######## Processing parameters ######## AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1 CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55 FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0 FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5 FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0 FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100 GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100 MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18 MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12 MPC_CODE= V36 NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000 NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000 OMP_NUM_THREADS= ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5 SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0 TELESCOP= TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2 FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no ####################################### HOSTNAME= tau USER= HOME= ####################################### SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr) INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes FITS_FILE_EXT=fits CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX= Fields in the data directory: UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ####################################### ########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ########### Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1 server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 452596 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 452596 MB at . Checking input images (2 new) REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 433.5681 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 536.5760 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 943.6351 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 483.1426 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 943.6064 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 481.7820 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.17644 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-17T02:05:00.4332726' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-17T07:05:00.4332726' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61147.2951439004 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-17T07:05:10.3341726' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61147.2952584955 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.996698991719 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999476436782 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 39.7863888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.557222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.56051224877117 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29460 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29460 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.62 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 41.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 29.50236 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 19.401552 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits :) Spent 0.509867 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-04-17T02:05:55.7374285' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-04-17T07:05:55.7374285' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61147.2957839929 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-04-17T07:06:05.6405371' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61147.2958986112 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99669906634 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 45.9999476253011 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 39.6319444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 304.594166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.5655624761889 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29460 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29460 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 15.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 77.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 894.62 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 19.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 41.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 29.50236 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 19.401552 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits SET-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits CCD-TEMP= -5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits :) Spent 0.495755 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-5C_20s_2026-04-09.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37805.313903 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24603.0, right_median=28063.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-04-08.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.79525964 Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 Second-epoch image center 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 Second-epoch image center 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00204 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oD8vYau4EX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dxf66wTcHw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B2LAFGeTCg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V8bgyJ8Pk4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8553 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.9613 to 156.6650 deg, Dec +40.0487 to +51.3367 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.9613 to 156.6650 deg, Dec 40.0487 to 51.3367 deg Loaded 5231 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3733 out of 3986 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3986 out of 8553 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.925283 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.925283 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 2.2 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.oD8vYau4EX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=613, passed=8553 Got 8553 stars (including 7928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8553 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8432 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Dxf66wTcHw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=607, passed=8478 Got 8478 stars (including 7857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8478 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8371 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.B2LAFGeTCg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=404, passed=6698 Got 6698 stars (including 6283 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6629 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.V8bgyJ8Pk4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=6669 Got 6669 stars (including 6244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6669 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 975 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6592 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6591 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6591 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20378.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20460.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20378_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 20378_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 10:14:21.13 +45:32:58.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.89, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.87)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.059 810122233226334336 153.58772010055 +45.54950524417 10.9668 10.4126 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.059#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20410_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 20410_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 10.85 10:14:21.13 +45:32:58.7 0777 2959 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:50:30.44 +45:05:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20460_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 20460_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.48 09:50:30.41 +45:05:50.4 3251 3613 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:09:32.19 +45:48:39.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.289 809994964755144576 152.38422516793 +45.81101206983 12.5476 12.1796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.289#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 Second-epoch image center 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0676 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:35:59.865 +46:00:01.75 Second-epoch image center 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0655 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:36:21.355 +46:01:36.82 Second-epoch second image center 09:36:20.702 +46:01:34.00 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00204 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lCRE289dxT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bDqoMgyrHe Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FaXb9r2XKm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cx3Jd9yG1w Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 43399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.9080 to 156.6649 deg, Dec +39.9553 to +51.3489 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.9080 to 156.6649 deg, Dec 39.9553 to 51.3489 deg Loaded 5292 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3485 out of 3994 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3994 out of 43399 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814796 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814796 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.59 10:09:32.18 +45:48:39.5 1312 2896 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 89 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.lCRE289dxT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=2286, passed=43372 Got 43372 stars (including 41025 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43372 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42786 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42784 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bDqoMgyrHe (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 142: echo: write error: Broken pipe It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2279, passed=43488 Got 43488 stars (including 41131 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43488 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 40.0 to 51.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43006 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FaXb9r2XKm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1511, passed=38550 Got 38550 stars (including 36977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38550 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38236 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38237 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38237 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Cx3Jd9yG1w (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1518, passed=38552 Got 38552 stars (including 36985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38552 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38225 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-51-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0298.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-52-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0299.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0179.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52962.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53081.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53257.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53284.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53292.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53320.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53332.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53340.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53346.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53352.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53365.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53401.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53423.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53432.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53440.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53452.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52962_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52962_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks**** FOUND 09:23:57.20 +44:16:52.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.671 817884854037343232 140.98934140180 +44.28188709000 14.6844 13.8528 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.671#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52963_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52963_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.75 09:23:57.23 +44:16:53.5 6048 4312 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:24:19.10 +44:07:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52964_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52964_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.64 09:24:19.02 +44:07:47.1 6006 4402 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:25:00.31 +49:22:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52966_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52966_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.46 09:25:00.34 +49:22:36.5 6043 1238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:54:10.14 +49:34:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52967_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52967_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.62 09:54:10.13 +49:34:57.5 3205 0881 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52968_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52968_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.88 10:10:14.77 +41:32:07.2 0774 5442 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:01:38.08 +49:19:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52969_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52969_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.37 09:01:38.05 +49:19:38.1 8354 1252 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:31:36.25 +44:02:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52972_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52972_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.06 09:31:36.30 +44:02:28.2 5216 4419 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:01:12.60 +45:33:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52988_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 52988_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.83 09:01:12.57 +45:33:38.9 8487 3533 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:28:47.65 +45:36:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53005_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53005_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 10.78 09:28:47.66 +45:36:26.1 5564 3493 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53006_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53006_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.54 10:13:56.83 +41:05:39.6 0303 5635 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:50:30.46 +45:05:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53010_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53010_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.57 09:50:30.43 +45:05:50.2 3251 3613 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53018_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53018_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.75 09:28:00.42 +48:34:47.5 5727 1708 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53031_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53031_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.78 08:59:33.85 +48:31:43.4 8582 1727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53033_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53033_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.26 10:13:21.27 +47:09:02.9 1063 2025 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:03:04.10 +50:02:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53037_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53037_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.39 09:03:04.06 +50:02:17.1 8198 0826 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53040_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53040_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 11.89 09:30:43.81 +42:08:41.7 5250 5569 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53041_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53041_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.18 09:29:58.52 +42:23:42.8 5342 5422 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53051_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53051_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.26 09:58:13.78 +43:43:23.5 2318 4332 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53066_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53066_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.48 09:38:33.00 +51:07:08.5 4798 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:37:55.11 +45:54:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53071_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.59 09:37:55.10 +45:54:53.0 4620 3250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53081_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53081_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.76 10:05:49.72 +43:42:51.1 1492 4215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 08:57:57.40 +51:09:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.77, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.75)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.568 1016871616574421632 134.48903092490 +51.16638276268 12.6907 12.2433 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.568#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53086_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53086_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.76 08:57:57.40 +51:09:58.2 8667 0111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53087_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53087_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.01 09:03:22.37 +48:58:14.3 8188 1476 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:34:17.03 +49:03:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53098_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53098_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 12.83 09:34:17.03 +49:03:25.5 5121 1387 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53104_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53104_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.08 10:09:43.14 +45:23:00.2 1247 3148 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53107_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53107_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.29 09:30:52.33 +50:58:16.9 5520 0248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:14:32.12 +44:52:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53112_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53112_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.15 09:14:32.15 +44:52:36.3 7067 3972 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:05:24.23 +48:33:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53125_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53125_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.27 09:05:24.25 +48:33:40.8 7991 1732 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:14:14.27 +47:44:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53126_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53126_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.48 09:14:14.26 +47:44:26.0 7102 2243 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:09:06.87 +49:17:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53136_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53136_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.30 09:09:06.85 +49:17:28.0 7611 1299 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:33:47.88 +47:31:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53138_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53138_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.18 09:33:47.85 +47:31:49.6 5111 2309 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 08:53:03.99 +50:11:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53151_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53151_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.58 08:53:03.90 +50:11:35.3 9177 0672 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 08:59:19.30 +46:33:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53162_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53162_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.49 08:59:19.31 +46:33:51.3 8661 2917 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:43:43.25 +50:35:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53166_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53166_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.63 09:43:43.25 +50:35:36.5 4279 0386 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:24:02.82 +50:55:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53167_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53167_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.66 09:24:02.86 +50:55:39.1 6169 0300 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:04:39.98 +43:03:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53177_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53177_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.57 09:04:39.96 +43:03:07.4 8163 5067 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:05:16.39 +50:31:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53189_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53189_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.83 10:05:16.38 +50:31:27.6 2216 0152 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:44:57.54 +43:14:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53196_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53196_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.78 09:44:57.53 +43:14:49.0 3728 4786 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:29:54.29 +46:11:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53199_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53199_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.81 09:29:54.30 +46:11:08.7 5465 3140 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.74 08:59:16.75 +49:11:09.6 8593 1326 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53212_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53212_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.61 09:01:02.76 +49:27:08.4 8410 1173 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:35:59.12 +45:54:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53213_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53213_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.93 09:35:59.15 +45:54:23.5 4821 3269 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:50:13.85 +49:06:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53214_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53214_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.99 09:50:13.82 +49:06:04.5 3556 1218 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53226_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53226_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.01 10:10:35.98 +40:46:35.0 0650 5893 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:30:52.68 +47:01:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53228_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.95 09:30:52.65 +47:01:42.4 5391 2628 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:40:50.77 +47:50:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53230_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53230_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.92 09:40:50.77 +47:50:18.7 4413 2071 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:46:01.21 +45:53:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53236_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53236_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.98 09:46:01.14 +45:53:51.7 3774 3185 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:08:33.15 +47:18:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53241_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53241_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.15 09:08:33.19 +47:18:51.2 7686 2495 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:21:13.91 +44:48:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53249_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53249_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.07 09:21:13.92 +44:48:37.1 6349 4001 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:06:56.66 +49:21:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53253_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53253_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.28 10:06:56.78 +49:21:33.2 1939 0823 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:30:35.53 +47:50:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53257_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53257_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.09 09:30:35.55 +47:50:53.1 5446 2137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:53:25.31 +50:37:43.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.179 826931876228733312 148.35638751955 +50.62885985622 14.2736 13.7584 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.179#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53258_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53258_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.24 09:53:25.32 +50:37:43.2 3356 0260 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:02:36.56 +50:11:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53264_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53264_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.14 09:02:36.56 +50:11:47.9 8239 0727 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:44:16.63 +45:32:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53266_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53266_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.23 09:44:16.67 +45:32:11.9 3935 3419 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53268_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53268_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.94 10:22:43.75 +50:00:35.3 0477 0121 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53274_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.14 10:17:55.62 +48:06:17.4 0711 1363 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 08:52:03.35 +46:06:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53275_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53275_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.30 08:52:03.35 +46:06:17.4 9447 3151 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:21:10.40 +45:53:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53282_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53282_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.22 09:21:10.39 +45:53:13.7 6370 3353 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53284_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53284_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.40 10:05:47.38 +49:05:25.4 2026 1004 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:22:31.45 +45:00:52.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.225 818731581069963136 140.63130074905 +45.01528468218 14.3613 13.8214 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.225#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53286_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53286_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.38 09:22:31.40 +45:00:52.5 6215 3875 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:35:45.54 +41:04:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53292_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53292_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.17 09:35:45.50 +41:04:44.3 4644 6180 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:36:18.83 +46:18:06.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.734 824290162104205568 144.07868374404 +46.30217787778 14.8514 14.2726 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.734#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53297_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53297_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.41 09:36:18.72 +46:18:05.7 4804 3030 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:00:34.41 +50:03:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53299_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53299_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.58 10:00:34.38 +50:03:20.3 2624 0507 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:13:54.20 +50:16:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53304_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53304_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.25 10:13:54.20 +50:16:42.3 1362 0145 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:44:46.53 +48:36:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53305_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53305_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.28 09:44:46.47 +48:35:60.0 4062 1578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53320_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53320_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.29 09:15:00.48 +50:27:39.4 7031 0595 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:50:14.69 +44:00:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.631 819931354414898688 147.56068782868 +44.01412773945 14.2420 13.4018 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.631#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.36 09:50:14.68 +44:00:48.7 3204 4266 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:30:04.78 +45:27:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53332_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53332_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.49 09:30:04.73 +45:27:17.5 5424 3578 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 08:50:50.03 +51:04:10.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.225 1017010017601170688 132.70919181966 +51.07029591811 14.4958 13.7930 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.225#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53338_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53338_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.42 08:50:50.02 +51:04:11.1 9360 0118 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:18:53.93 +47:30:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53340_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53340_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.53 09:18:53.94 +47:30:10.1 6625 2383 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:57:33.62 +45:33:52.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.53, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.51)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.675 820495747477205248 149.39074006960 +45.56451568238 14.6708 14.0573 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.675#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53346_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53346_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.52 09:57:33.71 +45:33:52.4 2544 3240 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:25:31.76 +47:11:49.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.868 819544738638451840 141.38295852474 +47.19670205391 14.8851 14.4359 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.868#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53352_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53352_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.80 09:25:31.75 +47:11:48.4 5943 2551 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:18:58.51 +49:28:10.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.178 846814173195650432 154.74426629495 +49.46933539042 14.8032 14.1809 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.178#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53362_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53362_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 15.04 10:18:58.61 +49:28:09.0 0774 0526 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53365_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53365_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.67 10:20:18.30 +47:09:28.3 0352 1876 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:38:21.68 +49:52:57.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.583 826195718834654720 144.59030301040 +49.88402285981 14.6310 13.6674 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.583#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53380_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53380_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.81 09:38:21.67 +49:53:00.7 4758 0860 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53381_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53381_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 15.01 09:24:49.79 +46:44:14.7 6005 2830 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:38:56.54 +50:47:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53386_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53386_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.56 09:38:56.55 +50:47:43.2 4745 0304 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53398_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53398_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.68 10:20:47.35 +45:48:03.8 0129 2673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:30:06.49 +43:00:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53400_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53400_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.57 09:30:06.44 +43:00:15.9 5346 5053 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:27:27.20 +45:12:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53401_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53401_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.63 09:27:27.17 +45:12:18.9 5695 3741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:30:45.49 +48:55:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.313 825797901783851776 142.69051942013 +48.92451741523 15.3288 14.8604 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.313#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53422_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53422_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 15.03 09:30:45.46 +48:55:27.2 5464 1487 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:26:28.51 +49:52:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53423_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53423_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.87 09:26:28.50 +49:52:23.3 5911 0933 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:09:29.51 +50:10:39.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.375 1013158840684677888 137.37398131855 +50.17761725061 15.0066 14.2500 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.375#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53432_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53432_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 15.09 09:09:29.52 +50:10:39.4 7567 0761 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 10:23:19.69 +48:12:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.159 834621585675259904 155.83208111838 +48.21389656635 14.7665 14.1048 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.159#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53440_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53440_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.80 10:23:19.76 +48:12:50.1 0181 1179 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:39:52.20 +42:03:28.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.342 813889052687936768 144.96759964162 +42.05822647428 15.0737 14.6051 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53452_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53452_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.88 09:39:52.17 +42:03:27.3 4226 5552 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:20:40.79 +47:09:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.90, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.88)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.391 1011659759659702144 140.16999455694 +47.15321685044 14.9132 14.4398 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.391#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53464_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 53464_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.89 09:20:40.84 +47:09:11.8 6439 2591 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 33324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 33324_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 14.57 09:28:41.15 +46:01:14.0 5587 3245 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits **** FOUND 09:08:47.92 +42:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 37407_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 The candidate 37407_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 10.79 09:08:47.92 +42:09:21.5 7712 5619 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 10:14:21.13 +45:32:58.9 10:09:32.19 +45:48:39.5 09:23:57.20 +44:16:52.2 08:57:57.40 +51:09:58.5 09:53:25.31 +50:37:43.4 09:22:31.45 +45:00:52.9 09:36:18.83 +46:18:06.2 09:50:14.69 +44:00:48.6 08:50:50.03 +51:04:10.3 09:57:33.62 +45:33:52.0 09:25:31.76 +47:11:49.2 10:18:58.51 +49:28:10.0 09:38:21.68 +49:52:57.9 09:30:45.49 +48:55:28.3 09:09:29.51 +50:10:39.7 10:23:19.69 +48:12:49.9 09:39:52.20 +42:03:28.3 09:20:40.79 +47:09:11.2 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461147.79525964 -observatory V36 00:14:12.94 -01:19:43.7 Mercury (-0.0mag) 03:14:59.85 +18:20:10.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 00:21:31.29 +01:16:09.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:13:13.64 +22:45:14.4 Jupiter (-2.1mag) 00:29:45.45 +00:52:34.0 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:47:58.27 +19:48:21.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:11:00.54 -00:14:18.6 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:33:48.59 -22:52:39.8 Pluto (14.5mag) 01:24:20.86 +12:07:56.4 Moon (-8.3mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Apr 17 02:08 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461147.79525964: 07:13:06.61 +22:45:27.9 Io (5.8mag) 07:13:21.38 +22:44:55.3 Europa (5.9mag) 07:13:13.38 +22:45:07.6 Ganymede (5.4mag) 07:13:45.90 +22:44:03.9 Callisto (6.6mag) 07:16:30.42 +22:32:16.2 Himalia (15.3mag) 07:13:17.53 +22:45:04.5 Thebe (16.2mag) 07:16:43.44 +23:02:32.3 Elara (17.3mag) 07:12:11.83 +23:24:34.0 Pasiphae (17.4mag) 07:21:31.60 +22:43:23.1 Carme (18.5mag) 00:29:41.38 +00:53:01.8 Titan (8.8mag) 00:29:50.59 +00:52:33.5 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:29:23.37 +00:52:30.9 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:29:48.91 +00:52:59.2 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:31:21.32 +01:01:13.7 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Apr 17 02:08 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461147.79525964: 15:43:38.05 -17:11:14.4 JWST 17:53:03.14 +37:00:38.2 Chandra 18:29:42.80 -27:48:18.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Apr 17 02:08 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461147.79525964 -observatory V36 -> Warning: Longitude 255.61742 is outside valid range [-180, 180] 18:52:30.71 -28:51:21.5 13.9mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:07:40.45 -69:36:03.8 17.4mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:32:43.89 +31:26:46.5 17.2mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:17.86 +10:42:01.6 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:10:33.73 +29:16:51.2 17.1mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:30:45.00 +26:04:23.4 16.0mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:03:42.67 +32:01:26.2 16.2mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:31:16.92 -00:01:02.1 17.3mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:53:24.74 +18:38:26.4 17.6mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:40:14.81 -11:30:09.4 17.5mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:07:03.13 -11:40:38.2 17.6mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:55:29.63 +62:58:59.9 17.5mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:18:02.78 -03:45:18.1 14.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:29:38.01 +86:05:31.7 17.8mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:18:31.76 +63:30:27.8 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 05:16:01.79 +18:43:43.0 11.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 16:18:25.91 +06:36:08.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:21:09.65 +15:37:41.0 14.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:27:32.24 -22:11:22.4 16.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:17:49.10 +44:58:19.6 17.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 13:33:28.13 +46:17:49.3 15.2mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 03:27:20.39 -26:24:56.5 17.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 23:56:01.64 +18:05:10.0 8.3mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 12:53:33.52 +03:05:26.2 17.4mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 03:38:05.40 +02:29:27.9 13.7mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 00:03:13.85 +37:27:13.2 14.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:45:27.40 -09:38:58.0 11.8mag 10P/Tempel 14:58:32.38 +03:04:16.8 14.1mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:02:27.93 -01:29:06.5 15.7mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 18:01:18.05 -09:33:48.8 18.0mag 40P/Vaisala 10:37:32.05 -03:59:53.7 16.9mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:50:40.88 +17:42:27.4 17.2mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 07:13:10.19 +36:43:58.5 17.0mag 63P/Wild 23:30:42.21 -11:17:46.0 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 04:06:43.77 +21:41:43.9 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 01:08:26.77 +08:28:57.1 14.3mag 78P/Gehrels 23:06:54.44 -09:00:28.4 14.6mag 88P/Howell 02:14:05.00 +20:59:05.3 15.1mag 93P/Lovas 04:57:15.75 +32:21:19.3 16.2mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:29:54.67 +37:45:48.6 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:35:13.38 +14:30:49.4 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:50:04.96 +14:38:59.0 17.5mag 131P/Mueller 01:33:00.27 +13:40:39.2 10.6mag 141P/Machholz 01:41:44.61 +05:21:30.8 10.6mag 141P-A/Machholz 00:26:26.22 +01:13:28.8 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 02:12:09.99 +07:07:05.5 17.8mag 141P-I/Machholz 01:05:59.92 -00:52:23.6 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring 14:49:08.02 +00:03:41.9 17.7mag 210P/Christensen 21:42:33.31 -11:08:14.3 17.6mag 218P/LINEAR 17:16:51.05 -13:46:36.9 16.1mag 235P/LINEAR 05:37:17.35 +34:47:37.7 16.8mag 240P/NEAT 07:39:08.63 -05:01:43.4 17.7mag 242P/Spahr 22:20:09.01 -20:37:54.6 17.8mag 260P/McNaught 02:00:50.57 +20:47:06.8 18.0mag 295P/LINEAR 15:42:07.66 +07:04:28.8 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 07:34:42.37 +21:22:09.3 17.7mag 450P/LONEOS 05:37:46.22 +44:57:24.2 17.5mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.9K Apr 17 02:08 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 2026-04-14.4 15.15 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.29 13.32 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.55 -22:39:33.40 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.3 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 05:25:54.76 -30:15:35.80 ASASSN-26cg 2026-03-25.07 16.88 06:57:16.49 -26:54:37.20 SN2026fzb 2026-03-25.14 15.8 14:37:38.23 -43:00:52.30 ASASSN-26cd 2026-03-24.24 12.52 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 08:30:02.60 -35:12:47.50 ASASSN-26cf 2026-03-23.2 14.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.58 14.8 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.36 16.11 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Apr 17 02:08 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 188K Apr 17 02:08 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 09:06:56.603 -64:55:52.46 AT 2026jcy 2026-04-09.11 18.906 08:27:06.222 -58:50:26.83 AT 2026jcx 2026-04-09.08 19.372 13:48:22.893 -31:10:42.12 AT 2026jcw 2026-04-09.08 19.95 17:39:28.750 +05:01:10.80 AT 2026jcv 2026-04-09.86 16.87 14:44:31.580 +71:55:25.90 AT 2026jcu 2026-04-09.47 17.9 12:39:27.288 -08:14:32.64 AT 2026jct 2026-04-09.53 20.16 14:15:21.948 -35:02:48.79 AT 2026jcs 2026-04-09.59 19.67 12:55:53.000 +08:04:22.00 AT 2026jcr 2026-04-09.62 22.1051 12:29:42.630 -28:00:38.18 AT 2026jcq 2026-04-09.56 18.99 13:00:14.826 -06:35:50.60 AT 2026jcp 2026-04-09.56 19.7 12:54:45.376 +09:10:41.41 AT 2026jco 2026-04-09.62 20.9256 13:25:12.570 -33:30:18.80 AT 2026jcn 2026-04-07.60 19.74 13:20:52.501 -35:57:03.67 AT 2026jcm 2026-04-07.60 20.01 12:07:08.367 +13:12:39.86 AT 2026jcl 2026-04-09.62 22.8073 12:11:43.063 +14:00:46.62 AT 2026jck 2026-04-09.62 21.8834 14:57:35.040 -17:11:22.89 AT 2026jcj 2026-04-09.58 19.52 15:09:26.181 -10:41:27.18 AT 2026jci 2026-04-09.45 20.2 18:22:34.467 +53:35:59.16 AT 2026jch 2026-04-05.40 19.7444 15:13:25.280 +39:43:46.60 AT 2026jcg 2026-03-30.81 21.1 17:32:02.830 +27:34:31.03 AT 2026jcf 2026-03-27.92 21.46 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Apr 17 02:08 tns_transients_list.txt Discovery image 2 2026 04 17.29590 2461147.79590 13.57 09:44:07.82 +42:56:02.1 3801 4983 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_020652_TTUQ1b1x1_2355849_Ofo5lwWT/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_02-05-55_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0180.fits
