This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J173452-1958.6,2461147.8223,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J173452-1958.6 20260417.3223 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J175006.14-203115.6,2461147.8223,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J175006.14-203115.6 20260417.3223 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.8223,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.3223 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180311.66-200510.7,2461147.8223,12.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180311.66-200510.7 20260417.3223 12.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174327.53-212525.9,2461147.8223,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174327.53-212525.9 20260417.3223 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175556-1727.9,2461147.8223,10.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175556-1727.9 20260417.3223 10.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175734-1932.3,2461147.8223,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175734-1932.3 20260417.3223 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J180508.33-211335.1,2461147.8223,11.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J180508.33-211335.1 20260417.3223 11.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V2989 Oph,2461147.8223,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V2989 Oph 20260417.3223 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J269.8417-20.3795,2461147.8223,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J269.8417-20.3795 20260417.3223 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4120481981865473664,2461147.8223,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4120481981865473664 20260417.3223 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J175123.36-175412.4,2461147.8223,13.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J175123.36-175412.4 20260417.3223 13.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174404.17-191302.2,2461147.8223,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174404.17-191302.2 20260417.3223 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J175919-2126.2,2461147.8223,9.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J175919-2126.2 20260417.3223 9.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174020.19-191802.7,2461147.8223,13.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174020.19-191802.7 20260417.3223 13.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4119121512397882880,2461147.8223,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4119121512397882880 20260417.3223 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J174702.78-213617.5,2461147.8223,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J174702.78-213617.5 20260417.3223 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4123983342279793920,2461147.8223,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4123983342279793920 20260417.3223 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461147.82272350 17.04.2026 07:44:33.310 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8864
Objects passed selection criteria: 8844
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7761.25
Average stars matched: 7567.5 (97.5036 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 02:58:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
First image: 2461099.00589001 27.02.2026 12:08:18.897 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Last image: 2461147.82272350 17.04.2026 07:44:33.310 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 321
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 125827
Objects passed selection criteria: 125528
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 103296
Average stars matched: 98619.8 (95.4734 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1903452 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 03:01:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.82195066
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 937.9'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1323 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01341 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9pudrqnuGF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iRe2z7PLkv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g5pOZq4U3E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WKsaB8VvDl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0365 to 275.0296 deg, Dec -23.3066 to -12.5656 deg
Loaded 14544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9713 out of 10414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10414 out of 15752 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846952
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846952
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.62
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.8 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.9pudrqnuGF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1456, passed=15752
Got 15752 stars (including 14271 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15752 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iRe2z7PLkv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1474, passed=15602
Got 15602 stars (including 14101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14410 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14411 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g5pOZq4U3E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=586, passed=8064
Got 8064 stars (including 7469 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.90"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.92"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.94"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.06"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WKsaB8VvDl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=614, passed=8245
Got 8245 stars (including 7623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.88"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.91"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.04"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20663.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20757.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20663_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20663_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:28.62 -15:17:33.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.780 4145277687058250752 270.61903298380 -15.29272308397 10.2225 9.2863 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.780#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:37.96 -17:56:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20735_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20735_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.77 -14:56:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20740_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20740_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:39.70 -17:48:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20748_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20748_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:00.64 -15:16:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 20757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:28.96 -19:16:34.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.823 4121747695897972224 262.36991350908 -19.27557224393 11.4129 10.5539 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.823#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1451 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:46:18.174 -18:00:45.70
Second-epoch image center 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1323 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:46:54.377 -18:02:04.58
Second-epoch second image center 17:46:51.322 -18:01:43.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01341 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wqkOcXcpOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RJLG1IFKXR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SYwIS4ShaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OTJsc4GZBW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits and wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 179796 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.0045 to 275.0499 deg, Dec -23.3098 to -12.5486 deg
Loaded 14601 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9967 out of 12785 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12785 out of 179796 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.613163
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.613163
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.74
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 200 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.5 pix fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.7 mag. Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.wqkOcXcpOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=17851, passed=179768
Got 179768 stars (including 161620 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 179768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 919 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 169691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 919 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RJLG1IFKXR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=17987, passed=181054
Got 181054 stars (including 162799 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 181054 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168414 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 168413 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 921 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SYwIS4ShaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=7111, passed=77065
Got 77065 stars (including 69867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75724 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75725 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.83"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1003)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OTJsc4GZBW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=7341, passed=79277
Got 79277 stars (including 71857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79277 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 77877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.82"
Excluding outliers - 917 stars left (next iteration limit 1008)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-08-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-27_06-09-19_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-43-26_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_024514_TTUQ2b1x1_916295_h1nNgVZl/wcs_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out137137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out196601.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207373.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207378.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207407.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207419.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207423.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207426.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207434.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207442.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207451.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out207476.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out208032.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out208108.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out208145.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out208156.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out208174.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out49961.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out86018.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106153.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22645.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25837.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41018.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45429.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46576.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53704.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80424.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83193.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out87164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out98517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207373_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207373_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:17.50 -16:54:57.9 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207376_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207376_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207378_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:25.45 -17:28:22.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.648 4123533985618886528 264.60623009158 -17.47299314915 13.1032 12.0933 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.648#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207379_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207379_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207392_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:18.35 -16:03:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207407_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207407_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:48.00 -16:09:46.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.901 4124658309325209984 263.45017983861 -16.16318092482 13.0250 11.9028 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.901#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207411_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207411_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:03.21 -15:20:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207412_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207412_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:21.04 -18:57:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207419_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207419_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:16.27 -14:09:35.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.21)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207423_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207423_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:40.79 -13:46:51.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.521 4147198744343270400 271.16999934120 -13.78150389568 12.7021 11.9822 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.521#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207426_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207426_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:19.15 -22:10:07.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.533 4069560334201722112 270.07838236081 -22.16791036857 12.1631 11.3430 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.533#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207427_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207427_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:12.79 -15:19:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207430_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207430_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:37.33 -15:23:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207434_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207434_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:11.94 -19:20:39.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.849 4095324949655881216 271.30081808589 -19.34452379902 12.0818 11.2344 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.849#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207439_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207439_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:31.38 -21:36:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207442_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207442_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:15.53 -20:23:08.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.388 4094919710903202560 271.31436812471 -20.38417649085 12.2478 11.5559 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.388#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207446_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207446_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207447_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207447_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:50.85 -14:07:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207449_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207449_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:42.66 -16:14:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207451_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207451_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:36.26 -15:31:57.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.61)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207453_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207453_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:58.32 -13:47:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207455_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207455_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:37.84 -13:45:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207456_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207456_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207457_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207457_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:40.42 -17:26:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207461_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207461_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:52:17.28 -18:04:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207469_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207469_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207474_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207474_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:59.73 -21:57:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207476_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207476_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:28.59 -15:17:33.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.334 4145277687058250752 270.61903298380 -15.29272308397 10.2225 9.2863 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.334#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207550_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207550_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:26.69 -15:24:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207558_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207558_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.70 -16:44:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207566_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207566_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:30.67 -16:24:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207576_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207576_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:59.53 -17:21:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207606_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207606_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:59.46 -14:03:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207615_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207615_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:00.68 -18:23:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207636_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207636_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:56.94 -15:44:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207667_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207667_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:14.50 -14:20:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207671_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207671_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:03.27 -18:32:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207708_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207708_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:57.87 -14:45:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:55.87 -15:21:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207735_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207735_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:14.61 -18:35:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207737_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207737_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:25.64 -16:13:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207743_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207743_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:32.90 -20:22:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207747_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207747_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:09.50 -20:29:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207756_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207756_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:37.64 -16:00:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207757_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:10.38 -20:13:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207761_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207761_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:39.18 -14:42:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207779_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207779_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.44 -14:39:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207806_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207806_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:39.59 -19:31:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207809_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207809_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:06.05 -13:57:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:10.33 -15:43:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207850_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207850_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:33.96 -19:44:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207859_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207859_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:49.47 -14:16:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207868_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207868_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:38.23 -14:37:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207881_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207881_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:25.99 -15:09:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:56.65 -19:10:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207892_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207892_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:19.87 -14:59:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207902_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207902_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:51.73 -15:50:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207905_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207905_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:01.13 -15:31:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207941_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207941_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:01.00 -15:21:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207964_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207964_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:45.11 -17:43:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207968_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207968_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:28.36 -18:57:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207975_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207975_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:53.98 -14:31:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207977_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207977_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:00.70 -20:28:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207992_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207992_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207995_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 207995_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:34.43 -19:42:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208009_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208009_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:55.88 -15:23:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208011_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208011_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:04.04 -19:43:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:16.26 -15:05:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208031_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208031_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:16.21 -17:20:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208032_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208032_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:33.99 -19:52:41.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.336 4119783482736397056 265.89182519383 -19.87784697819 13.6171 11.5930 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.336#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208035_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208035_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:45.68 -15:48:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:01.62 -19:13:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208056_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208056_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:15.75 -19:06:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208057_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208057_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:56.74 -22:16:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208059_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208059_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:14.09 -19:12:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208061_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208061_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:50.65 -16:21:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208063_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208063_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:27.49 -14:27:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208074_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208074_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:43.60 -20:58:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208089_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208089_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:40.53 -15:16:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208096_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208096_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:33.92 -22:13:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208101_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208101_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:20.96 -17:36:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208105_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208105_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:25.44 -21:02:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208106_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208106_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:34.33 -18:07:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208108_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208108_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:46.47 -17:52:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.385 4120630317255137280 266.69429914399 -17.87445157058 12.7180 11.5236 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.385#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208122_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208122_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:14.67 -18:38:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208123_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208123_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:54.16 -15:21:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208128_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208128_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:44.40 -17:15:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208134_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208134_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:26:31.91 -15:08:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208141_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208141_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:15.48 -21:03:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208142_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208142_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:53.29 -20:18:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208145_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208145_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:15.03 -17:54:58.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.266 4134887684459978624 260.06179446560 -17.91661240175 13.5630 11.3585 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.266#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208146_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208146_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:16.92 -14:02:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208156_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208156_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:00.08 -19:42:31.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.890 4122085211582097536 260.74979481676 -19.70888627408 13.5359 11.6088 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.890#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208158_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208158_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:40:56.90 -19:56:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208159_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208159_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:33.12 -21:10:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208163_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208163_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:49:28.68 -16:57:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208166_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208166_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:34.76 -15:03:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208167_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208167_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:01.95 -16:36:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208174_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208174_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:47.15 -14:13:30.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.826 4137549941374428544 262.94677577838 -14.22450015515 12.7788 11.3491 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.826#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:47.22 -16:06:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208177_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208177_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:28.02 -18:35:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208178_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208178_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.85 -18:35:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208183_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208183_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:12.10 -19:23:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208188_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208188_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:32.58 -15:26:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208205_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208205_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:02.17 -21:05:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208221_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 208221_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:32.24 -14:06:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46576_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 46576_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38865_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 38865_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 142858_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:09.49 -15:34:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 86018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:17.00 -17:55:38.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.887 4123478361586918272 264.57066587191 -17.92752112721 10.6185 9.2465 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.887#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16586_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 16586_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:57.58 -22:01:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175538_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 175538_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:59.76 -14:39:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 162656_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:46:30.51 -13:45:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56976_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 56976_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:02.76 -19:20:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79146_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 79146_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190960_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 190960_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:56.10 -19:19:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 85879_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:14.94 -17:56:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191157_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 191157_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.16 -20:57:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191654_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 191654_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:38.59 -22:12:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191710_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 191710_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:09.57 -20:47:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137137_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 137137_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:24.82 -15:18:21.6 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.78)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 49659_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:39.69 -19:39:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45429_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 45429_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23872_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 23872_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:51.30 -21:30:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 175775_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.22 -14:38:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170828_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 170828_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:41.99 -14:22:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 170707_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:27.19 -14:22:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25107_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 25107_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98517_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 98517_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 53704_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200172_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 200172_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:22.19 -14:12:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177723_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 177723_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:31.89 -14:54:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 206047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 206047_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:44.04 -18:54:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27872_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 27872_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80424_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 80424_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95175_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 95175_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:24.91 -17:31:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63307_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 63307_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 41018_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49961_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 49961_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:27.72 -19:46:15.4 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.11)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130409_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 130409_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:42.18 -14:14:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44393_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 44393_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:05.89 -20:06:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 169548_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:45.56 -14:08:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 25679_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:58.11 -21:11:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146870_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 146870_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:22.98 -15:40:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83193_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 83193_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 44480_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:49.41 -19:58:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 149124_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:02.95 -15:52:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125524_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 125524_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:45:48.00 -16:07:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 191635_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:59:33.76 -18:31:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73233_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 73233_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:28.38 -18:28:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 53720_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:50.00 -19:27:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 191478_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:14.71 -21:44:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 146470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 146470_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:17.04 -15:45:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111310_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 111310_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:48:11.31 -16:47:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 136842_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:00.58 -15:16:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87164_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 87164_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58754_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 58754_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 197176_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:17.04 -16:53:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 178698_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:10.71 -14:56:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 25837_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113772_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 113772_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:41:12.57 -16:39:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32855_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 32855_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:49.33 -20:51:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 21013_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:53.00 -21:36:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15441_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 15441_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:39.33 -22:07:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 120701_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:42:00.34 -16:20:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 197021_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:42.30 -14:55:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 137883_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:05.09 -15:20:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164079_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 164079_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:51:56.08 -13:52:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14743_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 14743_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:03:41.54 -22:10:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196601_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 196601_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:11.50 -20:34:33.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.596 4118926138545631360 266.04868277781 -20.57598143125 12.2810 10.7665 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.596#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55097_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 55097_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:40.90 -19:22:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132539_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 132539_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:02:04.51 -15:03:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135064_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 135064_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:44:11.21 -15:09:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 121494_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:54.62 -16:18:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49619_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 49619_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:07.85 -19:36:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27789_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 27789_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:15.95 -21:14:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56970_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 56970_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25354_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 25354_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:24.21 -21:23:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 90291_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:56.35 -17:40:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 33957_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:59.03 -20:38:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41601_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 41601_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113067_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 113067_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:20.54 -16:41:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108346_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 108346_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:18:33.03 -16:45:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105300_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 105300_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:00:26.72 -17:04:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 136162_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:47.19 -15:06:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137785_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 137785_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:53:09.82 -15:19:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22645_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 22645_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34518_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 34518_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:09.97 -20:47:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 137734_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:11.64 -15:20:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194605_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 194605_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:29.45 -14:52:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 81673_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:50:25.57 -18:10:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46305_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 46305_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:57:45.97 -20:01:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142924_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 142924_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:24:20.12 -15:27:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
Preparing report for the candidate 106153_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 81568_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:59.32 -18:06:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 70901_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:39.70 -18:34:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22418_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 22418_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:54:50.80 -21:37:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63043_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 63043_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:51.32 -18:49:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23131_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 23131_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:25.81 -21:40:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43980_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266
The candidate 43980_fd_Sgr-01-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-44-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0266 did not pass the final checks
