This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 03 02.17 +59 41 48.8 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 50.86 +61 11 16.1 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 427334750440581248,2461148.9003,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 427334750440581248 20260418.4003 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 02 29.28 +59 22 49.6 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2013548017755596032,2461148.9003,11.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2013548017755596032 20260418.4003 11.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 20.66 +56 15 12.0 7.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J013.0898+56.2612,2461148.9003,7.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J013.0898+56.2612 20260418.4003 7.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 46 56.80 +60 27 36.9 9.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 22 09.48 +56 55 37.6 9.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 56.27 +55 53 08.3 9.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 33.17 +56 06 10.9 9.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J011.6237+56.1200,2461148.9003,9.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J011.6237+56.1200 20260418.4003 9.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 47.76 +55 58 27.5 9.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 20.07 +55 58 02.2 9.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423715914084174848,2461148.9003,9.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423715914084174848 20260418.4003 9.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 41.53 +55 53 29.5 9.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423677809133289984,2461148.9003,9.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423677809133289984 20260418.4003 9.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 49 03.79 +56 17 46.2 9.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423752885163500160,2461148.9003,9.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423752885163500160 20260418.4003 9.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 49 26.52 +56 04 11.7 9.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 06.41 +55 59 38.9 9.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 31 11.97 +58 36 19.1 10.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 18.58 +56 18 17.8 10.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J011.8027+56.3109,2461148.9003,9.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J011.8027+56.3109 20260418.4003 9.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 48 58.90 +56 10 51.4 10.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423744054710787840,2461148.9003,9.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423744054710787840 20260418.4003 9.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 50.68 +56 02 14.4 10.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423686055470370816,2461148.9003,10.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423686055470370816 20260418.4003 10.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 23.03 +55 46 32.6 10.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 42.25 +56 14 30.1 10.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.6900+56.2483,2461148.9003,10.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.6900+56.2483 20260418.4003 10.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 51.59 +56 03 29.8 10.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 11 38.85 +56 51 07.6 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 33.02 +56 13 58.6 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424473030915482496,2461148.9003,10.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424473030915482496 20260418.4003 10.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 53 25.54 +56 56 03.0 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J013.3350+56.9391,2461148.9003,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J013.3350+56.9391 20260418.4003 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 32.42 +55 59 11.9 10.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.9056+55.9809,2461148.9003,10.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.9056+55.9809 20260418.4003 10.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 13.32 +55 58 18.8 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 24.77 +56 11 32.3 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424475436097315584,2461148.9003,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424475436097315584 20260418.4003 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 07.85 +56 07 30.8 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424471484727421312,2461148.9003,10.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424471484727421312 20260418.4003 10.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 36.10 +56 19 33.6 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424500140744322432,2461148.9003,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424500140744322432 20260418.4003 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 54.27 +55 45 51.6 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 36.20 +56 15 56.3 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1050 Cas,2461148.9003,10.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1050 Cas 20260418.4003 10.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 53 10.49 +56 05 39.3 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 59.70 +56 53 41.0 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423873212967953920,2461148.9003,10.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423873212967953920 20260418.4003 10.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 54 11.83 +56 48 49.7 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423824933229004800,2461148.9003,10.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423824933229004800 20260418.4003 10.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 41.39 +56 06 35.8 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424468357994767232,2461148.9003,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424468357994767232 20260418.4003 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 26.24 +55 57 31.8 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 418464440391022592,2461148.9003,10.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 418464440391022592 20260418.4003 10.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 43 23.96 +61 39 31.5 11.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J234322.71+613910.5,2461148.9003,11.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J234322.71+613910.5 20260418.4003 11.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 14.54 +56 03 36.4 10.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424481861371898880,2461148.9003,10.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424481861371898880 20260418.4003 10.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 09.58 +55 47 18.7 10.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 30.76 +56 55 18.4 10.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423830194571832960,2461148.9003,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423830194571832960 20260418.4003 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 48 22.22 +56 34 02.1 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423760169429611136,2461148.9003,10.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423760169429611136 20260418.4003 10.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 24.31 +56 17 14.9 10.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424490863619671040,2461148.9003,10.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424490863619671040 20260418.4003 10.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 49 42.43 +55 55 01.3 11.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423705881040668160,2461148.9003,10.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423705881040668160 20260418.4003 10.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 02 41.79 +59 57 57.6 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J000.6920+59.9683,2461148.9003,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J000.6920+59.9683 20260418.4003 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 49 03.84 +61 01 20.3 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 10.16 +55 58 26.9 11.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 15 17.47 +56 52 57.2 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 54 03.47 +56 33 17.6 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 19.12 +56 48 31.6 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423868265164260736,2461148.9003,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423868265164260736 20260418.4003 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 39.11 +56 16 48.2 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.6570+56.2783,2461148.9003,11.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.6570+56.2783 20260418.4003 11.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 53 39.69 +56 18 50.8 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 15 57.67 +57 33 27.8 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 37 11.53 +62 01 03.2 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2015607811047868928,2461148.9003,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2015607811047868928 20260418.4003 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 09 05.90 +56 49 26.7 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 08.59 +56 17 51.3 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424499797152684032,2461148.9003,11.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424499797152684032 20260418.4003 11.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 51.11 +56 01 35.2 11.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 26 29.73 +61 34 46.5 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 27.10 +56 01 37.5 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 43.34 +56 39 41.2 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423845141059202688,2461148.9003,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423845141059202688 20260418.4003 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 52 56.20 +56 44 29.7 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423820951802306304,2461148.9003,11.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423820951802306304 20260418.4003 11.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 24.35 +56 25 15.5 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 424502099249598464,2461148.9003,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 424502099249598464 20260418.4003 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 53 50.93 +56 44 51.2 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423823180881308672,2461148.9003,11.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423823180881308672 20260418.4003 11.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 47 41.29 +56 13 29.2 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J011.9111+56.2142,2461148.9003,11.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J011.9111+56.2142 20260418.4003 11.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 07 27.93 +61 47 16.1 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 45 56.39 +55 58 11.1 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 418463890635212416,2461148.9003,11.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 418463890635212416 20260418.4003 11.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 41 12.65 +63 16 58.1 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2016281025705701504,2461148.9003,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2016281025705701504 20260418.4003 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 53 11.38 +56 17 32.6 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 21 27.10 +59 13 38.8 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FQ Cas,2461148.9003,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FQ Cas 20260418.4003 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 31.92 +55 54 49.7 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423679527120179328,2461148.9003,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423679527120179328 20260418.4003 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 54 06.57 +56 36 41.5 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 18 46.66 +60 26 41.8 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 34.07 +56 05 37.2 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 49 21.91 +55 54 47.3 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 11.83 +56 02 14.1 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 39.60 +56 08 56.6 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 46 21.48 +55 51 40.6 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 49 56.75 +56 44 33.8 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423858129040251008,2461148.9003,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423858129040251008 20260418.4003 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 41 29.05 +60 04 24.1 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J004127.26+600437.9,2461148.9003,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J004127.26+600437.9 20260418.4003 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 44 34.51 +56 06 37.6 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 418478390441958656,2461148.9003,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 418478390441958656 20260418.4003 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 50 46.78 +56 46 32.3 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423870876499992832,2461148.9003,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423870876499992832 20260418.4003 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 51 53.88 +56 53 03.3 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 423876030465094912,2461148.9003,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 423876030465094912 20260418.4003 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 48 13.63 +55 53 19.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.0692+55.8927,2461148.9003,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.0692+55.8927 20260418.4003 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 54 56.38 +58 33 41.0 8.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
W Cas,2461148.9003,8.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
W Cas 20260418.4003 8.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 31 08.92 +58 08 02.8 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 16 20.22 +60 59 25.6 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429571603776296320,2461148.9003,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429571603776296320 20260418.4003 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 37 27.80 +58 34 04.5 11.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 425004747870085760,2461148.9003,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 425004747870085760 20260418.4003 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 48 43.15 +55 46 39.0 8.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J012.1640+55.7806,2461148.9003,8.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J012.1640+55.7806 20260418.4003 8.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 08 20.25 +56 49 14.3 8.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J347.0731+56.8191,2461148.9003,8.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J347.0731+56.8191 20260418.4003 8.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 46 54.83 +60 27 26.6 9.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 22 10.14 +56 55 30.0 9.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,9.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 9.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 31 12.55 +58 36 15.3 10.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 49 34.22 +62 11 10.8 10.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2012896144805163136,2461148.9003,10.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2012896144805163136 20260418.4003 10.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 11 39.57 +56 51 03.7 10.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,10.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 10.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 09 07.81 +56 49 28.2 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 33 18.38 +62 52 55.8 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 02 41.91 +59 57 19.0 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J000.6920+59.9683,2461148.9003,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J000.6920+59.9683 20260418.4003 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 48 32.33 +62 00 13.8 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2012889577786064384,2461148.9003,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2012889577786064384 20260418.4003 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 09 26.21 +59 39 36.7 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 41 55.09 +61 46 22.6 12.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 05 28.74 +60 12 07.5 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2209511879226505728,2461148.9003,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2209511879226505728 20260418.4003 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 39 47.11 +61 17 55.6 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 41 47.73 +61 46 13.0 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 24 07.65 +61 19 47.7 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 428893308180399872,2461148.9003,13.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 428893308180399872 20260418.4003 13.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 10 26.42 +61 37 43.9 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429661106588734336,2461148.9003,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429661106588734336 20260418.4003 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 15 39.45 +61 28 15.5 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 31 31.10 +58 00 09.9 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 15 12.04 +61 25 17.1 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429596583305870976,2461148.9003,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429596583305870976 20260418.4003 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 52 03.03 +59 08 35.2 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 23 01.21 +63 24 25.9 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 08 12.10 +59 43 42.6 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 06 37.62 +61 24 23.4 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 15 26.53 +61 30 45.7 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429691068280524672,2461148.9003,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429691068280524672 20260418.4003 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 23 53.96 +63 19 08.8 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 09 33.59 +59 39 01.8 14.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2209338431270457600,2461148.9003,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2209338431270457600 20260418.4003 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 27 29.09 +62 52 41.1 13.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 08 52.75 +59 45 25.0 14.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 34 42.61 +60 36 13.8 14.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 430098613442781056,2461148.9003,14.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 430098613442781056 20260418.4003 14.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 08 53.12 +59 46 46.5 14.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429063904280540672,2461148.9003,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429063904280540672 20260418.4003 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 23 49 00.37 +61 00 58.9 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.9003,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.4003 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.4003* 00 05 01.94 +60 18 17.1 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 429283424347030272,2461148.9003,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 429283424347030272 20260418.4003 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58829464 27.12.2025 02:06:58.657 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
First image: 2461036.58829464 27.12.2025 02:06:58.657 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Last image: 2461148.90065900 18.04.2026 09:36:46.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24241
Objects passed selection criteria: 24179
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20945.2
Average stars matched: 20433.8 (97.5579 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128196 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 05:32:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.58829464 27.12.2025 02:06:58.657 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
First image: 2461036.58829464 27.12.2025 02:06:58.657 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Last image: 2461148.90065900 18.04.2026 09:36:46.938 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1888
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 98 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 165665
Objects passed selection criteria: 165359
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 152588
Average stars matched: 146390 (95.9378 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1982248 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 05:47:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.89987323
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 926.6'x609.4' 15.4(deg)x10.2(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.72"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76
Second-epoch image center 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Image size: 926.5'x609.3' 15.4(deg)x10.2(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.72"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76
Second-epoch image center 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01050 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o6sz9XLs0X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FPWet0LTBZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JOUMUEPjSr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jmbM0oINov
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 25547 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0005 to 359.9978 deg, Dec +55.3501 to +67.4045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0005 to 359.9978 deg, Dec 55.3501 to 67.4045 deg
Loaded 133072 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14110 out of 15859 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15859 out of 25547 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.955169
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.955169
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
2.5 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
15.0 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.o6sz9XLs0X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3206, passed=25547
Got 25547 stars (including 22312 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25547 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2187 through 0 to 19.8663, gap 19.8663 to 341.2187
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2185 through 0 to 19.8666, gap 19.8666 to 341.2185
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FPWet0LTBZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3160, passed=25477
Got 25477 stars (including 22297 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2186 through 0 to 19.8660, gap 19.8660 to 341.2186
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2185 through 0 to 19.8672, gap 19.8672 to 341.2185
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JOUMUEPjSr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1458, passed=16584
Got 16584 stars (including 15102 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16584 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012869 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010296 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 342.0056 through 0 to 19.7040, gap 19.7040 to 342.0056
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 332 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 261 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 193 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 250 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 342.0159 through 0 to 19.7137, gap 19.7137 to 342.0159
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 367 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 306 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 304 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.61"
Excluding outliers - 304 stars left (next iteration limit 275)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jmbM0oINov (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1428, passed=16720
Got 16720 stars (including 15277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012868 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010294 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 342.0088 through 0 to 19.7032, gap 19.7032 to 342.0088
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 336 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 262 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 251 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.84"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 342.0182 through 0 to 19.7133, gap 19.7133 to 342.0182
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 362 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 292 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5198 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69"
Excluding outliers - 292 stars left (next iteration limit 276)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31576.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16012.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31542.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31549.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31566.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31584.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31589.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31596.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31599.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31602.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31609.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31621.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31627.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31631.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31633.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31648.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31649.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31653.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31680.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31683.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31684.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31686.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31689.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31697.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31701.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31706.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31710.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31737.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31746.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31762.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31773.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31779.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31787.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31788.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31789.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31792.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31812.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31826.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31837.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31844.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31845.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31853.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31856.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31873.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31874.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31877.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31883.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31887.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31902.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31924.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31940.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31943.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31982.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 117s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 59s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31538_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31538_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31539_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31539_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31541_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31541_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31542_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31542_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31552_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31552_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:54.09 +56:37:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31556_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31556_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:15.65 +56:31:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31569_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31569_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:50:36.60 +56:36:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31576_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31576_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:49:04.97 +56:33:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.728 423850088861403392 012.27106792977 +56.56063432464 8.7695 8.1180 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.728#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31584_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31584_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31586_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31586_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31587_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31587_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31590_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31590_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31592_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31592_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31598_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31598_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31615_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31615_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31621_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31621_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31648_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31648_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31651_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31651_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31657_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31657_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31666_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31666_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31684_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31684_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31686_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31686_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31694_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31694_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31697_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31697_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31725_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31725_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31737_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31737_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31741_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31741_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31742_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31742_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31757_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31757_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31770_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31770_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31776_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31776_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31778_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31778_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31787_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31787_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31873_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31873_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31874_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31874_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31877_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31877_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31883_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31883_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31891_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31891_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31910_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31910_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31921_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31921_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31946_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31946_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 31960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31982_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 31982_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 16012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 4s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 180s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 926.6'x609.4' 15.4(deg)x10.2(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.72"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76
Second-epoch image center 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0518 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Image size: 926.5'x609.3' 15.4(deg)x10.2(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.72"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:01.853 +61:59:36.76
Second-epoch image center 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:23.046 +61:57:44.92
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:26.431 +61:57:15.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01050 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TEgVbM4fB3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oYxEEGdll9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMrKeutiu2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w4MBUdE3dD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 170710 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +55.3116 to +67.4209 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 55.3116 to 67.4209 deg
Loaded 133731 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10993 out of 16914 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16914 out of 170710 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774723
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774723
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.66
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1708 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
2.3 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TEgVbM4fB3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=28495, passed=170667
Got 170667 stars (including 141945 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 170667 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2187 through 0 to 20.1102, gap 20.1102 to 341.2187
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2186 through 0 to 20.1103, gap 20.1103 to 341.2186
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oYxEEGdll9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=73, blended=28343, passed=170972
Got 170972 stars (including 142388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 170972 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2186 through 0 to 20.0818, gap 20.0818 to 341.2186
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.2184 through 0 to 20.0827, gap 20.0827 to 341.2184
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YMrKeutiu2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=13563, passed=135751
Got 135751 stars (including 121968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 135751 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012869 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010296 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.9076 through 0 to 19.9198, gap 19.9198 to 341.9076
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 312 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 250 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34854 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.9210 through 0 to 19.9340, gap 19.9340 to 341.9210
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.4 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 334 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 280 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 277 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37407 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.79"
Excluding outliers - 277 stars left (next iteration limit 264)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w4MBUdE3dD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=14034, passed=136417
Got 136417 stars (including 122177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 136417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012868 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010294 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.9315 through 0 to 19.9218, gap 19.9218 to 341.9315
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.5 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 317 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 245 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.89"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 238.0959 through 0 to 19.9300, gap 19.9300 to 238.0959
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 787 (Dec 55.4 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 286 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 282 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.43"
Excluding outliers - 282 stars left (next iteration limit 257)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-06-58_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-26_20-07-54_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-35-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_043748_TTUQ1b1x1_1758215_sxuPZ8hy/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102223.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out196935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197172.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197194.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197201.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197220.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197256.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197278.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197416.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197550.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197557.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out197868.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198313.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198535.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198587.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198688.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199941.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out199986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200007.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200064.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200315.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200537.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200729.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200935.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out201611.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92225.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 117s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 27s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196622_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196622_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196650_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196650_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196652_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196652_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196665_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196665_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196666_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196666_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196685_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196685_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196688_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196688_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196697_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196697_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196704_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196704_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196712_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196712_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196729_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196729_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196737_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196737_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196747_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196747_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196754_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196754_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196761_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196761_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196763_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196763_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196766_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196766_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196777_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196777_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196790_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196790_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196791_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196791_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196797_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196797_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196799_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196799_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196802_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196802_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196804_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196804_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196807_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196807_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196808_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196808_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196810_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196810_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196818_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196818_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196825_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196825_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196828_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196828_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196829_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196829_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196830_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196830_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196832_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196832_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196833_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196833_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196836_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196836_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196842_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196842_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196846_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196846_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196851_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196851_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196861_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196861_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196863_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196863_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196867_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196867_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196868_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196868_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196873_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196873_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196881_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196881_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196883_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196883_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196885_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196885_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196886_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196886_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196888_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196888_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196897_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196897_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196900_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196900_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196904_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196904_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196905_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196905_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196906_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196906_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196907_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196907_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196911_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196911_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196919_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196919_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196928_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196928_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196930_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196930_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196932_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196932_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196933_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196933_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 196935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196942_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196942_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196947_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196947_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196951_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196951_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196955_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196955_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196956_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196956_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196959_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196959_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196963_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196963_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196964_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196964_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196965_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196965_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196969_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196969_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196970_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196970_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196971_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196971_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196976_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196976_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196983_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196983_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196985_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196985_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196997_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 196997_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197004_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197004_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197019_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197019_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197020_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197020_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197025_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197025_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197033_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197033_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197039_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197039_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197043_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197043_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197044_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197044_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197046_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197046_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197047_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197047_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197050_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197050_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197057_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197057_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197062_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197062_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197063_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197063_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197065_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197065_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197069_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197069_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197072_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197072_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197074_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197074_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197077_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197077_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197078_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197078_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197082_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197082_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197083_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197083_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197093_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197093_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197096_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197096_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197097_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197097_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197098_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197098_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197099_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197099_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197100_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197100_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197101_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197101_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197102_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197102_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197110_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197110_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197112_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197112_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197116_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197116_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197124_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197124_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197129_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197129_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197132_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197132_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197141_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197141_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197143_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197143_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197145_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197145_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197150_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197150_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197152_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197152_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197157_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197157_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197159_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197159_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197161_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197161_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197163_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197163_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197164_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197164_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197166_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197166_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197169_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197169_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197174_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197174_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197179_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197179_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197181_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197181_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:11.89 +60:34:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197200_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197200_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197212_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197212_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197218_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197218_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197227_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197227_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197228_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197228_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197233_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197233_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197234_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197234_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197238_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197238_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197241_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197241_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197243_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197243_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197253_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197253_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197256_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197256_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197257_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197257_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197263_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197263_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197264_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197264_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197272_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197272_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197278_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197278_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197306_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197306_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197307_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197307_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197318_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197318_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197325_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197325_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197330_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197330_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197333_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197333_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197334_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197334_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197340_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197340_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197345_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197345_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197374_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197374_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197390_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197390_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197400_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197400_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197404_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197404_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197405_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197405_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197407_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197407_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197410_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197410_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197416_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197416_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197421_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197421_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197422_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197422_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197426_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197426_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197455_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197455_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197458_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197458_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197463_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197463_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (183346.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197467_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197467_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197474_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197474_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197477_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197477_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197490_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197490_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197492_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197492_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197501_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197501_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197522_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197522_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197543_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197543_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197551_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197551_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197557_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197557_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197559_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197559_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197563_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197563_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197585_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197585_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197592_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197592_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163029.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197608_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197608_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197624_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197624_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197625_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197625_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197628_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197628_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197634_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197634_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197635_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197635_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197639_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197639_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197646_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197646_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197647_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197647_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197657_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197657_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197659_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197659_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197663_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197663_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197672_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197672_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197678_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197678_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197703_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197703_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197709_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197712_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197712_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197716_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197716_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197719_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197719_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197732_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197732_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197744_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197744_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197751_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197751_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197756_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197756_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197763_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197763_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47126.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197770_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197770_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197778_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197778_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197781_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197781_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197784_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197784_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197787_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197787_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197794_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197794_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197796_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197796_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197802_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197802_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197803_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197803_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197811_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197811_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197825_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197825_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197828_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197828_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197831_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197831_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197833_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197833_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197838_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197838_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197842_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197842_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197854_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197854_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47300.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197859_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197859_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197868_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 197868_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197874_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197874_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197891_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197891_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197903_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197903_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197906_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197906_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197908_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197908_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197925_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197925_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197939_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197939_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197945_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197945_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197950_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197950_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197951_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197951_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197956_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197956_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197962_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197962_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197966_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197966_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197969_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197969_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197973_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197973_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197974_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197974_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197984_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197984_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197998_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 197998_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:17.01 +61:19:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198013_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198013_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198031_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198031_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198034_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198034_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198044_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198044_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198049_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198049_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198054_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198054_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198061_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198061_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198065_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198065_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198083_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198083_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198089_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198091_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198091_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198101_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198101_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198106_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198106_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198109_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198109_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198113_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198113_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198119_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198119_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198122_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198122_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198130_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198130_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198132_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198132_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198133_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198133_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198136_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198136_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198138_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198138_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198140_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198140_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198146_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198146_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198152_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198152_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198163_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198163_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198186_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198186_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198197_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198197_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198204_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198204_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198230_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198230_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198243_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198243_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198246_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198246_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198263_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198263_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198266_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198266_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198267_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198267_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198268_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198268_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198269_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198269_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198277_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198277_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198282_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198282_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198284_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198284_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198289_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198289_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198294_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198294_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198301_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198301_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198302_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198302_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47193.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198305_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198305_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198306_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198306_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198313_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198313_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198318_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198318_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198322_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198322_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198327_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198327_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198329_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198329_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198347_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198347_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198348_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198348_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198352_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198352_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198353_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198353_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198362_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198362_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198366_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198366_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198374_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198374_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198376_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198376_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198385_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198385_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198388_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198388_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198399_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198399_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198400_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198400_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198403_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198403_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198405_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198405_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198417_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198417_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198422_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198422_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198427_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198427_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198437_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198437_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198443_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198443_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198449_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198449_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198464_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198464_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198465_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198465_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198467_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198467_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198471_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198471_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198479_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198479_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198486_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198486_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198491_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198491_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198494_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198494_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198496_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198496_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198502_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198502_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198509_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198509_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198510_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198510_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198513_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198513_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198518_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198518_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198523_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198523_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198527_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198527_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198528_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198528_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198538_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198538_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198540_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198540_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198545_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198545_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198546_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198546_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198559_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198559_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198570_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198580_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198580_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198585_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198585_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198587_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198587_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198591_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198591_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198594_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198594_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198597_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198597_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198598_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198598_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198603_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198603_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198604_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198604_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198607_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198607_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198613_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198615_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198615_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198617_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198622_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198622_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198628_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198628_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198644_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198644_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198655_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198655_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198660_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198660_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198662_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198669_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198669_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198670_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198670_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198673_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198673_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198674_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198674_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198677_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198685_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198685_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198687_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198687_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198688_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198688_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198691_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198691_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198693_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198693_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198695_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198695_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198704_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198704_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198713_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198713_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198717_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198717_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198719_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198719_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198720_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198720_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198738_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198738_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198742_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198742_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198744_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198744_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198746_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198755_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198769_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198769_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198782_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198782_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198791_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198791_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198795_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198795_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198797_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198797_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198805_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198807_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198807_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198813_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198813_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198818_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198818_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198820_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198820_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198827_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198830_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198830_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198836_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198836_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198840_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198840_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198845_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198848_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198848_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198853_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198854_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198854_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198864_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198864_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198866_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198866_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198867_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198867_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198870_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198870_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198871_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198871_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198872_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198872_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198882_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198882_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198907_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198907_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198908_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198908_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198914_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198914_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198919_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198919_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198921_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198921_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198930_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198930_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198931_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198934_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198942_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198942_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198946_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198946_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198947_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198947_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198952_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198952_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198958_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198958_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198964_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198964_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198968_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198971_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198971_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198980_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198983_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198983_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 198988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198992_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198992_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198996_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198996_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198998_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 198998_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199001_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199001_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199009_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199012_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199014_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199016_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199018_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199018_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199019_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199019_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199020_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199020_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199021_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199021_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199030_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199030_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199031_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199031_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199033_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199033_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199034_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199034_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199038_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199038_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199042_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199042_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199053_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199062_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199062_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199066_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199068_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199068_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199073_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199073_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199080_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199084_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199084_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (71.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199095_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199095_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199096_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199096_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199097_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199097_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199106_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199106_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199109_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199109_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199119_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199119_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (183103.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199125_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199134_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199134_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199136_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199136_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199139_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199142_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199146_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199146_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199158_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199160_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199160_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199166_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199166_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199170_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199170_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199172_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199174_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199174_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199177_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199177_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199181_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199181_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199182_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199184_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199184_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199185_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199185_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199188_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199188_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199206_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199206_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199207_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199207_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199208_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199208_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199214_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199214_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199216_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199216_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199220_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199221_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199221_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199225_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199225_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199226_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199229_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199229_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199233_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199233_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199234_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199234_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199249_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199249_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199256_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199256_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199274_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199282_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199282_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199285_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199285_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (59.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199286_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199286_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199288_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199288_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199292_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199292_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199297_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199297_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199303_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199303_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199307_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199307_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199309_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199310_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199310_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199312_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199312_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199314_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199314_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199316_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199317_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199317_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199320_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199320_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199323_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199325_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199325_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47313.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199331_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199331_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199336_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199336_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199337_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199338_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199338_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199340_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199340_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199341_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 199341_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199356_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199356_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199359_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199359_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199361_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199361_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199363_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199363_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199367_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199367_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199380_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199380_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199384_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199384_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199387_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199387_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199389_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199389_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199390_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199390_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199403_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199403_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199407_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199407_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199412_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199412_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199416_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199416_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199418_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199418_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199419_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199419_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (77.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199432_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199432_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199435_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199435_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199437_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199437_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199448_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199448_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199453_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199453_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199466_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199466_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199468_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199468_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199469_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199469_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199476_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199476_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199480_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199483_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199483_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199484_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199484_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199485_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199490_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199490_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199491_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199491_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199493_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199493_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199495_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199497_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199497_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199498_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199498_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199506_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199506_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199513_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199513_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199518_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199518_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199529_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199529_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199533_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199533_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199539_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199539_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199540_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199540_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199542_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199542_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199546_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199546_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199552_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199552_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199554_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199562_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199562_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199563_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199563_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199566_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199575_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 199575_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199580_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199580_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199584_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199584_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199590_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199590_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199596_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199602_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199608_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199608_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199619_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199619_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199621_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199621_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199625_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199625_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199626_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199626_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199627_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199630_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199630_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199631_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199637_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199637_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199638_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199639_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199639_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199643_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199643_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199645_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199645_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199646_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199646_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199654_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199654_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199656_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199656_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199661_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199661_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199664_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199664_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199668_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199671_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199671_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199674_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199674_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199676_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199678_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199678_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199681_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199682_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199683_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199687_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199687_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199692_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199693_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199693_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199696_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199698_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199700_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199700_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199701_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47158.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199707_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199717_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199717_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199718_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199718_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199720_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199720_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199724_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199724_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199727_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199732_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199732_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199734_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199736_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199738_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199738_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199740_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199740_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199741_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199741_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199747_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199747_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199749_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199756_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199756_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199761_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199761_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199766_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199766_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199774_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199777_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199777_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199783_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199785_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199785_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199790_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199790_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199793_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199793_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199795_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199795_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199800_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199800_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199803_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199803_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199809_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199813_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199813_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199815_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199815_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199821_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199821_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199834_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199835_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199839_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199843_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199849_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199850_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199852_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199852_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199857_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199857_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199865_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199865_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199866_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199866_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199869_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199869_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199871_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199871_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199877_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199877_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199879_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199879_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199889_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (162972.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199890_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199890_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199896_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199900_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199900_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199902_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 199909_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199916_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199918_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199918_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199923_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199938_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 199941_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199943_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199944_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199953_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199959_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199959_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199960_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199962_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199962_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199977_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199979_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 199986_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199987_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199987_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199989_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199989_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199991_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199992_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199992_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199995_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199995_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199996_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199996_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199997_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199997_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 199999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200001_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200001_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200006_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200006_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200007_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200007_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200011_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200013_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200013_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200018_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200018_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200021_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200021_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200023_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200023_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200025_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200025_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200026_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200027_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200043_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200043_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200045_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200045_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200049_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200049_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200052_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200055_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200057_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200057_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200059_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200060_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200060_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200061_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200061_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200064_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200073_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200073_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200079_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200085_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200087_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200098_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200098_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200108_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200110_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200110_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200111_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200112_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200112_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200118_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200120_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200121_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200121_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200128_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200131_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200143_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200143_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200147_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200147_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200149_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200157_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200157_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200159_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200159_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200169_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200169_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200180_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200180_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200188_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200188_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200194_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200197_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200197_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200217_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (163162.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200222_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200222_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200228_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200228_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200231_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200232_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200232_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200245_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200248_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200248_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200250_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200250_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200252_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200252_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200254_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200257_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200257_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200260_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200264_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200264_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200269_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200269_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200270_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200275_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200275_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200280_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200280_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200289_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200289_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200290_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200290_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200291_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200291_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200299_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200299_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200315_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200315_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200317_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200317_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200319_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200319_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200320_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200320_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200321_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200321_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200324_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200324_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200327_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200327_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200329_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200329_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200331_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200331_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200335_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200335_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200347_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200347_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200351_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200353_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200353_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200354_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200355_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200355_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200363_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200363_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200366_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200366_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200372_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200372_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200379_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200379_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200382_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200382_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200384_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200384_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200385_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200385_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200393_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200393_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200394_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200394_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200402_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200404_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200404_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200410_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200410_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200414_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200415_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200417_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200417_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200419_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200419_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200423_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200424_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200425_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200426_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200426_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200435_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200435_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200441_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200442_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200444_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200444_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200447_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200461_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200466_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200466_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200473_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200473_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200477_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200477_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200478_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200478_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200484_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200484_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200486_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200486_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200487_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200488_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47320.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200497_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200497_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200499_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200501_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200501_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200503_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200503_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200506_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200506_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200508_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200508_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200510_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200510_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200514_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200526_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200526_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200531_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200532_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200535_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200543_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200543_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200555_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200562_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200562_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200564_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200569_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200569_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200579_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200588_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200589_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200609_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200610_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200612_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200612_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200620_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200623_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200630_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200630_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200633_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200642_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200645_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200645_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200650_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200650_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200654_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200654_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200658_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200658_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200670_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200670_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200675_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200680_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200686_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200686_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200689_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200691_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200691_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200694_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200694_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200710_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200711_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200716_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200716_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (108811.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200718_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200718_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200729_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200729_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200739_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200739_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200748_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200748_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200752_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200758_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200760_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200762_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200773_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200775_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200776_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200776_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200780_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200781_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200781_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200788_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200789_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200794_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200794_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (63.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200812_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200816_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200817_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200817_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200821_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200821_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200822_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200837_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200841_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200841_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200848_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200848_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200855_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200855_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200856_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200861_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200861_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200863_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200863_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200865_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200865_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200884_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200884_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200885_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200885_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200887_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200892_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200895_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200911_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200911_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200915_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200922_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200927_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200933_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200933_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 200935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200948_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200952_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200952_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200961_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200974_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200974_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200975_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200975_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200976_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200976_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200982_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200982_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200987_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200987_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 200994_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201002_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201008_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201022_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201032_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201035_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201035_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201038_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201038_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201041_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201042_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201042_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201048_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201051_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201067_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201071_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201075_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201076_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201076_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201084_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201084_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201088_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161877.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201093_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201093_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201103_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201105_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201114_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201115_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201115_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201133_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201133_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201137_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201148_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201151_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201153_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201154_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201167_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201173_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201184_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201184_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201199_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201199_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (72.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201200_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201200_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201207_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201207_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201213_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201213_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201214_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201214_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201215_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201215_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201219_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201222_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201222_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201230_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201230_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201238_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201238_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201244_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201244_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201248_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201248_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201250_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201250_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201253_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201253_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201259_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201259_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201262_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201268_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201268_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201276_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201276_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201287_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201293_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201294_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201294_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201295_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201298_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201300_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201304_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201308_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201308_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201311_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201313_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201313_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201326_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201328_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201333_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201333_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201335_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201335_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201339_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201343_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201352_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201352_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201355_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201355_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201357_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201357_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201368_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201368_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201382_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201382_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201383_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201391_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201392_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201399_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201399_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201409_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201412_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201412_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201420_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201434_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201436_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201439_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201440_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201440_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201456_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201458_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201458_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201459_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201459_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201472_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201472_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201475_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201482_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201482_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201489_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201505_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201508_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201508_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201517_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201522_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201522_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161874.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201524_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201524_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201534_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201536_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201537_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201548_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201550_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201561_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201576_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201576_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201586_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201586_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201593_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 201611_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201618_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201629_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201636_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201637_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201637_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 201653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 201653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159203_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 159203_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182360_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 182360_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163267_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 163267_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92225_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 92225_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94769_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 94769_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157703_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 157703_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 11462_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158745_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 158745_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71810_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 71810_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167242_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 167242_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 157764_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193338_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 193338_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 136451_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 164844_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 18826_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 122010_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52123_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158616_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 158616_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52924_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164695_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 164695_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (58.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 127557_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 127557_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142905_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 142905_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 102223_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 161521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 11706_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 183767_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (47.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 123092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161541_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 161541_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159492_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 159492_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 182949_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 160599_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 109715_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:54:56.62 +58:33:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 122247_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 69913_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 71937_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 182155_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 181765_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 32183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 164582_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 23283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 181504_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164076_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 164076_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-36-46_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.7") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 12s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 156s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2
00:05:01.94 +60:18:17.1
23:31:08.92 +58:08:02.8
00:16:20.22 +60:59:25.6
00:37:27.80 +58:34:04.5
00:48:43.15 +55:46:39.0
23:08:20.25 +56:49:14.3
23:46:54.83 +60:27:26.6
23:22:10.14 +56:55:30.0
23:31:12.55 +58:36:15.3
23:49:34.22 +62:11:10.8
23:11:39.57 +56:51:03.7
23:09:07.81 +56:49:28.2
00:33:18.38 +62:52:55.8
00:02:41.91 +59:57:19.0
23:48:32.33 +62:00:13.8
00:09:26.21 +59:39:36.7
23:41:55.09 +61:46:22.6
00:05:28.74 +60:12:07.5
23:29:05.08 +65:31:35.1
23:39:47.11 +61:17:55.6
23:41:47.73 +61:46:13.0
00:24:07.65 +61:19:47.7
00:10:26.42 +61:37:43.9
00:15:39.45 +61:28:15.5
23:31:31.10 +58:00:09.9
00:15:12.04 +61:25:17.1
23:52:03.03 +59:08:35.2
00:23:01.21 +63:24:25.9
00:08:12.10 +59:43:42.6
00:06:37.62 +61:24:23.4
00:15:26.53 +61:30:45.7
00:23:53.96 +63:19:08.8
00:09:33.59 +59:39:01.8
23:23:57.03 +64:47:39.4
00:27:29.09 +62:52:41.1
00:08:52.75 +59:45:25.0
00:34:42.61 +60:36:13.8
00:08:53.12 +59:46:46.5
23:49:00.37 +61:00:58.9
########### Completed Cas-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0
23:31:08.92 +58:08:02.8
00:16:20.22 +60:59:25.6
00:37:27.80 +58:34:04.5
00:48:43.15 +55:46:39.0
23:08:20.25 +56:49:14.3
23:46:54.83 +60:27:26.6
23:22:10.14 +56:55:30.0
23:31:12.55 +58:36:15.3
23:49:34.22 +62:11:10.8
23:11:39.57 +56:51:03.7
23:09:07.81 +56:49:28.2
00:33:18.38 +62:52:55.8
00:02:41.91 +59:57:19.0
23:48:32.33 +62:00:13.8
00:09:26.21 +59:39:36.7
23:41:55.09 +61:46:22.6
00:05:28.74 +60:12:07.5
23:29:05.08 +65:31:35.1
23:39:47.11 +61:17:55.6
23:41:47.73 +61:46:13.0
00:24:07.65 +61:19:47.7
00:10:26.42 +61:37:43.9
00:15:39.45 +61:28:15.5
23:31:31.10 +58:00:09.9
00:15:12.04 +61:25:17.1
23:52:03.03 +59:08:35.2
00:23:01.21 +63:24:25.9
00:08:12.10 +59:43:42.6
00:06:37.62 +61:24:23.4
00:15:26.53 +61:30:45.7
00:23:53.96 +63:19:08.8
00:09:33.59 +59:39:01.8
23:23:57.03 +64:47:39.4
00:27:29.09 +62:52:41.1
00:08:52.75 +59:45:25.0
00:34:42.61 +60:36:13.8
00:08:53.12 +59:46:46.5
23:49:00.37 +61:00:58.9
00:05:01.94 +60:18:17.1
###################################################################################
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:08.92 +58:08:02.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:16:20.22 +60:59:25.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:37:27.80 +58:34:04.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:43.15 +55:46:39.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:08:20.25 +56:49:14.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:46:54.83 +60:27:26.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:22:10.14 +56:55:30.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:12.55 +58:36:15.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:34.22 +62:11:10.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:11:39.57 +56:51:03.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:09:07.81 +56:49:28.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:33:18.38 +62:52:55.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:41.91 +59:57:19.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:48:32.33 +62:00:13.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:26.21 +59:39:36.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:55.09 +61:46:22.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:28.74 +60:12:07.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:29:05.08 +65:31:35.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:39:47.11 +61:17:55.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:47.73 +61:46:13.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:07.65 +61:19:47.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:26.42 +61:37:43.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:39.45 +61:28:15.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:31.10 +58:00:09.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:12.04 +61:25:17.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:03.03 +59:08:35.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:01.21 +63:24:25.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:12.10 +59:43:42.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:37.62 +61:24:23.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:26.53 +61:30:45.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:53.96 +63:19:08.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:33.59 +59:39:01.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:23:57.03 +64:47:39.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:27:29.09 +62:52:41.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:52.75 +59:45:25.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:34:42.61 +60:36:13.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:53.12 +59:46:46.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:00.37 +61:00:58.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:01.94 +60:18:17.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:41.91 +59:57:19.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:01.94 +60:18:17.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:28.74 +60:12:07.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:37.62 +61:24:23.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:12.10 +59:43:42.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:52.75 +59:45:25.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:53.12 +59:46:46.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:26.21 +59:39:36.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:33.59 +59:39:01.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:26.42 +61:37:43.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:12.04 +61:25:17.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:26.53 +61:30:45.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:39.45 +61:28:15.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:16:20.22 +60:59:25.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:01.21 +63:24:25.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:53.96 +63:19:08.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:07.65 +61:19:47.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:27:29.09 +62:52:41.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:33:18.38 +62:52:55.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:34:42.61 +60:36:13.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:37:27.80 +58:34:04.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:43.15 +55:46:39.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:08:20.25 +56:49:14.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:09:07.81 +56:49:28.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:11:39.57 +56:51:03.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:22:10.14 +56:55:30.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:23:57.03 +64:47:39.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:29:05.08 +65:31:35.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:08.92 +58:08:02.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:12.55 +58:36:15.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:31:31.10 +58:00:09.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:39:47.11 +61:17:55.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:47.73 +61:46:13.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:41:55.09 +61:46:22.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:46:54.83 +60:27:26.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:48:32.33 +62:00:13.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:00.37 +61:00:58.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:34.22 +62:11:10.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:03.03 +59:08:35.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:02:41.79 +59:57:57.6 -- not a known variable star
00:02:41.91 +59:57:19.0 -- not a known variable star
00:03:02.17 +59:41:48.8 -- not a known variable star
00:05:01.94 +60:18:17.1 -- a known variable star
00:05:28.74 +60:12:07.5 -- not a known variable star
00:06:37.62 +61:24:23.4 -- not a known variable star
00:07:27.93 +61:47:16.1 -- not a known variable star
00:08:12.10 +59:43:42.6 -- not a known variable star
00:08:52.75 +59:45:25.0 -- not a known variable star
00:08:53.12 +59:46:46.5 -- a known variable star
00:09:26.21 +59:39:36.7 -- not a known variable star
00:09:33.59 +59:39:01.8 -- not a known variable star
00:10:26.42 +61:37:43.9 -- a known variable star
00:15:12.04 +61:25:17.1 -- not a known variable star
00:15:26.53 +61:30:45.7 -- a known variable star
00:15:39.45 +61:28:15.5 -- not a known variable star
00:15:57.67 +57:33:27.8 -- not a known variable star
00:16:20.22 +60:59:25.6 -- a known variable star
00:21:27.10 +59:13:38.8 -- a known variable star
00:23:01.21 +63:24:25.9 -- not a known variable star
00:23:53.96 +63:19:08.8 -- not a known variable star
00:24:07.65 +61:19:47.7 -- not a known variable star
00:27:29.09 +62:52:41.1 -- not a known variable star
00:33:18.38 +62:52:55.8 -- not a known variable star
00:34:42.61 +60:36:13.8 -- a known variable star
00:37:27.80 +58:34:04.5 -- not a known variable star
00:41:29.05 +60:04:24.1 -- a known variable star
00:44:34.51 +56:06:37.6 -- not a known variable star
00:45:14.54 +56:03:36.4 -- not a known variable star
00:45:24.31 +56:17:14.9 -- not a known variable star
00:45:26.24 +55:57:31.8 -- not a known variable star
00:45:33.02 +56:13:58.6 -- not a known variable star
00:45:36.20 +56:15:56.3 -- not a known variable star
00:45:56.39 +55:58:11.1 -- a known variable star
00:46:07.85 +56:07:30.8 -- not a known variable star
00:46:11.83 +56:02:14.1 -- not a known variable star
00:46:21.48 +55:51:40.6 -- not a known variable star
00:46:33.17 +56:06:10.9 -- not a known variable star
00:46:39.60 +56:08:56.6 -- not a known variable star
00:46:41.39 +56:06:35.8 -- not a known variable star
00:47:08.59 +56:17:51.3 -- not a known variable star
00:47:18.58 +56:18:17.8 -- not a known variable star
00:47:20.07 +55:58:02.2 -- not a known variable star
00:47:24.35 +56:25:15.5 -- not a known variable star
00:47:24.77 +56:11:32.3 -- not a known variable star
00:47:27.10 +56:01:37.5 -- not a known variable star
00:47:36.10 +56:19:33.6 -- not a known variable star
00:47:41.29 +56:13:29.2 -- not a known variable star
00:47:51.11 +56:01:35.2 -- not a known variable star
00:47:56.27 +55:53:08.3 -- not a known variable star
00:48:13.63 +55:53:19.2 -- not a known variable star
00:48:22.22 +56:34:02.1 -- not a known variable star
00:48:43.15 +55:46:39.0 -- not a known variable star
00:48:58.90 +56:10:51.4 -- not a known variable star
00:49:03.79 +56:17:46.2 -- not a known variable star
00:49:21.91 +55:54:47.3 -- not a known variable star
00:49:26.52 +56:04:11.7 -- not a known variable star
00:49:42.43 +55:55:01.3 -- not a known variable star
00:49:56.75 +56:44:33.8 -- not a known variable star
00:50:13.32 +55:58:18.8 -- not a known variable star
00:50:23.03 +55:46:32.6 -- not a known variable star
00:50:34.07 +56:05:37.2 -- not a known variable star
00:50:39.11 +56:16:48.2 -- not a known variable star
00:50:42.25 +56:14:30.1 -- not a known variable star
00:50:43.34 +56:39:41.2 -- not a known variable star
00:50:46.78 +56:46:32.3 -- not a known variable star
00:50:59.70 +56:53:41.0 -- not a known variable star
00:51:06.41 +55:59:38.9 -- not a known variable star
00:51:19.12 +56:48:31.6 -- not a known variable star
00:51:31.92 +55:54:49.7 -- not a known variable star
00:51:32.42 +55:59:11.9 -- not a known variable star
00:51:41.53 +55:53:29.5 -- not a known variable star
00:51:47.76 +55:58:27.5 -- not a known variable star
00:51:50.68 +56:02:14.4 -- not a known variable star
00:51:53.88 +56:53:03.3 -- not a known variable star
00:51:54.27 +55:45:51.6 -- not a known variable star
00:52:09.58 +55:47:18.7 -- not a known variable star
00:52:10.16 +55:58:26.9 -- not a known variable star
00:52:20.66 +56:15:12.0 -- not a known variable star
00:52:30.76 +56:55:18.4 -- not a known variable star
00:52:50.86 +61:11:16.1 -- not a known variable star
00:52:51.59 +56:03:29.8 -- not a known variable star
00:52:56.20 +56:44:29.7 -- not a known variable star
00:53:10.49 +56:05:39.3 -- not a known variable star
00:53:11.38 +56:17:32.6 -- not a known variable star
00:53:25.54 +56:56:03.0 -- not a known variable star
00:53:39.69 +56:18:50.8 -- not a known variable star
00:53:50.93 +56:44:51.2 -- not a known variable star
00:54:03.47 +56:33:17.6 -- not a known variable star
00:54:06.57 +56:36:41.5 -- not a known variable star
00:54:11.83 +56:48:49.7 -- a known variable star
00:54:56.38 +58:33:41.0 -- a known variable star
23:02:29.28 +59:22:49.6 -- a known variable star
23:08:20.25 +56:49:14.3 -- not a known variable star
23:09:05.90 +56:49:26.7 -- not a known variable star
23:09:07.81 +56:49:28.2 -- not a known variable star
23:11:38.85 +56:51:07.6 -- not a known variable star
23:11:39.57 +56:51:03.7 -- not a known variable star
23:13:11.28 +60:34:37.7 -- not a known variable star
23:15:17.47 +56:52:57.2 -- not a known variable star
23:18:46.66 +60:26:41.8 -- not a known variable star
23:22:09.48 +56:55:37.6 -- not a known variable star
23:22:10.14 +56:55:30.0 -- not a known variable star
23:23:57.03 +64:47:39.4 -- not a known variable star
23:26:29.73 +61:34:46.5 -- not a known variable star
23:29:05.08 +65:31:35.1 -- not a known variable star
23:31:08.92 +58:08:02.8 -- not a known variable star
23:31:11.97 +58:36:19.1 -- not a known variable star
23:31:12.55 +58:36:15.3 -- not a known variable star
23:31:31.10 +58:00:09.9 -- not a known variable star
23:37:11.53 +62:01:03.2 -- not a known variable star
23:39:47.11 +61:17:55.6 -- not a known variable star
23:41:12.65 +63:16:58.1 -- a known variable star
23:41:47.73 +61:46:13.0 -- not a known variable star
23:41:55.09 +61:46:22.6 -- not a known variable star
23:43:23.96 +61:39:31.5 -- a known variable star
23:46:54.83 +60:27:26.6 -- not a known variable star
23:46:56.80 +60:27:36.9 -- not a known variable star
23:48:32.33 +62:00:13.8 -- not a known variable star
23:49:00.37 +61:00:58.9 -- not a known variable star
23:49:03.84 +61:01:20.3 -- not a known variable star
23:49:34.22 +62:11:10.8 -- a known variable star
23:52:03.03 +59:08:35.2 -- not a known variable star
Found 108 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
123 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
ERROR: too many candidates -- 123 (excluding asteroids and hot pixels, 108 new), not updating the exclusion list!
###################################################################################
Not allowed to update the exclusion list IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= NO
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.89987323 -observatory V36
00:20:15.15 -00:40:49.2 Mercury (-0.0mag)
03:20:26.46 +18:44:03.1 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:24:39.47 +01:36:48.1 Mars (1.2mag)
07:13:45.08 +22:44:21.7 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:30:14.83 +00:55:36.3 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:48:12.45 +19:49:06.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:11:09.13 -00:13:24.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:51.25 -22:52:43.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
02:28:08.79 +18:32:52.0 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 18 05:32 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.89987323:
07:13:52.48 +22:44:05.1 Io (5.8mag)
07:13:33.44 +22:44:46.0 Europa (5.9mag)
07:13:28.82 +22:44:51.9 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:14:08.94 +22:43:25.2 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:16:58.83 +22:30:53.8 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:13:44.68 +22:44:24.7 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:17:13.19 +23:01:12.4 Elara (17.3mag)
07:12:47.78 +23:23:06.6 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:22:01.53 +22:42:36.6 Carme (18.5mag)
00:30:07.36 +00:56:01.8 Titan (8.8mag)
00:30:18.66 +00:55:47.3 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:29:51.11 +00:55:22.6 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:30:13.83 +00:56:04.1 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:31:49.79 +01:04:08.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 18 05:32 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.89987323:
15:47:39.38 -17:55:56.2 JWST
20:43:12.77 -14:03:46.2 Chandra
08:52:40.58 -50:16:30.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 18 05:32 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.89987323 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:52:54.92 -28:55:21.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:08:29.18 -69:32:59.9 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:58.95 +31:27:14.6 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:09.97 +10:49:48.2 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:10:50.44 +29:19:33.5 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:32:02.84 +26:06:09.1 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:58.61 +32:01:39.7 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:31:28.45 +00:05:50.2 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:53:07.52 +18:43:55.9 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:39:52.29 -11:29:10.8 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:06:34.53 -11:30:12.4 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:56:33.24 +63:03:00.5 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:17:01.15 -03:46:32.2 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:26:41.05 +86:14:50.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:19:06.28 +63:30:15.5 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:18:21.06 +19:04:29.2 11.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:17:41.78 +06:46:57.1 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:26.40 +15:55:55.0 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:28:32.42 -22:01:26.5 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:18:46.29 +44:42:11.7 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:28:55.32 +46:56:11.8 15.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:29:07.26 -26:35:32.5 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
00:08:32.48 +17:30:09.1 8.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:53:05.05 +03:09:21.2 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:46:08.60 +02:23:38.3 14.0mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:06:18.81 +37:38:55.9 14.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:47:36.01 -09:35:22.3 11.7mag 10P/Tempel
14:57:01.41 +02:56:59.0 14.2mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:02:11.40 -01:27:03.3 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:01:32.54 -09:31:29.4 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:32.29 -03:54:53.7 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:52:23.77 +17:53:40.6 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:15:14.63 +36:29:33.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:32:05.89 -11:09:54.9 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:09:43.21 +22:03:58.6 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:10:54.09 +08:41:53.9 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
23:10:12.70 -08:40:51.8 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:17:14.53 +21:16:26.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:59:22.83 +32:24:42.1 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:31:16.01 +37:15:14.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:36:56.46 +14:38:08.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:52:15.47 +14:46:54.2 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:38:52.21 +14:02:32.1 10.6mag 141P/Machholz
01:47:26.25 +05:46:13.2 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:31:38.46 +01:36:14.3 12.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:17:55.67 +07:31:42.0 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:09:05.52 -00:18:56.9 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:47:10.61 +00:10:03.9 17.7mag 210P/Christensen
21:45:40.04 -10:52:22.6 17.7mag 218P/LINEAR
17:17:02.49 -13:38:33.7 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:39:41.79 +34:52:17.8 16.8mag 240P/NEAT
07:39:42.98 -04:54:45.3 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:22:54.88 -20:19:50.9 17.8mag 260P/McNaught
02:03:07.33 +21:03:41.7 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR
15:41:40.17 +07:08:41.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:35:09.44 +21:22:16.4 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:39:24.10 +44:53:31.4 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 18 05:32 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 18 05:32 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 18 05:32 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
17:09:17.180 +58:08:27.31 AT 2026jgr 2026-04-10.97 20.21
14:27:07.800 +63:03:09.75 AT 2026jgq 2026-04-07.96 19.63
21:24:26.763 +17:46:17.22 AT 2026jgp 2026-04-10.51 19.5235
21:11:00.071 -12:31:56.57 AT 2026jgo 2026-04-10.51 17.9913
17:04:17.414 +05:53:27.19 AT 2026jgn 2026-04-10.42 20.0079
16:20:49.652 -00:22:10.33 AT 2026jgm 2026-04-10.42 19.437
12:38:24.734 +21:15:54.35 AT 2026jgl 2026-04-10.28 20.5723
13:24:21.892 +04:47:40.06 AT 2026jgk 2026-04-10.27 20.106
12:51:33.318 -00:15:04.90 AT 2026jgj 2026-04-10.27 19.4096
12:05:14.424 +12:01:26.77 AT 2026jgi 2026-04-10.26 20.2481
22:30:32.862 +33:06:00.06 AT 2026jgh 2026-04-08.51 19.6664
16:11:58.319 -09:00:29.25 AT 2026jgg 2026-04-08.41 19.9237
15:03:38.583 +10:04:47.83 AT 2026jgf 2026-04-07.47 20.0529
15:26:23.672 +05:34:01.67 AT 2026jge 2026-04-07.34 20.2566
14:13:26.808 +12:46:43.53 AT 2026jgd 2026-04-07.28 20.201
16:00:54.694 +34:45:50.57 AT 2026jgc 2026-04-07.50 19.9668
16:30:49.348 -18:08:16.31 AT 2026jgb 2026-03-28.50 20.531
13:20:44.619 +15:48:51.00 AT 2026jga 2026-04-10.29 19.1395
20:25:01.765 -18:27:19.12 AT 2026jfz 2026-04-08.51 19.5206
21:27:27.572 -08:47:51.47 AT 2026jfy 2026-04-08.51 19.6422
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 18 05:32 tns_transients_list.txt
