This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461149.6909,11.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260419.1909 11.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6909,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1909 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6909,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1909 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6909,14.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1909 14.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6909,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1909 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
YZ Cnc,2461149.6909,11.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
YZ Cnc 20260419.1909 11.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461149.69131321 19.04.2026 04:35:19.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14356
Objects passed selection criteria: 14337
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12998.5
Average stars matched: 12634.2 (97.1978 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118600 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 23:37:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
First image: 2461083.71692514 12.02.2026 05:12:12.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Last image: 2461149.69131321 19.04.2026 04:35:19.461 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91400
Objects passed selection criteria: 91166
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 84081
Average stars matched: 80793.2 (96.0898 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1948328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 23:39:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.69048925
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vTC2gKrvV5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kUMiAYf2z7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eSEk4bYy4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Si2mG7tmHR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3509 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.2995 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3509 deg
Loaded 9871 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7216 out of 7782 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7782 out of 14371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.912020
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.912020
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.9 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vTC2gKrvV5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1108, passed=14371
Got 14371 stars (including 13247 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14371 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14189 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14187 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kUMiAYf2z7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1133, passed=14315
Got 14315 stars (including 13161 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14132 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eSEk4bYy4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=819, passed=11866
Got 11866 stars (including 11032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11771 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Si2mG7tmHR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=820, passed=11717
Got 11717 stars (including 10881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11717 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11574 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21294.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 20695_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:51.92 +29:02:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20696_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 20696_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:22.40 +30:08:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 21075_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21214_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 21214_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:05.84 +29:16:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 21275_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:03.00 +28:20:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21294_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 21294_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:00.73 +28:46:14.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.404 876339045402594560 120.25308674861 +28.77066073591 12.2502 11.8014 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.404#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 06746_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.05 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 12811_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:14.04 +33:22:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0319 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:59:59.909 +29:59:55.65
Second-epoch image center 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0448 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:00:05.307 +29:58:24.50
Second-epoch second image center 08:00:08.514 +29:57:59.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a6Zqw7YrOJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QwibFr3spC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XWoqUAojaO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nLyUbsVKZM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits and wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 92293 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec +24.1558 to +35.3693 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 110.1895 to 129.3003 deg, Dec 24.1558 to 35.3693 deg
Loaded 9883 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6521 out of 7921 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7921 out of 92293 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.781221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.781221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
1.8 pix Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
15.6 mag. Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.a6Zqw7YrOJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=6631, passed=92272
Got 92272 stars (including 85483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QwibFr3spC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=37, blended=6656, passed=92132
Got 92132 stars (including 85329 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 92132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 91266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XWoqUAojaO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=4835, passed=76505
Got 76505 stars (including 71524 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75833 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75831 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nLyUbsVKZM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=4795, passed=77657
Got 77657 stars (including 72716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77657 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 76750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0201.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_23-12-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-34-08_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_233621_TTUQ1b1x1_1743735_UvrvQojL/wcs_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109329.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109343.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109348.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109364.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out109365.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112947.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112987.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113032.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113103.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113210.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113231.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113286.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113363.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113414.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113471.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113490.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out113521.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out111620.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113305.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109318_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109329_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:50.08 +27:21:29.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.164 683765601048312576 121.95839129900 +27.35832258542 14.7605 14.2878 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.164#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109331_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:05.93 +34:59:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109333_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:47.84 +33:27:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109334_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109334_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:57:12.71 +32:52:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109338_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109338_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:32.91 +27:15:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109339_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:44.38 +32:43:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109343_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:04.77 +24:55:56.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.170 682317956551049088 123.51952086318 +24.93246700273 14.3956 13.9327 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.170#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109344_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109344_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:29:20.19 +30:56:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109346_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:37.19 +33:44:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109347_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109347_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:30:53.13 +33:18:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109348_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:34.92 +27:42:29.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.025 683353078028741120 124.89564122927 +27.70779985681 14.2501 13.6314 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.025#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109353_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:33.71 +25:30:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109362_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109362_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:52.72 +30:20:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:12.63 +29:33:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109364_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:16.82 +31:50:36.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109365_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:29.17 +24:51:32.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.705 678740729831155200 126.87150312406 +24.85889058992 13.4439 13.0180 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109366_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:42.44 +30:37:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109369_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:08.52 +30:49:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109370_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:37:52.47 +31:42:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109371_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:36.40 +27:55:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 109851_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:23.79 +27:43:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110226_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 110226_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:48.81 +31:51:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110424_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 110424_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:30.10 +35:02:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 110427_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110846_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 110846_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:34:06.16 +30:58:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110961_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 110961_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:11.08 +31:36:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110999_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 110999_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:17.80 +29:14:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111031_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111031_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:06.85 +27:56:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111063_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:33.86 +30:50:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111087_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:32:53.02 +31:03:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111175_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111175_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:07.86 +31:29:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111378_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:34.14 +27:31:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111601_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 111601_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111620_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 111620_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111621_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111621_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:23.27 +31:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111664_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111664_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:02.24 +31:46:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111725_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111725_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:53.99 +33:54:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111763_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111763_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:51.66 +33:09:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111912_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 111912_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:26.06 +25:37:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112042_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112042_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112206_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112206_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:58:13.03 +31:55:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112218_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112218_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:03.61 +28:28:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112355_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:23.21 +27:33:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112379_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112379_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:29.79 +35:07:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112384_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112384_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:08.93 +34:39:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112409_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112409_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:42.83 +30:00:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112602_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112602_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:37.05 +29:27:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112659_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112659_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:10.08 +25:16:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112800_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112800_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:56.93 +28:28:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112947_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:14.34 +29:01:41.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.823 875790702635102080 117.55971233504 +29.02774481390 14.8873 14.1823 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.823#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112960_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112960_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:27.97 +27:52:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112987_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 112987_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:49.39 +34:29:35.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.217 894361797624504320 114.70597416542 +34.49278051875 15.0141 14.3628 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.217#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113032_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113032_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:33.28 +29:07:15.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.496 707343356594898816 127.13829409264 +29.12041571120 15.0325 14.3910 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.496#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113103_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113103_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:52.78 +28:46:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.512 707316384200336768 127.21962503918 +28.77141691366 14.9967 14.4725 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.512#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113210_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113210_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:27:59.04 +33:39:56.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.003 903035982294745472 126.99570989962 +33.66513752543 14.9347 14.4361 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.003#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113231_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113231_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:20.71 +29:07:16.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.712 707517113791865856 126.58667771896 +29.12068761604 15.0381 14.5367 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.712#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113253_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:04.64 +33:50:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113265_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113265_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:28:20.25 +33:48:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113286_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:36.08 +34:30:11.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.054 903377655533088384 125.65003840543 +34.50262278178 15.1910 14.6472 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.054#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113305_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 113305_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113363_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:32.26 +30:36:29.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.542 708131672072546688 127.88379994750 +30.60781190529 14.9978 14.5517 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.542#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113367_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:06:13.63 +31:49:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113414_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:54.68 +33:49:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.266 903274095281737856 125.72777896493 +33.82869139364 14.8645 14.2560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.266#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113471_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113471_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:56.04 +32:58:06.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.897 901534874044823808 125.73379661662 +32.96853761235 15.0661 14.4043 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.897#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113490_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113490_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:27.63 +34:12:00.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.670 902598273588091648 124.86456906645 +34.19999314092 15.0275 14.5451 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113521_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:29.24 +31:48:54.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.389 881088424535047808 119.12213854385 +31.81447264977 15.2987 14.7935 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.389#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113560_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 113560_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:44:43.69 +29:53:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
Preparing report for the candidate 30129_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 44359_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:11.05 +29:09:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344
The candidate 69850_fd_Gem-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-35-19_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0344 did not pass the final checks