This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 03 40.83 +04 43 56.0 11.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,11.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 11.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 27 45.65 +05 46 11.9 11.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 11 54.28 +01 34 52.7 12.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 10 50 11.35 +03 43 14.8 12.6 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,12.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 12.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 16 11.13 +05 43 58.9 13.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,13.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 13.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 02 02.08 +02 57 40.9 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,13.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 13.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 01 37.97 +10 37 43.8 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 04 51.51 +08 53 15.5 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 05 01.17 +10 45 07.4 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 29 05.69 +09 29 15.7 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,14.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 14.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2675* 11 26 49.11 +01 50 40.7 14.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7675,14.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2675 14.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461147.76790650 17.04.2026 06:25:37.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5894
Objects passed selection criteria: 5887
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5536
Average stars matched: 5340.25 (96.4641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111616 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 01:27:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
First image: 2461082.88537814 11.02.2026 09:14:46.671 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Last image: 2461147.76790650 17.04.2026 06:25:37.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 64
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33014
Objects passed selection criteria: 32920
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31290.8
Average stars matched: 29783.2 (95.1823 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 01:28:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.76715616
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1094 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1224 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B9NfNXcn95
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GXlWE3d5eD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SSbqAOlbUP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HTPM40ICLM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5629 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0658 to 175.0329 deg, Dec +0.7091 to +11.2821 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0658 to 175.0329 deg, Dec 0.7091 to 11.2821 deg
Loaded 3938 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3214 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 5629 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832371
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832371
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.1 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.B9NfNXcn95 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=399, passed=5629
Got 5629 stars (including 5225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5629 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GXlWE3d5eD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=431, passed=5671
Got 5671 stars (including 5234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5671 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5584 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SSbqAOlbUP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=5496
Got 5496 stars (including 5123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HTPM40ICLM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=5496
Got 5496 stars (including 5108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5419 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20414.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20434.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20414_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 20414_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20416_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 20416_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:36.82 +02:35:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20434_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 20434_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 20461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:23.26 +06:07:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 20470_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:22.53 +06:38:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:03:40.83 +04:43:56.0
11:27:45.65 +05:46:11.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1094 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:11.175 +05:59:37.65
Second-epoch image center 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1224 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:37.566 +05:59:28.16
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:40.637 +05:59:08.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01390 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yfJfFgE66Q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fod5CYjeMA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I4aAfioatM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8L5VLiekJO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31032 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.0537 to 175.0351 deg, Dec +0.7036 to +11.2819 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.0537 to 175.0351 deg, Dec 0.7036 to 11.2819 deg
Loaded 3942 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3441 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3441 out of 31032 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714936
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714936
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
2.0 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
1.9 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
1.9 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yfJfFgE66Q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1190, passed=31016
Got 31016 stars (including 29781 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31016 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fod5CYjeMA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1251, passed=31400
Got 31400 stars (including 30103 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I4aAfioatM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1081, passed=31828
Got 31828 stars (including 30692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31828 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8L5VLiekJO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1119, passed=31738
Got 31738 stars (including 30551 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31738 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-14-46_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0423.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_03-15-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0424.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-24-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0159.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_012637_TTUQ1b1x1_48345_wSaBvPFr/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52331.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52338.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52744.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52977.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53060.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53137.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53174.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53248.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53258.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53272.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53289.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53311.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53335.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53362.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53371.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53387.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52573.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52717.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52993.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52331_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52331_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:55.41 +09:00:40.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.163 3867561017177963136 163.98085410845 +09.01118206197 14.7687 14.1777 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.163#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52337_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52337_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:48.50 +04:19:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52338_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:28.39 +02:06:48.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.436 3805521996998271232 166.11817077071 +02.11346525189 12.9145 12.3876 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.436#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52450_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52450_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:40.82 +04:43:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52470_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52470_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:45.64 +05:46:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52539_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52539_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:59.68 +05:47:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52540_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52573_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52617_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:09.94 +08:50:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52650_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52670_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:21.82 +02:00:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52701_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:56.45 +10:11:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52717_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52717_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52721_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52721_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52744_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:08:53.69 +02:39:42.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.504 3811614326503773312 167.22330200246 +02.66195969654 13.3520 12.6161 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.504#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52752_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.21 +07:22:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52775_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:07:23.28 +06:22:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52798_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:16.25 +07:50:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52823_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:21.02 +11:03:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52864_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52898_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52898_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:17.07 +02:47:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52915_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:50.53 +05:56:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 52977_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:07.46 +07:22:41.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.571 3817795746515364736 170.28065195866 +07.37810777654 14.0590 13.4586 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.571#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 52993_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53049_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:50.16 +09:56:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53060_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:32.05 +05:01:09.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.34, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.32)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.663 3864096765276356992 163.13283640071 +05.01962025102 14.3939 13.7502 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.663#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53109_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53109_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:58.38 +06:54:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53127_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53127_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:23.82 +10:27:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53137_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:13.16 +06:52:32.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.951 3865507679213434752 161.30457001521 +06.87554584753 14.5869 14.1161 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.951#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 53140_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53148_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:15.49 +04:41:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53153_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53153_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:58.67 +10:35:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53154_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53154_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:52.07 +01:04:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53158_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53158_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:01.33 +06:32:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53159_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53159_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:37.27 +10:23:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53174_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:36.55 +07:23:12.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.278 3865002213101945600 164.15254293084 +07.38791196162 14.9925 14.3976 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.278#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53189_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53189_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:59.06 +07:09:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53195_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53195_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:57.54 +06:24:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53228_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:42.77 +08:52:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53243_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:56.40 +07:20:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53246_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:31.95 +08:50:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53248_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53248_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:22.27 +08:22:14.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.68, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.66)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.957 3866009434472449792 163.34251487531 +08.37113612304 14.8216 14.3415 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.957#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53253_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53253_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:17.52 +10:26:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53257_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:37.92 +01:03:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53258_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:09.12 +08:07:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.72, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.70)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.332 3868745878396384000 161.28808407934 +08.13217871463 14.7252 14.0996 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53267_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:45.50 +09:23:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53270_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:19.89 +09:46:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53271_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:05.07 +01:36:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53272_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53272_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:38:59.35 +02:13:55.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.952 3855814212903888768 159.74685939336 +02.23246677555 14.7742 14.1799 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.952#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53282_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53282_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:42.02 +07:55:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53284_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
Preparing report for the candidate 53284_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53289_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53289_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:25.65 +04:26:58.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.417 3813011423529803264 173.85595863508 +04.44938195161 14.8140 14.2052 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.417#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53295_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:42:49.02 +03:36:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53311_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53311_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:12.85 +07:16:47.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.037 3865548120625417984 161.55325390261 +07.27987858320 14.8199 14.2029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.037#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53317_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53317_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:36.43 +01:42:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53328_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53328_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:25.75 +08:06:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53335_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53335_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:08.49 +09:12:04.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.91, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.89)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.332 3869127580729396992 160.28501983035 +09.20099246078 14.8160 14.3121 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53355_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53355_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:26.60 +03:35:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53362_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53362_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:54.33 +06:21:04.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.929 3865239948132186624 161.47624214040 +06.35113934334 14.8480 14.3079 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.929#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53369_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53369_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:30.21 +04:52:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53371_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53371_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:54.49 +05:35:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.372 3859134050824758272 160.22694281173 +05.59244048343 15.0803 14.5096 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.372#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160
The candidate 53387_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-25-37_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0160 did not pass the final checks
