This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 11 11 54.67 +01 34 51.4 12.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 11 02 02.30 +02 57 36.4 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 11 02 28.55 -01 29 12.1 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,13.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 13.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 10 39 50.56 +00 18 20.8 13.9 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,13.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 13.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 10 42 43.65 -04 29 52.9 14.2 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 11 26 49.49 +01 50 39.2 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,14.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 14.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 04 17.2511* 11 26 43.04 -06 28 53.9 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461147.7511,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260417.2511 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461147.75141210 17.04.2026 06:01:52.005 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6431
Objects passed selection criteria: 6424
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5979.75
Average stars matched: 5817 (97.2783 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112184 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 01:04:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
First image: 2461058.90639640 18.01.2026 09:45:02.649 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Last image: 2461147.75141210 17.04.2026 06:01:52.005 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 108
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 35420
Objects passed selection criteria: 35338
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33498
Average stars matched: 32133.5 (95.9266 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135916 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Apr 16 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-19-g55e4b97d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-04-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Apr 17 01:05:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461147.75074995
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00505 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hJn6f48YxF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h0FxPuucfK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lh95HU6feR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0f83hLOiPe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to +3.3133 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2436 to 175.0501 deg, Dec -7.2952 to 3.3133 deg
Loaded 3835 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3238 out of 3372 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3372 out of 6399 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879752
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879752
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.68
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hJn6f48YxF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=432, passed=6399
Got 6399 stars (including 5960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6399 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6329 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h0FxPuucfK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=6519
Got 6519 stars (including 6107 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6416 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6418 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lh95HU6feR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5593
Got 5593 stars (including 5181 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5593 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5544 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0f83hLOiPe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5594
Got 5594 stars (including 5186 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 20529_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:24.15 -02:42:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0238 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:34.742 -01:59:53.74
Second-epoch image center 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:39.993 -02:00:27.67
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:39.147 -02:00:14.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00505 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QYjRdFUMwk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4h1UzEGdjn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vk9ZVbwomp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mvY46kYBhs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits and wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34371 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to +3.3144 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.2400 to 175.0938 deg, Dec -7.3026 to 3.3144 deg
Loaded 3852 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3086 out of 3398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3398 out of 34371 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.774901
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.774901
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 100 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
2.2 pix Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.QYjRdFUMwk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1404, passed=34365
Got 34365 stars (including 32904 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34365 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4h1UzEGdjn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1420, passed=33111
Got 33111 stars (including 31640 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33111 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32671 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32673 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits -region wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vk9ZVbwomp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1304, passed=33712
Got 33712 stars (including 32347 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mvY46kYBhs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1283, passed=33818
Got 33818 stars (including 32474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33818 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33541 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-02_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0455.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_03-45-37_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-00-54_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-04-17_CI_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_010252_TTUQ1b1x1_2581768_ecG4myHI/wcs_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52176.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52515.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52517.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52707.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52730.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52767.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52815.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52842.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52857.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52885.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52952.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52954.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52972.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52980.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52987.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52988.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52991.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52992.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52997.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52998.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53013.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53028.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52160.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52598.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:56.94 +02:24:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51724_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51724_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:39:04.64 -05:29:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51726_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:17:59.68 -04:19:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51727_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:49.38 +01:41:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:45.02 +01:31:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51731_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51731_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:30.17 +00:00:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51857_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51857_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51859_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51859_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51884_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51884_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51916_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51916_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51917_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51917_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51936_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51936_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:17.22 +02:07:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51959_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51959_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51961_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51961_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:57.80 -04:08:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51971_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 51971_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51972_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 51972_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52047_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:27.81 +02:36:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52057_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52057_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52103_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52103_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:51:21.72 +02:00:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52123_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52149_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:24.06 -01:03:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52157_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52160_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52160_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52166_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52166_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.38 -02:53:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52176_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52176_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:50.60 -05:08:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.487 3785802810005624448 171.21071948342 -05.13549062053 13.5295 13.1021 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.487#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52220_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52220_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52235_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52235_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:33.38 +00:11:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52251_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52300_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:10.35 -00:48:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52304_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52304_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:13.23 -00:17:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52311_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52311_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:05:57.97 -05:23:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52340_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52340_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:37.68 -00:49:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52351_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52351_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:14:03.12 +02:50:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52383_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52383_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:37:41.28 -03:54:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52389_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52404_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52465_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52465_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:03.53 -07:01:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52479_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52500_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52500_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:50.81 +01:39:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52504_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52504_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:16.93 +02:47:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52515_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52515_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:24.74 -06:05:26.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.062 3785073490199000832 167.85337017634 -06.09079729490 13.9458 13.2071 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.062#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52517_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:50.55 -06:22:16.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.123 3787672357729944576 166.71069240904 -06.37105644695 14.3567 13.8164 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.123#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52537_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52537_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52544_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52544_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:36.91 -05:54:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52572_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:37.51 -05:07:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52598_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52608_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52608_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:49.04 +02:21:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52630_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52630_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:18.89 -06:36:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52640_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52640_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:58:20.70 -02:03:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52664_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:43:12.34 +00:57:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52691_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52691_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:03:06.39 +01:32:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52699_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52707_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:55.50 -01:54:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.332 3793761624923235200 174.73175988517 -01.90828874220 14.7871 14.2639 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
Preparing report for the candidate 52723_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52730_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:49:39.19 -00:43:35.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.42, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.40)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.401 3803147021817785472 162.41363136731 -00.72663449276 14.7628 14.2423 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.401#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52767_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52767_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:34:57.98 -02:11:38.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.372 3793407307301251968 173.74221466342 -02.19394906466 14.6306 14.1998 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.372#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52769_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:31.97 -02:18:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52779_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52815_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:54.44 -05:32:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.75, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.73)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.659 3593761250104710272 174.47701669420 -05.53440237145 14.8640 14.2748 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.659#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52828_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:41.46 -03:10:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52838_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:36.78 +00:10:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52842_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52842_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.90 -00:21:58.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.213 3797386439882071680 172.28261447549 -00.36607313515 13.9173 12.7086 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.213#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52850_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:02:01.75 -06:58:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52855_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:42.19 -06:16:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52857_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:56:36.74 -01:38:50.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.954 3802125094479584512 164.15408235628 -01.64781832871 15.0917 14.5921 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.954#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52875_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:59.53 -00:16:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52879_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:25.93 -03:25:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52882_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:06:01.44 +01:39:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52885_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:47:08.44 +01:01:52.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.715 3806662229211142656 161.78515505599 +01.03130941506 15.0727 14.4117 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.715#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52895_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:36:15.44 -05:44:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52896_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:40.40 +02:49:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52899_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:45.91 -01:02:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52928_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:57.65 -06:48:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52936_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:31.28 -06:36:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52939_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:50.05 +02:04:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52945_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52945_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:07.50 -06:40:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52952_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:52.55 -00:35:55.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.317 3797181896359292160 172.71909333129 -00.59895102995 14.9641 14.4594 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.317#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52954_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52954_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:19.99 -02:05:33.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.523 3796549058698352000 171.58342821478 -02.09250598866 14.9056 14.3912 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.523#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52960_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:39.92 -04:53:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52963_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:39:13.87 +01:11:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52972_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:49.71 -02:28:12.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.455 3793386176062076928 173.20752439910 -02.46999197367 14.8557 14.3336 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.455#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52980_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:01.09 +00:32:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.360 3807873650507206400 163.00489610631 +00.53514303656 14.9074 14.3649 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.360#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52982_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52982_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:52:55.13 -05:49:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52987_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:56.42 -02:43:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.76, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.74)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.793 3787502654982063872 171.73530339499 -02.73223681171 14.9176 14.4394 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.793#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52988_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52988_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:33.70 -04:29:48.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.109 3788526781343919232 167.39095700089 -04.49706379084 15.0232 14.4394 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.109#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52991_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:07.38 -05:01:27.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.77)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.295 3786146750986631040 172.28072026941 -05.02424309276 14.6922 14.0476 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.295#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52992_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:55.18 +00:45:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.723 3806639036387771904 161.72988392414 +00.76413509550 15.2405 14.9175 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.723#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52994_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:33:15.48 +00:28:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52995_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:30:10.15 -07:04:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52996_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:24:47.81 -00:43:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52997_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.52 -02:44:30.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.685 3792578516052038784 174.28177903985 -02.74186643168 14.8057 14.3032 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.685#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52998_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:35:55.32 -05:05:36.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.71, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.69)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.997 3785990822198000000 173.98068355462 -05.09388491796 14.7980 14.1635 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.997#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 52999_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:58.10 -04:33:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53013_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:18.82 -02:55:44.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.860 3791011024787439872 167.32860090377 -02.92890329795 15.0116 14.5086 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.860#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53025_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53025_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:50.68 -02:25:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53028_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:57.33 -00:26:23.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.655 3797067581510011648 171.48894955861 -00.44028699493 14.9812 14.2560 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.655#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146
The candidate 53034_fd_Leo-08-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_01-01-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0146 did not pass the final checks