NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-10-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 315416 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 315416 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits

renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits_preview.png'
UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 467.7238 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1011 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1083.4521 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 459.8127 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1085.4235 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 458.4721 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.31644 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 6.05999994277954 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 6.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-18T04:15:44.5582146' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-18T09:15:44.5582146' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61148.3859323841 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-18T09:15:54.4585871' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61148.3860469675 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.999387213851 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997487491536 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.1747222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 307.988055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.04508633751036 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20332 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20332 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 6.05999994277954 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 6.05999994277954 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 6.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 251.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits :) Spent 0.579879 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 6.07999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 6.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-18T04:16:38.4140782' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-18T09:16:38.4140782' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61148.3865557178 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-18T09:16:48.3136828' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61148.3866702896 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 161.999387264187 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9997487234479 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 29.0266666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 308.048888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.05452366459865 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-10' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20332 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20332 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 6.07999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 6.07999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= -5.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 6.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 251.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 22.00176 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits :) Spent 0.526527 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/d_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 40671.357813 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=26440.0, right_median=31961.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-04-08_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits


fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.88604813 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 Second-epoch image center 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 Second-epoch image center 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01369 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bKWorn1RVU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pF47Pt8RtM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PIrZeDvMrZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UmFU1OUXCT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6790 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.5321 to 173.9047 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3880 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.5321 to 173.9047 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3880 deg Loaded 4503 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3303 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3303 out of 6790 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.941863 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.941863 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 2.0 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.bKWorn1RVU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=6790 Got 6790 stars (including 6304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6790 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6709 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6708 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6708 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.pF47Pt8RtM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=455, passed=6829 Got 6829 stars (including 6359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6829 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.PIrZeDvMrZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=4825 Got 4825 stars (including 4550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4825 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4743 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4744 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.UmFU1OUXCT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=4822 Got 4822 stars (including 4550 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4822 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4751 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 Second-epoch image center 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0121 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55 Second-epoch image center 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0126 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:48:05.555 +45:59:58.98 Second-epoch second image center 10:48:02.929 +46:00:39.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01369 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A9AKj5gVSL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oaw7IpTO6k Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ujOb9tkXgX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5WzaYmRhcA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34879 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2633 to 173.9047 deg, Dec +39.8064 to +51.4079 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2633 to 173.9047 deg, Dec 39.8064 to 51.4079 deg Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2970 out of 3313 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3313 out of 34879 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846261 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846261 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 1.9 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.A9AKj5gVSL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1431, passed=34864 Got 34864 stars (including 33366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34864 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34448 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Oaw7IpTO6k (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1414, passed=34861 Got 34861 stars (including 33384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34861 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ujOb9tkXgX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=933, passed=23899 Got 23899 stars (including 22941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23899 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23577 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23576 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.5WzaYmRhcA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=968, passed=23808 Got 23808 stars (including 22818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23808 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23546 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-15-44_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out56604.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 51797_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 The candidate 51797_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 18.38667    2461148.88667    12.71    10:59:48.92 +45:34:02.5   3549 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:59:48.90 +45:34:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52810_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 The candidate 52810_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 18.38667    2461148.88667    12.28    10:53:27.73 +49:13:03.0   4227 1258   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:53:27.75 +49:13:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54064_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 The candidate 54064_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 18.38667    2461148.88667    13.40    10:54:08.95 +43:10:23.3   4141 4915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:54:08.96 +43:10:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 55559_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 The candidate 55559_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 18.38667    2461148.88667    14.10    10:25:49.25 +50:00:47.1   6919 0658   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:25:49.30 +50:00:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 56604_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 The candidate 56604_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 18.38667    2461148.88667    14.88    10:27:50.40 +46:36:27.1   6880 2737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_041822_TTUQ2b1x1_56995_8xabj85T/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_04-16-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:27:50.41 +46:36:27.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.075 833401368288056960 156.95961173454 +46.60779460494 14.7112 13.8373 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.075#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:27:50.41 +46:36:27.9 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.88604813 -observatory V36 00:20:10.56 -00:41:18.9 Mercury (-0.0mag) 03:20:22.33 +18:43:45.4 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:24:37.11 +01:36:32.6 Mars (1.2mag) 07:13:44.67 +22:44:22.4 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:30:14.46 +00:55:34.1 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:48:12.27 +19:49:05.7 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:11:09.02 -00:13:25.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:51.22 -22:52:43.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 02:27:04.04 +18:27:53.1 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 18 04:20 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.88604813: 07:13:52.21 +22:44:05.6 Io (5.8mag) 07:13:33.11 +22:44:46.5 Europa (5.9mag) 07:13:28.55 +22:44:52.2 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:14:08.67 +22:43:25.6 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:16:58.46 +22:30:54.8 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:13:43.77 +22:44:26.5 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:17:12.81 +23:01:13.4 Elara (17.3mag) 07:12:47.32 +23:23:07.8 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:22:01.14 +22:42:37.2 Carme (18.5mag) 00:30:07.03 +00:55:59.6 Titan (8.8mag) 00:30:18.36 +00:55:44.9 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:29:50.76 +00:55:20.4 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:30:13.51 +00:56:01.8 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:31:49.43 +01:04:06.6 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 18 04:20 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.88604813: 15:47:40.52 -17:55:25.8 JWST 20:35:09.04 -11:10:37.1 Chandra 08:48:14.13 -49:40:38.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 18 04:20 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.88604813 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:52:54.64 -28:55:18.4 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:08:28.56 -69:33:02.2 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:32:58.75 +31:27:14.3 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:10.08 +10:49:42.3 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:10:50.23 +29:19:31.4 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:32:01.86 +26:06:07.8 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:58.40 +32:01:39.6 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:31:28.30 +00:05:45.0 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:53:07.75 +18:43:51.8 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:39:52.59 -11:29:11.5 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:06:34.88 -11:30:20.3 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:56:32.46 +63:02:57.3 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:17:01.95 -03:46:31.2 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:26:43.45 +86:14:43.6 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:19:05.82 +63:30:15.7 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:18:19.31 +19:04:13.8 11.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:17:42.34 +06:46:49.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:21:26.20 +15:55:41.3 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:28:31.65 -22:01:33.9 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:18:45.55 +44:42:23.8 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:28:58.75 +46:55:44.1 15.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:29:05.90 -26:35:24.4 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 00:08:22.43 +17:30:38.2 8.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:53:05.41 +03:09:18.3 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:46:02.71 +02:23:42.4 14.0mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:06:16.49 +37:38:47.1 14.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:47:34.43 -09:35:25.0 11.7mag 10P/Tempel 14:57:02.60 +02:57:04.6 14.2mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:02:11.60 -01:27:04.9 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 18:01:32.39 -09:31:31.1 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala 10:37:32.28 -03:54:57.5 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:52:22.47 +17:53:32.2 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:15:13.05 +36:29:44.4 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:32:04.84 -11:10:00.7 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:09:40.93 +22:03:42.0 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:10:52.23 +08:41:44.1 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels 23:10:10.22 -08:41:06.5 14.6mag 88P/Howell 02:17:12.14 +21:16:13.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:59:21.22 +32:24:39.6 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:31:14.97 +37:15:37.7 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:36:55.16 +14:38:02.8 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:52:13.83 +14:46:48.3 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:38:47.77 +14:02:15.8 10.6mag 141P/Machholz 01:47:21.95 +05:45:54.6 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:31:34.53 +01:35:57.2 12.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:17:51.32 +07:31:23.6 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:09:03.18 -00:19:22.0 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:47:12.11 +00:09:59.2 17.7mag 210P/Christensen 21:45:37.72 -10:52:34.4 17.7mag 218P/LINEAR 17:17:02.39 -13:38:39.7 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:39:39.96 +34:52:14.4 16.8mag 240P/NEAT 07:39:42.54 -04:54:50.5 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 22:22:52.81 -20:20:04.5 17.8mag 260P/McNaught 02:03:05.60 +21:03:29.3 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR 15:41:40.53 +07:08:38.5 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:35:09.10 +21:22:16.3 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:39:22.86 +44:53:34.3 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 18 04:20 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 18 04:20 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 18 04:20 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 13:24:21.892 +04:47:40.06 AT 2026jgk 2026-04-10.27 20.106 12:51:33.318 -00:15:04.90 AT 2026jgj 2026-04-10.27 19.4096 12:05:14.424 +12:01:26.77 AT 2026jgi 2026-04-10.26 20.2481 22:30:32.862 +33:06:00.06 AT 2026jgh 2026-04-08.51 19.6664 16:11:58.319 -09:00:29.25 AT 2026jgg 2026-04-08.41 19.9237 15:03:38.583 +10:04:47.83 AT 2026jgf 2026-04-07.47 20.0529 15:26:23.672 +05:34:01.67 AT 2026jge 2026-04-07.34 20.2566 14:13:26.808 +12:46:43.53 AT 2026jgd 2026-04-07.28 20.201 16:00:54.694 +34:45:50.57 AT 2026jgc 2026-04-07.50 19.9668 16:30:49.348 -18:08:16.31 AT 2026jgb 2026-03-28.50 20.531 13:20:44.619 +15:48:51.00 AT 2026jga 2026-04-10.29 19.1395 20:25:01.765 -18:27:19.12 AT 2026jfz 2026-04-08.51 19.5206 21:27:27.572 -08:47:51.47 AT 2026jfy 2026-04-08.51 19.6422 22:51:05.792 +13:39:46.62 AT 2026jfx 2026-04-07.52 18.7064 22:32:15.535 +20:20:28.26 AT 2026jfw 2026-04-07.52 19.3956 12:14:11.325 +06:43:20.74 AT 2026jfv 2026-04-10.29 21.5987 16:23:07.590 +21:51:17.91 AT 2026jfu 2026-04-06.84 21.14 17:52:20.230 +52:51:57.75 AT 2026jft 2026-04-05.90 21.36 16:56:00.430 +57:09:19.70 AT 2026jfs 2026-04-05.86 20.99 17:15:20.400 +48:53:58.53 AT 2026jfr 2026-04-05.85 20.83 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 18 04:20 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C