This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0840 Aql,2461147.8050,8.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0840 Aql 20260417.3050 8.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J279.1200+10.0472,2461147.8050,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J279.1200+10.0472 20260417.3050 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1112 Oph,2461147.8050,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1112 Oph 20260417.3050 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 45 11.47 +05 47 37.9 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 13912151,2461147.8050,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 13912151 20260417.3050 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1614 Aql,2461147.8050,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1614 Aql 20260417.3050 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1902406+021201,2461147.8050,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1902406+021201 20260417.3050 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 53 43.48 +04 06 13.2 12.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4281092185112572928,2461147.8050,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4281092185112572928 20260417.3050 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 45 18.23 +04 16 07.8 10.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BX Ser,2461147.8050,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BX Ser 20260417.3050 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GSC 04660-00195,2461147.8050,12.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GSC 04660-00195 20260417.3050 12.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 14029043,2461147.8050,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 14029043 20260417.3050 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 35 10.16 +04 40 40.5 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1835102+044041,2461147.8050,12.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1835102+044041 20260417.3050 12.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J190532.39+030935.2,2461147.8050,12.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J190532.39+030935.2 20260417.3050 12.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 39 53.98 +04 26 47.8 13.0 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DH Ser,2461147.8050,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DH Ser 20260417.3050 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J190343+0150.8,2461147.8050,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J190343+0150.8 20260417.3050 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.3050* 18 57 34.89 +03 31 01.0 13.2 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J185734.88+033058.5,2461147.8050,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J185734.88+033058.5 20260417.3050 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
First image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Last image: 2461147.80527222 17.04.2026 07:19:25.520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12484
Objects passed selection criteria: 12475
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11216.8
Average stars matched: 11010.2 (98.159 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 118700 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 02:23:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
First image: 2461121.89388564 22.03.2026 09:27:01.719 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Last image: 2461147.80527222 17.04.2026 07:19:25.520 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 201
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 57 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 111505
Objects passed selection criteria: 111341
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 97617
Average stars matched: 94136.5 (96.4345 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1893144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 02:25:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.80476736
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1137 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00395 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5A0nTTQ3sy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DeQqpqSl6L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.byKKSKgjXl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bIP7LHjnyd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17031 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.8858 to 290.8648 deg, Dec +0.6585 to +11.3165 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.8858 to 290.8648 deg, Dec 0.6585 to 11.3165 deg
Loaded 13648 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10048 out of 10700 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10700 out of 17031 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810355
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810355
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.79
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
2.6 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
14.8 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5A0nTTQ3sy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1444, passed=17031
Got 17031 stars (including 15563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17031 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DeQqpqSl6L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1468, passed=16916
Got 16916 stars (including 15414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.byKKSKgjXl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=741, passed=10826
Got 10826 stars (including 10080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bIP7LHjnyd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=716, passed=10843
Got 10843 stars (including 10125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20733.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20733_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20733_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:51.45 +06:17:31.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.80, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.78)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.393 4477156411377934080 277.21442932183 +06.29204406540 10.5941 9.2845 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.393#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20735_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20735_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.79 +09:50:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20760_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20760_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:25.94 +04:27:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20765_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:49.26 +10:04:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20771_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:15.28 +09:46:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20778_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20778_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:21.96 +02:01:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20782_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 20782_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:07.79 +04:11:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07866_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 07866_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:57:18.21 +06:41:50.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1137 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:51:43.806 +06:00:37.02
Second-epoch image center 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1098 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:51:16.905 +05:59:15.67
Second-epoch second image center 18:51:17.820 +05:59:19.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00395 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u9rdTGM024
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CFc9aka7xl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YPXgcNbOez
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PSkzO00KbX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits and wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 147350 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 274.8613 to 290.8654 deg, Dec +0.6327 to +11.3181 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 274.8613 to 290.8654 deg, Dec 0.6327 to 11.3181 deg
Loaded 13685 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9356 out of 12073 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12073 out of 147350 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.621929
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.621929
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 146 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
2.0 pix Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
2.5 pix fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
14.9 mag. Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.u9rdTGM024 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=17153, passed=147336
Got 147336 stars (including 129905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 147336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143455 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CFc9aka7xl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=17458, passed=150232
Got 150232 stars (including 132473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 150232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146059 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits -region wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YPXgcNbOez (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=8485, passed=84390
Got 84390 stars (including 75793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PSkzO00KbX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=8427, passed=84272
Got 84272 stars (including 75721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84272 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81736 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.74"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1027)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0267.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-22_04-28-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0268.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-18-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_022014_TTUQ2b1x1_3839246_AVC7xGxL/wcs_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out166014.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169926.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169929.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169953.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out169992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170451.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170503.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170535.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170619.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170642.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170747.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170803.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170832.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170840.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out170850.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out32388.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08434.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169922.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out169946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21439.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22300.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25601.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25796.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27840.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out37729.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40590.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169922_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 169922_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169926_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169926_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:52.65 +09:14:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.376 4479498061936492800 279.46940763138 +09.24346035575 13.8272 12.9661 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.376#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169929_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169929_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:32.08 +07:14:09.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.511 4286500919032707840 280.63325624407 +07.23592592490 13.3388 12.3151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.511#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169946_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 169946_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169952_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169952_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:04.96 +04:10:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169953_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169953_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:40.87 +09:18:22.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169954_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169954_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:00.00 +03:36:23.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169960_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169960_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169964_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169964_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:16.10 +08:13:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169983_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169983_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:27.04 +09:20:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169986_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169986_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:48.02 +08:22:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169988_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169988_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:28.42 +09:23:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169989_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169989_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:44.14 +08:12:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169991_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169991_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:00:32.80 +04:21:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169992_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169992_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:36.55 +07:49:57.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169996_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 169996_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:38.53 +09:46:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170002_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170002_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:59.87 +09:44:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170004_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170004_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:59.28 +06:48:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170016_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170016_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:37.95 +10:05:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170042_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170042_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170048_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170048_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.78 +09:50:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170091_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170091_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:41.49 +09:45:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170107_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170115_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170115_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:25:31.10 +08:01:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170124_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170124_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:32.45 +06:39:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170174_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170174_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170223_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170223_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:33.14 +04:17:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170239_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170239_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:02.92 +09:25:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170246_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170246_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:24.73 +02:29:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170256_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170256_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170261_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170261_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:14.98 +09:59:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170264_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170264_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:24.14 +08:50:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170272_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170272_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:29.80 +09:35:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170290_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170290_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:55.54 +03:56:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170300_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170300_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:21.67 +09:05:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170323_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170323_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:25.58 +08:27:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170325_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170325_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:01.20 +04:37:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170339_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170339_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:18.48 +09:42:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170342_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170342_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170378_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170378_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:29.97 +09:06:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170379_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170379_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:10.33 +09:49:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170405_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170405_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:21.71 +09:41:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170409_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170409_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:51.27 +03:00:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170410_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170410_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:19.96 +08:15:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170411_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170411_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.29 +09:02:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170418_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170418_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:02.74 +07:42:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170421_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170421_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:55.94 +09:09:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170426_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170426_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:53.30 +06:01:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170431_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170431_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:51.27 +07:49:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170436_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170436_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:23.03 +10:01:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170451_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170451_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:03.16 +03:54:37.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.518 4284062137834369280 277.26236993822 +03.91136016307 13.5427 12.5914 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.518#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170452_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170452_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:07.32 +09:41:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170476_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170476_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:52.36 +07:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170477_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170477_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:57.25 +05:41:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170481_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170481_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:15.57 +05:25:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170482_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170482_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:25.41 +05:12:56.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170486_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170486_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:49.97 +05:12:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170489_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170489_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:23.81 +05:12:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170493_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170493_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:09.03 +09:58:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170499_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170499_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:17.07 +08:57:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170503_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170503_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:37:23.43 +09:16:19.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.514 4479686417699084160 279.34723834424 +09.27135947406 13.9282 13.3050 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.514#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170506_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170506_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:42.32 +07:00:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170512_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170512_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:10.59 +07:29:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170524_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170524_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:42.51 +07:06:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170535_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170535_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:18.42 +03:40:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.54, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.52)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.573 4283303058180588672 277.32524260545 +03.68238397144 12.2062 10.6204 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.573#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170538_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170538_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:46.01 +06:40:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170568_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170568_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:45.81 +05:28:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170577_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170577_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:01.37 +07:23:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170579_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170579_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:50.37 +01:58:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170581_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170581_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:55.72 +06:50:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170585_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170585_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170587_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170587_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:22.06 +08:50:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170588_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170588_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:47.69 +06:52:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170595_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170595_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170603_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170603_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:41.46 +08:10:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170612_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170612_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:34.15 +06:57:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170613_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170613_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:58.06 +09:13:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170616_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170616_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:03.11 +06:37:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170619_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170619_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:21.88 +07:12:55.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.888 4477376073208077952 277.09072478253 +07.21559344345 13.7856 13.1656 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.888#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170621_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170621_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:00.03 +06:19:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170632_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170632_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:41.14 +09:18:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170642_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170642_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:23:39.79 +05:40:41.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.56, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.54)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.866 4476695441145880576 275.91515572527 +05.67927765127 12.9373 11.7196 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.866#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170652_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170652_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:41.08 +03:02:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170661_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170661_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170668_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170668_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:26:00.99 +08:35:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170681_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170681_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:52.15 +09:09:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170684_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170684_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:18.88 +05:47:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170686_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170686_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:34.44 +05:57:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170688_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170688_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:58.79 +10:09:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170706_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170706_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:23.84 +04:45:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170707_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170707_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:24.93 +04:15:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170721_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170721_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:04.84 +03:04:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170728_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170728_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:30.14 +03:12:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:40.95 +09:53:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170747_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170747_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:10.55 +09:11:56.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.016 4310481993506188672 284.29314196704 +09.19936825789 12.5091 10.9867 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.016#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170753_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170753_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:41.61 +02:30:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170765_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170765_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:51.48 +09:34:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170767_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170767_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:22.21 +07:16:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170803_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170803_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:39.89 +05:19:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.836 4284665872793633920 278.66570146882 +05.32587931541 13.9373 12.9988 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.836#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170804_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170804_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:03.45 +04:00:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170832_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170832_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:50.38 +09:58:25.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.102 4480413852028101632 277.45958606981 +09.97318190857 14.0509 13.4960 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.102#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170840_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170840_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:52.39 +06:41:28.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.555 4285086745234059776 278.96816230447 +06.69119254867 13.5336 12.2507 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.555#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170850_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170850_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:03.70 +04:22:51.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.160 4269375544399682688 286.51573582768 +04.38083801805 12.4761 10.8134 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.160#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170861_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170861_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170873_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 170873_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:34:58.64 +05:53:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32430_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 32430_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:13.81 +04:12:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68455_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 68455_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:18.21 +06:41:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32388_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 32388_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:08.77 +04:04:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.673 4281276520809556608 285.78714000347 +04.07411387323 11.5007 9.8160 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.673#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50461_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 50461_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:29:05.31 +05:25:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 25734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:45.57 +03:30:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102279_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 102279_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:49.25 +10:04:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54260_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 54260_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37627_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 37627_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:52.13 +04:31:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126647_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 126647_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:30.20 +09:28:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130690_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 130690_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:35.34 +09:03:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157884_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 157884_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:17.03 +05:01:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102995_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 102995_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:24.72 +09:51:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22300_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 22300_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12932_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 12932_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:10.12 +02:18:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11634_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 11634_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32909_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 32909_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34675_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 34675_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122041_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 122041_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:02.95 +09:40:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 162403_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 162403_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:06.51 +08:58:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25601_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 25601_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12055_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 12055_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:06:13.47 +02:16:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27840_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 27840_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 76734_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:13.01 +07:13:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80084_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 80084_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:40.43 +07:32:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94063_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 94063_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:34.85 +08:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 116113_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:24:24.61 +09:59:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 78274_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:27:51.97 +07:17:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18569_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 18569_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:08.11 +02:51:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15531_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 15531_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:53.27 +02:35:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117127_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 117127_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:42.97 +10:03:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166014_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 166014_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:57.08 +02:19:49.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.320 4279734661909656704 280.98687742812 +02.32923351079 12.1297 10.5266 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.320#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40590_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 40590_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21439_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 21439_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37729_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 37729_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26517_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 26517_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:24.94 +03:35:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13259_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 13259_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:50.23 +02:22:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120504_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 120504_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:15.29 +09:46:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08434_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 08434_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25796_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
Preparing report for the candidate 25796_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58744_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248
The candidate 58744_fd_Ser-04-Q2b1x1_2026-04-17_02-19-25_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0248 did not pass the final checks
