This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.8956,12.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.3956 12.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3956* 16 52 48.59 +51 03 41.0 14.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J253.2025+51.0613,2461147.8956,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J253.2025+51.0613 20260417.3956 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
First image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Last image: 2461147.89597294 17.04.2026 09:30:02.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8211
Objects passed selection criteria: 8197
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7311.5
Average stars matched: 6790.5 (92.8742 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113848 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 04:33:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
First image: 2461093.84068309 22.02.2026 08:10:25.019 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Last image: 2461147.89597294 17.04.2026 09:30:02.062 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39639
Objects passed selection criteria: 39576
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 36263.5
Average stars matched: 34746.5 (95.8167 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 04:34:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.89532521
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53
Second-epoch second image center 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01360 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KPqa5SpgWm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YB97FzC125
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uaQ6iICemi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yj7Vbu4lz1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9047 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 240.4666 to 269.6503 deg, Dec +47.2686 to +59.6936 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 240.4666 to 269.6503 deg, Dec 47.2686 to 59.6936 deg
Loaded 8455 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5174 out of 5454 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5454 out of 9047 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.829807
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.829807
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
2.6 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
3.7 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
3.7 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
15.1 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KPqa5SpgWm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=799, passed=9047
Got 9047 stars (including 8238 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YB97FzC125 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=760, passed=9068
Got 9068 stars (including 8305 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9068 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8980 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8978 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uaQ6iICemi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1159, passed=10111
Got 10111 stars (including 8949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yj7Vbu4lz1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1186, passed=10109
Got 10109 stars (including 8918 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10109 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.68"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20330.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20768.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20330_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 20330_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:46.84 +50:08:02.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.24, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.22)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.141 1413028129962713728 249.94500720288 +50.13427235920 12.2208 11.7649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.141#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20331_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 20331_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:01.79 +56:26:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20487_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 20487_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:15.11 +53:11:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20756_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 20756_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:45.80 +52:41:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20762_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 20762_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:11.81 +53:23:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20768_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
Preparing report for the candidate 20768_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03070_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 03070_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:59:49.63 +52:19:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:34:16.89 +57:10:14.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0165 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 936.8'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:56:35.288 +54:00:12.86
Second-epoch image center 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0187 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:56:28.994 +53:59:51.53
Second-epoch second image center 16:56:32.173 +53:59:11.40
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01360 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fCeqGcCdbJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U0jXfMQBvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b1quAAghqL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nQe67pUYif
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits and wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 47455 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 240.3445 to 269.7260 deg, Dec +47.2686 to +59.7071 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 240.3445 to 269.7260 deg, Dec 47.2686 to 59.7071 deg
Loaded 8519 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4876 out of 5478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5478 out of 47455 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.649106
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.649106
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 40 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
2.4 pix Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
3.4 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
3.4 pix fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
15.2 mag. Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fCeqGcCdbJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4183, passed=47438
Got 47438 stars (including 43201 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47438 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.3 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U0jXfMQBvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=4149, passed=47216
Got 47216 stars (including 43015 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 686 to 750 (Dec 47.2 to 59.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits -region wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b1quAAghqL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=5945, passed=42340
Got 42340 stars (including 36376 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42340 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nQe67pUYif (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6062, passed=42551
Got 42551 stars (including 36469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41328 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1026)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-10-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0310.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-11-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0311.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-29-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0347.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_043044_TTUQ2b1x1_1783729_0E5jvqA4/wcs_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52905.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52924.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52927.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54817.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54921.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54922.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54944.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out54999.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55012.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55023.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55073.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55095.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55138.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55160.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54823.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52905_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52905_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:13.51 +56:14:48.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52917_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:49:04.76 +56:10:06.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.787 1427519383979233920 252.26973238057 +56.16789558837 14.9645 14.4932 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52919_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:09.45 +54:13:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.851 1420095172231015296 256.04064310949 +54.22320120783 14.7387 14.2363 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.851#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52924_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:05.58 +51:05:33.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52927_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:00.39 +56:44:11.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.845 1420807965003244288 261.50202550985 +56.73658238602 13.6123 13.1028 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.845#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52930_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 52930_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:17.69 +55:47:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 53736_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:48.16 +55:40:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53994_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 53994_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:31:14.06 +57:23:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54129_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:45.92 +51:52:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54414_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:41.53 +50:16:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54662_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54662_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:20.50 +52:54:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54748_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54748_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:27.26 +49:41:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54805_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54805_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:38.75 +55:23:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54817_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:26.66 +49:44:34.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.930 1423502112088897664 244.11051159103 +49.74336050403 14.7604 14.2561 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.930#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54823_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
Preparing report for the candidate 54823_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54868_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:14.20 +49:57:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54885_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54885_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:36.18 +54:37:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54896_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54896_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:38.64 +55:13:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:10.81 +56:42:17.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.961 1621909844314553216 243.79375516798 +56.70525475385 14.5750 13.6295 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.961#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54922_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54922_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:36.98 +50:56:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.592 1423833065089520512 247.40294656595 +50.95001831347 14.8288 14.0648 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.592#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54932_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54932_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:03.34 +54:35:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54944_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54944_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:34.98 +55:47:58.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.126 1429668654333726080 243.64420854896 +55.80038929907 14.9412 14.4237 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.126#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54959_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54959_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:36.57 +55:29:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54973_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54973_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:50.10 +56:28:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54974_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54974_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:09.68 +57:25:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54982_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54982_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:05:10.35 +50:23:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54985_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54985_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:18.11 +49:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54994_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54994_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.41 +50:11:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54999_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 54999_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:14:33.12 +50:22:49.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.590 1414632970263231232 258.63735642708 +50.38017032537 14.3298 13.7333 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.590#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55004_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:28.79 +54:38:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55012_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55012_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:35:00.70 +56:00:30.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.068 1430129796382740224 248.75190836266 +56.00847348330 14.7670 14.1679 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.068#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55023_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55023_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:17.58 +52:21:27.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.210 1413545484543508608 251.82280066098 +52.35788864018 14.3280 13.2098 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.210#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55053_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55053_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:24:36.89 +55:53:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55073_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55073_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:12:16.87 +50:55:36.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.357 1415467533948148224 258.07092007890 +50.92732699387 14.5540 13.8505 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.357#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55095_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55095_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:23.25 +56:34:41.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.172 1432797933145796736 258.34645743809 +56.57828611109 14.4840 13.3751 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.172#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55138_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55138_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:54.50 +51:48:48.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.507 1418662920896771328 256.72642779410 +51.81345105989 14.6892 14.1182 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.507#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55160_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55160_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:13:16.09 +51:50:47.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.327 1415710148060907648 258.31631471034 +51.84685370668 14.8207 14.3337 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.327#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55164_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 55164_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:22.69 +51:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 17921_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:15.12 +53:11:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14870_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348
The candidate 14870_fd_Dra-10-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_04-30-02_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0348 did not pass the final checks