This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.1045* 05 04 42.45 +25 26 08.9 11.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6045,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1045 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.1045* 04 43 50.76 +28 01 37.6 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J077.0006+30.8796,2461149.6045,14.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J077.0006+30.8796 20260419.1045 14.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461149.6045,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260419.1045 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.1045* 04 59 37.20 +27 40 23.6 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6045,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1045 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6045,13.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1045 13.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 19.1045* 04 47 28.36 +28 48 47.6 14.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461149.6045,14.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260419.1045 14.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461149.60491066 19.04.2026 02:30:54.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15322
Objects passed selection criteria: 15278
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12680
Average stars matched: 12332 (97.2555 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 22:19:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461149.60491066 19.04.2026 02:30:54.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 112
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 61 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126694
Objects passed selection criteria: 126416
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110278
Average stars matched: 106333 (96.422 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2348728 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 22:22:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461149.60405665
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0241 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZDdEOHLS0y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M57g5d7evw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CnQipl2T1L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VDRO2o1aXi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZDdEOHLS0y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M57g5d7evw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CnQipl2T1L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=734, passed=9051
Got 9051 stars (including 8298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9051 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VDRO2o1aXi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=739, passed=9272
Got 9272 stars (including 8519 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21254_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 21254_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.48 +31:18:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:27.98 +34:07:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21294_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 21294_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.33 +34:07:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 21314_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:04:42.45 +25:26:08.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0383 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0241 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:06.381 +29:57:49.12
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:04.015 +29:58:30.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01439 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wdrhaYdACi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0IrbVkL35D
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eDdLcuAB4E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D14d3ZOAUm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
1.9 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wdrhaYdACi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0IrbVkL35D (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eDdLcuAB4E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=5781, passed=83494
Got 83494 stars (including 77547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 83494 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D14d3ZOAUm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=6190, passed=84960
Got 84960 stars (including 78608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 569 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 82154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-29-40_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0254.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213151_TTUQ1b1x1_1504356_1rV8cZQ8/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161015.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162436.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162640.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out160965.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out161885.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out162656.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out162741.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out162774.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out162809.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160911.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160959.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160961.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 550s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160907_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:39.19 +29:11:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160918_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160918_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:15.54 +33:46:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:46.01 +32:30:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160933_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:37.07 +27:48:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160941_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:20.74 +34:46:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160952_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160952_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:16.61 +33:33:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160955_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160955_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:25.08 +29:02:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160959_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160965_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:26.61 +24:37:21.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.93 +29:23:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160972_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:17.60 +26:48:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160981_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.82 +28:54:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160982_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160985_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:43.74 +32:55:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 160989_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160991_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160991_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.65 +32:42:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160994_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160994_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:48.94 +28:47:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160996_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:41.57 +33:02:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 160998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.68 +28:44:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161006_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161006_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:31.14 +27:42:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161009_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:37.46 +26:55:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:07.77 +32:41:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161015_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161015_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:58.44 +33:54:53.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.649 3449172030782453888 083.24398993569 +33.91507199426 11.7994 11.0092 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.649#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161146_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.68 +34:09:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161179_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.29 +34:07:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161182_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:46.84 +32:32:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161183_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:42.44 +25:26:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161325_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.64 +34:23:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 161393_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161411_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.21 +32:26:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161425_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 +26:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161454_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.90 +28:31:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161513_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.17 +34:24:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161550_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.51 +33:11:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161581_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161581_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.08 +34:06:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161585_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.63 +33:12:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161603_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:21.75 +33:35:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161643_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:01.26 +33:48:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161672_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161672_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.33 +34:10:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161673_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.85 +33:11:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161718_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161718_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.84 +29:10:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161735_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161735_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.28 +31:44:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161739_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.69 +30:49:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161743_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.95 +34:09:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161758_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:10.62 +34:12:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161808_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161808_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:59.48 +25:52:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161827_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161827_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.23 +32:25:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161867_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161867_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.61 +29:45:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:41.68 +32:40:23.5 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161897_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161897_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:28.21 +33:36:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161936_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.20 +33:52:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161957_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:30.92 +32:48:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161976_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.86 +32:37:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161978_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:32.50 +32:47:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161983_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:35.24 +31:49:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161987_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.75 +33:23:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161995_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161995_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:51.13 +28:31:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 161998_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:25.41 +27:00:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162008_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162008_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.80 +32:25:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 162018_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162024_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:41.36 +33:56:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.26 +32:55:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162054_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.83 +30:56:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162056_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162056_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.10 +31:04:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162066_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162066_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.12 +31:15:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162076_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162076_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.77 +26:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162091_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162091_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:16.34 +32:24:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.07 +30:28:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162111_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:08.75 +33:20:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162118_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:52.52 +34:01:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162126_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:08.24 +30:12:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.75 +28:40:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162153_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:00.90 +34:07:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162178_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162178_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:08.55 +33:13:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162200_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.97 +32:03:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162212_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:24.86 +29:23:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162270_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.08 +29:22:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162317_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:53.28 +32:52:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162329_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:01.20 +28:18:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162372_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.39 +34:32:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162386_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.19 +31:01:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162408_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:03.49 +33:54:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162436_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:21.58 +30:46:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.522 159234370607781120 069.09034335223 +30.77568256140 14.2653 13.6259 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.522#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162451_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.46 +32:27:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162460_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:27.80 +32:29:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162479_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162479_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:42.02 +29:51:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162522_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:11.35 +34:26:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162608_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162608_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:32.17 +30:31:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162625_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:09.63 +31:24:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162640_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162640_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:30.47 +32:25:08.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162656_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:59.23 +28:14:34.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162741_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:09.75 +28:58:36.9 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162748_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
Preparing report for the candidate 162748_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162774_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162774_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:04.39 +33:25:33.3 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.71)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162778_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162778_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:41.75 +33:40:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162809_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 162809_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:05.80 +29:33:56.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.22 +32:10:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.51 +31:18:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_21-30-54_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0255 did not pass the final checks
