This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,9.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 9.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 45 33.66 +70 40 24.0 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 23 50 18.39 +66 11 35.6 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 33 00.98 +66 44 48.1 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 23 53 51.22 +65 49 30.0 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,11.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 11.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 40 56.68 +71 20 12.4 11.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,11.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 11.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 40 19.08 +65 55 17.1 12.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,12.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 12.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 35 44.68 +66 26 15.8 13.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 43 30.94 +66 41 21.7 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 20 53.81 +66 10 51.0 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 48 12.03 +71 30 49.6 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 40 08.77 +65 57 32.1 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 37 17.96 +68 36 11.3 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 08 29.65 +66 29 18.4 13.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
WISE J233413.8+685700,2461148.8516,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
WISE J233413.8+685700 20260418.3516 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.3516* 00 47 27.17 +71 40 40.1 14.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461148.8516,14.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260418.3516 14.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.59057495 27.12.2025 02:10:15.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
First image: 2461036.59057495 27.12.2025 02:10:15.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Last image: 2461148.85188668 18.04.2026 08:26:33.009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14344
Objects passed selection criteria: 14282
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10192.8
Average stars matched: 9318 (91.4179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118344 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 04:29:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461036.59057495 27.12.2025 02:10:15.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
First image: 2461036.59057495 27.12.2025 02:10:15.676 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Last image: 2461148.85188668 18.04.2026 08:26:33.009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 161
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95413
Objects passed selection criteria: 95185
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72746.8
Average stars matched: 66483 (91.3896 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1942256 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 04:41:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.85128487
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Image size: 924.7'x626.4' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87
Second-epoch image center 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Image size: 924.7'x626.4' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87
Second-epoch image center 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0475 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01058 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LOFDwMnPtC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2F4q8d9PKK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3M6DN6J0eI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qPyDVSEDwo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16658 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0025 to 359.9970 deg, Dec +62.8658 to +75.5048 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0025 to 359.9970 deg, Dec 62.8658 to 75.5048 deg
Loaded 84082 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8746 out of 9568 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9568 out of 16658 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.942221
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.942221
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.91
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.03
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.5 pix Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
15.0 mag. Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LOFDwMnPtC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1610, passed=16658
Got 16658 stars (including 15034 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16658 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.9470 through 0 to 28.4123, gap 28.4123 to 332.9470
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.9477 through 0 to 28.4145, gap 28.4145 to 332.9477
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2F4q8d9PKK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1667, passed=16773
Got 16773 stars (including 15086 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16773 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012956 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010364 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 333.1738 through 0 to 27.8274, gap 27.8274 to 333.1738
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 338 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 286 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.96"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 281 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 333.1326 through 0 to 27.8046, gap 27.8046 to 333.1326
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 416 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 387 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4504 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.13"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 386 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.47"
Excluding outliers - 386 stars left (next iteration limit 309)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3M6DN6J0eI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=621, passed=10044
Got 10044 stars (including 9413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012843 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010274 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.9495 through 0 to 26.8592, gap 26.8592 to 331.9495
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 242 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 192 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 11.04"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 182 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.9380 through 0 to 26.8408, gap 26.8408 to 331.9380
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 294 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.77"
Excluding outliers - 257 stars left (next iteration limit 200)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qPyDVSEDwo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=629, passed=10093
Got 10093 stars (including 9455 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10093 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012843 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010274 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.9498 through 0 to 26.8593, gap 26.8593 to 331.9498
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 243 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 195 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 124 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 185 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.92"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.9346 through 0 to 26.8497, gap 26.8497 to 331.9346
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 293 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 247 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1815 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 246 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2438 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.30"
Excluding outliers - 246 stars left (next iteration limit 203)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21046.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21046_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 21046_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 15s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Image size: 924.7'x626.4' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87
Second-epoch image center 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0431 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Image size: 924.7'x626.4' 15.4(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:02.007 +69:59:50.87
Second-epoch image center 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0475 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:33.222 +69:59:03.59
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:33.117 +69:58:25.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01058 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZoeGBHiGLX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.znFI52jzMn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K8LEqMKww5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uBhYWjArgQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits and wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 114234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0012 to 359.9997 deg, Dec +62.7863 to +75.5048 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0012 to 359.9997 deg, Dec 62.7863 to 75.5048 deg
Loaded 84921 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7448 out of 9832 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9832 out of 114234 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.779293
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.779293
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 145 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
2.3 pix Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
15.2 mag. Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZoeGBHiGLX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=42, blended=12405, passed=114192
Got 114192 stars (including 101585 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 114192 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.6411 through 0 to 28.4717, gap 28.4717 to 332.6411
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.6416 through 0 to 28.4739, gap 28.4739 to 332.6416
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 763 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 112171 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits -region wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.znFI52jzMn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits' -> 'wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=12319, passed=113226
Got 113226 stars (including 100709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113226 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 932.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 932.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012956 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010364 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.7589 through 0 to 27.9073, gap 27.9073 to 332.7589
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 349 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 300 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 256 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.18"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 293 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 332.7145 through 0 to 27.8794, gap 27.8794 to 332.7145
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 414 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 384 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 384 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.75"
Excluding outliers - 384 stars left (next iteration limit 322)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits -region wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K8LEqMKww5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4828, passed=71267
Got 71267 stars (including 66334 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012843 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010274 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.8481 through 0 to 27.1313, gap 27.1313 to 331.8481
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 226 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 179 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.77"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 170 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.19"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.8190 through 0 to 27.1173, gap 27.1173 to 331.8190
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 288 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 250 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.08"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 248 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.81"
Excluding outliers - 248 stars left (next iteration limit 187)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uBhYWjArgQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4834, passed=71325
Got 71325 stars (including 66389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 924.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 924.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012843 (46.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010274 (37.0 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.9287 through 0 to 27.1319, gap 27.1319 to 331.9287
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 227 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 175 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 109 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 165 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 331.8955 through 0 to 27.1112, gap 27.1112 to 331.8955
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 827 (Dec 63.5 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 280 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 239 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 237 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.77"
Excluding outliers - 237 stars left (next iteration limit 181)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-15_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0065.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2025-12-26_20-10-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-25-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_032825_TTUQ2b1x1_989674_Q9GG1wWO/wcs_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cep-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132428.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out132463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133857.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134827.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out137763.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138019.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138486.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140093.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140803.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out140989.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141221.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out141767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142155.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142196.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142286.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142403.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142673.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142830.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144615.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out145933.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out146460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out147384.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 54s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 20s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132394_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132394_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132395_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132395_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132398_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132398_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132400_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132400_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132401_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132401_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132405_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132405_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132412_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132412_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132414_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132414_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132416_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132416_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132421_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132421_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132423_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132423_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132425_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132425_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132428_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 132428_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132430_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132430_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132439_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132439_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132440_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132440_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132441_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132441_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132443_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132443_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132444_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132444_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132449_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 132449_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132450_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132450_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132454_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132454_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132455_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132455_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132456_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132456_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132457_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132457_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132458_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132458_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132462_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 132462_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132463_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 132463_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133857_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 133857_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134062_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 134062_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134138_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 134138_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134827_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 134827_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135239_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 135239_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135840_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 135840_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136391_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 136391_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136618_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 136618_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137034_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 137034_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137146_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 137146_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137274_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 137274_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137297_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 137297_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137508_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 137508_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137558_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 137558_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137575_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 137575_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137763_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 137763_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138019_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 138019_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138117_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 138117_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138311_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 138311_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138486_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 138486_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138518_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 138518_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138810_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 138810_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138811_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 138811_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139786_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 139786_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139884_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 139884_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139897_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 139897_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139919_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 139919_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140015_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 140015_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140048_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 140048_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140060_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 140060_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140093_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 140093_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140276_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 140276_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140347_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 140347_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140480_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 140480_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140803_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 140803_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140989_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 140989_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141055_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141055_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141103_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141103_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141163_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141163_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141221_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 141221_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141342_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141342_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141391_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141391_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141429_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 141429_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141567_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141567_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141574_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141574_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141580_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141580_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141620_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141620_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141682_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141682_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141687_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141687_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141704_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141704_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141767_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 141767_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141952_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 141952_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142067_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142067_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142068_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142068_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142081_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142081_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142155_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142155_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142196_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142196_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142286_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142286_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142358_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142358_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142371_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142371_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142403_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142403_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142558_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142558_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142673_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142673_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142753_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142753_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142781_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142781_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142830_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 142830_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142872_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142872_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142905_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142905_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142931_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 142931_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143069_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143069_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143082_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143082_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143226_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143226_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143422_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143422_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143455_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143455_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143492_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143492_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143502_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143502_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143614_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 143614_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143879_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143879_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143883_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 143883_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144041_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 144041_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144159_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 144159_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144615_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 144615_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144630_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 144630_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144756_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 144756_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144954_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 144954_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144993_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 144993_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145177_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145177_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145399_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145399_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145567_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145567_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145697_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145697_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145705_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145705_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145707_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145707_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145757_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145757_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145933_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 145933_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145984_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 145984_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146039_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146039_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146426_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146426_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146460_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 146460_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146526_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146526_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146550_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146550_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146776_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146776_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146837_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146837_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146921_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146921_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146970_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 146970_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147103_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147103_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147111_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147111_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147123_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147123_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147230_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147230_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147261_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147261_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147268_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147268_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147292_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147292_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147318_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147318_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147373_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147373_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147384_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 147384_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147393_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 147393_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13668_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 13668_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:12:22.12 +73:46:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66618_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 66618_fd_Cep-03-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_03-26-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 76s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cep-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2
########### Completed Cep-03-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2
###################################################################################
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1 -- not a known variable star
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5 -- not a known variable star
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4 -- not a known variable star
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1 -- not a known variable star
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8 -- not a known variable star
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3 -- not a known variable star
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4 -- not a known variable star
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5 -- not a known variable star
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2 -- not a known variable star
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0 -- not a known variable star
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5 -- not a known variable star
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1 -- not a known variable star
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8 -- not a known variable star
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3 -- not a known variable star
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1 -- not a known variable star
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1 -- not a known variable star
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4 -- not a known variable star
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7 -- not a known variable star
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0 -- not a known variable star
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1 -- not a known variable star
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6 -- not a known variable star
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0 -- not a known variable star
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0 -- not a known variable star
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2 -- not a known variable star
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0 -- not a known variable star
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8 -- not a known variable star
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6 -- not a known variable star
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1 -- not a known variable star
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0 -- not a known variable star
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2 -- not a known variable star
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2 -- not a known variable star
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9 -- not a known variable star
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2 -- not a known variable star
Found 33 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
33 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
00:00:09.03 +71:30:31.1
00:00:29.93 +70:55:08.5
00:01:43.25 +72:19:42.4
00:01:43.75 +67:24:19.1
00:04:38.37 +67:49:13.8
00:05:00.23 +73:01:13.3
00:08:29.65 +66:29:18.4
00:12:21.38 +73:46:40.5
00:16:11.28 +67:04:25.2
00:20:53.81 +66:10:51.0
00:24:03.98 +70:07:33.5
00:33:00.98 +66:44:48.1
00:35:44.68 +66:26:15.8
00:37:17.96 +68:36:11.3
00:40:08.77 +65:57:32.1
00:40:19.08 +65:55:17.1
00:40:56.68 +71:20:12.4
00:43:30.94 +66:41:21.7
00:45:33.66 +70:40:24.0
00:47:27.17 +71:40:40.1
00:48:12.03 +71:30:49.6
23:12:41.62 +67:24:32.0
23:14:34.57 +70:34:12.0
23:34:18.70 +68:56:58.2
23:36:38.19 +67:50:26.0
23:49:51.77 +66:56:46.8
23:50:18.39 +66:11:35.6
23:51:11.96 +69:08:40.1
23:53:51.22 +65:49:30.0
23:55:33.71 +66:52:46.2
23:58:35.48 +66:51:22.2
23:58:48.89 +68:23:47.9
23:59:57.87 +70:12:19.2
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.85128487 -observatory V36
00:19:59.00 -00:42:33.6 Mercury (-0.0mag)
03:20:11.97 +18:43:00.8 Venus (-3.9mag)
00:24:31.16 +01:35:53.6 Mars (1.2mag)
07:13:43.66 +22:44:24.2 Jupiter (-2.1mag)
00:30:13.53 +00:55:28.3 Saturn (0.9mag)
03:48:11.82 +19:49:04.3 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:11:08.74 -00:13:27.1 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:33:51.14 -22:52:43.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
02:24:19.17 +18:15:46.5 Moon (-8.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 18 04:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.85128487:
07:13:51.48 +22:44:07.1 Io (5.8mag)
07:13:32.32 +22:44:47.6 Europa (5.9mag)
07:13:27.87 +22:44:53.1 Ganymede (5.4mag)
07:14:07.98 +22:43:26.8 Callisto (6.6mag)
07:16:57.55 +22:30:57.5 Himalia (15.3mag)
07:13:41.57 +22:44:30.6 Thebe (16.2mag)
07:17:11.85 +23:01:16.1 Elara (17.3mag)
07:12:46.17 +23:23:10.6 Pasiphae (17.4mag)
07:22:00.18 +22:42:38.8 Carme (18.5mag)
00:30:06.19 +00:55:54.0 Titan (8.8mag)
00:30:17.61 +00:55:38.8 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:29:49.88 +00:55:15.0 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:30:12.72 +00:55:56.1 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:31:48.53 +01:04:01.1 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 18 04:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461148.85128487:
15:47:43.44 -17:54:01.5 JWST
20:18:47.32 -05:17:36.3 Chandra
08:37:53.69 -48:07:39.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 18 04:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461148.85128487 -observatory V36
-> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180]
18:52:53.93 -28:55:10.6 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
05:08:27.00 -69:33:08.0 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:32:58.26 +31:27:13.4 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:30:10.35 +10:49:27.7 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:10:49.71 +29:19:26.1 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
04:31:59.39 +26:06:04.5 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:03:57.88 +32:01:39.4 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:31:27.92 +00:05:32.1 17.4mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:53:08.31 +18:43:41.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:39:53.32 -11:29:13.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
09:06:35.76 -11:30:39.9 17.7mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
21:56:30.48 +63:02:49.4 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:17:03.94 -03:46:28.8 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
21:26:49.43 +86:14:25.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:19:04.67 +63:30:16.2 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
05:18:14.91 +19:03:35.3 11.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
16:17:43.76 +06:46:28.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:21:25.69 +15:55:06.6 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
03:28:29.74 -22:01:52.6 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
05:18:43.72 +44:42:54.2 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
13:29:07.39 +46:54:34.3 15.3mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
03:29:02.48 -26:35:04.3 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
00:07:57.19 +17:31:51.2 8.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
12:53:06.32 +03:09:11.0 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
03:45:47.87 +02:23:52.9 14.0mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
00:06:10.67 +37:38:24.9 14.7mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
18:47:30.44 -09:35:31.6 11.7mag 10P/Tempel
14:57:05.59 +02:57:18.6 14.2mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:02:12.12 -01:27:08.7 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
18:01:32.01 -09:31:35.3 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala
10:37:32.26 -03:55:06.8 17.0mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
01:52:19.21 +17:53:11.0 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
07:15:09.08 +36:30:12.1 17.0mag 63P/Wild
23:32:02.20 -11:10:15.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn
04:09:35.23 +22:03:00.3 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
01:10:47.56 +08:41:19.7 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels
23:10:03.98 -08:41:43.4 14.6mag 88P/Howell
02:17:06.13 +21:15:40.6 15.1mag 93P/Lovas
04:59:17.17 +32:24:33.4 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:31:12.36 +37:16:35.9 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos
02:36:51.89 +14:37:49.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
02:52:09.69 +14:46:33.4 17.5mag 131P/Mueller
01:38:36.63 +14:01:34.8 10.6mag 141P/Machholz
01:47:11.13 +05:45:08.0 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
00:31:24.63 +01:35:14.1 12.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
02:17:40.38 +07:30:37.3 17.9mag 141P-I/Machholz
01:08:57.30 -00:20:25.2 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
14:47:15.87 +00:09:47.4 17.7mag 210P/Christensen
21:45:31.88 -10:53:04.1 17.7mag 218P/LINEAR
17:17:02.13 -13:38:54.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR
05:39:35.37 +34:52:05.9 16.8mag 240P/NEAT
07:39:41.44 -04:55:03.6 17.7mag 242P/Spahr
22:22:47.58 -20:20:38.5 17.8mag 260P/McNaught
02:03:01.25 +21:02:57.9 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR
15:41:41.44 +07:08:30.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
07:35:08.22 +21:22:16.2 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS
05:39:19.74 +44:53:41.8 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 18 04:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 2026-04-16.06 14.03
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88
06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8
14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52
17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82
08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82
16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54
17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39
19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81
08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27
12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6
18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16
12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93
13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33
19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26
14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31
13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97
06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67
12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24
07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74
06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48
11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95
10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53
20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83
06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93
07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78
19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2
04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS
11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2
07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8
16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12
13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29
09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06
03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29
06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37
14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97
10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48
18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37
13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77
15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33
13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29
13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68
11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2
05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32
03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22
04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26
16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7
13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66
09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11
20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86
11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88
08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64
13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28
17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 18 04:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag
07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag
00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag
07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag
17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag
08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 18 04:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
13:24:21.892 +04:47:40.06 AT 2026jgk 2026-04-10.27 20.106
12:51:33.318 -00:15:04.90 AT 2026jgj 2026-04-10.27 19.4096
12:05:14.424 +12:01:26.77 AT 2026jgi 2026-04-10.26 20.2481
22:30:32.862 +33:06:00.06 AT 2026jgh 2026-04-08.51 19.6664
16:11:58.319 -09:00:29.25 AT 2026jgg 2026-04-08.41 19.9237
15:03:38.583 +10:04:47.83 AT 2026jgf 2026-04-07.47 20.0529
15:26:23.672 +05:34:01.67 AT 2026jge 2026-04-07.34 20.2566
14:13:26.808 +12:46:43.53 AT 2026jgd 2026-04-07.28 20.201
16:00:54.694 +34:45:50.57 AT 2026jgc 2026-04-07.50 19.9668
16:30:49.348 -18:08:16.31 AT 2026jgb 2026-03-28.50 20.531
13:20:44.619 +15:48:51.00 AT 2026jga 2026-04-10.29 19.1395
20:25:01.765 -18:27:19.12 AT 2026jfz 2026-04-08.51 19.5206
21:27:27.572 -08:47:51.47 AT 2026jfy 2026-04-08.51 19.6422
22:51:05.792 +13:39:46.62 AT 2026jfx 2026-04-07.52 18.7064
22:32:15.535 +20:20:28.26 AT 2026jfw 2026-04-07.52 19.3956
12:14:11.325 +06:43:20.74 AT 2026jfv 2026-04-10.29 21.5987
16:23:07.590 +21:51:17.91 AT 2026jfu 2026-04-06.84 21.14
17:52:20.230 +52:51:57.75 AT 2026jft 2026-04-05.90 21.36
16:56:00.430 +57:09:19.70 AT 2026jfs 2026-04-05.86 20.99
17:15:20.400 +48:53:58.53 AT 2026jfr 2026-04-05.85 20.83
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 18 04:29 tns_transients_list.txt
