43984909221 14.1093 13.6301 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.150#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 52940_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:03:20.61 +17:51:55.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.108 623114924750840064 150.83480172751 +17.86476931432 13.7245 13.1095 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.108#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 52957_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 52960_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:13:11.47 +14:57:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.213 3888187614796529792 153.29661320853 +14.95606268243 13.1680 12.5981 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.213#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 52964_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53030_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:11:36.31 +15:37:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53061_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53065_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53075_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53080_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53124_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53136_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53136_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53145_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53145_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53148_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53149_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53154_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53158_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53170_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53187_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53207_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53207_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53210_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53221_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53221_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53227_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53238_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53238_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53244_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53255_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53257_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53262_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53266_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53266_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53267_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53274_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53276_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53279_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53279_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53286_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53288_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53296_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53296_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53297_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53297_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53309_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53309_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53318_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53318_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53321_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53329_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53334_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53340_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53340_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53341_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53341_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53342_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53342_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53347_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53351_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53351_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53355_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53355_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53356_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53356_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53361_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53362_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53363_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53369_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53375_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53380_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53380_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53381_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53387_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53396_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53398_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53398_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53401_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53401_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53404_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53404_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53406_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53409_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53412_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53412_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53414_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53414_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53420_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:31:51.13 +17:15:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53424_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53424_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53426_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53426_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53427_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53434_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53434_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53438_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53438_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53443_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53443_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53445_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53447_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53452_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53452_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53453_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53461_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53461_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53466_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53466_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53472_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53472_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53479_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53479_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53491_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53491_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53492_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53492_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53494_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53494_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53497_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53497_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53505_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53505_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53509_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53509_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53515_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53516_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53516_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53518_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53518_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53519_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53519_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53525_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53525_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53526_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53526_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53536_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53539_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53539_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53548_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53548_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53550_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53550_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53561_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53561_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53578_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53584_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53590_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53590_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53591_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53608_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53608_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53609_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53610_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53610_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53612_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53612_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53614_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53616_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53616_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:30:08.63 +09:16:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53620_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53620_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53621_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53625_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53626_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53633_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53638_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53639_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53641_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53641_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53644_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53650_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53650_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53651_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53652_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53655_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53655_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53656_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53656_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53661_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53673_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53675_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53676_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53676_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53681_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53686_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53686_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53691_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53691_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53692_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53692_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53701_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53701_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53709_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53714_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53714_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53715_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53720_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53721_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53721_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53722_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53722_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53726_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53727_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53728_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53729_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53729_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53733_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53735_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53735_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53738_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53739_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53739_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53740_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53744_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53744_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53747_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53747_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53748_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53752_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53753_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53754_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53754_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53757_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53758_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53760_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53760_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53768_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53772_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53772_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53780_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53783_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53783_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53784_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53784_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53786_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53786_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53796_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53798_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53807_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53807_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53815_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53820_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53829_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53837_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53837_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53839_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53839_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53841_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53841_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53845_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53852_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53855_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 53856_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53864_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53867_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53867_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53868_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53870_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53870_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53875_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53875_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53877_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53877_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53886_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53886_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53890_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53892_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53895_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53895_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53896_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53908_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53913_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53913_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53915_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53915_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53917_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53924_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53926_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53929_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53934_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53936_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53937_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53939_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53939_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53948_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53949_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53950_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53952_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53953_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53961_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53962_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53967_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53972_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53977_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53979_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53983_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53995_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53996_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53996_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53998_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53998_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53999_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 53999_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 54000_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 54007_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 54009_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54017_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376
The candidate 54017_fd_Leo-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-28-56_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0376 did not pass the final checks
