This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.4252* 16 42 12.56 +34 55 18.3 14.8 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461147.9252,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260417.4252 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461147.9252,14.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260417.4252 14.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
First image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Last image: 2461147.92545932 17.04.2026 10:12:29.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7975
Objects passed selection criteria: 7963
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7299.5
Average stars matched: 7139.5 (97.8081 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 05:15:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
First image: 2461121.97230774 22.03.2026 11:19:57.389 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Last image: 2461147.92545932 17.04.2026 10:12:29.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 126
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 16 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49438
Objects passed selection criteria: 49343
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45071.2
Average stars matched: 43658.5 (96.8655 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 05:16:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.92495378
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tsKO9Pml1K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2MWL7l0nX9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OoaHQBFwoY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QY0MjtcN5r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits) and catalog (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 10322 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.0605 to 256.3322 deg, Dec +32.1214 to +43.3393 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.0605 to 256.3322 deg, Dec 32.1214 to 43.3393 deg
Loaded 7032 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4977 out of 5259 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5259 out of 10322 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.951996
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.951996
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
2.0 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
2.5 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.5 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
15.5 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
15.0 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.0 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tsKO9Pml1K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=710, passed=10322
Got 10322 stars (including 9592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10322 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2MWL7l0nX9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=714, passed=10255
Got 10255 stars (including 9525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10255 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10053 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OoaHQBFwoY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=420, passed=7924
Got 7924 stars (including 7501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QY0MjtcN5r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=442, passed=8043
Got 8043 stars (including 7596 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 20516_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:24.43 +36:25:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20590_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 20590_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:29.22 +42:10:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0584 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:21:48.591 +38:00:08.03
Second-epoch image center 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0561 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:21:30.819 +38:00:09.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:21:31.517 +38:00:08.89
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00229 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sAn43lcZF3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cxSFldTe58
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6gj96dMnAM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0DXwVyuywm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits and wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits) and catalog (wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat) found
'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 61628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.0124 to 256.3632 deg, Dec +32.1070 to +43.3397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.0124 to 256.3632 deg, Dec 32.1070 to 43.3397 deg
Loaded 7076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4610 out of 5285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5285 out of 61628 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.839470
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.839470
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
1.9 pix CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
2.2 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.2 pix fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
15.7 mag. CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
15.2 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.sAn43lcZF3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3241, passed=61610
Got 61610 stars (including 58251 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61610 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60422 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cxSFldTe58 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits' -> 'wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=11, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=3229, passed=61566
Got 61566 stars (including 58229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61566 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 60784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits -region wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6gj96dMnAM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2123, passed=45693
Got 45693 stars (including 43521 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45693 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45166 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0DXwVyuywm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=2243, passed=46414
Got 46414 stars (including 44115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits -region wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-19-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0372.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_06-20-39_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0373.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-11-46_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_051314_TTUQ2b1x1_2071787_WSnWKiHQ/wcs_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field CrB-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75856.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75862.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75865.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75870.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75875.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out75878.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76491.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76526.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76550.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76594.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76709.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76760.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76769.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76784.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75856_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75856_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:42.98 +34:12:00.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.646 1323682742803373056 243.17926805322 +34.20034413702 14.5524 14.0629 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.646#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75857_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75857_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:35.92 +41:55:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75862_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75862_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:25.09 +35:59:20.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.253 1372175260036832896 241.10446313411 +35.98894687371 14.1824 13.4341 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.253#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75865_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75865_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:28.19 +36:23:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.988 1351125865837649408 253.61754109331 +36.38423853020 14.2251 13.5475 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.988#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75866_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75866_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:02:15.13 +40:54:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75870_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75870_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:53:02.47 +36:51:12.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75875_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75875_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:33.68 +38:11:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.524 1330776894904560000 244.39051279901 +38.19182535315 12.9052 12.4719 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.524#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75878_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75878_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:48.87 +34:44:14.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.067 1323770772451926272 242.70363409655 +34.73726695772 10.9063 10.1754 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.067#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75926_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75926_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75989_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75989_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75997_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 75997_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76025_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76025_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:39.32 +36:24:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76060_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76060_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76130_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76130_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76161_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76161_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76175_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76175_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:55.00 +35:39:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76176_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76176_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:58.43 +35:11:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76230_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76230_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:10.64 +40:32:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76240_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76240_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76245_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76245_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76260_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76260_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76314_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76314_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76321_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76321_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:36.54 +39:49:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76329_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76329_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:19.65 +37:48:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76335_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76335_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76359_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76359_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:51.48 +40:46:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76360_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76360_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76384_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76384_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76401_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76401_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:36:42.79 +40:28:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76426_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76426_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:25.38 +40:26:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76442_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76442_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76454_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76454_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76457_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76457_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76479_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76479_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76481_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76481_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:27:43.62 +39:21:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76487_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76487_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76488_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76488_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76491_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76491_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:47.01 +36:42:58.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.288 1330540328106010752 243.94555541470 +36.71602789761 14.5258 14.0204 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.288#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76495_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76495_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76507_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76507_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76512_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76512_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76518_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76518_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76526_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76526_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:10.38 +40:39:04.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.416 1355842461482998784 251.29317162632 +40.65112304275 14.6095 14.1159 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.416#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76532_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76532_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76540_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76540_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76541_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76541_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:09.61 +39:28:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76545_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76545_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:22:18.00 +39:52:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76550_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76550_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.62 +42:00:23.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.320 1381731184313810304 243.93514740653 +42.00674224016 14.5975 14.0507 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.320#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76555_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76555_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76560_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76560_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76594_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76594_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:36.93 +36:23:51.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.371 1330200750811926016 242.90385257913 +36.39750958315 14.7792 14.1861 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.371#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76655_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76655_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76665_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76665_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76673_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76673_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76674_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76674_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76683_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76683_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76693_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76693_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76709_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76709_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:59.05 +33:48:26.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.719 1323796164297988864 240.99589069849 +33.80757206864 15.0988 14.2625 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.719#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76722_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
Preparing report for the candidate 76722_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76726_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76726_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76748_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76748_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76760_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76760_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:36.66 +36:28:36.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.786 1372426910760974592 239.90248710572 +36.47680439325 15.1562 14.6849 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.786#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76769_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76769_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:39.31 +36:42:52.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.314 1378214598234592512 241.91335019949 +36.71514774062 15.0480 14.2207 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.314#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76784_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
Preparing report for the candidate 76784_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76794_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76794_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76811_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379
The candidate 76811_fd_CrB-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_05-12-29_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0379 did not pass the final checks