This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,13.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 13.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,14.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 14.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,15.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 15.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6893,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1893 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AT Cnc,2461149.6893,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AT Cnc 20260419.1893 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.70008337 22.02.2026 04:47:57.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461093.70008337 22.02.2026 04:47:57.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461149.68974872 19.04.2026 04:33:04.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13631
Objects passed selection criteria: 13610
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12405.8
Average stars matched: 12081.2 (97.3843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 23:35:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.70008337 22.02.2026 04:47:57.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461093.70008337 22.02.2026 04:47:57.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461149.68974872 19.04.2026 04:33:04.289 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 83795
Objects passed selection criteria: 83550
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 77669
Average stars matched: 74701.2 (96.179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1874748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 23:36:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.68882637
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67
Second-epoch image center 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67
Second-epoch image center 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18
Second-epoch second image center 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Uzi0MtEl69
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.92rTAzAvrq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cTG5qr8Two
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UKhzl1sl26
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13703 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.6698 to 133.2123 deg, Dec +16.3190 to +27.3485 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.6698 to 133.2123 deg, Dec 16.3190 to 27.3485 deg
Loaded 8739 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6706 out of 7190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7190 out of 13703 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921568
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921568
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.4 mag. Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Uzi0MtEl69 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1104, passed=13703
Got 13703 stars (including 12580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13448 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.92rTAzAvrq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1109, passed=13640
Got 13640 stars (including 12518 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cTG5qr8Two (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=828, passed=11302
Got 11302 stars (including 10459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11302 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11176 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UKhzl1sl26 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, passed=11262
Got 11262 stars (including 10397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11262 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11099 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cnc-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20695_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 20695_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:25:17.08 +24:20:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20767_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 20767_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21016_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 21016_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:54.75 +24:09:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21133_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 21133_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:39.18 +21:35:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00776_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 00776_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:42.81 +17:17:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cnc-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
08:31:06.07 +20:37:04.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67
Second-epoch image center 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0256 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:18:28.231 +22:00:01.67
Second-epoch image center 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0140 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:18:33.581 +21:59:07.18
Second-epoch second image center 08:18:31.446 +21:59:38.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01201 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cUrGg00h4x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q2bWMJKTJf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5m0FXScoVq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1aO0jOAtWo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84194 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.6500 to 133.2207 deg, Dec +16.3111 to +27.3510 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.6500 to 133.2207 deg, Dec 16.3111 to 27.3510 deg
Loaded 8767 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5951 out of 7242 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7242 out of 84194 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789886
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789886
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
1.9 pix Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.5 mag. Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.cUrGg00h4x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=6351, passed=84160
Got 84160 stars (including 77670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84160 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q2bWMJKTJf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=6314, passed=84327
Got 84327 stars (including 77873 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84327 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5m0FXScoVq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=4517, passed=72031
Got 72031 stars (including 67380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71098 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71097 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1aO0jOAtWo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=4555, passed=72391
Got 72391 stars (including 67720 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 72391 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-47-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-48-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-31-44_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0341.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_233406_TTUQ1b1x1_1686472_2VOwRBiT/wcs_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cnc-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100692.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100694.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100695.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100717.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out100725.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103088.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103433.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103612.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103668.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103845.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103884.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out103902.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104048.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104087.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104090.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out104143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out94269.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out103860.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101692.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102307.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102995.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103631.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out103921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99841.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100692_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100692_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:16.91 +25:38:44.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.549 679777638014296320 126.06969236248 +25.64585125212 15.1129 14.6247 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.549#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100694_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100694_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:00.98 +25:54:41.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100695_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100695_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:52.15 +26:23:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.808 682182785340627072 120.96676020754 +26.38993729730 15.1730 14.7053 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.808#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100698_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100698_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:44:41.39 +24:59:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100705_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100705_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:17.64 +20:50:43.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100709_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100709_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:03.71 +24:28:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100717_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100717_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:47.65 +25:45:11.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.59)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100723_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100723_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:45.88 +20:07:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100725_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100725_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:27.60 +22:10:16.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.856 676310087582269824 126.11476307973 +22.17115841672 14.6653 14.1509 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.856#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100726_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100726_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:48.53 +24:37:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100727_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100727_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:06.49 +22:40:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100728_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100728_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100729_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100729_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:37.46 +17:09:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100732_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100732_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:45:27.26 +19:23:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100736_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100736_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:04.10 +19:56:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100738_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100738_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:46.92 +25:51:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100742_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100742_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:48:19.14 +26:15:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100743_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100743_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:44.17 +23:01:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100747_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100747_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:51.02 +23:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100754_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100754_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:33.64 +19:11:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100873_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 100873_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:06.07 +20:37:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101138_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 101138_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:54.75 +24:09:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101692_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 101692_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101797_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 101797_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:22.42 +25:02:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101940_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 101940_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:02:03.48 +24:56:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101942_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 101942_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:37.86 +24:16:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101966_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 101966_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101982_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 101982_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:04.89 +19:27:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102046_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 102046_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102094_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102094_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:42.76 +16:53:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102200_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102200_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:42.30 +16:55:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102269_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102269_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:31:23.08 +19:51:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102307_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 102307_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102452_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102452_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:38:47.37 +17:58:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102638_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102638_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:10.06 +27:04:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102748_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102748_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:17.29 +23:19:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102776_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 102776_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102788_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102788_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:24:20.97 +18:55:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102803_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102803_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:35.80 +23:59:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102827_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102827_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:56.17 +23:35:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102869_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102869_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:39.15 +21:02:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102960_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102960_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:56:33.42 +21:51:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102970_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102970_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:41:57.55 +25:51:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102973_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 102973_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:49:14.67 +23:44:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102995_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 102995_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103023_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103023_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:12:17.80 +18:16:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103032_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103032_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:59:09.15 +17:58:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103088_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103088_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:09:49.85 +17:15:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.037 656835876927901568 122.45654520039 +17.25884810770 14.6708 14.2161 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.037#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103156_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103156_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:43.93 +26:32:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103219_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103219_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:35:41.37 +23:15:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103235_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103235_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:45:33.65 +25:25:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103342_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103342_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:54:38.70 +25:51:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103385_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103385_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:04:46.42 +26:46:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103417_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103417_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:33:58.86 +22:22:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103433_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103433_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:37:40.60 +18:25:11.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.350 659643759043985408 129.41953051083 +18.42066984308 14.9850 14.5547 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.350#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103471_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103471_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:35.50 +22:05:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103538_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103538_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:14:20.54 +21:02:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103608_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103608_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:08:24.79 +26:19:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103612_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103612_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:33.11 +18:16:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.608 668554819751271680 117.88807040559 +18.26631620894 14.8077 14.3646 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.608#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103631_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 103631_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103651_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103651_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:11.27 +19:34:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103668_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103668_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:48.54 +18:38:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.812 669384538712923648 122.70275759244 +18.64171248300 14.5675 13.9455 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.812#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103708_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103708_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:23:02.72 +22:37:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103735_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103735_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:38.30 +26:11:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103736_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103736_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:48:10.75 +24:04:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103809_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103809_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:52:04.17 +25:24:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103833_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103833_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:42:57.14 +21:20:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103845_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103845_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:12.66 +23:04:38.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.994 680350483572599168 120.05245109147 +23.07744814724 14.8469 14.3893 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.994#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103860_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103860_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:49:14.03 +23:22:49.6 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103868_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103868_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:16.54 +18:28:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103884_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103884_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:19:16.68 +24:10:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.199 679021208374040960 124.81980897962 +24.17820820148 15.3656 14.9618 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.199#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103902_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103902_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:15.66 +20:21:50.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103921_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 103921_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103959_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 103959_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:42:10.13 +20:59:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104048_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104048_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:33.52 +26:45:42.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.160 874924562349248768 116.38900304767 +26.76176018714 14.6093 13.9603 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.160#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104060_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104060_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:52.91 +21:30:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104087_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104087_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:05.64 +22:38:27.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.670 689094551654122752 132.52329944626 +22.64096373578 15.1591 14.6568 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.670#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104089_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104089_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104090_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104090_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:26:09.09 +24:18:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.816 678340095282987392 126.53799957843 +24.31413722945 15.3004 14.8375 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104094_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104094_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104143_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104143_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:43:11.56 +26:17:04.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.443 703139163431639936 130.79797155402 +26.28427813789 15.1716 14.6310 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104147_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104147_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:10:24.97 +18:34:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104154_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104154_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:42:23.26 +25:30:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104159_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 104159_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:22:12.44 +22:47:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13080_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 13080_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:48:37.57 +17:57:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15185_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 15185_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:53.77 +18:10:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03987_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 03987_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:21:42.81 +17:17:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99841_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
Preparing report for the candidate 99841_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61198_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 61198_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:48:21.06 +26:15:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94269_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342
The candidate 94269_fd_Cnc-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_23-33-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0342 did not pass the final checks
