This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.8281,10.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.3281 10.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J252.2056-23.2783,2461148.8281,12.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J252.2056-23.2783 20260418.3281 12.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.8281,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.3281 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.8281,13.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.3281 13.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
OGLE-BLG-ECL-007874,2461148.8281,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
OGLE-BLG-ECL-007874 20260418.3281 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4107488335719784320,2461148.8281,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4107488335719784320 20260418.3281 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.8281,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.3281 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461148.82839074 18.04.2026 07:52:42.960 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7167
Objects passed selection criteria: 7157
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6182
Average stars matched: 6024.25 (97.4482 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113988 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 02:56:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
First image: 2461099.00968565 27.02.2026 12:13:46.840 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Last image: 2461148.82839074 18.04.2026 07:52:42.960 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 88
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104714
Objects passed selection criteria: 104534
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85800.5
Average stars matched: 82108.8 (95.6973 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2077180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Apr 18 02:59:33 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.82779485
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0023 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v2K07L6iDE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NtkH45wppz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iizYZBT8Gh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FScNry8vzQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 250.0068 to 268.2094 deg, Dec -31.3083 to -20.4292 deg
Loaded 11388 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7042 out of 7452 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7452 out of 10772 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815328
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815328
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.37
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.45
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
2.1 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
2.6 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.4 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.v2K07L6iDE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=949, passed=10772
Got 10772 stars (including 9801 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1014)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NtkH45wppz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=936, passed=10621
Got 10621 stars (including 9668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10621 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10335 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iizYZBT8Gh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=382, passed=6259
Got 6259 stars (including 5871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6259 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.69"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6142 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1010)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FScNry8vzQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=379, passed=6354
Got 6354 stars (including 5971 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6354 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 923 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Excluding outliers - 922 stars left (next iteration limit 1015)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 20574_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 07146_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.16 -25:10:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:47:36.16 -30:02:23.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0023 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:16:48.675 -26:00:08.00
Second-epoch image center 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:16:48.861 -26:00:00.22
Second-epoch second image center 17:16:47.390 -26:00:30.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00997 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N5IrJ47gKp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pqTP0xF17f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jFAhaSXk98
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NyibS4zvNg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits and wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 143168 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.9656 to 268.2487 deg, Dec -31.3138 to -20.3822 deg
Loaded 11498 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8059 out of 9812 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9812 out of 143168 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.596166
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.596166
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.57
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
1.8 pix Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
2.3 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
2.4 pix fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
14.6 mag. Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.N5IrJ47gKp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=11615, passed=143155
Got 143155 stars (including 131260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 143155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140509 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pqTP0xF17f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=11364, passed=142792
Got 142792 stars (including 131150 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 142792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 936 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140429 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 350 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1029)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits -region wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jFAhaSXk98 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4091, passed=69931
Got 69931 stars (including 65723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69931 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 925 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68466 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 925 stars left (next iteration limit 1016)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NyibS4zvNg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=4055, passed=69439
Got 69439 stars (including 65277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69439 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 928 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67643 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 928 stars left (next iteration limit 1020)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-13-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-14-28_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0068.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-51-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0085.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-18_CI_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_025323_TTUQ2b1x1_1903505_1Ndi7p04/wcs_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-08-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166792.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166802.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166807.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167152.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167580.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out167594.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166758_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166758_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:51:40.19 -22:44:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166771_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166771_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:21.77 -23:53:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166778_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166778_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:08.56 -27:56:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166781_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:45.43 -23:09:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166786_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166786_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166792_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:39.07 -24:30:54.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166794_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166795_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:54.60 -24:08:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166796_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166796_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:02.31 -29:20:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166797_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:00.00 -22:31:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166799_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:41.69 -23:39:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166802_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166802_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:24.84 -22:44:39.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.82)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166803_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166803_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:26.72 -25:57:44.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166807_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:24.07 -29:13:17.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.662 4058790858330189696 263.35009205711 -29.22155884341 12.8368 12.4069 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.662#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166815_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:46.75 -27:59:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 166820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166821_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:40.54 -25:52:01.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.30)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 166863_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:36.17 -30:02:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167016_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167016_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:46.49 -27:53:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167085_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:36.35 -29:05:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167099_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:08.92 -28:58:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167152_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 167152_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167206_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:50.38 -22:12:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167216_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:30.44 -26:45:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167231_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167231_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:18.35 -28:11:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167248_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167248_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:29.28 -26:11:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167283_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167283_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:55.51 -29:26:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167300_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167300_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:10.06 -30:03:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167326_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167326_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:22.10 -29:04:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167356_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167356_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:26.76 -29:10:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167387_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 167387_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167398_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167398_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:58:11.41 -23:31:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167426_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167426_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:55.38 -22:43:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167428_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:52.74 -23:45:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167475_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167475_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:44.58 -24:49:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167476_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167476_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:36.54 -26:21:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167480_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167480_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:11:09.49 -22:44:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167506_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167506_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:54.67 -24:26:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167538_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167538_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:11.10 -23:58:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167551_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167551_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:22.42 -29:20:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167564_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 167564_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167568_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167568_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.79 -28:24:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167575_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167575_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:15.34 -26:10:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 167580_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167585_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167585_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:17.29 -24:10:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167587_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167587_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:24.10 -25:52:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167588_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167588_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:54.86 -25:40:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167594_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
Preparing report for the candidate 167594_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167618_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167618_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:33.91 -22:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167647_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167647_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:00.55 -22:29:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167651_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 167651_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.50 -22:40:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 158009_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:49.27 -30:04:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155122_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 155122_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:25.02 -28:26:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 49148_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:02:32.20 -28:07:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 39673_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:34.97 -28:33:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 154362_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:25.37 -22:10:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 121849_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:01.75 -23:23:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 60742_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:17.41 -27:12:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164731_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 164731_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:19.18 -25:22:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 24051_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:46.97 -29:29:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 124624_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:00:01.81 -23:25:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 72820_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:09:35.04 -26:36:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 89939_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:50:56.18 -25:10:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 92031_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:07:10.87 -25:14:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 16931_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:03.07 -29:43:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 57059_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:35.82 -27:23:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 130787_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:27.37 -24:00:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086
The candidate 26023_fd_Oph-08-Q2b1x1_2026-04-18_02-52-42_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0086 did not pass the final checks