This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J191312-2429.8,2461148.9043,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J191312-2429.8 20260418.4043 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,12.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 12.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.9043,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.4043 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461148.90464219 18.04.2026 09:42:31.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8363
Objects passed selection criteria: 8355
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7739.5
Average stars matched: 7565.5 (97.7518 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114612 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 05:11:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
First image: 2461125.96625102 26.03.2026 11:11:14.088 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Last image: 2461148.90464219 18.04.2026 09:42:31.085 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91050
Objects passed selection criteria: 90948
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 83678.2
Average stars matched: 80462.8 (96.1573 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1926000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 05:12:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.90394465
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01222 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.idwlWqYA2z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6yszRx9sA1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g5YwfZTOLD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfIHNNE2i9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9134 to 297.0413 deg, Dec -31.2592 to -20.5068 deg
Loaded 13424 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7844 out of 8105 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8105 out of 10651 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.652325
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.652325
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.idwlWqYA2z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10651
Got 10651 stars (including 9923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10651 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10493 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10491 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 936 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6yszRx9sA1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=701, passed=10578
Got 10578 stars (including 9862 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10578 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g5YwfZTOLD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, passed=8263
Got 8263 stars (including 7833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8167 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 935 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NfIHNNE2i9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=528, passed=7883
Got 7883 stars (including 7348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7883 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20573.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 20573_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:43.21 -25:47:39.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.39)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 20617_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:57.24 -25:26:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0503 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:56.571 -25:59:36.82
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0558 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:00.188 -25:56:42.52
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.435 -25:56:38.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01222 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PYM9ehpYav
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EOV481MXXS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yzzh7QBamq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HtNV5j7vDJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 108796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8622 to 297.0498 deg, Dec -31.2698 to -20.5069 deg
Loaded 13477 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9921 out of 11624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11624 out of 108796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.409319
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.409319
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.26
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PYM9ehpYav (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=8591, passed=108793
Got 108793 stars (including 100032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 108793 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 106939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EOV481MXXS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=8843, passed=110133
Got 110133 stars (including 101112 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 110133 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107867 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yzzh7QBamq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4584, passed=74409
Got 74409 stars (including 69728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73662 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 73660 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HtNV5j7vDJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=5653, passed=85959
Got 85959 stars (including 80176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85959 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.2 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0681.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_06-11-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0682.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-41-30_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0207.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_050627_TTUQ2b1x1_2197140_wU3uetzB/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129422.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129425.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129441.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129444.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129449.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129453.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129463.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129472.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129905.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129978.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out129979.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130022.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130078.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130086.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130165.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130172.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130211.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130214.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130236.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130258.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130265.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130267.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130268.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130325.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130353.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out130354.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out130239.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129877.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130171.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130283.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129422_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129422_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:11:20.21 -25:39:17.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129425_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129425_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:50.76 -22:47:54.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.726 6771019382423130496 288.96076820009 -22.79823970804 13.9878 13.4091 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.726#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129428_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:36.86 -26:44:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129441_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129441_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:47.33 -23:38:06.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.14)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129444_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129444_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:11.12 -27:38:35.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129449_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129449_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:11.15 -22:07:09.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129453_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129453_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:46.05 -27:17:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.997 6765898166494411008 290.19066506767 -27.29919390140 13.6784 13.2239 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.997#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129455_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129455_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:01.27 -22:40:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129463_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129463_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:30.72 -25:39:40.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.592 6764274256543250176 286.87777298729 -25.66230985573 13.1461 12.4370 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.592#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129465_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 129465_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129471_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129471_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129472_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129472_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:42.68 -24:05:58.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129474_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129474_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:12:47.13 -23:53:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129476_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:51.70 -27:38:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129479_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:50.94 -29:51:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129483_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:58.95 -21:56:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129765_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:28.96 -27:40:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129824_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129824_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:36.62 -27:22:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129841_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:59.72 -22:17:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 129877_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129880_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 129880_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129905_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129905_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:40.07 -23:49:14.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.292 6770698531184477312 289.41702305957 -23.82115946247 13.2803 12.6539 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.292#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129906_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129906_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:57.29 -23:16:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129912_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129912_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:59.08 -27:37:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129913_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:13.92 -28:07:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129916_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129916_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:35.35 -21:59:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.36 -22:34:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129945_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129945_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:12.22 -26:34:53.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.611 6763196730843514240 288.55110339971 -26.58138563630 12.8197 12.0753 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.611#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129978_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129978_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:37.66 -26:00:40.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.829 6763842973113982848 285.40652469847 -26.01156072804 13.1708 12.6162 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.829#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129979_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 129979_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:13.43 -29:47:47.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.790 4047300205900560512 280.55581919111 -29.79695462793 12.9290 10.8822 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.790#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130022_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130022_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:47.00 -27:34:01.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.329 4072556439008616064 280.94617525239 -27.56718287905 13.7256 11.7366 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.329#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130078_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130078_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:49.28 -23:08:23.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.498 4080687391873422080 286.95458137053 -23.13994620458 13.2495 12.6236 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.498#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130086_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130086_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:18.80 -23:32:31.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.508 6770721586569659904 289.82875100746 -23.54202474216 13.2986 12.5771 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.508#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130087_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130087_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:17.72 -27:10:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130094_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130094_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:14:55.19 -27:24:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130095_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130095_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:11.27 -27:05:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130105_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 130105_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130165_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:13.31 -25:54:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.181 4073177559985172480 281.30674898505 -25.91631223893 13.2443 12.5188 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.181#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 130171_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130172_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130172_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:58.89 -25:18:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.362 4073420582086983424 281.49575882936 -25.30185537523 11.6424 10.2908 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.362#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130211_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130211_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:39.87 -23:40:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.37, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.35)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.657 4075495738486937216 283.16596672280 -23.68025042965 13.3940 12.7975 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.657#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130213_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130213_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:00.16 -24:44:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130214_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:11.96 -28:42:46.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.890 4071580858618533376 281.05030641062 -28.71323850356 13.3774 12.6284 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.890#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130236_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130236_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:14.93 -29:44:30.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.444 4047257565465347456 280.81266617243 -29.74183198467 13.7688 13.0682 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.444#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130239_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130239_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:39.84 -26:14:53.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:19.35 -25:50:17.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.797 6764080020941659136 287.08137155387 -25.83866812916 13.7509 12.8041 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.797#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130265_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130265_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:33.28 -27:52:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.453 4071877078243011840 282.88912669003 -27.87874136357 13.7438 12.9355 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.453#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130267_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130267_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:15.50 -26:30:49.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130268_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130268_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:27.46 -26:26:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.931 6763988039921099264 287.61489518343 -26.43682286229 13.8289 13.3116 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.931#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130278_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130278_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:21.77 -29:05:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130279_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130279_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 130283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130301_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130301_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:56.91 -22:28:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
Preparing report for the candidate 130311_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130315_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:57.36 -29:07:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130325_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130325_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:56.45 -22:16:30.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.332 4081554979577538304 286.23578032131 -22.27559588224 13.3591 12.5861 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130350_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130350_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:08.51 -22:02:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130353_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:09.72 -29:05:29.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.728 6762303274568860800 287.54052326286 -29.09184008578 13.7158 13.1579 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.728#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130354_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130354_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:39.81 -24:24:13.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.487 6770422137148867072 287.16630491868 -24.40399246901 13.5506 12.7875 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130357_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 130357_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:47.19 -22:22:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 49415_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:07.60 -25:56:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44366_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 44366_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:49.17 -26:26:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 92745_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:19.75 -22:29:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 29896_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:19.43 -27:42:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208
The candidate 53940_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-42-31_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0208 did not pass the final checks