NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-12-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 17.37089    2461147.87089    13.62    10:52:33.15 +36:37:39.4   4992 4064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.68    10:52:33.43 +36:37:42.7   4993 4063   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 17.3712  2461147.8712  13.65  10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0
184.74911  63.16744 galactic  LMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 1.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 04 17.37089    2461147.87089    14.66    11:09:08.39 +39:31:31.2   3189 2153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.46    11:09:08.46 +39:31:30.8   3190 2153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 04 17.3712  2461147.8712  14.56  11:09:08.42 +39:31:31.0
176.12679  65.42604 galactic  UMa  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 1.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1252 Celestia                -1     -0       1  14.4    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-12-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-12-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-12-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 415048 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 415048 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits_preview.png'
UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits

renamed 'UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits_preview.png'
UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 445.5529 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 550.9869 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 960.8474 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 457.3240 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 961.2034 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 457.3546 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.15653 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-17T03:53:54.6259073' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-17T08:53:54.6259073' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61147.3707711226 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-17T08:54:04.5267700' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61147.3708857177 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 163.6357070166 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.000065719947 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.1258333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 296.874444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.87592360920193 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-12' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 54 33' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 86.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/d_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits :) Spent 0.619917 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/d_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-17T03:54:47.9714620' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-17T08:54:47.9714620' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61147.3713885532 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-17T08:54:57.8758621' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61147.3715031827 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 163.635707064002 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000656920402 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.9647222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 296.943888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.88431137712822 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-12' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 54 33' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29458 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 19.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 86.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.5 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 18.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 15.50124 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/d_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) Spent 0.622922 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/d_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits


fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.87088686 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 Second-epoch image center 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 Second-epoch image center 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 Second-epoch second image center 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NdtisQS1Bt Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ThNBELPJHK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ViKrysW0vj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NMKkNamGJj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6872 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.1823 to 174.3878 deg, Dec +32.2121 to +43.3157 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.1823 to 174.3878 deg, Dec 32.2121 to 43.3157 deg Loaded 4456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3229 out of 3396 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3396 out of 6872 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.971334 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.971334 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.58
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 2.0 pix UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.NdtisQS1Bt (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=451, passed=6872 Got 6872 stars (including 6414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6872 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6785 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6785 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6785 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ThNBELPJHK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, passed=6783 Got 6783 stars (including 6309 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6783 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6703 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6701 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ViKrysW0vj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=256, passed=4502 Got 4502 stars (including 4242 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4502 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4422 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4422 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4422 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NMKkNamGJj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=265, passed=4484 Got 4484 stars (including 4215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4484 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4403 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4404 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4404 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-12-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20336.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20336_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 20336_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.70    10:35:21.48 +43:17:46.0   7155 0120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:35:21.47 +43:17:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.187 828837432969473792 158.83951863418 +43.29613891417 11.5727 11.0927 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.187#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-12-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 Second-epoch image center 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0564 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:54:32.866 +38:00:16.51 Second-epoch image center 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0582 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:54:45.047 +38:02:39.58 Second-epoch second image center 10:54:45.767 +38:02:40.21 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00237 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E0F9gkdRdw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6GeJBGcY5n Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Rt7OS0cW4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Et5xk9WJ2V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits and wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 34090 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 153.1514 to 174.4792 deg, Dec +32.2087 to +43.3262 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 153.1514 to 174.4792 deg, Dec 32.2087 to 43.3262 deg Loaded 4482 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3106 out of 3403 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3403 out of 34090 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.885141 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.885141 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.71
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 1.9 pix UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.7 mag. UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 15.7 mag. UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 15.1 mag. fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.E0F9gkdRdw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1324, passed=34069 Got 34069 stars (including 32681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34069 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33613 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33613 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33613 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits -region wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6GeJBGcY5n (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1361, passed=34274 Got 34274 stars (including 32855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34274 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33857 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits -region wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3Rt7OS0cW4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=776, passed=25493 Got 25493 stars (including 24681 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25493 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25183 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25184 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25184 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Et5xk9WJ2V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=762, passed=25596 Got 25596 stars (including 24794 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25596 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25335 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 669 (Dec 31.9 to 43.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25335 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25335 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-39-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0638.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-40-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0639.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-53-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0245.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/wcs_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-12-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52412.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52463.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52749.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out52739.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52392.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52879.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52387_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52387_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.40    10:39:07.25 +36:31:06.3   6613 4209   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:39:07.21 +36:31:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52388_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52388_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.77    10:59:56.20 +39:57:26.0   4277 2000   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:59:56.20 +39:57:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 Preparing report for the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52396_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52396_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.15    10:22:35.36 +36:10:19.9   8636 4440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:22:35.35 +36:10:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52412_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52412_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    10.27    10:38:27.16 +43:18:26.6   6813 0107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:38:27.17 +43:18:26.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.316 780810661978238208 159.61311715367 +43.30730350413 10.0616 9.4020 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.316#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52436_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52436_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.25    11:19:25.87 +32:25:12.0   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52443_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52443_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.41    11:28:34.69 +33:12:05.6   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52451_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52451_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.52    10:47:30.85 +40:36:17.3   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52463_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52463_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.69    10:35:21.49 +43:17:46.0   7155 0120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:35:21.48 +43:17:46.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.111 828837432969473792 158.83951863418 +43.29613891417 11.5727 11.0927 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.111#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52469_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52469_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.75    10:26:05.67 +41:03:59.7   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52481_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52481_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    11.99    10:49:42.37 +34:09:58.2   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52483_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52483_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.11    10:57:18.68 +33:32:02.9   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52486_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52486_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.17    10:54:52.69 +42:50:53.7   4985 0302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:54:52.69 +42:50:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52491_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52491_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.25    10:56:41.74 +43:08:16.7   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52510_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52510_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.53    11:21:00.55 +35:47:08.5   1492 4215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52518_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52518_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.65    11:06:29.32 +41:53:11.9   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52519_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52519_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.48    10:32:39.18 +38:01:46.4   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52520_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52520_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.71    11:20:23.11 +41:09:38.9   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52525_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52525_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    12.71    11:24:16.66 +37:28:13.0   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.28    10:26:09.87 +39:10:21.5   8185 2625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:26:09.82 +39:10:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52583_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52583_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.27    10:54:09.03 +43:10:22.5   5079 0110   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:54:08.99 +43:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52596_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52596_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.48    10:59:30.79 +40:27:54.8   4352 1698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:59:30.85 +40:27:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52605_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52605_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.42    11:34:56.80 +42:09:39.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52616_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52616_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.47    11:01:41.95 +34:57:17.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52627_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52627_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.66    11:05:23.02 +41:15:51.4   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52632_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52632_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.51    10:22:33.97 +41:18:05.8   8593 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52634_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52634_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.37    10:41:28.26 +35:48:06.6   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52636_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52636_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.85    10:36:22.28 +42:30:48.5   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52642_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52642_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.67    10:45:59.14 +39:30:05.1   5869 2381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:45:59.11 +39:30:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52643_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52643_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.56    11:29:32.52 +36:09:04.6   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52666_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52666_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.76    10:40:54.17 +41:31:16.9   6503 1185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:40:54.13 +41:31:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52682_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52682_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.87    10:44:24.46 +42:05:04.0   6122 0830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:44:24.46 +42:05:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52695_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52695_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.81    10:18:28.39 +37:15:31.4   9128 3771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:18:28.43 +37:15:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52699_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52699_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.09    11:26:47.35 +40:05:01.7   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52708_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52708_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.87    11:04:20.06 +38:50:45.6   3707 2619   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 11:04:20.01 +38:50:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52710_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52710_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.25    11:33:21.17 +39:17:47.6   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52724_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52724_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.08    11:34:00.42 +37:56:35.2   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52727_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52727_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.03    10:30:39.04 +42:45:32.4   7674 0450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:30:39.08 +42:45:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52739_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52739_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.10    10:44:43.23 +38:18:36.3   5984 3104   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:44:43.26 +38:18:35.8 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.11, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.09) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52749_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52749_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.05    11:00:27.20 +34:27:07.2   3928 5300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 11:00:27.24 +34:27:04.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.09, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.07)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.045 761501760325174912 165.11324631642 +34.45045829917 14.2182 13.5801 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.045#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52761_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52761_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    13.95    11:07:51.22 +41:16:34.4   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52784_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52784_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.08    11:30:07.70 +34:35:42.7   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52787_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52787_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.24    10:48:00.58 +38:02:40.3   5587 3245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52793_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52793_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.04    10:46:47.34 +40:23:42.7   5803 1838   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:46:47.38 +40:23:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52795_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52795_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.24    11:07:49.43 +35:30:26.9   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52804_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52804_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.21    11:31:25.22 +35:22:52.1   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52808_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52808_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.39    11:27:36.84 +38:26:12.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52813_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52813_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.60    11:29:47.90 +35:04:46.0   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52815_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52815_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.54    11:10:29.88 +41:51:07.6   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52818_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52818_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.68    11:03:14.08 +37:46:15.0   3773 3276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 11:03:14.05 +37:46:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52822_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52822_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.03    10:51:00.82 +40:57:45.7   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52828_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52828_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.49    11:25:11.83 +33:37:31.6   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52835_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52835_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.38    10:22:42.38 +40:38:34.7   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52857_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52857_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.31    10:33:32.26 +37:55:15.7   7304 3378   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits **** FOUND 10:33:32.31 +37:55:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52859_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52859_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.37    11:17:10.72 +36:42:50.1   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.10    10:25:57.31 +36:59:01.7   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52872_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52872_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.55    10:32:30.37 +40:57:10.2   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52877_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52877_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.12    10:18:22.14 +37:42:43.5   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52879_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 Preparing report for the candidate 52879_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52883_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52883_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.49    10:50:05.13 +42:59:36.0   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52888_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52888_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.63    11:35:19.79 +39:55:39.3   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52891_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52891_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.59    10:23:20.91 +42:03:00.4   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52896_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52896_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.83    11:03:47.98 +33:13:45.7   3441 6001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52901_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52901_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.81    11:29:02.85 +42:20:23.0   1158 0136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52909_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52909_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.75    11:23:26.38 +38:03:11.3   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52913_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52913_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.38    10:18:55.41 +36:43:04.2   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52917_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52917_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.71    11:28:17.94 +37:08:21.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52924_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52924_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.82    11:33:29.70 +38:49:01.4   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52925_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52925_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.89    11:06:06.22 +40:46:52.5   3619 1437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52948_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52948_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.93    10:49:40.51 +34:57:57.1   5282 5086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52949_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52949_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.83    11:06:19.04 +33:47:09.2   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52951_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.88    10:32:44.90 +40:34:04.2   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52952_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52952_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.78    10:48:39.80 +42:57:53.3   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52954_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 The candidate 52954_fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 04 17.37150    2461147.87150    14.88    11:09:02.64 +33:51:50.1   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_035552_TTUQ1b1x1_2462884_7SicHByc/fd_UMa-12-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_03-54-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0246.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-12-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 11:09:08.42 +39:31:31.0 ########### Completed UMa-12-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 11:09:08.42 +39:31:31.0 ################################################################################### 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) 11:09:08.42 +39:31:31.0 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_apass.txt IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:52:33.29 +36:37:41.0 10:35:21.47 +43:17:46.0 10:38:27.17 +43:18:26.5 10:35:21.48 +43:17:46.0 11:00:27.24 +34:27:04.6 10:44:43.26 +38:18:35.8 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461147.87088686 -observatory V36 00:14:37.68 -01:17:06.5 Mercury (-0.0mag) 03:15:22.31 +18:21:49.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:21:44.26 +01:17:33.9 Mars (1.2mag) 07:13:15.77 +22:45:10.6 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:29:47.49 +00:52:46.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:47:59.24 +19:48:24.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:11:01.14 -00:14:14.9 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:48.78 -22:52:40.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:29:56.52 +12:37:35.6 Moon (99.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 17 04:00 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461147.87088686: 07:13:08.25 +22:45:25.8 Io (5.8mag) 07:13:22.14 +22:44:54.3 Europa (5.9mag) 07:13:14.21 +22:45:06.6 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:13:47.62 +22:44:00.8 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:16:32.36 +22:32:10.4 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:13:17.58 +22:45:04.4 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:16:45.47 +23:02:26.7 Elara (17.3mag) 07:12:14.28 +23:24:27.9 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:21:33.64 +22:43:19.8 Carme (18.5mag) 00:29:43.14 +00:53:14.3 Titan (8.8mag) 00:29:52.85 +00:52:46.5 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:29:25.28 +00:52:42.7 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:29:50.64 +00:53:12.0 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:31:23.29 +01:01:25.7 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 17 04:00 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461147.87088686: 15:43:33.31 -17:14:45.9 JWST 17:56:42.24 +36:01:46.0 Chandra 19:09:49.02 -08:02:23.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 17 04:00 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461147.87088686 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:52:32.38 -28:51:38.2 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:07:43.80 -69:35:51.1 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:32:44.93 +31:26:48.3 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:17.32 +10:42:33.7 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:10:34.91 +29:17:02.4 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:30:50.37 +26:04:30.5 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:43.73 +32:01:27.0 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:31:17.69 -00:00:33.8 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:53:23.57 +18:38:49.1 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:40:13.25 -11:30:05.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:07:01.14 -11:39:55.1 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:55:34.06 +62:59:16.8 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:17:58.60 -03:45:23.1 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:29:26.85 +86:06:10.5 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:18:34.12 +63:30:26.4 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:16:11.45 +18:45:09.2 11.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:18:22.88 +06:36:53.1 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:21:10.83 +15:38:55.9 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:27:36.39 -22:10:41.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:17:53.06 +44:57:12.6 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:33:09.18 +46:20:31.2 15.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:27:27.76 -26:25:39.7 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 23:56:50.13 +18:03:02.2 8.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:53:31.53 +03:05:42.4 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:38:39.66 +02:29:02.7 13.7mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:03:26.64 +37:28:02.2 14.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:45:36.13 -09:38:43.6 11.8mag 10P/Tempel 14:58:25.88 +03:03:47.3 14.1mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:02:26.75 -01:28:58.0 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 18:01:19.04 -09:33:39.3 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala 10:37:31.97 -03:59:32.8 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:50:47.97 +17:43:13.6 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:13:18.73 +36:42:58.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:30:47.99 -11:17:13.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:06:56.11 +21:43:15.6 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:08:36.91 +08:29:50.4 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels 23:07:08.12 -08:59:08.0 14.6mag 88P/Howell 02:14:18.03 +21:00:17.0 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:57:24.49 +32:21:33.0 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:30:00.20 +37:43:41.7 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:35:20.49 +14:31:19.5 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:50:13.95 +14:39:31.7 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:33:24.43 +13:42:10.2 10.6mag 141P/Machholz 01:42:08.08 +05:23:12.5 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:26:47.62 +01:15:02.1 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:12:33.76 +07:08:47.0 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:06:12.70 -00:50:06.3 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:48:59.81 +00:04:08.5 17.7mag 210P/Christensen 21:42:46.22 -11:07:09.5 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR 17:16:51.79 -13:46:04.3 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:37:27.29 +34:47:56.7 16.8mag 240P/NEAT 07:39:10.97 -05:01:14.5 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 22:20:20.41 -20:36:41.3 17.8mag 260P/McNaught 02:00:59.98 +20:48:15.0 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR 15:42:05.75 +07:04:46.3 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:34:44.22 +21:22:09.7 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:37:52.96 +44:57:07.9 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 17 04:00 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 2026-04-14.4 15.15 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 17 04:00 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 17 04:00 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 05:01:51.299 -18:28:54.90 AT 2026jdi 2026-04-10.03 18.777 08:39:10.564 +29:27:51.25 AT 2026jdh 2026-04-05.92 20.076 05:16:07.663 -51:55:24.28 AT 2026jdg 2026-04-09.01 18.932 16:24:20.167 -77:47:22.20 AT 2026jdf 2026-04-06.30 18.759 10:54:01.893 -46:24:49.75 AT 2026jde 2026-04-08.14 18.941 04:46:52.721 -52:39:36.18 AT 2026jdd 2026-04-09.76 19.48 14:22:01.413 -44:48:30.56 AT 2026jdc 2026-04-06.32 18.535 11:00:58.810 +13:03:06.37 AT 2026jdb 2026-04-04.40 18.483 21:44:44.073 -57:47:11.39 AT 2026jda 2026-04-08.34 18.227 07:51:17.046 -84:48:42.24 AT 2026jcz 2026-04-09.12 18.768 09:06:56.603 -64:55:52.46 AT 2026jcy 2026-04-09.11 18.906 08:27:06.222 -58:50:26.83 AT 2026jcx 2026-04-09.08 19.372 13:48:22.893 -31:10:42.12 AT 2026jcw 2026-04-09.08 19.95 17:39:28.750 +05:01:10.80 AT 2026jcv 2026-04-09.86 16.87 14:44:31.580 +71:55:25.90 AT 2026jcu 2026-04-09.47 17.9 12:39:27.288 -08:14:32.64 AT 2026jct 2026-04-09.53 20.16 14:15:21.948 -35:02:48.79 AT 2026jcs 2026-04-09.59 19.67 12:55:53.000 +08:04:22.00 AT 2026jcr 2026-04-09.62 22.1051 12:29:42.630 -28:00:38.18 AT 2026jcq 2026-04-09.56 18.99 13:00:14.826 -06:35:50.60 AT 2026jcp 2026-04-09.56 19.7 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 17 04:00 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 92 C