This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.1053* 05 02 49.53 +25 20 41.2 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.6052,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.1052 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.1053* 04 57 59.63 +27 38 01.3 12.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.6052,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.1052 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.6052,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.1052 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 18.1053* 04 45 56.14 +28 46 06.6 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461148.6052,14.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260418.1052 14.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461148.60558432 18.04.2026 02:31:52.485 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15357
Objects passed selection criteria: 15324
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 13210
Average stars matched: 12859.2 (97.3448 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120364 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 21:33:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461148.60558432 18.04.2026 02:31:52.485 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126801
Objects passed selection criteria: 126524
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 111352
Average stars matched: 107423 (96.4722 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2021040 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 21:36:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461148.60490973
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01066 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DCbldfZW1A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vuFTdxcqaR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d4ZwKOVhuC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NmTKitsFLN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec +24.3185 to +35.3019 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5643 to 84.6649 deg, Dec 24.3185 to 35.3019 deg
Loaded 8463 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6027 out of 6737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DCbldfZW1A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vuFTdxcqaR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d4ZwKOVhuC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=723, passed=10196
Got 10196 stars (including 9464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10196 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NmTKitsFLN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, passed=10223
Got 10223 stars (including 9473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9841 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21318.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21249_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.48 +31:18:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21260_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21260_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.67 +34:09:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21271_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:46.81 +32:32:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21281_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.03 +34:07:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:41.48 +34:26:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21294_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 21294_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:28.34 +34:07:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 21318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.28 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:02:49.53 +25:20:41.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0033 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0103 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:00:00.416 +29:59:57.47
Second-epoch second image center 05:00:03.206 +30:00:10.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01066 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bWsXMlBG2U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hzsZwMjXuT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L456EZ7wva
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AvnwrZTCUA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 137583 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec +24.3186 to +35.3036 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 65.5579 to 84.6894 deg, Dec 24.3186 to 35.3036 deg
Loaded 8491 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4933 out of 6876 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.63
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 102 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.1 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
2.0 pix fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bWsXMlBG2U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.3 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 134320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hzsZwMjXuT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 135338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.L456EZ7wva (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=5967, passed=84375
Got 84375 stars (including 78271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81353 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AvnwrZTCUA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=6368, passed=88258
Got 88258 stars (including 81731 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.0 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84355 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84354 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-30-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0016.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_213248_TTUQ1b1x1_2361964_PNs1xewE/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160906.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160925.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160926.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160939.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160945.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160946.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out161962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162204.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162265.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162407.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162409.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162548.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162562.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162575.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162589.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out162596.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out162101.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161287.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out161780.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out162473.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160901_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:16.63 +33:33:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160906_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160906_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:03.68 +29:56:41.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160912_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.29 +32:25:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160917_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:47.13 +31:22:42.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.781 180504594846380160 077.69651828685 +31.37768182676 14.8305 13.9941 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.781#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160922_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:20.57 +34:46:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160925_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:53.40 +31:01:54.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160926_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:35.78 +34:20:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.461 173627798153695872 070.64894377230 +34.34305498971 13.8861 13.1332 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.461#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160939_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:47.87 +33:55:59.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.22)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160943_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:37.69 +32:42:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160945_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.97 +33:49:28.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.07, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.05)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.065 181984331340479360 079.62057376562 +33.82417056907 14.1422 13.5444 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.065#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:21.98 +28:33:33.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.672 3442801804010758912 083.59163257156 +28.55875980718 13.6509 12.8358 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.672#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160948_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:31.99 +29:23:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160949_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:40.89 +32:42:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160951_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:24.73 +32:58:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160952_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160952_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:49.18 +34:12:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160960_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:16.90 +34:38:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160961_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:25.64 +34:37:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 160964_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:04.48 +29:46:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161094_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161094_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.69 +34:09:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161106_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:46.82 +32:32:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161258_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:40.64 +34:23:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 161287_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161318_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 +26:55:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161330_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.18 +32:26:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161357_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.92 +28:31:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161379_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:10.24 +34:24:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161426_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.67 +32:33:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161439_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.54 +33:11:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161492_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.66 +33:12:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:08.33 +34:10:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161552_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161552_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.94 +34:09:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161564_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161564_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:01.43 +33:48:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161582_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.87 +33:11:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161627_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.91 +29:10:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161646_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.59 +29:45:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161698_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161698_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:19.78 +33:23:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161703_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161703_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.69 +30:49:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161707_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161707_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.17 +32:25:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161720_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161720_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:23.84 +33:30:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161725_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161725_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:56.09 +33:34:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161748_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161748_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:26.86 +30:56:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161749_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161749_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.88 +30:48:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161777_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161777_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:31.11 +26:59:35.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.881 3441997343751893888 083.13008370108 +26.99338121811 13.7503 13.1267 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161780_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 161780_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161781_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161781_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.30 +31:44:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161801_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.87 +29:39:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161806_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161806_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:21.28 +32:55:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161826_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:09.81 +33:47:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161841_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161841_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.70 +26:10:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161845_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.08 +30:28:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161849_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161849_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:34.84 +33:55:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161859_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:41.38 +33:56:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161885_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:33.35 +34:20:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161911_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.75 +28:40:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161938_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.08 +31:04:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161940_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:29.49 +34:32:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161946_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:08.77 +33:20:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161958_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161958_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:39.57 +33:59:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161962_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:15.21 +30:17:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.480 156929927378514816 074.56340369869 +30.28425792805 13.9772 13.2609 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.480#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161970_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.83 +32:25:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161990_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 161990_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:30.88 +32:48:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162013_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:55.87 +32:37:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162036_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.16 +29:22:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162047_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162047_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:52.13 +31:01:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162050_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.15 +31:15:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162085_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:41.99 +29:51:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162095_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.80 +32:23:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162101_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:35.77 +34:32:24.2 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162131_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:25.39 +27:00:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162139_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:24.69 +29:23:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162144_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:24.10 +32:46:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162156_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162156_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:04.92 +32:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162166_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162166_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.50 +32:27:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162176_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:48.54 +33:24:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162185_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:11.14 +33:20:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162192_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.65 +30:10:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162204_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:16.57 +30:56:43.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.907 180294931724602368 079.56943173255 +30.94588287759 14.0114 13.1455 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.907#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162210_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162210_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:34.59 +33:19:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162236_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.81 +27:29:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162265_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162265_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:11.37 +29:59:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.978 156696457253454848 075.54744389654 +29.98615173326 13.9294 12.9713 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.978#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162266_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:09.72 +31:24:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162284_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.96 +31:25:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162307_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:08.27 +27:11:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162311_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:05.07 +30:58:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162365_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:51.34 +32:23:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162407_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:11.34 +34:26:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.880 182636547895404416 082.04754526479 +34.44104809344 14.4644 13.8923 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.880#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162409_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:32.07 +30:31:11.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.891 159214991715380992 069.13390908725 +30.51968619092 14.3579 13.6369 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.891#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162437_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162437_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:49.17 +33:30:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162444_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162444_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:11.71 +34:12:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162473_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
Preparing report for the candidate 162473_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162541_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:03.43 +33:20:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162548_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:13.33 +29:01:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.999 155249259432446080 073.30628572129 +29.02686858936 14.6964 13.8644 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.999#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162562_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162562_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:52.94 +30:22:49.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.597 157086096686595456 075.71951400000 +30.38082822189 14.5037 13.6220 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.597#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162575_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:22.62 +30:17:28.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.577 156935772831263488 074.59475215869 +30.29139569041 14.9269 14.2676 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.577#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162589_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:48.70 +30:23:04.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.451 3447013247079580288 081.20248682766 +30.38485217227 14.5931 13.6924 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.451#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162596_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 162596_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:45.34 +29:10:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.511 155793071011385728 075.18843972431 +29.17169716884 14.9624 14.3106 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.511#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 33755_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:00.50 +32:53:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.50 +31:18:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.26 +32:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103576_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 103576_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:49.51 +25:20:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 52105_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:02.63 +31:54:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017
The candidate 111869_fd_Aur-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_21-31-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0017 did not pass the final checks