This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4056022288059532672,2461147.9013,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4056022288059532672 20260417.4013 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175800-3443.2,2461147.9013,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175800-3443.2 20260417.4013 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.99490872 27.02.2026 11:52:30.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
First image: 2461098.99490872 27.02.2026 11:52:30.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Last image: 2461147.90250278 17.04.2026 09:39:26.240 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 18
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8405
Objects passed selection criteria: 8400
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7631
Average stars matched: 7439.25 (97.4872 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114796 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 04:41:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461098.99490872 27.02.2026 11:52:30.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
First image: 2461098.99490872 27.02.2026 11:52:30.113 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Last image: 2461147.90250278 17.04.2026 09:39:26.240 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 160
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 55 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95798
Objects passed selection criteria: 95652
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 85519
Average stars matched: 81364.8 (95.1423 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1934620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 04:43:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.90009962
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Image size: 938.8'x625.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Image size: 937.7'x625.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72
Second-epoch image center 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72
Second-epoch image center 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57
Second-epoch second image center 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01056 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FanbTkj1eW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LXG4syzqR3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0R2SBEnFo8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.evhfRyvrm6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11461 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 256.0353 to 276.0310 deg, Dec -39.2725 to -28.4470 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 256.0353 to 276.0310 deg, Dec -39.2725 to -28.4470 deg
Loaded 23663 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8906 out of 9199 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9199 out of 11461 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.562163
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.562163
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.73
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
2.4 pix Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.4 pix fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.7 mag. Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
13.8 mag. Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FanbTkj1eW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=970, passed=11461
Got 11461 stars (including 10482 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.09"
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LXG4syzqR3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1009, passed=11426
Got 11426 stars (including 10401 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11426 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.84"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.86"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.96"
Excluding outliers - 907 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0R2SBEnFo8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=591, passed=7700
Got 7700 stars (including 7105 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.80"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7469 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
Excluding outliers - 908 stars left (next iteration limit 999)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.evhfRyvrm6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, passed=9007
Got 9007 stars (including 8463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9007 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.08"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.10"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.25"
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20556_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 20556_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:55.27 -37:20:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 20557_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20594_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 20594_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:31.63 -34:38:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20602_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 20602_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:56.07 -35:11:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20635_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 20635_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:52.11 -34:27:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Image size: 938.8'x625.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Image size: 937.7'x625.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72
Second-epoch image center 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0138 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:44:23.486 -33:59:41.72
Second-epoch image center 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0230 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:44:20.997 -34:00:20.57
Second-epoch second image center 17:44:21.001 -34:00:58.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01056 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xdcdvZ10ae
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cCa3I0tNVU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IeGdVZQfK1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ERTgqyQEQp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits and wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 131235 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 256.0353 to 276.1068 deg, Dec -39.2831 to -28.4039 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 256.0353 to 276.1068 deg, Dec -39.2831 to -28.4039 deg
Loaded 23882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17026 out of 19896 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19896 out of 131235 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.258988
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.258988
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.86
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.86
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 60 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
2.2 pix Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
2.6 pix fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
13.9 mag. Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xdcdvZ10ae (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=11842, passed=131223
Got 131223 stars (including 119209 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.85"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 926 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 924 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 127965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Excluding outliers - 924 stars left (next iteration limit 1018)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cCa3I0tNVU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=12422, passed=135115
Got 135115 stars (including 122527 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 135115 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013039 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010431 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 938 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131611 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Excluding outliers - 929 stars left (next iteration limit 1021)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IeGdVZQfK1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=7597, passed=101305
Got 101305 stars (including 93547 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 930 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98510 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ERTgqyQEQp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=7519, passed=84338
Got 84338 stars (including 76743 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.00"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 310 (Dec -39.3 to -28.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.21"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 1001)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-52-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0297.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_05-53-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-35-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0351.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_044014_TTUQ2b1x1_2675384_5WnclFIs/wcs_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out153879.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out153882.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out153905.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out153927.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out153961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out154009.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out155440.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out155466.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out155519.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out153907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48327.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153879_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153879_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:41.57 -29:57:42.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.001 4056984738678523520 264.92295704146 -29.96223373391 13.9282 13.2997 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153882_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153882_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:26.61 -32:41:09.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153891_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153891_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:33.00 -30:27:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153905_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153905_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:22.22 -32:21:48.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.196 4043684878580525184 270.09208947266 -32.36431143060 13.4691 12.5591 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.196#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153907_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
Preparing report for the candidate 153907_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153927_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153927_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:27.60 -30:53:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.711 4044085513174875776 269.36481348095 -30.89472687988 12.7819 11.8988 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153957_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153957_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:29.07 -30:01:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153961_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153961_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:05.44 -33:48:34.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153998_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 153998_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:28.21 -31:47:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154009_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154009_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:41.41 -29:49:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.715 4056402684719816576 268.17358994749 -29.83301532916 12.6798 11.8208 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.715#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154028_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154028_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:44.22 -31:00:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154084_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154084_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:55.79 -31:29:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154098_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154098_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:55.57 -31:00:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154110_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154110_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:35.88 -31:14:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154127_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154127_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154130_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154130_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:57.62 -31:51:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154141_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154141_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:22.49 -29:55:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154144_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154144_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:14.15 -32:59:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154154_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154154_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:34.84 -33:07:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154163_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154163_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154165_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154165_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:55.31 -37:20:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154384_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154384_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:39.02 -29:52:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154503_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154503_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:19.16 -35:11:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154516_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154516_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:38.68 -35:56:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154548_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154548_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:43.16 -32:41:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154591_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154591_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:16:51.10 -33:21:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154661_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154661_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:13.56 -32:27:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154691_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154691_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:08.37 -31:17:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154702_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154702_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:48.96 -36:07:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154746_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154746_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:33.27 -36:58:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154776_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154776_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:29.30 -34:13:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154778_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154778_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:48.53 -32:28:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154893_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154893_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 154921_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 154921_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:10.17 -30:03:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155055_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155055_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:59.46 -34:44:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155077_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155077_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:00.37 -35:12:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155126_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155126_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:53.28 -31:28:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155135_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155135_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:05.68 -30:03:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155142_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155142_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:40.48 -36:04:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155188_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155188_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:37.74 -33:17:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155198_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155198_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:47.94 -31:05:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155217_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155217_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:01.26 -30:40:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155254_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155254_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:02.50 -35:27:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155299_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155299_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:13.68 -29:39:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155406_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155406_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:20.83 -37:50:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155411_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155411_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:06.40 -35:02:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155429_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155429_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:47.82 -32:06:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155440_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155440_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:51.20 -34:18:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.737 4041557181792813184 267.21241464512 -34.31460481940 12.6777 11.3829 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.737#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155445_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155445_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:55.93 -30:45:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155466_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155466_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:47.86 -32:47:56.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.329 4043443673237559552 268.19827207410 -32.79961025771 11.3966 9.8633 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.329#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155519_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155519_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:36.09 -34:56:27.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.07)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155527_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155527_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:05.18 -29:48:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155540_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155540_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:56.09 -32:43:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155617_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155617_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:50.13 -37:10:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155693_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 155693_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:13.42 -30:11:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55309_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 55309_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:49.89 -34:12:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63065_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 63065_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:19.08 -33:38:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48916_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 48916_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:31.72 -34:38:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48327_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
Preparing report for the candidate 48327_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10509_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352
The candidate 10509_fd_Sco-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-39-26_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0352 did not pass the final checks