This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0494 Aur,2461149.6520,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0494 Aur 20260419.1520 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J077.6706+51.8100,2461149.6520,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J077.6706+51.8100 20260419.1520 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J051234.45+545151.9,2461149.6520,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J051234.45+545151.9 20260419.1520 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0507 Aur,2461149.6520,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0507 Aur 20260419.1520 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0525270+500355,2461149.6520,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0525270+500355 20260419.1520 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461149.65226079 19.04.2026 03:39:05.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19059
Objects passed selection criteria: 18971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14228.5
Average stars matched: 12917.2 (90.7843 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 121632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 07:53:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
First image: 2461049.69862881 09.01.2026 04:45:51.529 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Last image: 2461149.65226079 19.04.2026 03:39:05.332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 93
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137206
Objects passed selection criteria: 136776
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 100625
Average stars matched: 91728 (91.1585 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1900680 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Apr 19 07:55:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.65168057
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.3'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0807 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Image size: 937.3'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0881 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09
Second-epoch second image center 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00742 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0M0MPqheD5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jFkE4VjkY6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8g8TMvsKAP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hyJfggPr3F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4455 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.2437 to 98.9738 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4455 deg
Loaded 11842 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7480 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 21171 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.946929
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.946929
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.0 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.4 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0M0MPqheD5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1951, passed=21171
Got 21171 stars (including 19188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21171 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jFkE4VjkY6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1992, passed=21135
Got 21135 stars (including 19116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21135 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 932 stars left (next iteration limit 1025)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8g8TMvsKAP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1278, passed=14665
Got 14665 stars (including 13378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hyJfggPr3F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1267, passed=14649
Got 14649 stars (including 13373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out34732.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13894.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32322_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 32322_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:56.15 +51:37:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32755_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 32755_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:46.30 +54:26:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33761_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 33761_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.24 +50:18:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 33923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.97 +52:48:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 34151_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:50.96 +55:53:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34593_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 34593_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:45.74 +50:55:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34732_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 34732_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:59.74 +52:18:38.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.415 972198424778543616 090.24828744182 +52.31074686407 12.8752 12.0200 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.415#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 12298_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.29 +53:54:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13894_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 13894_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 04099_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.53 +50:07:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:00:30.75 +55:27:13.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Image size: 937.3'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0807 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.3'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:38:46.898 +53:59:43.50
Second-epoch image center 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0881 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:39:19.368 +53:58:54.09
Second-epoch second image center 05:39:22.384 +53:58:51.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00742 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2uToOpLFzf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LUAXu9SzQK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7pOL7U8DCN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits &> /tmp/tmp.na0FGS9pvE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits and wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 155080 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec +47.5207 to +59.4472 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 69.1098 to 99.0219 deg, Dec 47.5207 to 59.4472 deg
Loaded 11908 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6184 out of 8396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8396 out of 155080 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.800893
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.800893
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
1.9 pix Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
2.6 pix fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.2uToOpLFzf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=52, blended=17009, passed=155028
Got 155028 stars (including 137750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155028 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153042 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153039 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LUAXu9SzQK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=17172, passed=155805
Got 155805 stars (including 138361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 155805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 152856 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits -region wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7pOL7U8DCN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=9607, passed=84192
Got 84192 stars (including 74507 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84192 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.na0FGS9pvE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=9808, passed=84376
Got 84376 stars (including 74493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84376 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-45-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-46-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0174.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-38-15_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0411.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_223950_TTUQ2b1x1_1343093_WUhkTUmn/wcs_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177310.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177320.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177335.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177342.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177352.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177355.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177359.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out193745.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148333.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177351.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27559.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88976.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177310_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177310_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:04.03 +52:33:05.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177320_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177320_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:40.01 +51:11:13.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.287 215382134471772288 084.16675044978 +51.18706375107 14.1635 13.5743 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.287#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177323_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177323_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:24.67 +50:20:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177330_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177330_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:16.90 +55:16:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.453 266794164314403328 080.82240921470 +55.27091384562 13.5792 12.7073 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.453#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177335_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177335_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:22.94 +50:59:58.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177342_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177342_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:03.30 +52:05:20.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.679 215750951902780672 088.26308638516 +52.08959475110 14.6050 13.8810 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.679#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177347_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177347_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:27.72 +55:25:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177348_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177348_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:06.87 +49:39:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177349_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177349_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:36.63 +54:19:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177351_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 177351_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177352_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177352_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:36.26 +51:16:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.02, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.00)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.700 971980240440018176 091.65111443189 +51.27472135256 13.8083 13.2179 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.700#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177354_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177354_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:29.55 +49:51:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177355_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177355_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:17.84 +55:16:43.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.341 997083774528610176 092.32447393512 +55.27864373397 13.7598 13.4362 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.341#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177358_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177358_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:46.31 +55:17:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177359_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 177359_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:16.97 +49:35:41.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.404 970101961045368064 091.82129745119 +49.59472681783 13.1204 12.3784 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.404#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178792_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 178792_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:55.74 +51:37:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179091_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 179091_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:55.32 +54:33:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181142_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 181142_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:44.52 +54:23:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181202_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 181202_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184144_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 184144_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:45.53 +49:53:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184395_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 184395_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:45.98 +56:56:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185809_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 185809_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:15.24 +54:54:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185882_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 185882_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:00.31 +56:56:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187324_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 187324_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:25.56 +52:43:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187572_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 187572_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:14.27 +50:00:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187753_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 187753_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:46.41 +56:55:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188071_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188071_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:12.39 +56:23:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188105_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188105_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.58 +50:23:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188185_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188185_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.57 +54:14:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188407_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188407_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:49.85 +50:34:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188615_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188615_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:50.74 +49:49:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188645_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188645_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:01.92 +50:57:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 188923_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:08.69 +50:16:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189196_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189196_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:49.20 +49:49:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189594_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189594_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:02.04 +51:43:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189674_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189674_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:06.63 +54:48:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189785_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189785_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:49.41 +51:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189803_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189803_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:49.51 +54:19:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189853_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189853_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:38.26 +57:44:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189910_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 189910_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:59.72 +53:35:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190008_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 190008_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:24.51 +56:05:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190085_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 190085_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:30.71 +51:10:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190358_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 190358_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:53.08 +52:57:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190496_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 190496_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:01.29 +58:12:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191162_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 191162_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:24.35 +55:28:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191352_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 191352_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:52.90 +54:15:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191491_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 191491_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:59.66 +50:51:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192070_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 192070_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:22.71 +50:56:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192555_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 192555_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:37.15 +53:51:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193135_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 193135_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:24.25 +50:55:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.181 211657882429957760 089.35170240443 +50.92702331806 14.5143 13.8190 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.181#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193745_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 193745_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:11.39 +52:24:18.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.199 215024071637549952 089.79691360105 +52.40502282671 14.6594 13.9774 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.199#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193965_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 193965_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:40.26 +51:42:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194403_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 194403_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:19.75 +52:20:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 197885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:06.59 +55:42:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 27904_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:21.21 +50:18:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 53316_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 28410_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:37.11 +50:14:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 66885_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:35.95 +52:48:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 56837_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:56.71 +52:02:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148333_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 148333_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 98888_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:44.92 +54:17:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150174_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 150174_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:30.70 +55:27:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 29073_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:04.52 +50:07:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88976_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
Preparing report for the candidate 88976_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 130580_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:38.41 +56:02:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 91599_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:20.30 +53:54:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 136027_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:23.97 +55:49:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 133856_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:57.03 +56:05:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 57109_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.13 +51:37:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120364_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 120364_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:04.66 +56:48:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31829_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 31829_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:08.42 +50:18:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 141855_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:50.93 +55:53:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26801_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412
The candidate 26801_fd_Aur-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_22-39-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0412 did not pass the final checks